Agenda Packet - 2004-01-26 cjF LAKE pkito City of Lake Oswego
AIPP Planning Commission
Monday, January 26, 2004
6:00 p.m. —Public Meeting/Work Session
Members: City Hall Council Chamber
James Johnson,Chair 380 A Avenue
Frank Groznik,Vice Chair Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Mary Beth Coffey,Kenneth L. Sandblast,
Mark Stayer,Daniel Vizzini and Alison Webster For Information: 503/635-0290
Council Liaison: Jack Hoffman AGENDA
This meeting is in a handicapped accessible location. For any special accommodations, please
contact Iris Treinen, 503/697-6591, 48 hours before the meeting.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. CITIZEN COMMENT—Regarding Issues Not On the Agenda(3 minute limit per individual)
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission -November 24, 2003
Commission for Citizen Involvement-November 10, 2003
V. PUBLIC MEETING
• P 01-0002 LGTC Implementation Advisory Committee—Update
Staff coordinator is Susan Millhauser, Assistant Planner.
VI. GENERAL PLANNING—WORK SESSION
• P 03-0006 Sloped Lots (possible amendments to the Community Development Code)
Staff coordinator is Dennis Egner, Long Range Planning Manager.
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
P 03-0008 East End Redevelopment Plan Update
(review draft of memorandum to City Council summarizing recommendation)
Findings, Conclusions and Order—
LU 03-0075/Ordinance 2376 - Citizen Involvement Guidelines
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
�
' �°`�`"K`�swE� Community Development
�,� �a
� ��` `�, Planning Division
' � 7 /I
' ' Memorandum
OREGON
To: Plannin� Commissioners
From: Susan Millhauser, Assistant Planner
Dennis Egner, Long Rauge Plaiming Manager
Date: January 2Q 2004
SubjeCt: Planning Commission Public Meeting—January 26, 2004
Lake Grove Town CenCer(P 01-0002) Advisory Committee Check In
The Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation Advisory Committee has met five times
siuce it was formed in October, 2003. As discussed in the attached Charge Statement
(Attachment A), the Comruittee has been working with staff to complete Task I. Task 1 s[ates:
Cleady define a 20 year vision for the Lake Grove Town Center. Include a description of
the character of Lake Grove Town Center and a clear definition of mixed use.
Committee members reviewed the resulYs of the first phase of the Town Center process to
identify cominon themes for the vision, and expanded on this work. Conunittee members
solicited feedback from their constituents on tl�e draft vision dated December 8, 2003. At its
January 14`h meeting, the Committee reviewed and discussed the draft vision statement, and
share feedback fron� their constituents. Based on comments received at this meeting, an updated
draft vision statement was prepared, dated January 20, 2004, and is included as Attachment B.
The Corrunittee will review and provide feedUack on the latest draft at its Jauuary 21, 2004
meeting, in preparation for the January 26`h Plamiing Commission meeting. A final draft visiou
statement will be distributed via email to tl�e Planning Conm�ission prior to the .Taimary 26`h
meeting.
Final and draft meeting notes froin Committee meetings held to date are included as Attachment
C.
L:ACase Files�Pla�ning Project Files�001�P 01-0002 Lake Grove Town CenterAPlanning CommissionAPC Public Mtg Ol-2G04 P
01-0002VPC Memo LGTC check in O]-26-04 P 01-0002.doc
Lake Grove 7�own Center Plan(P OI-0003)— Pave I of I
Task I Check In—Planning Commission Public Meeting Januory 26,3004
• ATTACHMENT A
City of Lake Oswego
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation
Advisory Committee Charge Statement
October 8, 2003
Purpose Statement
The Lake Grove Town Center Pla�i project provides an opportunity to enhance tl�e
commercial and high density residentia] portions of Lake Grove as a vibrant, attractive,
and coordinated mixed use area. The City of Lake Oswego's Comprehensive Plan
describes a "Town Center" as an area that serves tens of thousands of people, where good
transit services, a pedestrian environment, shoppin�, services, entertainment and higl�er
density housing will be encouraged.
A preliminary planning and public imolvement process began in September, 2002, and
culminated with the development of the Lake Grove Town Center(LG'I'C) Plan Report in
July, 2003. This report provides a summary of the issues, points of view, and consultan[
conclusions resulting from the Lake Grove Town Center process. Additionally, the
LGTC Plan Report serves as a source document for and bridge to the Phase Two
implementation planning process.
The following Guiding Principles were approved by the Planning Commission in
October, 2002, and will continue to guide the Phase Two planning process:
A. GiJiar�ce Lake Grove as n vifirunt ancl attrnctive rni.red-use center— Protect and
enhance Lake Grove's economic vitaliry and unique blend of locally owned
businesses. Integrate mixed use, land use, and transportation strate�ies tha[
promote economically successful, compact, land-efficient development.
B. G-eate a great street tGut supports all modes of lrave!—Improve Boones Ferry
Road to make it more at[ractive and safe for walking, biking, and transit, while
still accommodating auto traffic. Design a great street that is the centerpiece of
the Lake Grove area.
C. Support a�trl con�tect with adjucer�t�ieighborlioods — Support and impletnent the
Lake Grove, Waluga, and Lake Forest Neighborhood Plans. Identify appropriate
�vays to connect and integrate the Lake Grove Town Center with the adjacent
neighborhoods.
D. Creute workuble zoniug arid design guidelrnes— Identify strategies to encourage
infill and redevelopment in the Town Center, induding appropriate changes in the
mix of allowed land uses and zoning regulatio��s. Prepare design standards and
guidelines to support the overall vision for a vital and attractive mixed-use center.
E. Identifj�physical in:pr•ovements and catalyst p��ojects—Identify specific
improvements that will create the "bricks and mortar"to unplement the vision.
Identify key catalyst projects that will leverage additional public and private
investment.
F. Conduct an open process—Assure meaningful public participation so that the
plan will be endorsed and embraced by a broad spectrum of community interests
and organizations.
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation—Advisory Committee Charge Statement Page 1
October 8, 2003
G. Meet conmtunity and regional goals arzd e.rpecta[ia�s — Comply with, and
implement, State, regional, and local plans and policies. Specific plans to address
include Titles 1, 2 and 6 of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Ylan,
the Regional Transportation Plan (including mode split targets), the Oregon
Transportation Planning Rule, the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan and
TranspoRation System Plan, and the Boones Ferry Road Comdor Plan.
H. Coordinate tivitl: affected agencies, city and comnnarity interests — Assure
coordivation among affected agencies, with specific focus on Metro, Tri-Met,
City of Tualatin, Clackamas County, the Lake Oswego Plannine Commission,
and the City's Transportation Advisory Board (TAB).
Direction
The Advisory Committee sliall assist the Plannin� Commissioit to develop a draft Lake
Grove Town Center Implementation Plan consistent with adopted Guiding Principles.
The Plan sh�ll include recommended zoning and design standards, amendments to the
City's Comprehensive Plan and Transportation System Plan, a list ofpriority capital
projects, and funding sources for Town Center projects.
Scope of Work/Product
The Advisory Committee sl�all work with Ciry staff to develop a graphic and w�rittcn
report for recommendation to the Planning Commission consistent with the abovc
objectives and with the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan, within the timeframe
specified below. The Committee shall complete tl�e following tasks, which shall be
documented in the final re�port.
Tasks:
1. Clearly define a 20 year vision for flie Lake Gro��e To��°n Center. L�clude a
description of the character of Lake Gro��e Town Center and a clear definition of
mixed-use.
2. Review esisting zoning standards and determi��e appropriateness for achieving
LGTC Plan objectives mid Guiding Principles.
3. Define work on zoning and design standards based on issues identified in LGTC
Plan repoR.
4. Identify and prioritize implementalion projects, induding projects proposed in the
LGTC Vlan report; identify potential funding sources; and develop an overall
timeframe far implementation. Coordinate with Lake Oswego Redevelopment
Agency(LORA) staff.
5. Draft Community Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Transportation
System Plaii amendments.
Planning Commission Discretion
The Planning Commission, in its recommendations to the City Council, may accept,
modify, or reject the Advisory Committee's reconvnendations. The Planning
Commission's recommendations to City Council shall be infornied by testimon.l'recei��ed
at Planning Commission public I�earings conducted after receivin� the Advisory
Committee's final report.
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation—Advisory Committee Charge Statement Page 2
October 8, 2003
' Membership
Membership of the Advisory Committee shall consist of up to twelve (12) members
appointed by the City Council, based on Planning Commission recommendation,
including one representative, unless noted othenvise below, from each of the followin�
groups:
• Busv�ess owner in the Lake Grove Town Center Plan area(2 members);
• Commercial property owner in the Lake Grove Town Center Plan area;
• Business owner from outside the Lake Grove Town Center Plan area;
• Lake Forest Neighborhood Association;
• Lake Grove Neighborhood Association;
• Waluga Neighborhood Association;
• At-large member (Lake Oswego resident who lives outside of the Lake Grove
area— 2 members);
• Lake Oswego ChamUer of Commerce;
• Lake Oswego Transportation Advisory Board; and
• Lake Oswe�o Planning Commission (non-voting).
If the Planning Commission deterniines that it is appropriate for one altemate member
from each organization to be chosen, the altemate shall be encouraged to attend meetings.
However, the altemate shall be involved in the discussion on a limited basis, based on the
discretion of the Chair, if the primary meinber is present. If the primary member is not in
attendance, tl�e alternate member shall serve in the capacity of the primary member.
Additionally, representatives from the Development Review Commission (DRC) and
Lake Oswego School District shall be invited to attend committee meetings as non-voting
members. Staff shall be invited to atiend specific meetings and to provide teclmical
assistance (e.g. City Engineering and Development Review staf� and LORA staff.
Qualifications:
Tlie following qualifications shall be considered by the Planning Commission/City
Council in the selection of Comniittee members:
• Experience working within a consensus-driven decisiou-making process, and a
commilment to such a process for development of the LGTC Plan.
• Understanding that Committee recommendations will go through formal City
adoption process, including Plamiing Commission and City Council public
meetings, potentially resultin�in changes to Committee recommendations.
• Demonstration of a process for sharing information with, and receiving
information from, group(s) they aze representing and tl�e community-at-large.
Time Frame and Performance Requirements
The work of the Advisory Committee shall take no more than nine months to complete,
starting in October 2003. Following the submittal of the Committee's final report ro tl�e
Planning Commission, the tenn of the Committee shall be completed. At least three
public meetings and/or work sessions with the Planning Conunission shall occur during
this nine month period. The first meeting shall occur after the Committee has completed
Task ] (see above), the second meeting shall occur after the completion of Tasks 2 and 3,
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation—Advisory Committee Charge Statement Page 3
Oc[ober 8, 2003
and the third meeting shall occur after the completion of Task 4. The Planning "
Commission may detem�ine that an additional work session is appropriate durin� or after
the completion of Task 5. One of the aUove meetings/work sessions shall be a joint
meeting with the PC, DRC, and TAB.
Periodic progress reports shall be submitted to the Planning Commission by staffprior to
the scheduled public meetingshvork sessions. If i[ is detemiined that inadequate proUress
is being made at any time during the process, the project may be either canceled or
assumed by the Planning Commission. If the project is canceled or assumed by the
Planning Commission, the term of the Advisory Committee shall aiso be concluded.
Organization
Chair: The Planning Commission representative shall serve as the Committee chair and
shall be a non-voCii�g member of the Gommittee. In the chair's absence, City staff shall
conduct die meetings. City staff shall servc as technical representatives and shall be
responsible for assembling and compiling all information and repoRs necessary for thc
progress of work, including meeting uotes. Draft meeting notes and reports will be made
available in a timely fashion for members' review and correction. If all Committee
members are in agreement, meeting note distribution and other Committee
communications may occur via email. Finalized meeting notes and other project
materials shall be posted on the Lake Grove To�vn Center Plan project web site
(www.ci.os�ve�,o.or.us/pla�illgtc/1Qtc.l�tm).
Meetin�s: The date and time of ineetings shall be established at the first meeting or by an
indication of general consensus thereafter. All Committee meetings will 6e open �vork
sessions, where alternate members and members of the general public are invited to
attend with the understanding that active participation shall be at the discretion of the
Committee chair.
Ouorums and Decisions: No quorum shall be necessary to conduct business. Decisions
shall be made by an indication of general consensus among the Committee members
present. StaFf�vill not participate as decision makers. When this method does not serve
to establish a clear direction, the chair or the chair's representative shall call for a roll-call
vote. When agreement cannot be achieved on an issue, business shall proceed and City
staff shall document and present minority positions for future Planning Commission
consideration.
Recommended by the Planning Commission: Approved by the City Council:
James Johnson, Chair Judie Hammerstad, Mayor
Date Date
L:ACase Piks'��OOI�.Pl�nnme Proj c�Piles�P OLpp62 Leke firoce7mai Crnter�C in�CuunciliC�I�C Ad�fson'Churgc Staiemtnt Final
100803.doc
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Implementation—Advisory Committee Charge Statemenl Page 4
October B, 2003
� � p4
Z01
� � I Lake Grove Town Center 2024 Vision Statement
raf
� and Desired Characteristics
The Lake Grove Town Center vision statement is based on input received from Lake Oswego residents,
business and property owners at several communify workshops held between September 2002 and May
2003 and the citizen advisory committee formed in September 2003. The vision statement embodies the
shared values and aspirations o(the community. It is followed by a list of desired characteristics for all
aspects o(the Town Centec Together, the vision statement and desired characterisfics will guide Iutu�e
planning work within Lake Grove Town Center and set the tone for the community's luture.
Lake Grove Town Center— A Community Vision for 2024
The Lake Grove Town Center is a welcoming, comfortable community nucleus for the daily
activities of the residents of Lake Oswego's west end (see Figure 1). The two major Boones
Ferry Road entry points to the Town Center area are clearly marked by decorative monuments
or gateways that embody the distinct neighborhood character of Lake Grove. This character
has been shaped by a respect for and preservation of the natural resources of the area,
particularly the groves of native trees and restoration of natural water courses. There is a sense
of place where harmony exists between these natural elements and those elements of
development that provide opportunities for commerce, service, civic and related activities for the
people who live and work in and near the Town Center.
The rural independent roots of Lake Grove are reflected in a diverse mix of tasteful architectural
styles that allow old and new commercial development to blend compatibly through limits on
height, volume and exterior building materials. Locally owned, independent businesses are
encouraged to flourish. Some residential development has been incorporated into the
predominantly small business core, driven by market demand and government incentives rather
than governmental regulation, providing a range of housing options. Public uses that serve
west end residents, business owners and employees, such as an elementary school, a
community center and a commons, are provided in a coordinated fashion.
The Town Center is connected to the surrounding neighborhoods, employment areas,
downtown Lake Oswego and other adjacent centers through a variety of viable transportation
options, including walking, cycling, public transit and auto travel. The major transportation
artery, Boones Ferry Road, has been calmed by various traffic management tools including
sidewalks, signalized pedestrian crossings, bike lanes, landscaped dividers, and directed turn
lanes that allow ease of access to and from commercial areas and neighborhoods.
Pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicle traffic all move at a safe, smooth pace in this revamped
corridor. Public parking for vehicles, both on and off the street, is provided in conveniently
designated areas that allow for ease of access to retail, restaurant and other neighborhood
services without encroaching on low density residential neighborhoods. Street trees,
pedestrian-scale street lighting, public signage, landscaped medians with pedestrian refuges,
public transit shelters and other landscape elements within the Town Center reinforce the
neighborly character of the area. Adjacent residential neighborhoods and public parks and
open spaces within close proximity are directly linked to the Town Center by safe sidewalks,
pathways and bike paths to encourage walking and non-vehicular travel. The transition
between the more intensive development along Boones Ferry Road to low density residential
neighborhoods is done by subtly stepping down the height and scale of developed property to
blend one into the other rather than create an abrupt demarcation between the two.
By the year 2024, the Lake Grove Town Center has thoughtfully evolved into a pedestrian-
friendly neighborhood community. It has an enterprising and hospitable character that reflects
the people who live and work within and around it. The Lake Grove Town Center is place where
nature and human activity are well connected and pleasantly coexist; it is a place that beckons
you to look, linger and live.
ATTACHMENT B
Desired Characteristics of the Lake Grove Town Center
(Applicable Guiding Principles for each characteristic are indicated in [brackets].)
It takes a Community fo build a Village
The "village" of Lake Grove quietly celebrates its natural surroundings and rural beginnings.
Unique entry markers reflect this sense of place at either end of the Town Center on Boones
Ferry Road inviting people into the community. Conifer groves stand watch over and within the
central core. Three Sisters and Springbrook Creeks are restored as focal points for the
enjoyment of residents, employees and visitors. The property owners, business owners and
residents work together to preserve and enhance the village character of the Town Center,
preserving and highlighting historical features, activities and businesses. They work with local
government agencies to create a central gathering place or village commons for public activities
that heighten Lake Grove's sense of identity. [A,C,E,H]
• Create a Lake Grove village style to ensure consistent public signage, lighting, street
furniturelbenches, symbols, paving materials, landscaping and street trees. [A,B,D,E]
• Ensure preservation of existing mature trees and tree groves, native species in particular
(e.g. through building design). Preserve existing tall trees between streets and building
fronts and require new street trees to be as large as possible to achieve a sense of
enclosure. [A,B,D]
• Diverse architectural styles, compatible in scale and design with village goals, add to the
sense of place and are encouraged; the Town Center has developed over time rather than
sprung, full grown, from a drawing board. [A,D] However, single story, flat roof, ("strip mall")
development is discouraged. [D]
• Exterior building materials that are compatible with viliage character are encouraged (e.g.
brick, wood siding). [A,D]
• Encourage the use of sustainable building and developmeni practices (e.g. recycled or low-
impact building materials, on-site stormwater retention, pervious paving materials, "green
streets"). [G]
• Orient building entrances to pedestrian streets and public areas, with parking in the rear or
at the side. [A,D]
• Use pedestrian arcades, covered walkways and other pedestrian access to connect uses in
a safe and convenient manner. [A,B,C,D]
• Apply design standards that break up building mass at the street through the use of
architectural features and stepping back of building height (for two and three story
buildings). (A,C,D]
• Transition and decrease the intensity and scale of development along the cross streets as it
steps down from Boones Ferry Road to the edges of the Town Center through site
development and use standards where, appropriate (e.g. lot coverage, building setback,
height, allowed uses). [A,C,D�
• Reduce impact on surrounding residential development using landscaping, lighting, noise
and other standards to create buffers between development in the Town Center abutting
adjacent residential neighborhoods. [A,C,D]
• Develop a lighting standard that provides pedestrian scale light; lighting should not create
ambient light, but rather direct light downward. [A,B,D,E]
• Provide opportunities for decorative streetscape elements such as seasonal decoration,
hanging baskets, special event banners and public art. [A,B,Ej
• Restrict adult businesses and "big box" retail from the Town Centec [D,H]
Lake Grove Town Center Plan-Draft Vision Statement and Desired Characleristics Page 2
January 20, 2004
' Commerce and Economic Vitality through a mix of uses
. Foster a mix of businesses, including retail, services and offices, and encourage residential
development within the Town Center when economically feasible and attractive to property
owners. [A,D]
. Develop strategies to retain and attract locally-owned businesses, diverse shopping
opportunities and unique cultural attractions. [A]
• Strengthen connections between the Kruse Way employment area and Town Center retail
and service business (e.g. vehicular, transit, pedestrian and bicycle connections;
coordinated marketing efforts). [A,D,E]
• Provide for adequate parking opportunities in the Town Center through various methods:
maximize use of existing parking lots through shared access and/or parking agreements,
and flexible standards; develop on- and off-street public parking areas in and adjacent to the
Town Center; and provide rear alley access to parking areas to reduce access from Boones
Ferry. [A,D,E]
• Improve vehicular access between businesses and Boones Ferry Road. [A,Dj
• Ensure preservation of on-street parking opportunities for neighbors who live adjacent to the
Town Center. [C]
. Provide a range of housing opportunities through the preservation of the existing number of
high density housing units. The addilion of new housing units through redevelopment, when
economically feasible and attractive to property owners, is encouraged. (A,D]
Getting to and around in the Lake Grove Town Center
. Enhance the safety, convenience and attractiveness of walking, using transit and bicycling
within and to and from the Town Center (e.g. continuous sidewalks, signalized crossings of
Boones Ferry and pedestrian refuges/medians, consolidated driveways, removal of utility
poles and under grounding of utilities, attractive transit shelters). [A,B,C,D,E]
• Emphasize pedestrian amenities on cross streets to the neighborhoods to strengthen
connections to the Town Center. Augment the non-grid system of streets with additional off-
street pedestrian and bike pathways to provide safe and convenient connections for all
ages. [A,C,D,E]
• Strive for enhanced public transit service between the Town Center and downtown Lake
Oswego (e.g. bus, shuttle bus, trolley, commuter rail). In partnership with TriMet, design
and construct bus shelters along Boones Ferry Road and Kruse Way. [A,C,E,G,H]
• Encourage safe pedestrian connections between businesses and parking areas and
connectivity between building/parcels on each side of Boones Ferry. [A,C,D,E]
• Provide a range of safe bicycling options, including on-street bike lanes on Boones Ferry, a
bike loop around the Town Center, and secure bicycle parking. [A,B,C,D,E]
• Encourage the use of sustainable street design and stormwater management practices (e.g.
"green streets", pervious paving materials). [A,E]
• Integrate and enhance access to and views of parks and open space (e.g. Springbrook
Creek/Pennington Park, Waluga Park). [A,C,E]
• Utilize engineering and urban design strategies to calm traffic on Boones Ferry Road while
improving access to and from businesses in the corridor. [A,B,E]
• Discourage cut-through traffic in the neighborhoods. Ensure that current classifications of
streets are maintained. Actively monitor and manage traffic speed, traffic volume and
neighborhood cut-through traffic to ensure that actual usage of roads matches current
classification. [A,C]
L:1Case Files\Planning Project Files\2001\P 01-0002�ake Grove Town CenterWdvisory Committee\Vision statemenflVision
statement draft 1-20-04.doc
Lake Grove Town Center Plan—Draff Vision Statement and Desired Characteristics Page 3
January 20, 2004
. Lake Grove Town Center Plan
Implementation Advisory Committee
Meeting Notes
October 21, 2003, 4 to 6 p.m.
Adull Cammunity Center, 505 G Street
Members in Attendance:
Ken Sandblast, Chair(Lake Oswego Planning Commission), Lang Bates (At-Large Business O��ner),
Darcey Eaton (At-Large Resident), Julie Glisson (Lake Grove N.A.), Donna Jordan (Transportation
Advisory Board), Vic Kecler (Lake Grove Business Owner), Carolpn Krebs (Lake Forest N.A.), 7ack
Lundeen(Lake Grove Business Owner), �'ilma McNuhy (At-Lar�e Resident). Chuck O'Leary (Chambcr
of Commerce), Cheryl Uchida (Waluga N.A.)
Alternates In Attendance:
John Hurlburt(Lake Forest N.A.), Adelle Jenikc^ (Leke Gruve Businr5s O��ner), Geurge Psihogius (Lake
Grove Conunercial Property Owner), Barbara "Leller(Lake Grove N.A.)
Staff In Attendance: Dennis Eenec I.ong Range Planning Manaeer; Susan Millhauser. Assistant Planner
Guests In Attendance: John Gordon
I. Introductions
Ken Sandblast, Planning Commission represeNative and committee chair, introduced himself and noted
that he �vas appointed to chair the committee in part due to his invol��ement in the "GAP" (West Lake
Grove Design District) task force. Ken asked that everyone take a moment to introduce.themselves mid
the organization/group they are representing. A[tendees and [heir atfiliations arc listed abo�e.
II. Advisory Committee OrganizationlDiscussion
Ken provided an overview of the work of the Advisory Canmittee. He a,ked that Committce memUcn
familiarize themselves wi[h the Charge Statement and Lake Grove Town Center (LG"1'C) Ylan rzpor[. He
noted thaT [he Committee will not be starting over irom scra[ch, but rather will use the LGTC Plan report
as a starting point and resource document.
Charqe Statement
Dennis Egner, Long Range Planning Manager, reviewcd the Charge Statement He expl�ined that tliis
phase of the project is focused on refining to�vn cen[er concepts developed during the first phase, and
based on the guiding principles approved by the Planning Commission in October 2002. He reviewed the
Committee's roles and responsibilities(Charge Statement, page 2), and emphasized that the Committee
will make recommendations to the Planning Commission, which will hold formal hearings and then make
a recommendation to the City Council. The Council will then hold hearings prior to final decision
maki�g. He noted that City Planning stafPs role is tu provide [echnical support to the Conunittee,
Planning Commission and City Council, while the Committee's role is to �vork in an adeiso�_y capacip�to �
the Planning Commission and City Council. I
Denny reviewed the tasks outlined on page 2 of the Charge Statement. I le noted that there are three �
scheduled check-ins at public meetings with the Planning Commission after the completion of specific
project tasks, discussed on page 3 of the Charge Sta[ement. Yroposed Planning Commission meeti��g
dates are listed on the draft meeting schedule. Denny poin[ed out tl�e Charge Statemen[ section entided
"Ylanning Commission Discretion" at the bottom of page 2 and noted that check points with tl�e Pla�viing
Commission will help keep the Planning Commission up to speed on the Committee's work. He added
that we may want to build in City Council check points as well.
Dem�y noted that the time t�ame for the Conunittee's work is nine monlhs, which should be adequate. IIe
explained that Committee decisions will be made by Committee members present at a regularly scheduled
ATTACHMENT C
meeting. As both members and altemates are encowaged to a[tend meetings, he noted tliat at votes �Le
will need to be aware of who is a member and who is an alternate. Al[ernates will act in the capacity of a
member wl�en the member is not present. Denny noted that Kcn's role may be to limit contributions
during meeti�gs to committee members, if necessary. Staff will endeavor to take good notes and
represent all opinions.
Plans for Communicatinq With and Receivinq Feedback From Group/Orqanization
Ken asked that Committee meanbers share their plans for communicating with and receiving fcedbuck
from the group or organization they represent, if applicable. He observed that Committec membcrs hn�c
come to this process represen[ing a specific interest ��oup, but that hc hopes everyone can also have a
broader vision. Cotnmittce members went around the table and shared their plans, as follows:
• Jack Lundeen—As Lakc Grovc Business Association secretary, Jack stated tha[ he maintains a l:iz
distribution list of 30 people. He plans to fax items to members and request feedback. He noted that
it would be helpful to have a hullet list of ideas for feedback.
• Lang Bates—As an at-large Uusiness owner member, Lang noted that he does not represent a specif c
group. However,he could solicit feedback from various contacts in the East End.
• Julia Glisson—Julia described several ideas that she had brainstornied, including: 1) emails to the
Lake Grove N.A. board and other in[erested neighbors, and building the email list 2) listing her nanu
and contact infonnation in the newsletYer; 3) distributing mecting notes; and 4) calling special
meetings with the neighborhood association, itneeded. Julia asked if there was Oexibility �eith ���h�it
is in the LGTC Plan report7 Ken replied that we are not starting wi[h a blank slate, hut that
everything is not caste yet, either.
• Darcey Eaton—As an at-large member, Darcey noted that she does not represent a specific b�roup.
IIo���ever, as a Lake Grove Elementary PTA board member, she will be able to answer yues[ions fiom
concemed parents and share concerns wi[h[he Commi[tee, [hough she will not be acting in a fonn:�l
capacity as a school district representative.
• Cheryl Uchida—Cheryl explained that she is on the Waluga N.A.board and will use email to
communicate regularly with [he Uoard. She noted that they do not have many general meetings. She
will share information in neighborhood newsletters and would like bullet points, too. She added tliat
she was concerned diat the Planning Commission had not chosen to include a school district
representative on lhe Committee and was glad to see Darcey. Cheryl noted that a major Waluga I�'.A.
concern is about traffic flo«�ing through the neighborhood, and that they would like the To�tim Center
Plan to be consistent with the Waluga Neighborhood Plan.
• Wilma McNulq�—As an at-large member Wilma does not represent a specific group. Ilowever, s'he
shared that she will use the Holly Orchard N.A. newsletter to share inforniation. She added th�t shc
shops in ihe Lake Grove area, and walks and bikes there, too, and lmows that improvements can hc
made to pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
• Carolyn Krebs—Carolyn noted that she met with Lake Fores[N.A.board members and neighbors]ast
«�eek to talk about the LG7'C Ylan and her role on the Committee. She has a list of phone numbers
and email addresses. She already has sent out the Charge S[atement, with the tasks, and has gotten
some feedback. Lake Forest N.A. �vill hold its annual mceting in April and will be a good
opportunity for communicating with neighbors. She added that Lake Forest does not cun�ently
produce a newsletier, so email will proUably Ue [he bes� approach.
• Donna Jordan—Donna explained that the Transportation Advisory Board meets monthly and she will
also use email to sliare information and get feedback. Donna no[ed that she is concemed about multi-
modal and public transit in the To��m Center. She is also concerned that there are so many
opportunities for crashes on Boones Ferry Road, and that it is the major crash site in the city. She is
also concerned about impacts to business owners along Boones Perry. She noted that therc are
funding issues related to the I3oones Perry Corridor Plan and that the City has been turned down twice
by Metro for fimds to implement the Con�idor Plan. Denny replied that City sta£f kno�v of this issue
and are working on reframing the project for the next round of funding from Me[ro (MTIP funds).
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 2
Advisory Committee Meeting Notes—Ocfober 21, 2003
• Adelle Jenike—Adelle shared that she and other area business owners meet monthly with Metro
Council members Susan McClain and Brian Newman. She invited interested Committee members to
attend their next meeting.
• Chuck O'Leary—Chuck stated that the Chamber of Commerce has an email list that includes 782 of
its members. He noted that he will share information and solicit feedback at monthly Chamber Board
meetings and Govemment Affairs Committee meetings.
• George Psihogios—George noted that most members of the Lake Grove Commercial Property
O�vners Association are also members of the Lake Grove Business Association and that Jack had
outlined their communication process. George said that a common thread is that commercia] property
ovmers are concemed about transportation and the movement of vehicles.
Boones Fem Corndor Plan Coordination
A conversa[ion about concems related to the Boones Fe�ry Corridor Plan followed. Jack opined that
e��erybody wants something to work. He added that a fear in the business community is that it is not
technically feasible to move traffic,keep parking lots, keep sidewalks, and get across Boones Perry 2oad.
He added that we need to show tha[ the plan will work up and down the Boones Ferry Corridor. Ken
noted that everyone needs [o understand that Chere will be some risk involved. Denny noted that �ve will
need to look carefully at how policies will work on the ground in order to make assurances, and that the
City needs MTIP or other funding to do the engineering design work. Adelle added that we should be
able to gain from others' experiences. Donna inquired about the impact of the Bridgeport Quarry project
and the fwids the City is to receive from the developec Denny stated that traffic studies did not show
significant impact to Boottes Ferry Road, but that the regional mode] does not [ake I-� in to account,
making it difficult to assess impact from traffic that exits I-5 due to delays and travels through
neighborhoods.
CDs containing ihe Corridor Plan were distrihuted at the meeting. Committee members would like to see
hard copies of the Corridor Plan. Denny said we will bring a few copies to the next meeting. Ken noted
that early on in the first phase of to�m center planning process, the Planning Commission drafred a memo
to the City Council asking for clarification in regards to the Corridor Plan. The Council replied that it
was not on [he table to change Ihe basic recommendations of the Corridor Plan, including the five-lane
configuration with bike lanes. Susan added that these elements of the Corridor Plan were inte�nated in[o
the town center planning process. Denny noted that [he proposed five-lane contiguration of Boones Ferry
drove the project design team to look at and develop the basic to�vn center concept of emphasizing the
cross streets and bringing the neighborhood to the town center. Ken added that Committee members do
need ro have an understanding of what is in the Corridor Plan as there are some issues of concem.
III. Background InformationlDiscussion
Lake Grove Town Center Plan
Ken reviewed the Uuiding Principles, Yoeusing on the ones that]�ad generated the most discussion by the
Planning Conmiission, including:
C. Support and connect with adjacent neighborhoods;
B. Create a great street that supports all modes of travel; and
E. Identify physical improvements and catalyst projects.
Jack asked if Ihere were specific densities in town centers needed to support business, and noted that the
business people feel that businesses are doing fine right now and are no[dependino on future growth in
the town center. Denny replied that Metro targets are not so specific about where jobs and housing will
go. He explained that the City has assumed that most of the new housing required for town centers will
go in to the Foothills District. Susan added that the Metro targets are based on assumptions on available
land for development that the City supplied to Metro in the past. Donna asked that Ken and the staff
share information with the Committee on updates to the City's Comprehensive Plan that may affect the
town center. Denny noted that staff are coordinating their efforts and that [he outcomes of the
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 3
Advisory Commrttee Meeting Notes—October 21, 2003
Committees work be used to proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan. He added that an open housc
is scheduled for Monday, October 27 (6 to 9 p.m.) to gather citizen input on Comprehensive Plan updatzs.
Boones Ferry Comdor Plan Coordination
See discussion aUove.
IV. Future Meetings
Committee members reviewed the draft meeting schedulcd. APter a brief discussion, it ���as agreed upon
to change the Committee meeting day from Tuesdays ro Wednesdays. The 4 to 6 p.m. meeting time
remains [he same, though it does pose a problem for some Committee members. It was requested that a
mee[ing place in Ihe west end of the city be secured. Susan asked if Committee members were interc�izd
in receiving meetings notices and other related items via email. Everyone agreed thal email would ���ork
for small atlachments, but that larger documents would be distributed by mail. Jack had preciously stated
tl�at he does not have access to email; slaff will fax infom�ation to Jack.
Donna asked how they could prepare for Ihe next meeting. Iien said to thi�k about what thcy would likc
to see in the town center in 20 years. Susan added that staff will emai] some additional questions to think
about prior to the next meeting.
V. Adjournment
`I'he meeting adjoumed at approximately $:50 p.m.
L�.'�('aso Piles,2001`.Plannine Projzct Ffles\P 01-000'_ I�ke Grove�I i��m Cenler�._Adrisop�Conunilree'Advisory Cnmmiuce Meetin�i\otes:�1C
mxtlne nolcs 10-21-p3 FinaLdoc
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 4
Advisory Commitlee Meeting Notes— October 21, 2003
. Lake Grove Town Center Plan
Implementation Advisory Committee
Meeting Notes
November 5, 2003, 4 to 6 p.m.
Adult Community Center, 505 G Street
Members In Attendance:
Ken Sandblast, Chair, Lang Bates,Darcey Ea[on, Julie Glisson, Donna Jordan, Carolyn Krebs. Jack
Lundeen, Wilma McNulty, Chuck O'Leary, Cheryl Uchida
Alternates In Attendance:
John FIurlburt, George Psihogios, Barbara Zeller
Staff In Attendance: Dennis Ggner, Susan Millhauser
�uests In Attendance: Howard Shapiro, Rob Wa�,mer
I. Welcome
Denny Lgner welcomed everyone to the meeting. He noted that draft meeting notes from the October 21.
2003 meeting had been distributed via email the day before,not providing much time for review, and that
we would take edits/corrections at the next meeting. Susan Millhauser added that the goal will be to
distribute meeting notes wilh the agenda for the next meeting, about one week prior.
II. BackgroundlDiscussion- Lake Grove Town Center Plan Report
Susan asked if there were any outstanding questions abou[the 'Cown Center Plan report's contents or
process. Jack Lundeen replied that he had a comment about the process — that with Task 1, it feels like
we're reinventing work that has already been completed. Denny replied that we are trying to focus on the
envisioned charac[er of the town centec Uonna Jordan wondered if character might include locating
parking lots behind buildings ro create more of a neighhorhood cen[er feeling. Susan added tha[ while
input from ]ast year's public workshops provided us with many visions for the to�m center, an overall
vtsion had not really been defined, and tha[Task 1 provide an opportunity for the commit[ee [o reGne the
vision. Additionally, late in the process last spring, Susan noted, questions came up about how mixed use
is deGned, and that the committee's visioning work will clarify this definition for Lake Grove. Ken
Sandblast added that he is hoping that committee members can bring their individual (or organization's)
vision to help clarify the picture. For example, what does the business community see and what do the
neighborhoods see'?
III. Task 1 —20•Year Vision for Lake Grove Town Center
Denny handed out a workshcet�vith the follo�ving visioning discussion questions:
1) �Velcome back. You moved away from the Lake Grove area. After 20 years you return and ]ike
what you see! Describe what you see.
2) This is a two part question about the charaeter of Lake Grove:
a. List the top four elements of the natural andlor built environment that define the unique
characler of Lake Grove.
b. What characteristics could be enhanced to improve upon Lake Grove?
Regarding the firsf question, Denny noted that the same question was asked last falL He added that the
second question focuses more on the physical character of the town center and the responses should help
to define what the committee wants to see in terms of building design, type, and character. Denny asked
that everyone take two minutes to respond to the first question, to be followed by going around the room
and sharing, with staff taking notes on the Ilip charts. Carolyn Krehs said she would liRe to revisit [his
question afrer she gets feedUack 5�om her neighUors.
Question 1 Summary of Responses (arouped looselv bv topicl-After 20 vears...tlescribed what vou see.
• Preservation of history and individual character of businesses—non-homogenous, s[and alone
buildings
• Consistent architectural style —no stand alone buildings
• A Lake Grove version of the Lake Oswego style—street furniture, lighting (with standards), symhols.
landscaping
• Enhanced landscaping with businesses oriented to social interaction rather than a strip mall
• A new sense of entry and consisten[ signage/street furniture/street trees—the Lake Grove District
• Lake Grove Village—not district
• Mix of uses, like in downtovm Lake Oswego—office over retail, housing over retail on side streets
• Enhanced sense of entry—a water feature Ihat is ��isible from Boones Pen-y bridge at Kruse �Vay
(Wilma's concept)
• A lake from the stream that runs through Mercantile Medieal Plaza
• Lake Grove has a range of unique cultural attractiona that are diffcrent than do��rnto�vn Lakc Oswe!�u
and Bridgeport
• More unique shops
• Locally owned businesses, fewer chain stores
• I{ruse Way employee customer base has been taken ad��antagc o[—husinesses have marketcd tu thesc
employees
• Social gathering places —dif3erent dian Starbucks
• A sense of focus—a eenual gathering place. ���ith a potential opportunity at Lake Ciro��e Flementar}�
and other sites (post oCfice)
• A community center
• An adult center
• A library—redeveloped commercial sites
• Lake Grove Elementary is a critical feature
• Relocated school in the neighborhood (W'aluga Park'?j and redzaclopment of thc school site to a morc
intense use
• School is tied to Waluga Park
• Preserva[ion of native trees—oaks and firs
• Trees dominate from every vantage point— trees are taller that thc huildings
• More customers walk/bike comfortably and are able to cross Boones Ferry
• On Boones Ferry, the "5°i' ]ane is an island/median in more places,providing pedestrian refuge mid
slowing traffic
• Pedestrian ameni[ies on both sides of IIoones Ferry— lighting, benches
• Covered ���alkways
• Enhanced boulevards at crossings to the neighborhoods
• Walkways over Boones Ferry—could be incorporated in to buildings, husinesses
• SuUterranean crossing of Boones Perry
• The bike route is not on Boones Perry, rather it is a loop that goes around Lake Grove (Wilma's Bike
Loop map). Is money available for projects, like Boones Ferry, if bike route is not on the same street,
but on a parallel street within close disYance'?
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 2
Advisory Committee Meeting Notes—November 5, 2003
• Traffic is well managed along Boones Ferry and in neighborhoods
• Boones Perry is not T.V. Highway or McLoughlin
• Boones Perry is not straight anymore
• Sunset and Quarry have been upgraded to accommodate current traffic volumes
• Less traffic through the town center-maximum 25 mph on Boones Ferry
• Trolleys connecting downtown to Lake Grove Town Center-via rail line
• Shuttle bus-wesdeast connection
• Additional parking close to stores and out of view, with alleys in back so we don't have lots of access
drives onto Boones Ferry
• Alley concept-better than new street(alley behind McDonald's), designed for slow traffic
• Affordable housing
Questian 2
Due to time constraints, Ken suggested that we hold responding to the second question until the next
meeting when we will have more time and committee members will have an opportunity to check in with
their constituents.
A series of questions and conversations followed, and are summarized below under Other Business.
IV. Next Meeting
Ken noted that�ve �vill have a summary of Question 1 for the next meeting [see above]. Susan passed oot
a summary sheet with responses to [his question from the September 2002 community workshop. Susan
also passed out a handout with several definitions of mixed use and some inteme[ resources that may be
of interest to committee members.
The next meeting will be held at Lake Grove Elementary School (15777 Boones Ferry Rd.), Room 25
(from main entrance, tum right and il is the last room on the left), 4 to 6 p.m. Wilma suggested that name
plates would be helpful. Susan agreed and said she would bring table tents to the next meeting. An
updated meeting schedule was distributed. Committee members agreed that they would like to have
notebooks for meeti�g materials.
V. Other 8usinesslCommittee Member Reports
A question about the current height limit was asked. Susan confirmed that in the General Commercial
(GC) zone, which covers all of the commercial property in the town center, the height limit is 45 feet,
with a tapering do�tim in height based on distance from adjacent residen[ial properties. Julia Glisson
shared an architectural drawing of a proposed KFC remodel that Lake Grove Neighborhood Association
had received. The drawing was passed around and Julia asked what it is that people don't like about the
design.
Barbara Zeller asked ho�v the committee members feel about density, that is, can a neighborhood get too
dense that it can no longer be served by a conunercial district? Denny said that planned density for the
residential areas around the town center are not off the charta He wondered what the development
potential in the surrounding neighborhoods might be. Wilma noted that the definition of a town center
says a town center serves l Os of thousands of people and wondered what the commercial area serves now.
Lang Bates noted that there are probably 50,000 residents in the City and surrowiding areas that use the
town center. Chuck O'Leary noted that he was still hying to determine the number of housing units that
need to be accommodated in the town center. Susan replied that she will bring the estimates to the next
meeting, which are based on the City's estimates given to Metro as part of the City's compliance with the
Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (UGMPP). Denny added that the UGMFP targefs cover
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 3
Advisory Committee Meeting Notes-November 5,2003
both totvn centers, and [hat our estimates for Lake Grove assume that a majority of the new housing will
be accommodated in the downtown town center.
Denny noted tha[ we are s[ill planning a field trip witlt the Plam�ing Commission and committee members
to look at some examples of mixed use development in the region. Possible places include Pairview
Village, downtoam Gresham, Hollywood/Sandy Boulevard(new libraries with residentia] above in
Hollywood and Sellwood), NE Martin Luther King Boulevard, F[awlhome. [t was suggested that we
focus on areas similar to Lake Grove, that is, areas that are built out and �vill be redeveloped o��er time
ra[her than greenfield development like Orenco S[ation.
VI. Public Comment
Rob Wagner intruduced himself. He grew up in the Lake Grove area and has recently moved back to the
area, has a background in planning and public policy, is vcry intcrestcd in th� committee's work, and
would like continue attending meetings as a gucst.
VII. Adjaurnment
The mceting adjourned at approximarely �:55 p.m.
LiCa+e I ilec�20111APlannmg P�olz�t I ilec�P 01-OUO2IeAe Gruce To�+n Ctnier'✓ldvison�('ommiUcebAJvisoryCunmiittee Aleeifng Notasf�C
macung no�es I 1-05-U3 fineLdoc
Lake Grove Town Cenler Plan Page 4
Advisory Committee Meeting Notes—November 5, 2003
• Lake Grove Town Center Plan
Implementation Advisory Committee
Meeting Notes
November 19, 2003, 4 to 6 p.m.
Lake Grove Elementary School, 15777 Boones Ferry Road
Members In Attendance:
Ken Sandblast, Chair, Lang Bates, Darcey Eaton, Julia Glisson, Donna Jordan, Vic Keeler, Carolyn
Krebs, Jack Lundeen, Wihna McNulty, Chuck O'Leary, Cheryl Uchida
Alternatesln Attendance:
John Hurlburt, Adelle Jenike, George Psihogios, Barbara Zeller
Staff In Attendance: Dennis Egner, Susan Millhauser
Guests In Attendance: Michael Buck, Btenda Falson
I. Welcome 1 Approve Meeting Notes
Denny Egner welcomed everyone to the meeting and asked for any comments or corrections to the
meeting notes. For the October 21, 2003 notes, it was pointed out that on page 3, under the discussion of
density i�� the town center, the text should be updated to reflect that Jack Lundeen had stated that the
business people would say that businesses are doing fine right now and are not depending on future
growth in lhe town center. Regarding the Novetnber 5, 2003 notes, it was suggested that the question
rcgarding availability of funds for road projects with bike routes on parallel streets should be noted under
the bullet point on page 2 regarding bike routes and Boones Ferry Road. John Hurlbwt shared that he had
spoken with the Bicycle/Pedestrian Proo am Manager at ODOT who told him that bicyclists need to be
treated like commuters. Wilma McNulty replied that she would like to see both on-street bike lanes on
Boones Ferry to accommodate commuters as well as a bike loop �round the town center to serve families
and others who might not feel comfortable riding on Boones Ferry. Denny noted that Boones Ferry is not
a state road and that staff will check with Metro regarding their criteria for fundino. Susan Millhauser
replied that the durine the first phase of this project, the consultant looked at the City's Transportation
System Plan as well as information Wilma submitted and highlighted sVeets thaY are planned for on-street
bike lanes as well as potential bike routes and connections. Susan also noted that, as noted in the Town
Center Plan report, the City considers all nei�hborhood streets to serve as bike routes and that it is policy
not to stripe or sign every street. Susan added that the consultants also looked at safe crossings of Boones
Ferry in terms of connecting bike rou[es. Ken Sandblast noted that it sounds like a piece oY the vision is
to better integrate and interconnect bicycle and pedestrian access to and from the town center.
II. Task 1 —20•Year Vision for Lake Grove Town Center
Ken suggested that we start with Question 2,and then come back to Question 1 if time allows. Denny
su�gested that everyone take one to rivo minutes to respond to Question 2.
2) This is a two part question about the character of Lake Grove:
a. List the top four elements of the natural and/or built environment that define the unique
character of Lake Grove.
b. What characteristics could be enhanced to improve upoo Lake Grove?
Denny noted that this exercise will help us define desigu requirements, incentives, and other strategies we
will implement to defioe the character of Lake Grove. Wilma asked that we allow everyone to get their
ideas out before discussing individual ideas.
Question 2 a Summary of Responses(qrouped loosely by topic)—Elements that define unique character of Lake
Grove:
Com»iuniry/Serrse of Place
• On-going communication between conunercial/business owner groups and neighborhood associations
—not conunon elsewhere
• Rurallsmall town atmosphere
Focal Poi�:ts/E�ttry Ways
• Sense of entering and leaving the disirict—Kruse Way and Boones Ferry, railroad/Boones Peny to
the sauth—missing tlie center
• Schoolprovidesfocus
• Water—Three Sisters, S}�ringbrook; Lamont Springs; Waluga Park wetlands
d9ix of Uses
• Eclectic mix of office, retail, etc.
• Individual character of businesses—non-cocporate
• Great service businesses e.;;. gas stations, tire shops, in addition to retail. Retain for the neighborhood
—a great asset.
Architecture
• Smaller scale of architecwre — one story, stand alone buildings
• New commercial buildings—in brick; older structures—wood
• Mixed design of buildings—age differences
Street,rcape
• Streetscape elements such as holiday decorations, hanging baskets
• Curve in Boones Ferry Road allows Uetter vie�� of businesses
Trees/L arr�ls cupi iig
• Trees and plantings
• Buildings desi},med to retain natural landscape—keep hees
Accessibil i(y/Cauiecti vity
• Lack of a continuous/usable sidewalk
• Proliferation of driveways and utility poles/wires—too many driveways
• Long and narrow— linear commercia] corridor
• Non-grid pattem—how do you increase connectiaitg and pedcstrian connections in a non-�id system
• Level —flat topography
• Commercial area at same level as street
• Distinction between Kruse Way and Lake Grove—disconnected
Traffic/Boones Fen7� Corridor
• Speed along Boones Perry
Parking
• Lack of parkin�
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 2
DRAF7'Advisory Committee Meeting Notes—November 19, 2003
• Question 2 b Summary of Responses (qrouped looselv bv topic)- Characteristics that could be enhanced to
improve upon Lake Grove:
Conirm�niry/Sense ofPlace
• Farmer's market with artist sales
• I listorical features should be preserved e.g. Parsons produce stand
• Kruse Farm or other rural property could be enhanced, though not at the cen[er of the town center '
Focal Points/Eittry Ways
• Look at water(hydrologist)/lagoon in Mercantile Village
• Community/recreation center-Lake Grove fire station
• Focal point-sense of identity to bring people to the area
• Springbrook Creek sou[h of Pennington Park-enhance, capitalize on views
• Integrate features-markeVtoNm center/water features
A9i.c o(Uses
• Encourage economic diversity without strip malls-parking in the rear, setback sidewalk with planter
strip
• Discourage chain stores
• Encourage new businesses- family shopping opportunities
• Mised use-ho�v it is de(ined �cill guide streetscape/character, e.g. li��ehs�ork units
� :1rcl�irrchU'r ��
• I:nliance and maintain Lake Grove scalc
Strcetscape
• Streetscape improvements-uniform lighting, seating, special events decorations, signs
• Fence billboard at Lake Grove Elementary
• Sense of place-light standards; gateway feah�res
• Covered walkways connecting businesses
• Lnclosure alone street is provided by trees so can set back buildings/businesses
• Lighting directed downward rather[han ambient
• Uniform lamp posts/lighting standards
• More public arts as part of streetscape
T�re.��/Lai�dscapi�vg
• Sustainable design /green features and streets
.9ccessibiliry/Connectivity
• Plat topography allows for easier multi-modal transportation-bikes and walking
• Connectivity beriveen businesses and parking areas-reduce access points from Boones Ferry
• Enhance connec[ivity behveen buildings/parcels on each side of Boones Ferry as«�ell as safe
crossings
• Concem about pedestrian connection from Sunset to town center leading [o use of Sunset for parking
-what about a neighborhood parking pass program
Trnffic/Boones Ferry Corridor
• Slow traffic on Boones Ferry
• Discourage neighborhood cut t}u'ough traffic while slowing down Boones Ferry traffic
Lake Grove Town Center P/an Page 3
DRAFT Advisory Committee Meeting Notes-November 19, 2003
• Trolley to relieve commuter traffic
• Connect downtown Lake Oswego with Lake Grove via rail
Parki�tg
• Maximize current parking lots and develop public parking lots at north and south of ends of the tu�an
center—design to integrate parking wi[h gateway
Following the brainstorming activity, Denny noted that staff will bring examples of greenstreets to a
subsequent meeting. Susan noted that ihis type of design might be appropriate for transitioning strcets
and sidewalks between the more intense development at Boones Ferry and surrounding low densiry,
residential development.
Jacl< asked about building scalc (Jack, do you recall more specifically what your question was'?) and
Denny described how the recently adopted infill standards ensure compatibiliry with existing single
family development by pushing building mass back to the cen[er of the lot. �Vilma inquired whether on-
street parking on Boones Ferry might be possible. Denny replied that the Corridor Plan does not procidr
for on-street parking,however there may be certain areas wbere pockets could be located. Susan noted
Ihat the To�m Center Plan Report recommended on-street parking on Ihe cross streets.
Jack no[ed that the current zoning allows mixed use, and [hat the business communit} fears tha� nii�cd
use will be mandated. Denny replied that a focus of the next meeting will be to define mixed use ior I.akc
Grove.
Ken wrapped up the visioning segment of the meeting by pointing out lwo sections in the Town Center
Flan Report—the first bulle[on page 2 and page 6, item A—and noted that it sounds like the Advisory
Committee and the general public �vho participated in the first phase of d�e project are on the same track
in terms of a vision for the town centec Denny added that staff will write up a set of statements about the
vision and character of the to�vn center to bring back ro the Conmiittee for its review. Jack rzplied that hz
would like to ha��e this one to two weeks prior to the next meeting or the one after that in order to ha��e
time to get input from his constituen[s.
III Other BusinesslCommittee Member Reports
Town Center Targets for Housing and EmploYment
Donna opined that Lake Grove wants to be a local, neighborhood center rather than a town center, and
that downtown Lake Oswego serves as the [own center. Susan passed out a handout that summarizes
housing and employment targets and capacity estimates. Denny noted that Metro recommended targcts ol
39 to 40 persons per acre is made up of residential and employment. He added that ���hat we camiot
accorxunodate in Lake Grove �i�ill be accommodated in do��mtown and the Foothills area, giving us smne
freedom in determining ho�t dense the Lake Grove To��n Center is.
IV. Next Meeting
Denny summarized a�enda items Cor the next meeting: review and discuss draft vision statement,
presenta[ion and discussion of mixed use, and additional discussion about density and Metro targz[s.
Carolyn asked what it was that MeVo did not like about the Soones Ferry Corridor Plan. Susan replicd
that the project was submitted for funding under the boulevard program, and that there �vere several arcas
where the project received low rankings due to narrow sidewalk widths, small size of tree wells, lack of
on-street parking, and absence of an adopted town center plan. Denny added that the long length of thc
project also contributed to the low score and that Metro criteria seem to change annually. Susan noted
that Metro staff inembers cited Tacoma Avenue in Sellwood as an example of a street with similar traClic
volume to Boones Ferry Road that received boulevard funding through Metro. Susan added that she ��ill
bring a copy of the spreadsheet shot�•ing Metro rankings.
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 4
DRAFT Advisory Committee Meeting Noles—November 19, 2003
Wilma shared that sometimes we are our own enemy in terms of cut through traffic in neighborhoods.
Lang responded that a grid pattem �i�ith stop lights can slow traffic, and that we need to change the
pattem.
VI. Public Comment
There was no public comment.
VII. Adjournment
The meeting adjoumed at approxima[ely G:00 p.m.
L:\Case�iles�2001�Planning Project FilesV'01-0002 lake Gmve Town CenterWdvisory Commit[ee�Advisory Committec Meeting Notes�AC
meeting notes l L19-03 DRAPT.doc
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 5
DRAFT Advisory Committee Meeting Notes- November 19. 2003
• Lake Grove Town Center Plan
Implementation Advisory Committee
Meeting Notes
December 3, 2003, 4 to 6 p.m.
Lake Grove Elementary School, 15777 Boones Ferry Road
Members In Attendance:
Ken Sandblast, Chair, Lang Ba[es, Darcey Eaton, Julia Glisson, Donna Jordan, Vic Keeler, CarolYn
Krebs, Wilma McNulty, Sid Smither, Cheryl Uchida
Alternates In Attendance:
Karen Jacobson, George Psihogios
Staff In Attendance: Dennis E�ner, Susan �iillhauser
Guests In Attendance: Michael Buck, Glaine lohnson
I. Welcome 1 Approve Meeting Notes
Denny Egner welcomed everyone[o the meeting. As the November 19, 2003 meefing noles hadjust been
distributed the prior day, the Committee aareed to wait until the next meeting to finalize.
A handout outlining proposed meeting`'ground rules"was distribu[ed to those in attendance. The �round
rules were developed to help keep meetings productive.
II. Task 1 —20•Year Vision for Lake Grove Town Center
Review and Discuss Draft Vision Statement
Denny suggested tha[ everyone take a few moments [o revie�v the first rivo paragraphs of the draft vision
statement(dated December 2, 2003). He no[ed that reference to applicable Guiding Principles are noted
in brackets. It was agreed that edits from �oday's meetin�woidd be made and returned ro the Committee
within one week to allow time for sharing�vith constituents and receivin�feedback, and that the track
changes mode would be used to show what changes are being proposed. Denny clarified thal a vision
statement is a statement of what we �vant the l�own Center to be, and that it will fiirther define the
character of the area and act as a touchstone. He noted that in the vision statement"mixed use" and
"village character" still need to be defined by the Committee and that the presentation on mixed use will
provide some questions that will help to refine these items.
The Committee [hen reviewed and discussed [he draft vision statemen[and recommended revisions. The
specific updates are reFlected in the draf't vision statement dated December 8, 2003. These updates and
other general comments are briefly summarized belo�v:
• Mention that the LGTC is a smaller version of the downtown Town Center(Domia)
• The LGI'C is a service center for the west end of Lake Oswego(Denny)
• �1'e need ro further describe what is meant by Lake Grove(Wihna). How do Committee
members see Lake Grove(Susan)? It is the area from Wild Oats at the SW and north to
Kruse/Carman, with Childs Road at the south (Carolyn). Holly Orchard and Westlake
neighborhoods also consider themselves part of the Lake Grove area (Wilma)
• I he rest of Lake Oswego docs not know where/N hat the Lake Grove area is(Carolyn). I[would
be nice to have a map/set of maps that show the Town Center and the surrounding Lake Grove
area for the Committee's reviea� (Donna).
• The town center includes the commercial and high density residen[ial azeas of Lake Grove and is •
a service center for the surro�nding Lake Grove area which sounds like it extends beyond the
neighborhoods adjacent to the town center(Lake Grove, Waluga, and Lake Porest) (Denny).
• Like these ideas—the notion that Lake Grove TC is not a second Town Center like do��nto�cn
(Ken)
• Do not like the pluase "and adjacent to" in the first paragraph(Carolyn) It was agreed after
additional conversation to remove this phrase to clarify that the town center does not include
adjacentneighborhoods
• What is a pedestrian way (1�`paragraph) (Julia)? It includes sidewalks and pathways (Denny).
• Bikes and pedestrians don't work well together. The Bicycle Transportation Alliance may havc
some good ideas for the Committee and we could invite someone to a Committee meeting
(Wilma). Ken noted that the Committee likely�i'ill not have time to turn over a mzeting [o an
ou[side presentec However, it would be useful for Wilma lo cuntact them and get sun�r ticdbach
to bring to a subseyuent meeting.
• Let's mention pedestrian safety, and crossings of Boones Ferry in particular(Sid)
• Need a definition for village scale (2od paragraph). The [,ake Forest neighborhood association
feedback is that they would prefer 2 story buildings maximum, and [hat 3 stories ���ould bc hiehly
undesirable (Carolyn). The Committee's future work will clarify/define wha[ is meant by villagz
scale and that we may not 6e able to w�ite a definition for the tcrm, the document will spcak to
that(Ken).
• At this point, we are wanting feedback and clarification Gom constituents, so the options for
village scale are open ended(Julia). I'eople need to unders[and what is currendy allowed, i.e. 3
stories (Donna). We will �et to the details (Ken).
• We've heard ihat Lake Grove is not downtown L.O.but the three bullet points lisled under village
character deseribe downtown. Let's "x"those out(Karen). Sounds like Block 138 (George).
Except that there are no blocks [hat big in Lake Grove(Denny).
• Regarding the two highlighted bullets about schools, recall that the point was that people want a
school to be retained in the neighborhood (Domia)
• Under focal point, need to clarify that water features are natural, such as lakes, lagomis,
waterfalls, eta (Wilma)
• Under arohitecture, 4�'bullet,need to clarify what we mean by "strip mall" development(Ken)
• Would like to see existing development unified— from street to individual buildings (Donna)
• Enhanced egress and ingress to commercial properties on Boones Perry should be mentioned
under transportation. The plan needs to address medians that might limit access to rigl�t in/righc
out only(Mike).
• Under sense oPplace, should mention historic businesses such as Naomi's (Mike)
• Third bullet under architecture, don't need to necessarily orient buildings to the street. Some
buildings are set at an angle and can be seen well from the sireet (Carolyn).
• Some current requirements say that building entrances need to be oriented to transit streets and
Boones Perry is a transit street (Denny). The State Transportation Planning Rule requires
entrances facing transit streets and developers also want entrances facing parking lots which may
be in the back or at the side of a building (Lang).
• Concept is to emphasize pedestrian orientation on the side streets that connect to the
neighborhoods. This is more difticult along Boones Perry and may not necessaril�� ��ant to
require in Ihis area (business corridor) (Denny).
• There needs to be a pedestrian connection at McDonald's (Lang)
• Under architecture, 5th bullet about transition, this should talk about buffering —a wall or
vegetation—between town center properties and the surrounding neighborhood,not a transition to
the neighborhood (Carolyn). What is meant by tra�sition? (Sid)
• At the edge of the town cen[er, building form would match residential building form, with a
stepped do«•n scale of development Qot coverage, building height, buildina setback, etc.)
Lake Grove Town Center P/an Page 2
DRAFTAdvisory Committee Meeting Notes—December 3, 2003
. (Dem�y) Like shown on the cliarrette drawinas of the Pacific Lumber site with transition on that
lot to town houscs at the edge of the town center(Julia).
• Clarify what is meant by transition and add another bullet to address buffering.
• The 2nd bullet under traffic should be split into two bullets (Carolyn)
• Under streetscape 1"bullet,delete regularly spaced in reference to street trees (Carolyn)
Presentation and Discussion of Mixed Use
Ken noted that the presen[ation on mixed use would give commi[tee members some thoughts to chew on
for the next meeting. Denny did a Power Point presentation showing photos of��arious types of mixed
use development. The presen[ation posed questions about mixed use, strategies for dealing with scale and
question about design for the committee to think about and discuss, including:
• Do we require mixed use or just allow i[as we do today?
• If we require, where do we require(village mixed use concept)?
• What about the Gregg/Avery property at the NW comer of Boones Fe�y and Kruse Way?
• Horizonta] vs. vertical mixed use-do we care?
• Are there uses that should be discourage or prohibited (auto oriented uses, big box retail, auto
lots, drive thrus, regional draw businesses)?
• Strategies for dealing with scale-it's not just the height
o Buildi�g height steps back
o F{eight limitations
o Lot coverage limitations
o Square footage limitation
o Limit parking
o Floor Area Ratio (FAR) standards
o Setbacks -minimum and maximum
• Whut does Lake Grove look like in 20 vears?
o Canyon Road in Beaverton
o Hilisboro suburban development -westem Comell Road
o Down[own Troutdale
• Design standards dictate the look
• How do we achieve `eclectic uniformity"?
A handout of the presentation was distribu�ed to meeting attendees. Ken noted that [he presenta[ion was a
good starting point for future discussions anJ that commitlee members should s[art [hinl:ing about the
questions and strategies raised. Denny added that as Folks are out and about over the next mon(h, they
should ihink about scale- how buildings can step back from the street and how architectural feaWres can
help bring down the scale as well. Wilma asked where she might go to see this type of development.
Denny replied that the new library in Sellwood includes housing above and is a good example of a
building that steps back from [he street. He added that a field trip is tentatively scheduled for late January
for committee members and Planning Commissioners to ��isit areas that are pedestrian friendly and have
mixed use development, potentially talking with a developer who has done mixed use projects.
Committee members asked if the Power Presentation could be emailed to them so they could share it with
their cons[ituents. Susan replied that she would create a pdf of the PowerYoint to email, though the file
may be too large to email, and that it �could also be posted on the project web site.
III. Other Business/Committee Member Reports
Wilma inquired where there might be space on Boones Feiry Road to carve out some on-street parking
spaces. Mike (who sat on the Boones Perry Corridor Plan Advisory Committee)replied that the study
looked at two travel lanes and found that traffic would be too constrained. He added [hat the effect might
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 3
DRAFT Advisory Committee Meeting Notes-December 3, 2003
be similar to �vhen a utility truck is working in Roones Ferry Road and shuts do�vn a lane causing traffic �
to back up.
IV. Next Meeting
.4n addi[ional advisory committee meeting �vas proposed for Januarq 7. 2004 ilom 4 to 6 p.m. tu proaide
oommittee members additional [ime to eet feedback from constituents on ihe dratt vision statement.
Conunittee members agreed that an additional meeting would be helpful. Also, Susun noted that thc
January 12, 2004 Planning Commission check-in meeting has been moved lo January 26, 2004. Susan
will email the updated meeCing schedule and post it on Che project web site.
Ken briefly reviewed what topics the comtnittee ���ill likely discuss over the next several mee[inp;:
• January 7`"— discuss draft vision; discuss mixed use in the context of the current zoning
• January 14'"—finalize the vision; discuss applicability of exis[ing zoning
• February 4�'—discuss Planning Commission feedback and direction fi�om the January 26°i work
session regarding the vision; discuss if mixed use development is to include residential. If so,
where?
• Pebruary 25'�—lliscuss parking and shared access options
VI. Public Comment
Elaine Johnson introduced herself and said ihat Wilma had invitcd her to attend the meeting. She
commended the committee for its ���ork so Par and noted that it has a lot oChard work ahead. She �idded
that she is not sure that the guiding principles are reflected in the vision statement.
Mike Buck thanked the committee for allowing him to offer comments during the discussion o1 the
vision. He added that he hopes everyone can keep an open mind and that the discussions do not b�conx
polarized regarding connectivity from the neighborhoods to the town center and transitions to the
neighborhoads.
VII. Adjournment
The meeting adjoumed at approximately 6:00 p.m.
L:ACase Ffles\Planning Projec�Files',2001�P O1-0002 LaAe GroceTown Center�Advisory Committee,4dvison�Commitiee
hteetine NotcsAC meetine noms 12-03-03 DRAFT.doc
Lake Grove Town Center Plan Page 4
DRAFT Advisory Committee Meeting Notes—Decem6er 3, 2003
January 26, 2004
'��� � --(�Ch,' �_
�
� Background
Lake Grove Town Center Plan . Implementation Advisory Committee
was formed in October 2003 and has
met 5 times
Planning Commission Public Meeting . City Council, based on recommendation
January 26, 2004 from Planning Commission, approved its
Charge Statement and membership
Advisory Committee Check In
Background Task 1
. Committee includes citizen . Committee has been working to
representatives from: the business complete Task 1:
community, commercial property Clearly define a 20 year uision fo�
owners, neighborhood associations, the Lake Grove Town Center.
citizens at large, Transportation Indude a description of the
Advisory Board and Planning cha�acter of the Lake Grove Town
Commission Center and a dear definition of
mixed use.
Task 1 Next Steps - Tasks
. Committee members reviewed results Additional Committee tasks include:
from first phase of Town Center 2. Review existina zoninq standards and
process determine appropriateness for achieving
. Identified common themes for the LGTC Plan objectives and Guiding
vision and have expanded on this Principles.
work 3. Define work on zoning and desiqn
standards based on issues identified in
. Members have been soliciting LGrC Plan report.
feedback from their"constituents"
lof2
�
� January 26, 2004
Next Steps - Tasks Next Steps
. Committee will be meeting at least
4. Identifv and orioritize anolementation �roieds, monthly through the winter and spring
induding projects proposed in the LGTC Plan ■ Next meeting Scheduled for Wednesday,
report; identifv�otential funding sources, and February 4"', 2004
develoo an overali timeframe for ■ Meetings are held at Lake Grove
imolemen[ation. Coordinate with Lake Oswego
Redevelopment Agency(LORA) staff. Elementary School
5. �raft Cornmurity oevelopment Cnde, . Meeting schedule, agendas, meeting
Comprehensive Plan,and Transportation notes, charge statement and other
System Plan amendments. materials are posted on project web site
(www.ci.oswego.or.us/pla n/Igtc/Igtc.htm)
Next Steps
. Additional Planning Commission
check-ins:
. Monday, April 12, 2004 (Tasks 2 & 3)
. Monday, June 14, 2004 (Task 4)
. Draft Task 5 products Summer 2004
. Planning Commission and City Council
public hearings Fall 2004
2 of 2
1 BETORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ���rT
2 OF THE
3 CITP OF LAK� OSWEGO
4
5
6 A REQLTEST FOR TEXT AMENDEMENTS ) LU 03-0075 - 1528
7 TO CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT GUIDELINES ) (C/TY OF LAKE OSw'EGOJ
8 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & ORDER
9
io NATURE OF APPLICATION
tl
t2 A request by the City of Lake Oswe�o for legislative telt amendments to the Cit}�'s adopted
13 Citizen Involvement Guidelines for Lake Oswego (CIG), for the purpose of clarification,
14 con�ection and updating. The updates are primarily related to the City's recognized neighborhood
15 associations and reqtiirements for board meetings and notice. Other proposed amendme�its update
t6 and coirect infonnation and iwmbenng.
17
t8
19 HEARINGS
20
21 The Planning Commission held a public hearing a��d considered this application at its meeting of
zz Janunry 12, 2004.
23
za CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
25
26 A. Cih� of Lake Os�ce�o Communiri� De��elopment Code:
27
28 LOC 50.75.005 Legislative Decision Defined.
29 LOC 50.75.010 Criteria for Legislative Decision
30 LOC 50.75.015 Required Notice [o DLCD
31 LOC 50.75.020 Plaru�ing Commission Recommendation Required
32 LOC 50.7�.025 City Council Review and Decision
33
34 B. Statewide Pllnnine Goals or Administrative Re�ulations
35
36 Statewide Planninp Goal 1, Citizen Involvement
37 (City Comprehensive Plan, Goal 1 —Citizen Involvement, Policies 1, Z, 3, 5 and S
38 addressed)
39
ao Statewide Planning Goal 2, Land Use Planning
41 (City Comprehensive Plan, Goal 2— Land Use Planning, Section 1, Land Use Policies
42 and Regulations, Policy 23 addressed)
43
44
45
PAGE 1 LU03-0075�1528
• �
i CONCLUSION
�
? The Planning Commission condudes that LU 03-0075 is in compliance with all applicable
4 criteria.
5
6
7 FINDINGS AND REASONS
8
9 The Planning Commission incorporates the staff report, dated December 29, 2003, on LU 03-
10 0077 (with ali exhibits attached thereto) as support Cor its decision, supplemented by the further
11 findings and conclusions set forll� herein. u� the event of any inconsistency between the
12 supplementary matter herein and the staPf report, the matter herein controls. To the extent they
13 are consistent with tlte approv�l granted herein, the Cotnmission adopts by reference its oral
14 deliberations on this matter.
IS
16 Follo�vino are the supplementaty findings and conclusions of this Commissioii:
17
18 l. Citizen testimony was given in suppori of Option 2, as outlined in the stafCreport,
19 requiring a minimum of two ��eighborhood association board meetings per year, ratl�er Uian four.
20 The Planning Cotnmission approved Option 2, with some minor modifications related to
21 organization o£that section ofthe Citizen Involvement Guidelines, reducing the number of
22 reyuired nei�hborhood associ�tion board meetings to hvo per Vear, and retaining the abilit� to
23 call special board meetings as needed. Option 2 also included new notice requirement for
24 neighborhood association board meetings, requiring the posting of hvo signs in prominent
25 locations in the neigl�borhood (subject to the City's sign code) and notice in the local paper,
26 rather thau written nolice.
27
28 2. Additional citizen testimony was given recommending the ittclusion of more specific
2� language related to citizen influence into Section E (page 5) of the Citizen [nvolvement
3U Guidelines, as provided by Statewide Planning Goal 1 Citizen Invoh�ement (Appendix A of
31 Citizen Llvolvement Guidelines, page 16, itetn 3). The Vlanning Comtnission agreed that the
32 inclusion of this language would strengthen and clarify the intent of Citiren involvement
3� Guidelines.
:a
Pa�E z u� o,-oois-ts2s
I
I
� ORDER
�
-t IT IS ORDERED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION of the City of Lake Oswego that:
5
6 1. The Planning Commission recommends that LU 03-0075 be approved by the City
� Council.
s
9 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS ORDER was presented to and APPROVED by the Planning
I o Commission of the City of Lake Oswego.
11
12
13 DATED tl�is 26th day of January 2004.
14
IS
I6
l7
t S J ames Iohnson, Chair
t9 Plamiing Commission
20
21
Z� .
23
24 Iiis Treinen
25 Senior Secretary
26
�7
28
29 ATTEST:
30
3] YRELIMINARY DECISION - January 12, 2004
32
33 AYES: Coffey, Johnson, Sandblas[, Stayer, Vizzini, Webster
34 NOES: None
35 ABSTAIN: None
36 RECUSE: None
37 ABSENT: Groziuk
38
39 ADOPTION OF FINDINGS AND ORDER - January 26, 2004
40
ai AYES:
�2 NOES:
a3 ABSTAIN:
a4 RECUSE:
as AE3SI�hT:
1'AGL? 3 LU 03-0075-1528
- i��
Z Lake Grove Villa e Center 2024 Vision Statement
� IZ g .
ra� and Desired Characteristics
D
The Lake Grove Village Center vision statement is based on input received from Lake Oswego residents,
business and property owners at several communify workshops held between September 2002 and May
2003 and the citizen advisory committee formed in September 2003. The vision statement embodies fhe
sliared values and aspirations of the community. It is followed by a list of desired characteristics for al!
aspects of the Village Centec Together, the vision statement and desired characteristics will guide future
planning work within Lake Grove Village Center and set the tone for the community's future.
Lake Grove Village Center— A Community Vision for 2024
The Lake Grove Village Center is a welcoming, comfortable community nucleus for the daily
activities of the residents of Lake Oswego's west end (see Figure 1). The village of Lake Grove
quietly celebrates its natural surroundings and rural beginnings. These rural independent roots
are reflected in a diverse mix of tasteful architectural styles that allow old and new development
to blend compatibly. The two major Boones Ferry Road entry points to the Village Center area
are clearly marked by decorative monuments or gateways that embody the distinct character of
Lake Grove. This character has been shaped by a respect for and preservation of the natural
resources of the area, particularly the groves of native trees and restoration of natural water
courses. There is a sense of place where harmony exists between these natural elements and
those elements of development that provide opportunities for commerce, service, civic and
related activities for the people who live and work in and near the Village Center.
There is a lively community of local businesses in the Village Center, surrounded by neighbors
and employees who use these businesses. Decision makers have considered the economic
impact of their decisions on local business, leading to an economically viable business core
where locally owned, independent businesses are encouraged to flourish. Property owners,
business owners and residents have worked together to maintain and enhance the village
character Lake Grove, preserving and highlighting historical features, activities and businesses.
Some residential development has been incorporated into the predominantly small business
core, driven by market demand and government incentives rather than governmental regulation,
providing a range of housing options. Public uses that serve west end residents, business
owners and employees, such as an elementary school, a community center, a library facility and
a village commons, are important elements of the Village Center. Community members have
worked with the City of Lake Oswego and other government agencies to ensure that public uses
serve the community and heighten Lake Grove's sense of identity.
The Village Center is connected to the surrounding neighborhoods, employment areas,
downtown Lake Oswego and other adjacent centers through a variety of safe, convenient and
viable transportation options, including walking, cycling, public transit and auto travel. The
major transportation artery, Boones Ferry Road, has been calmed by various traffic
management tools including: sidewalks, signalized pedestrian crossings, bike lanes, landscaped
dividers and directed turn lanes, allowing ease of access to and from commercial areas and
neighborhoods and safe crossings of Boones Ferry Road. Pedestrians, cyclists and vehicle
traffic all move at a safe, smooth pace in this revamped corridor. Public parking for vehicles,
both on and off street, is provided in conveniently designated areas that allow for ease of
access to retail, restaurant and other neighborhood services without encroaching on the
surrounding residential neighborhoods. Street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, consistent public
signage, landscaped medians with pedestrian refuges, public transit shelters and other
streetscape elements within the Village Center reinforce the neighborly character of the area.
Adjacent residential neighborhoods and public parks and open spaces within close proximity are
directly linked to the Village Center by safe sidewalks, pathways and bike paths to encourage
walking and non-vehicular travel. The transition between the more intensive development along
Boones Ferry Road to the less intensive development at the edges of the Village Center is done
by subtly stepping down the height, scale and intensity of development along the cross streets.
This stepping down of development helps to bring the Village Center and neighborhoods
together rather than creating an abrupt demarcation between the two.
By the year 2024, lhe Lake Grove Village Center has thoughtfully evolved into a pedestrian-
friendly neighborhood community. It has an enterprising and hospitable character that reflects
the people who live and work within and around it. The Lake Grove Village Center is a place
where nature and human activity are well connected and prosperously coexist.
Desired Characteristics of the Lake Grove Village Center
(Applicable Guiding Principles for each characteristic are indicated in [brackets].)
It takes a Community to build a Vil/age
• Create a Lake Grove village style to ensure consistent streetscape elements such as public
signage, lighting, street furniture/benches, symbols, paving materials, landscaping and
street trees. [A,B,D,E] Develop a lighting standard that provides pedestrian scale light;
lighting should not create ambient light, but rather direct light downward. [A,B,D,E]
. Provide opportunities for public art and decorative streetscape elements such as seasonal
decorations, hanging baskets and special event banners. [A,B,E�
. Use unique entry markers at either end of the Village Center on Boones Ferry Road that
reflect Lake Grove's sense of place and invite people into the community. [A,C,E,H]
• Ensure preservation of existing mature trees and tree groves, native species in particular
(e.g. through building design). [A,D]
• Preserve existing tall trees between streets and buiiding fronts and require new street trees
to be as large as possible to achieve a sense of enclosure. [A,B,D]
• Explore the feasibility of restoring Three Sisters and Springbrook Creeks, as redevelopment
allows, to provide focal points for the enjoyment of residents, employees and visitors.
[A,E,H]
. Diverse architectural styles, compatible in scale and design with village goals, add to the
sense of place and are encouraged; the Village Center has developed over time rather than
sprung, full grown, from a drawing board. [A,D] However, single story with flat roof ("slrip
mall") development is discouraged. [D]
• Exterior building materials that are compatible with village character are encouraged (e.g.
brick, wood siding). [A,D]
• Encourage the use of sustainable building and development practices (e.g. recycled or low-
impact building materials, on-site stormwater retention, pervious paving materials, "green
streets"). [G]
• Encourage the orientation of building entrances to pedestrian and transit streets, walkways
and public areas, with parking in the rear or at the side. [A,D�
• Apply design standards that break up building mass at the street through the use of
architectural features and stepping back of building height (for two and three story
buildings). [A,C,D]
• Transition and decrease the intensity and scale of development along the cross streets as it
steps down from Boones Ferry Road to the edges of the Village Center through site
development and use standards, where appropriate (e.g. lot coverage, building setback,
height, allowed uses). [A,C,D]
. Reduce impact on surrounding residential development using landscaping, lighting, noise
and other standards to create buffers between development in the Village Center abutting
adjacent residential neighborhoods. [A,C,D]
• Restrict drive-thrus, adult businesses and "big box" retail from the Village Center. [D,H]
Lake Grove Town Cenler Plan—Draft Vision Sfatement and Desired Charactenstics Page 2
January 22. 2004
Commerce and Economic Vitality fhrough a mix of uses
• Foster a mix of businesses, including retail, services and offices, and encourage residential
development within the Village Center when economically feasible and attractive to property
owners. [A,D]
. Develop strategies to retain and attract locally-owned businesses, diverse shopping
opportunities and unique cultural attractions. [A] Preserve and highlight historical features,
activities and businesses
• Create a central gathering place or commons that builds on Lake Grove's sense of identity
and brings people to the area. [A,E]
• Strengthen connections between the Kruse Way employment area and Village Center retail
and service business (e.g. vehicular, transit, pedestrian and bicycle connections;
coordinated marketing efforts). [A,D,E]
• Provide for adequate parking opportunities in the Village Center. Methods may include:
shared access and/or parking agreements, flexible site development standards, on- and off-
street public parking areas in and adjacent to the Village Center, and rear alley access to
parking areas to reduce access from Boones Ferry. [A,D,E]
• Ensure preservation of on-street parking opportunities for neighbors who live adjacent to the
Village Center. [C]
• Provide a range of housing opportunities through the preservation of the existing number of
high density housing units. The addition of new housing units through redevelopment, when
economically feasible and attractive to property owners, is encouraged. [A,D]
Getting to and around in the Lake Grove Village Center
• Enhance the safety, convenience and attractiveness of walking, using transit and bicycling
within and to and from the Village Center (e.g. continuous sidewalks, signalized crossings of
Boones Ferry and pedestrian refuges/medians, consolidated driveways, removal of utility
poles and under grounding of utilities, attractive transit shelters). [A,B,C,D,E]
• Emphasize pedestrian amenities on cross streets to the neighborhoods to strengthen
connections to the Village Center. Augment the non-grid system of streets with additional
off-street pedestrian and bike pathways to provide safe and convenient connections for all
ages. [A,C,D,E]
• Encourage safe pedestrian connections between businesses and parking areas and
connectivity between businesses on each side of Boones Ferry. Pedestrian arcades,
covered walkways and other design features are encouraged to connect uses in a safe and
convenient manner. (A,B,C,D,E]
• Improve vehicular access between businesses and Boones Ferry Road. [A,D]
• Strive for enhanced public transit service between the Village Center and downtown Lake
Oswego (e.g. bus, shuttle bus, trolley, commuter rail). In partnership with TriMet, design
and construct bus shelters along Boones Ferry Road and Kruse Way. [A,C,E,G,H]
• Provide a range of safe bicycling options, such as on-street bike lanes on Boones Ferry
Road (and major collectors, as appropriate), a neighborhood bike route around the Village
Center and secure bicycle parking. [A,B,C,D,E]
• Encourage the use of sustainable street design and stormwater management practices (e.g.
"green streets", pervious paving materials). [A,EJ
• Integrate and enhance access to and views of parks and open space (e.g. Springbrook
Creek/Pennington Park, Waluga Park). [A,C,E]
. Utilize engineering and urban design strategies to calm traffic on Boones Ferry Road while
improving access to and from businesses in the corridor. [A,B,E]
• Discourage cut-through traffic in the neighborhoods. Ensure that current classifications of
streets are maintained. Actively monitor and manage traffic speed, traffic volume and
neighborhood cut-through traffic to ensure that actual usage of roads matches current
classification. [A,C]
Li�Case FileslPlanning Pmject Files120011P 01-0002 Lake Grove Town CenterV�dvisory CommitteelVision statementlVision statemenl draft 1-22-04.doc
Lake Grove Town Center Plan-Draft Vision Statement and Desired Charactenstics Page 3
January 22, 2004
Legend
Oak Creek O LakeGroveTown Center
ONeighborhood Associa�ion Boundary
O Lake Oswego City Limits
�i
��������� �`
� �� � � ��'� ' Hoily Orchard
�
- �, Mt. Park
<
,�� �=
Westlake
� Springbrook
Park
,ji o
' 9! �
r
/
. . G9�P Q �SY:..,- .
Waluga ° Lake '��`1 �
Grove vwew000 sr
Town
Ce r Lake Grove
L-SKE GROVE AVE.
Q4KR E RD.
P
Lake Forest FIRWOODRD. m(�`N
�
�o
� �MDRONA ST.
JPP�R�.
¢
�
>
Bryant
�'i
F��� ��
�5 _ _ �� Blue Heron Palisades
o� ��y�v'_ � �` ',—
0� � � �
;�°� N Figure 1
I y y . \
� � o soo ,soo Lake Crove Town Center
���`�"� Feet and West End Neighborhoods
VP01�4 SGM,Ciry d LaNeOsvego
_ . . . __
_ _ _
�
� � - o i� � ! S �
Lake Grove Town Center Plan ,��'�"'"°���
, ,
� � . , �
Planning Commission Public Meeting ` ,__,
Monday, January 26, 2004, 6:00 p.m.
' City Hall, 380 A Avenue, Council Chamber
Come and learn about the continuing work on the Lake Grove Town Center Plan. an advisory committee
comprised of citizen representatives from the business community, commercial property owners, neignoorhood
associations, citizens at large, the Transportation Advisory Board and the Planning Commission have been working with
City staff to clarify and refine the vision fcr the Lake Grove Town Center. The advisory committee is responsible for
making recommendations that refine and implement town center concepts developed in the first phase of the project.
At this meeting, the Planning Commission will review and provide feedback on the committee's work.
For more intormation contacf Susan Millhayser,Assistant Planner,af(503J 635-0291 or visR fhe project websrfe af www.ci.osweao.or.usiplan/IgfcAgtc.htm ���
� � � � � � � � 0
City of Lake Oswego FC Postage
I
��""'J-''" I PO Box 369 Pe PAID 24
� � Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Lake Oswego, OR
Susan Millhauser �
Plmming