Agenda Item - 2022-05-17 - Number 6.1 - Presentation - Ordinance 2892, House Bill 2001 (LU22-0007) '' \IY.' ::nik<Iiiii) ,
0,
41) A 11,s ii,N't A '] aie 111.414'41 ' . •
44Ik , :,
II - 'ir-14 1
r . .,- ii . iA, t. .
. ./.. , , ., : ,,,!,-,, - s.:.,: ,:
Vikp, ). / :, ,
,. . , ... ,. , 1
:I I ` r -1111 / Milli WW1 I I t 1 1 f 1
� Proposed Middle Housing
° moo
Code Amendments
RE�o
City Council Public Hearing - LU 22-0007
May 17, 2022
1
' "iv-- •
Overview .Y
1 . Process �� `, 4 ,' \
2. Proposed Code Amendments . . '��r� s
1
, , : . ...a.,: i
a. Definitions IIII ,� , . ` IV
b. Applicability, Uses, Locations, and Density ''„. . ." ,
c. Review Procedures ` ` III
d. Conversions and Additions ' " -
e. Design and Dimensional Standards •`ir-- _ : .1�
• 4
f. Parking and Access AI- . •. ---
g. Overlay Districts �� `` ' '`
I% / �f , }`'` :• _
3. Related Policies Not Within Scope r
a. Expedited Middle Housing Land Divisions N I. / ` .
b. Public Improvement Standards I i!I 1 ir
c. Demolitions and Non-Conforming Structures
.,,v
fr ., /
d. Affordability and Accessibility r
2
Process
Phase 1 : 2020 2021
NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE
Pro gre s s Analyze Neighborhood Conditions
Identify Neighborhood Patterns
Neighborhood Audit Comprehensive Plan
Association Interviews and Development Code
Virtual Community
Engagement Develop Alternative Implementation Options
r00
ti
Planning Commission
Public Input on Final
Phase 1 Report
Phase 2:Code Amendments
CCl approves Phase 2 public involvement plan
Phase 2: 2021 2022
SUMMER FALL WINTER SPRING SUMMER
Progress
Advisory Committee Meetings
Middle Hausiny Code AdvisoryCo ram ittee
Meets and Develops Recamr endatk ns
Community Engagament
rO weighEo�hoad
MSSO SStIOIi
outreach
FIFA
FIFA
Community Forum Si Community Forum V2
Economic Feasibility Analysis and Code Writing
HS 2001 Code Adoption
Draft Code Review Public Hearings Process
We are here 5
Proposed Code Amendments
Definitions z . c -..r . .-
zip"� 7:4\1114f741-
, -
Add `Middle Housing " definition to align with Division 46 I
Separate "Triplexes", "Quadplexes" and other middle ..;1�housing types fromMulti-family in residential zones .. ..-t__ , 1 :
where Division 46 applies ;el''' alieliali
Modify'Duplex" definition to align with Division 46 "'` iiuldilleirAdd definitions for Cottage Clusters "` , ," k4to. - 4c. . !.:o New definitions of`Cottage Cluster';`Cottage Cluster Dwelling';'Common Courtyard';and `Cottage Cluster Footprint"added to `-1 1 y ""
align with state requirements
nn'��
Fi
'''' :::;11
Add definitions for 'Townhouse" and 'Townhouse Project" . - - _ -- a . f
'44111-;* ;' - '
o Use these new terms to replace other,similar terminology in the
...=
code —such as "Attached Townhouse Dwelling"and'Zero Lot-
dl:' 41.4'4i444171.1".t.'-Line Dwelling"
7
Applicability
_ Jt
Allow middle housing types inall residentialitik4,.....4F "�;, '`,
g
zones where it's required "`" L _ems
o Residential Low Density: R-15,R-10,and R-7.5
o Residential Medium Density: R-6,R-5,and R-DD -
o Residential High Density:R-3,R-2,R-0,and R-W ;f" i.
•:,,r/i/� ////'
Update purpose statements to include ?F, ;, , s
middle housing r
J
Remove references to single-family zones . <F;lti i UM //911 'i I�-"`gym
a�
/// .4 . el E`•i ODE L—
aulao
'
8
Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) 50' 50'
Covenants, conditions, and/or restrictions 125' 125'
adopted prior to January 1 , 2020 remain
1 Unit 2 Units
enforceable. -,. 7.Odu/acre �' 13.9du/acre
However, HB 2001 prohibits Homeowners ,r so, So
Associations (HOAs) or other parties from
r i;
adopting new provisions that prohibit middle
housing development on or after January 1, 2020
r i r 125' f • 125'
%,,
4 Units 8 Units
27.9 du/acre 55.8 du/acre
Source:Opticos Design;du=dwelling units
Use Table
Table 3.Analysis of Use Regulations
Dwelling,
Lake Oswego Dwelling,
Housing Type Single Duplex Dwelling,Townhome Multi-Family None
Family
Division 46
Middle Housing N/A Duplex Townhouse Triplex/Quadplex Cottage
Type(s) Cluster
R-15 P N N N [N/A]
R-10 P N N N [N/A]
R-7.5 P N N N [N/A]
0
a R-6 P N N N [N/A]
C
O
N R-5 P P P P [N/A]
a,
Z R-DD P P P P [N/A]
LI
'n R-W P N N N [N/A]
n
a R-3 P P P P [N/A]
R-2 P P P N [N/A]
R-0 P P P P [N/A]
FMU P P P P [N/A]
Complies with Division 46 Does not comply with Partially complies with
Division 46 Division 46
P=Permitted use N=Use not permitted [N/A]=Use/housing type not listed 10
Locations m m o
o❑❑o
r Apo
L-1111- o _o 'on'no' o 0
Duplex construction permitted on `s9 All middle housing types
nonconforming lots , as required by R-6, R-5, R-DD, R-W, and R-3
Division 46
o Other middle housing types must still meet ��o 0
�`-�� ��
underlying siting standards —minimum lot 'ra Duplexes and Triplexes
size,lot width,building setbacks,etc. R-6, R-5, R-DD, R-W, and R-3
Lots for triplexes, quadplexes, and cottage
clusters must be larger than what is s -- �D
required for single -family houses in the A, f �� nm
q�, Duplexes and Triplexes
R-3,R-W,R-DD,R-5, and R-6 Districts R-5, R-DD, R-W, and R-3
o Triplex: 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size
�---__
mm
o Quadplex:7,000 sq. ft. min. lot size ':'.per Anna �Iu n
o Cottage Cluster: 7,000 sq. ft. min. lot size do. _-' Duplexes
R-W and R-3
11
Density
yam=
Middle housing other than townhousesexempted -;
from maximum density provisions ;:� lir.': Ia
r t^ w ;:i
� R
For townhouses,maximum density is 4x the density - 9jJ _
• 1 C I- 1 I 1 Ft,,,
for single-family dwellings in that zone L. ' r=
Minimum density of four (4) units per acre =
established for cottage clusters _ _ . -
Density limitations that apply on a per-dwelling basis 4.
were removed
i it 1 ° f ..
a
r
ai1,I it ,r r F. 0 1
*_ *r 1 .,
1 _
12
Review Procedures
New middle housing development (in residential zones
only) to be classified as a ministerial decision, except: "' •
• 1
• Townhouses require a land division —which is still considered ; ' `:
minor development—but design review of townhome •
buildings will no longer be required in residential zones •
_
• In the R DD Zone alldevelopment—including single-family
and middle housing dwellings —will still be minor development -
• Variances will continue to require minor development review*
*Minor variance standards (and design variance standards in the R-
DD Zone)were modified to apply to single-family residences and
middle housing equally
13
Conversions and Additions
:gyp % -�i - I
Middle housing created through theconversion of a single- -i. 8 °_ .,
family dwelling is exempted from building design standards
-
For additions to a single-family dwelling that result in the ",' �� `' ,, .'µ_.
creation of middle hous ing,building design standards `hall �11.
r.k
apply onlyto the newt added and anyreplaced portion(s) I ir,i ��=_ .��. _MI
pPY Y- P p � )
of the structure "
'
Regulates non-conforming development for middle housing .
IIINF
and single-family dwellings equally -
_ yip ,R
r ;
1 �-•---
. .. ... - r • �"
14
Dimensional Standards (1 of 4)
Existing bulk and massing standards (or �;,,_>''
"dimensional" standards) for single-family fr'" ,``
ray'
housing will be applied to duplexes, triplexes, ,� •'- -'�•.,
quadplexes, and townhouse projects ;y ``•.b
o Minimum setbacks 'f f
o Maximum floor areaIll%
o Maximum lot coverage '
o Maximum height
o Setback planes
Example of how the City's existing dimensional standards would be applied to
the construction of a quadplex
15
Dimensional Standards (2 of 4)
4 4 . . -r .
4 I •.-- •
, - .uximm
.i .lIon 414461414
/448 NI/ 4 =,-----)'.-,. ill ,........... _..._: . .
Er. erw A Whirl." ,-. .i&I,124.
Single Family House Duplex Triplex Quadplex Townhouses
Example of how the City's existing dimensional standards would be applied to the construction of
different middle housing types on the same size parent lot
16
Dimensional Standards -r� -4
r,„ r t
(3 of 4) ''
„A ...
AY , ref •\
f yr' r ~__ 1 t
7 ti rpf+r '} , t
'4 �* a err ,--"��' ,i f i
-
Height exceptions allowed ;`'-.-- - : ' ,.
I
for buildings that provide • .-
,
wider setbacks .r�' 1 I r'
A
A
Different setback standards
apply to steeply-sloped lots
A Setbacks B Max Height / Setback Planes 17
Dimensional Standards
(4 of 4)
GO
4:1) Max Lot Coverage D Max Hoor Area 18
Design Standards
Existing design standards for single-family :r. " -. L Y-- -
housin will also be applied to duplexes, _ • -
g pp p ` r �
triplexes, quadplexes, and townhouses - ,,;-/,i,-1,111 V 1 �p�(
AI
o Side Yard Appearance and Screening,Long Wall _ . `< 'p _ . y� .'
-' 1 ifib •
Planes, Solar Access
.3 tl j� `� !
o On-Site Circulation,Street Connectivity,Transit
o Overlay-specific design standards F" �►x "• ;. -�
o R-6 Zone-specific design standards111
,
a
Proposed amendments go beyond ■■E� ' " ■ _ X.
_ - -:.. -, . •'`
minimum compliance to enhance existing =„- .--
single-family garage appearance fall
; yk� - _ ° ;. i� , ir
Standards to better address the negative ,.� ;. 11.! ,1; s
--._.......A
visual impacts of front-facing garages and ''' �- =' - -
driveways for middle housing
19
Driveway Standards for Duplexes, Triplexes, and Quadplexes
Existing driveway standards for single-family \: • ;
dwellings will be applied to duplexes, triplexes, - "t
and quadplexes / • a• ��
On lots with less than 75 feet of frontage, only - ', l' , ' _ . -
one driveway will be allowed for both single- " `'4 i r j - • -"�'i`
_� _
i; - - ,. -
family and middle housing developments �. 11 4,7. 6
r ~ -
o Intended to maintain consistencywith single- g■ _ - ,'r; - ,F
g jj
family housing - ir-i - �` �a �
1111111'p;. II II -= .-- ii
o Will result in more widely spaced driveways,which
may reduce paving,grading,and tree removal —= `
o Reduces the number of access points to the street ,t_x �',• ° _. -� _ „, -
o Encourages more of the front yard to remain •
unpaved and landscaped -trr.,
v
Fy.--
20
Driveway Standards for Townhouses
Existing standards permit one driveway per lot
for townhouses
Staff proposed modifications to these
standards intended to mitigate potential ..
negative impacts of townhouse development:
o Limit the width of driveways on smaller lots to
reduce excess paving that is not consistent with
neighborhood character ,,10
o Driveways that are wider than their associated
garage opening will now be prohibitedAllIPPr
11 ::M.. p 81111 141 nmiiea 1 ral
466,
21
Modified Garage Design Standards (1 of 3)
Existing garage appearance and location { +` ,
standards will apply to all middle housing g' :4
Staff is proposing several modifications to 11
these standards intended to minimize the . r --- ,
visual prominence of garages: �, ", ` jj
� ` j
o Require garage recessing (at least 2 feet) , .. r _6
behind the main façade or behind a porchlor -'
garages occupying 30% or more of the width
of the façade aiiiiiiiiiminimm
a ‘ .• ;. k
o Allow exceptions to increase the width of the - .,. > sy ,x �; ;'' Jc ` '
garage to 75% only for lots that arenarrower F `= r
than 50 feet nu ..„ ., ..II MAW
'Ma
t+ r • *. " - te:
4
F-74 141 77,1,P .i . + _.
22
Modified Garage Design Standards (2 of 3)
Scale design standards based on the width of the garage relative to the façade :
Width of Garage as Minimum Garage Minimum Number of
Percent of Front Setback Garage Appearance
Facade Standards
Less than 30% None 2
30% to 60% 2 feet 3
60% to 75% 4 feet 4
Proposed: Table 50.06.001-2: Garage Location and Appearance Standards
23
Modified Garage Design Standards (3 of 3) . - �-
—
Garages shall comply with a minimum number of the
following appearance standards: AAA ir` I —. _______
o Provide individual garage doors for each parking stall Y'..: - '""
o Provide separate garage openings offset from one another by at �- ; =1 "�'
r� '• r = R
least two feet horizontally f-•-F, r „ I
o Provide windows on each garage door •
o Provide a decorative trellis ,pergola,or other feature giving the :.-�- ; }° "' ,. . -
perception that the garage opening is recessed ' , ,- ;:' .: ;,. Y.yq, ,
o Provide a covered porch that occupies at least 25%of the '"' w . wr—kg
-- rat_
combined façade of the dwelling and garage IE7
o Provide a patio with a surrounding screening wall at a height of 4 --.-- ' ion `, ,
feet located between the front of the house,the garage,and the '.
public right-of-way L
24
Cottage Cluster Standards
AThe proposal is to adopt the standards of the DLCD - _
Model Code that apply to cottage cluster housing, ,'
which include that: i 1 ■� "I I �` '� �`!y
is,,,....„.,..._,,
...i�E s.._I ai r.++,.
o Acottage cluster will have 5 to 8 cottages oriented around -r— `" "" !'.
a common courtyard ��� .. '�� �
-M
Y
o The footprint of each cottage (the size of the first story)
must be 900 square feet or less
o Cottage clusters are exempt from lot coverage standardstold o
o 10 ft. minimum setback required on all sides, 10 ft. .►, U AP A- Cam■ i v ® ! ",i
minimum separation required between buildings a �/ _, r 'f u f
gruel
o Parking lots must be screened from view from the streetOA: 7iis, • " 3 of -EL.IN-11 • _/_ WY^"
o The common courtyard must be landscaped and have 1 ,° i
walkways '"i -- ,.,..
o PC recommended a limit of one cottage cluster per lot di
25
Cottage Cluster
Ailey
Courtyard Design Standards
Cottage
� �I
��
XI l p1 } A minimum of 50%of cottages must be oriented to the common courtyard.
�% )C7
t r)(
alg Cottages oriented to the common courtyard must be within 10 feet of the courtyard.
6
A Pedestnan Porch
f. Path
l�y J Cottages must be connected to the common courtyard by a pedestrian path. Common tM a
6,p , Courtyard
L LJ 1 Cottages must abut the courtyard on at least two sides of the courtyard.
�� 15'MIN 010
{ 1 The common courtyard must be at least 15 feet wide at it narrowest width. rA il
�/ Property Lin
Sidewalk
[___/. L 1 1
Street Parking
Public Street
26
Cottage Cluster
Alley
Parking Design Standards
CottarE.
( ❑ ) Parking allowed in clusters of up to 5 spaces.
� ) M ) r)
� Clusters separated by minimum 4 feet of landscaping. ! Y7M
' 7
0 No parking or vehicle area within 20 feet from street property line(except alley). i
41.
Landsc ipe
j Buffer Pedestrian r- Porch
C No parking within 10 feet from other property lines(except alley}. /—Pete
Driveways and drive aisles permitted within 10 feet. �� 11/4t>=K: �, carprt
1l1' Common
Courtyard 0
0Screening required between clustered parking areas or parking structures and j
public streets or common courtyards. j
�� I - Driveway
l f 1 Garages and carports must not abut common courtyards. Q
�J 7.
Garage doors for individual garages must not exceed 20 feet in width. n MI
I MIN �:/ Screening GI rage
u — — — — — --j-=PnilQertytine - - - - - - - - - - -
Sidewalk
f I_ I I I J
Street Parking /
Public Street
27
Cottage Cluster Maximum Floor Area Standards
Proposed code amendments apply maximum
floor area requirements to individual cottages
within a cluster: !— , `_ —_- -
o In the R7.5, R6, R-5, R-DD, R3, R-2, R-0, and RrW
Zones,the average floor area of individual cottages ���' IHilo._ �-- 0
within a cottage cluster may not exceed 1,000 sq. ft. ,111-- ��
o In the R 10 and R 15 Zones,the average floor area !I1I ► ��' ioo.
of individual cottages within a cottage cluster may 120
not exceed 1,200 sq. ft.
io
o Intended to replicate the maximum floor area
permitted for single-family dwellings and other Cottage cluster development
middle housing types to the fullest extent possible with an average floor area for
each dwelling of 1,000 sq. ft.
while still maintaining compliance with Division 46
28
Parking Requirements
Per Division 46 requirements, a minimum of _
y•Y l
one (1) parking space per dwelling unit will z _
be required for all middle housing types '� ` r' �
o There is no capon the number of spaces that �- •
i ,-4_, 10
4r tv-. .
maybe provided -,,
I Li) Ir i i nail
o Required parking spaces do not have to be
located within a garage or carport -
o Parking space dimensions currently required for immai.
detached single-family dwellings will also be "
required for middle housing • ,-_
29
- /
Access Lanes and Flag Lots
Access lanes currently allow housing to be built in - -
areas that do not have frontage on a public street as
an exception to street frontage requirements PARCEL
Per Division 46, duplexes must be permitted the
same exceptions to public works requirements as - -
detached single-family residences
Therefore, duplexes must now be permitted on flag
lots served by access lanes in order to comply with - E - -
FE F
Division 46 PARCEFI
Additionally,on-lane parkingspaces located on the
p
access lane must be counted towards minimum
parking requirements to comply with Division 46's -
maximum-minimum parking standard
F +T f' fTk Lff E•+EEi : llEf F•+F�f
ii+n+
30
LAX GAOYE AVENUE
1
#2.* LakeOs ; .
4 b . °k 1
~ ak i Kt
Air friv '�' .Ft IjYr. rN+ ~
Neighborhood Overlay Districts - i`iii'
...
�- i ttalLOiraiirRio of er[a
F. . =KM 1 riy,_,,vi ,_, A.4 j -DIstrict-:471 jApi.tyr.",. ,
Clarify that design standards for detached single- osi.,..I • -1
family dwellings in applicable Overlay Districts will mow °villainy ,Ponirargraiddard," --
now apply to middle housing � -.�' .1
o Impervious surface limitations will remain effective, - jpi .-44410 l't
though cottage clusters will be subject to use-specific . ;
impervious surface standards that onlyapply impervious : '� '+Lake,Gro►+c' :;.;...*14- •
p pp Y p A-. 'd,'-
surface limits to the common courtyard yett-..rr. ;T. -� F
mop
Y ® oierlay dFrcf'=
pp 41mw.e .4r4Ar 4P,.,- $,,7 ii•Modifyotera —
the following standards not to scale by theAMLAP4 Y r
number of dwelling units , as required under
Division 46: _
o Front entry design standards in the Old Town • o pt aka
Neighborhood Design (R-DD) Overlay District Os,�e
o Front porch design standards in the R-6 Zone
Detached single-family dwellings and middle housing to be treated the same for the purposes of ilLP •.
vistivoralley surfacing standards in the R-6 Zoneifittilirlfr 4P —04,44- ' ;
�( 31
S:.1.J�,I 1117 i1i=1n' ! I i :49*: :r+:4 :;::P"!u «- 9112r.
., ��"x"..�=;: * •r4 �. ...� =l..nG� .• -'- � -•i�.�CRY• -•*�w� �
,:1 r ; }I ::It_ A.:r � ::* R is ; J i
Sensitive Lands Overlay District `" J � - ` I =f,*R '' ' i. ` ti=.�,1i { }_
i�. r- 'II[lur i 'I7r,.!l1IlliI?.:.; 1. .rl' ��� +��k
Per Division 46,duplex development will be allowed -' ` ;==_ _-"�_i.��zugp" ;' ��=: � #+;�w
within the Resource Protection (RP) District ii ` ' �' '="
1L- :r Iry ti•tit = .ice♦•4 4�illir'---• :r
o Because the code currently allows detached single-family ` ''' =-'� • '�' I' 'µ"
development within RP Districts,duplex development ;;r: ,:ry - ,. : ,,,,r-.1. .,. ,EVY_,,'"r�
I •, �: '
must also be allowed 1211111-• r�' pp -:s 'ir4 r"rI
�, c�� f Lpl�iltSlu e�\ `y'—,�-mac,: L:- ..�' .'� I*
o Triplexes,quadplexes,townhouses,and cottage clusters '.0.., m-atil-g •tsot,.ct. =!' +.
not already allowed by the zone will continue to not be - ' •I rir , I�■ " r ,�,Ia,•111.1 ' ,� -i.;
permitted within RP Districts !i1:1 ;; ,,ifig 3.- jriy�� I�'"` p " ."1t
ILII '� iS �' .- i'
Sri�"'-,' lire' ,C
"•.yr•.t:,� �, '�'"`-•�4�+:�T�"-'- a_•
Duplexes willbe allowed on sites otherwiser.
; ."1 .4�+ ,, .,1 i' -1_rl
encumbered by an RP District "' ` , '` '``'i`y` "'' '`
. � ` .! ; ,.-, "` ':•' : fir.I'
Density transfer provisions and mitigation planting ,: '` `' �"' .t
•�,.o4 , . I ::r r: ::••y,'='h12 ,•'7 1{I- ter.ri
...,,
,r ;4 _:!" _IIIIA•
standards within the RP District will also be "= ` r ' • � i' _4
unrrrii r�, r 1 7•= �.�,.
,'!i'�,; I 1. ��'.�.� �=::��� xr.
extended to duplexes :#= '"" -' . "' P•." ���"~
'4 ' ram rnP:!a: � {�. I l
H� ;t li'a,•-e�_ `/ilia. I Jr•IPili
5 4224r
.:'rti¢,.i"4.M1r"pil�,,•.1_A;AI" S.I�:. gm E� II � isR.�7)it*ra
• •.��°' ia>s� 4�rr
ii
Drarimok
rn :.IF:
L% ._1111� MI _4 /i�'� 32
9irlr�.,y i •w r "'airyam'}
ur�
Related Policies Not Within Scope
tokr,. ,1'
Expedited Middle HousingLand Divisions ii ``
}
Under Senate Bill 458,the City must allow expedited land f 1 " ' }
divisions for middle housing to enable each dwelling unit to i rr
be owned and sold individually. liki ,, ` t
o `Parent lot"must comply with applicable middle housing land use • ' ;='.. . . i
regulations cannot result in more than one dwellingunitper each ' ~ -` r
g rf' ill 14
resulting lot or parcel :.. t, �, -„tea:
o Structures must comply with all relevant buildin code .. , 6;) e t
requirements (i.e. firewalls) .. — . ' ; r
o Must provide separate utilities for each resulting middle housing 10
+ ' _ '11' ; ."..� • `,
unit/lot;easements required for utilities, common areas,parking, /j . /'i `:- "
driveways V L • +
There will be no reference to Senate Bi11458 or expedited �; . \ 4; ,....q.
land divisions for middle housing within the code itself ..".41, / /,� /
or \\?rp,,
o City will defer to ORS 197.360 - 197.3 80 when processing `I{ {{ i �7 N. '-,,
expedited middle housing land division applications •-k: #/finib. ' %
_ �- .r
Public Improvement Standards
Changing the classification of certain types of housing from minor minor development to ministerial development
impacts requirements that development provide public
Q � _ :• c4f1 fx
improvements to mitigate the impacts of their
it �_ -;_ . t
approved development.
o Currently no opportunity for the City to require mitigations or • m ,.
offsetting public improvements for ministerial development
City is working to develop new clear and objective
public improvement standards for ministerialrites:1' .
applications to mitigate impacts of development Is
o Will differ from the City's current minor development
process,which requires a case-by-case,rough
proportionality analysis
o These standards will be newly-applicable to single-family - .-
dwellings and middle housing
35
Demolitions and Non-Conforming Structures
yaw. - ...k.: ., . r _.; . M-.; •.._.. . .,." - ..
The City Council is reviewingthe 4 :'' • *' :Y. :x �--: F - °. .
definition of demolition in the4 - - . ...!.
`=
Building Code (LOC Chapter 45)to A it m ;.
•better address significant structural E•`.• ''ce*: lizlir g`' .
removal 4'.:-... , I i 4 1. .
Policies related to the continuation .,
`�l 1 w� :x
of non-conformingdevelopment are • •` _ ,• ram'
under review : 4 `-' : _s.,.
a i ,dry is 44tatil.
til A, .
.: �.q: ems-
36
Affordability and Accessibility
One goal of HB 2001 is to create more housing that is _
affordable to families with low or moderate incomes
Middle housing alsohas potential to create housing that is
• _
accessible to people with disabilities and seniors `---------__..
4y
'ram
However, new middle housing is unlikely to be affordable to �j '\Z r " .� ' _ 4
lower income families in Lake Oswego or accessible without -- -
subsidy or assistance. _ I1 1---t-i
Programs and policies to encourage the construction of deed-
------- — .
restricted affordable housing and housing with accessibility i -.er -
features that exceed the ADArequirements will be explored in I -
the City's upcoming work to comply with House Bill 2003:
_ r
o Housing Needs Ana/ysimpdate -2023 — - -
o Housing Production Strateggas required under HB 2003) -2024 37
Questions and Discussion
# 1114 , '1.- ,- ::: ____11r47'
il :..-,•ii , I ,' . '
. 41, 4.. ,, ' , )10.
s. , ..4410 ....e i, . .4..... .. Iii i k k 4 vii. 4- 10,
1!, . . , .., ,, .-,: , ._.,- .... - . , %.:
Next Steps
\ ! ,,, i ri
. „)::"7.
,\ - , i i I) III
• ' - ' " ' .1 i it
' ,. ,d 1 \•fr _j-nk-
• ,•
1,7e/71,,,, .L.;,
r
� .1� -
` 39