Agenda Item - 2022-11-14 - Number 4.1 - Presentation from Staff - LU 22-0041 / AP 22-05 - Planning and Building Services
r-O'n E
�
�. � LU 22-0041
0RFG �� 52043th Stre
City Council, November 14, 2022
Evan Fransted, AICP, Senior Planner
Applicant 's Request
. Development Review Permit to . Design Variance to reduce the rear
construct additions on an existing yard setback from 20 feet to 4.5 feet;
dwelling in the Downtown . Design Variance to increase the
Redevelopment Design District; maximum lot coverage from 35% to
. Minor Variance to reduce the 47%; and
combined total 15 foot side yard . Design Variance to increase the
setback to 12 feet for the proposed maximum long wall plane on a narrow
second story and east additions; lot from 60 feet to 72.21 feet.
. Design Variance to reduce the north
side yard setback to 2.9 feet and south
side yard to 3.7 feet for the proposed
west addition;
Respect. 7xcellerice. Trust. Service,
Appealed Issues
1, The information presented by the applicant was incomplete and insufficient
to meet code as noted in Exhibit G-200;
2) Staff interpretation provided to the Commission on code and First Addition
Neighbors-Forest Hills Neighborhood ( FANFH ) development was insufficient
and that the Commission deliberation was not sufficient to cover the items
raised in Exhibit G-200; and
3) The Commission did not adequately consider, per code mandate, the
information presented during the hearing by the neighbors.
Respect. 7xcellerice. Trust. Service,
- 19- ri ' 16. 6- --ail7.: I 14.--- .1J1- LL.:-.
w 5J/ ,
INV °
C Ave
INIIIIMIL
Site Location �_1 ----.55,71/ -- it•
67./ _,_/ --_____540 ' —58-7--"--1- _. —i:i
5,56, ' _,----„___ i _5_17___A 1
54qj
; 556 -
/ -----
.1 (0 5qo
55 --5 _. .__ i
j '. 6
{-- - 6 f 52o
5
g? _i --I' §9:4 . 5_14
5_04 -------1 ---1 —1 6101 qIZ53 I/ toc
J F- -_ -- -
cp
1[2 i 485 : Ave 510
(j; (0, -47-0 IP r ----r.ri
xoir it,
it ' 0 Azar.] ----, __, 413§
cc,___,. sAFEwAy 1
° E ` ._ Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
r a f
3 f APaao.. wF an-. lj
+ OF fANF OS NEE +
i75F }f as 04.4. O(t' f
16., r �y r
r .h .7—ti , N' r
r +` T.L 3200rG r
r �� ,
,esea Fr x lr"L.".".1: x %�yd 4� L# a.wrtnw A � —— — J
x 142 Grua"a m 1R x J\
r f. r<raz.'arc + q
O Imo'r SPED r W\ s
xras.2r'AC r Lyy .. % A. • »,dorm 8113'#3• W raaas'rr �� fix .
t -a • + gas ,im.o,:r f19.gg' $ r
r + 1
...10.....
i45 {n + x + L 0f f} ry mite t
- 4} al
f J r —— -ra f-—. r 3
"4r T.L. 3300 a.r rer.s ary{ { +
Ili
JR1If: rJu.ra' +? + 1143 LOG a 4 r
+ S7D'JTrf Sr, + i6 0104'OW x +
x WO'6r¢P � Lc?.
Q 7 ir Lu
rf++ J 4 J 1 Y gay ?'I�4.[ i -' b4.1P Ir
rB2,rt£P X r- - /6,4. - I, PRAM l 4G O
i i......1 ., .
. r , y •
r {L 5 - i s
J / iG �i Q 1 1 M` r
r7 {CG + +� � 1 $ f r �g5. d�9 Mr—— r x Ir
+ • if.' # + xr ?'rAf1 rin�Jo YFh'F£ Wit: J
r EL .,
•J! 0fr ��-«_rf. Y.3f'ag,rt
14)
II
p 4 1 N.
r{ 4 1.; id�x r
3 0xoaau'aa T,L, 3402 rl ,
i efr4. 4.. 1
I
Existing Conditions Survey
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service,
- ... _ •POW 171 F17 I
. 7I 7 1
1
r __I a �
� N
•_„,___.
___. ____
EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: SOUTH 2
SCALE: 114
Existing Elevation Plans - South
Respect. 7xcellerice. Trust. Service,
I I
I
j
I
I
#DEL,
IJ I R�1JA 14'I a ELS
E
A MO'
I 1 1 -
,3'bbd 5'llhLYL
L I 1
EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: WEST 4 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: EAST ' 2
SCALE 1/4" SCALE 1/4"
Existing Elevation Plans - East & West
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service,
e IAADSCIAlA MOONED-1.y1S SF
47TT
•
• *.tWI
•
l,.hD3C.Art...N.Al
� 1114
�} �� �'Ll� l. I,scs srr; a a�n ..n f
' a_ _ • • r_ ••ma • I. • • •. ra•• • I+a SI TREE• ��� sa��r�aa ����aaa��. r �
� . s - - - - --, .
r.r:_'._I_•I'I'Is I_ ' PR6n5EDB OCK
'T#'05ED COVETED 4 CH' !%rY4Y ,F. • JU'WJ: .VI_
•
• SI Y:,:,"1'cl4r II NVkrLe4 .
J l�_ - _ _ - ,, • rhOrOdEil COVfJrtG
•
1—:—r—^—„I--'i W'IIR IAG4IY NLYY SC.• AL'JIM1SY 6` _ _ 'f• er *�*F •_ _ _ VIP; �.
SINGLE F},M LY rESiC;Af L lM..{rJYYII.R41]LH:l F 'L• , • '`f. T I."
7#iF 0.7E}TPIIWT 56d c[;r7laur.l ,L+ • �• � V7
1.
w in
•
.,'-0` 1
':Vt:IS r,.LYAr4r.k'h -ro+36ECea'E4Lu 1 - ''I af. , sT". {
DEIGHY.VIANC.E I' h.' .d;cc ce,ry.,Ina- hlM
oi :OR Am,
FTi4r45ED 14Ni YAM? S}SF R77rr9•+r •
I L .• a, EICdTLN-APWLT j
EA rgeNNY TOM
41 KM
T:• -J .;_a . 4 • _i �F 'r _ kRP .*Kaa aFJ0. l', • . . .
• •_ • • • � ":iL r'L`
L : •.` F.'J. +, •r •a, �i• rbd �9.4�:•�:�:it+.'i1. �J. . . tiLt :i. . , . L : N'r - c-I
§' � • —
! '
Site Plan
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service,
— ...
ivdr r.r ii.414- IOW" IW.T rrs irr
?'• I— 1 X -... .
7 'I
1-1.--i—— - - .
, . , 16../F IT-61.1.7 941.172.
I i 711.11
t61/2.... 1 7-2 If?
A
g '
i •k.--.- ------
E
a .
•
i... -.1
ATTACIAFT)GAPAGF ( PATIO F. ' . Li,.
RECODOM RECIIDOM 4 -,,J 1 .,., j
' L
7.-i 1.7. ri 1.2..Li I 6
•,. IT- „ 7-6'
•
-
E
-.r / I% .
I .. '] L
.1 IUTCHEN I LIVING •I I
1 —
:-. . , !.. Sr. . M----‘
1— ,Tr' 7 _L=TWINI D
1: 1 . •
72W66
k• ADNE .
-.]mr.
.\ 1 iv? .iya.a..
II^ ! '........
-
_:..t ..
n L.COVERED
ENTRY
/ •
, •
( ----7 _ 011 HAu. ; popck.
,,..1
.— •
No— — . =... r I I— 1171 1
MNMG MIRY
MUCROOM
L.'
'f—
._
E.. r \ BATHROOM n FAMILY PATIO 0
— -----— ---- -
_
1-4.• •
,-_..
I I r .r-It r__== .p__
..w., 17...7 IEZ
6,7' ef-11+2.
i'
SE-413P.CK Lit-0'
I 1v-4.1l
ENSEMEIN NEW V.44-1-
FLOOR PLAN: MAIN LEVEL
tik—E 1---0 Main
tirs,
o ... .
Level Floor Plan
c
›,..
F" ...'
C.3
OREG0N4
.r1a�
142- 18-1G iR r
YB1�
f rr
—� F— . Tl
NY
I 0
MAS1£R "TENCLUSE� ..
9kTW R¢.7M
4
FLOW,
•. - -_ i. 7?YQd' A u I LL it
7,25Lih y iRM4d E zaXa,d-
6' MASTE R
18-12 y - 8EORQoM
p1,
u w 91
.,
—J
E. _ J •I . .
FLOOR PLAN- UPPER LEVEL
7.7.xirisk—E___oiste,
Upper Level Floor Plan
0 -
c..
10 cs3 G99
1
,.. y _ _ _ 29 FT MAY 6AAEHEiGHT 1
d]AI
-75r..'OCS 4P'EL.7
. 0 ,,,
.
12 FR9NT YA7f1 SETBACK
— ' — POE rMpSE MAC KBANE 4¢ RA.,
— • 1 — . . a — .Qo.21rF�7 21 E,
-0 Ti.
- 1 4,c r -.
OTv1 �r4i'rikr
_ or n. . _
_ .
1
L 0 1
43G$F G---i $p i, iL _L
�r aslcalnxesaw_L�11
'.4.%
.„.„ .
PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS: SOUTH 1
SCALE; 1/4
Proposed South BuildingElevation
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service,
I
i
— - - . — . — 20 FT MAX BASE HEIGHT— . — . — -—. - - - — - — • -
SLOE TARO SETBACK PLANEI. —
. r____. - .� � . -. J�
-1- 7 7 _
I I I $ N On FRONTI
j - •+ fin EAST
- 11 _
_ ,
dil ' \1>
_
r arsr I $?�i.K
325 5F
•
i r 12S SF 1
$4%10114:94W Pr7
Proposed North Buildin Elevation
g
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service,
I[ v .
"..s. .+tea= ..yF i.p, +f..� .y'
•' I - -.
-
Artistic Renderings - Front
Respect. 7xceller,ce. Trust. Service,
,z,osli, iiwis. thi.....„ ._ . --_--;-_---IIT-..----_--_-_-_- .
V'g*.14Ill1111111141111111111khk...
II
Artistic Renderings - Rear
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service,
Minor Variance Criteria
i. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or safety;
ii. The granting of the variance will not be materially injurious to properties or improvements within
300 ft. of the property;
iii. The granting of the variance will have little or no negative impact on the streetscape (e.g.,
pedestrian environment or other aspects of the public realm that contribute to the neighborhood
character); and
iv. The proposed development will not adversely affect existing physical and natural systems such as
traffic, drainage, Oswego Lake, hillsides, designated Sensitive Lands, historic resources, or parks, and
the potential for abutting properties to use solar energy devices any more than would occur if the
development were located as specified by the requirements of the zone.
Respect. 7xcellerice. Trust. Service,
Gip -----
-----------„J
58ö7 — _.5-9-§ -7 ITV-----------5- C Ave
10 N p
558 ' 569
I 590 4° -V
567 580 587
556 � _54Q ") 555 ar556 -� _ 56 �
f 553, 554 c�530 ir
5"35 � -,,, ,,Al. 542 � 547
529 � 540 ____,
5 � 6 / 5iT 520 � --�
504
� — `' iliji �0 529 53i 5�
504 5 / 5
)1111
--______, 2 t-c)
B Ave Lo ,T- -If' / LI i i
----- ii ii----------___ ------ .10
-------.- f 1 MA
Respect. excellence. Trust. Service.
CALCULATIONS
FLOOR AREA
PER TABLE 5004_001-1 i-12:1 MAX FLOORAREA-3,660X 1.2-4,3925F MAX FLOOR AREA
Code Compliant Buildable Area Ex15r 1,930 NEW CHANGE
MAIN FLOOR 164 SF 51555E 351 SF
UPPER FLOOR 1645E 5155E 3515E
IUTALYkDFCKED FLOOR BSA SF 1,945 SF 1,061 SF
PER COVERAGE
PER TABLE 5004_001.12-35%(SINGLE FAMILY DETACH X3,6605F-1,2815E MAX LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING HOUSE 720 SF
ADDITION NEW FOOTPRINT 710 SF
COVERED OUTDOOR AREA 210 SF
ATTACHED GARAGE 29 SF.
TOTAL PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 1,669 SF/3,640 SF-(47%1-PROPOSED DESIGN VARIANCE
'PORTION OF ATTACHED GARAGE(200 SFl EI(EMPF FROM LOT COVERAGE PER LOC 50.04.001.3.D.ii.I.A.(1).
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LANDSCAPING EEO
PER TABLE SO 05 004.8 b.I)))-I596(RESIDENTIAL)X 3,660 SF-599 SF LANDSCAPED AREA.
LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS FOLLOWS:
(1) WHEN NECESSARY ROUTE SOIL ARRANGEMENTSAND SOIL MULCHES TO PRESERVE MOISTURE
CONTENT.
(2) IRRIGATION SHALL AVOID SYSTEMS WHICH THROW WATER INTO THE AIR ESPECIALLY WRING HIGH
WIND OR HIGN TEMPERATURE PERIODS.WATERING SHOULD OCCUR BETWEEN 6PM AND 9AM.
(3) PLANT DURING SEASONS WHEN PLANTS Vigil RE LESS STRESSED AND REWIRES LESS INJTIAL
WATERING.
(4) PLAT TREES•04RE ROOT'WHEN POSSAOLE.
(5) WHEN PO551RLE,PLANT TURF BY 5EES(NOT 50D),TO PROMOTE DEEP ROOT DEVELOPMENT wHICH
WILL MAKE THE TURF MORE DROUGHT TOLERANT
LANDSCAPING PROVIDED-1,505 5F
LOT5
EL 3209
V
Z_
LAN
PE AREA:
TOG A z SI 1,55SD52660 SF-41%
o ¢zW 09-' I 1.I
10 h J
O
i L+ + ——— a.2 rii2 a— +t. +28712: eQir-'m .-:le _ +h4.-,„ , ':"—. v_--.�
'a�'•(s ��___�_�__ - •T' � + _ y.cy «;'• STREET TREE:
* r 7 •'�i • } ` • .•.-1. PAPERBA.V MAPLE
/// j// j// •PATIO tl
/ // // M x<3D•AFG hs � CERGRISEpA
o N 55 ISS- L^yj jFR/jO�j�y%�j/G�f �/j/ 1 / // • / //�\ \�\ \\� \\ \\ \��\\ \. \ . PROPOSED BRICK €N.
aa ��//j//. FI�'S��N��j�,'b(`R( / //� /� e1 // `�®��%®®�j®�`����`�% �®®`j% %�� � _—__________________________.Gm�_, ENTRY PATHWAY: \
/ /'_ �/ � /� �4���®j���������`®j��`,��`®�� //% _ .:_____________________________._____ RUNNING PATTERN \
� /%j/j/j/jj //j �� ` V�®®jjP� ��.A®j ♦®� ���®®jj40-, 4 /�/ + + + + . . + «•• « +•+ . . PROPOSED COVERED
// + , jjP♦.` ��., /// ./ .',' + •,• ENTRY PORCH £ w
s,« • //ii/ji///i//i/ II, � ` ` ®j.- // _/ .•.'.•.•+'+' 110 SF FOOTPRINT W
B N. N•. � j �i;��. ,�,��► ��� � ' o,oA : : :
J +•I. !E 7,.5.O•.P III/�YOe •��� ^C , ��� � / / / F. •F•++•+ .../«+ + . .«+ + « + V1
't''''---------,--".%
Q j ® �♦ `SIP: ,. ��� ♦.®, / A=
�.+,_„, ® ®��ijj�♦����♦j`jj�p`j�`��1�®�� :f': :`:+a+:.•«•+•.•W. + . :,�W w w W f,
as c e a.� j `��♦l� / IANOSCAPE SUFFER
LANTINGS,
DESIGN VARIANCE ••p.• I.
1`FC « . ,� rjj�1P® ' � - RAILING
PROPOSED REAR YARD •
+'••I• Al. ; � sr" / O
SETBACK +•I,1 %% %.6, %% %% ®\ 4 / + « + +•« + EXISTING ASPHALT
/ � DRNEWAY TO BE
.'. I 1 PATIO s^a� r 1 ys--FOt'Q'FI°ITI.�PD.SEJBACK..
1 N . X<30•AFG. ? ••+• • ' _t. • +i✓++++• +(2(/FF, .
a r,n� - .3a•-3: '1d'ai:' „1e:': 's8•.7'.' as .Ss3v3•.'• -- - - - -
+ Z' CI 11995' '
\ 104 / \
LZ�O¢C
E�Z Y Wx-x0 �� gI
/ A
G9U I,W1Jl VNriN1 /
N�
MWpjgN Z
LOT 7
TI +ant I
Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.
Design Variance Criteria
a. The applicant demonstrates that:
i. Compliance with the applicable standard is not practicable due to the physical characteristics of
the site or existing structure; or
ii. An alternative design will better accomplish the purposes, goals, or objectives of the base
district and any adopted plan or overlay district applicable to the property.
b. The applicant demonstrates that the proposed variance will:
i. Result in a project that is exceptional in the quality of detailing, appearance and materials; or
ii. Create a positive unique relationship to other nearby structures, views or open space; or
iii. If in the DRD (within R-2 only), the variance is necessary to create a complementary relationship
with a viable existing structure on an abutting lot that is not designed in the Lake Oswego style.
Respect. 7xcellerice. Trust. Service,
Staff Recommendation
Uphold the Development Review Commission's decision to
approve LU 22-0041.
It3
` M
FAi C7
OREG Ott
END