Agenda Packet - 1986-11-03 '
1
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 351 FIRST STREET
Nsvembor 3, 1986
\ r, 7:30 P.M.
YMM►„M,,,,N�,y„{,,,,,{,Y kM Y1,MAH,MMIFN.FMMMOkYMNMNI,MNIIYYM%#M MMYMkYMMMYrMNkkkAMN11%YMM»MkY Mi.IH,MMI,k..1,M„My y*NNia KY 4MNMkMMM
ITEM MEETING FORMAT
•:I dFNieM*****MkkkYMm**** *****************#*******-******MMNkMMkNMR4U************kOYMNNk***.*4**************** • \,
1. CALL TO ORDER I. Staff Report
II. ROLL CALL 2. Correspondence
p 3. Applicant's Presentation
Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. Public Testimony from others in t•
July 10, 1986 support of application
September 15, 1986 5. Public testimony from those in
October 6, 1986 opposition of the application
6. Comments or questions from
IV. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Interested persons who neither are
proponents nor opponents
7. Rebuttal ',estimony from applicant `
V, PUBLIC HEARINGS A. A request by DR. Gholam Maleki 8. Closing of public hearing
.1s " (prop. owner) & OTAK, Inc. (agents
9. Board discussion/action s,.
,s.7, for owner) for approval of 12 duplex The time limits established In the
fi,p+ lot planned development) &, for ap- ,
proval of a variance to the Transit Development Code will be applied to
` ;'"• '-' 1 Std. requiring a hard surfacedpedestrian the applicant's presentation and all
� •
ti•,;• near those giving testimony. (See reverse
path plto be passengerconstru exchangeted to the facilityyt side of sheet for specific time limits. . `
�!2 multiple
(VAR 52-86-09)) d, variances to the t,
Site Circulation-Private St. Std. re- Questions from the ORB may be asked of
quiring a maximum cross slope of 5%on
those testifying before the Board or •,
of any other Individual, whenever the
• . any driveable area (VAR 53-86-09)) d, Board deems it necessary.
a variance decreasing the cul-de-sac
turning radius from 50' to 40' (VAR
50-86-09). The applicant Is also re-
questing to modify the original Mt. Park
PUD. The site Is located N. of Jefferson
Parkway, E. of PCC & W. of Cervantes Rd.
�, . , 1 (81k. 58, Mult. Co. TM 4224),
VI, GENERAL PLANNING
, , - Orientation Program - Discussion at Meeting
r ` VII. OTHER BUSINESS - Findings, Conclusions and Order
- SD 34-79 (Mod.-86) (John Condon)
- SO 28-76 (Mod.-86) (Carlson Gaston Homes)
' - VAR 34-86-07 (Robert Bailey Design Group)
- DR 17-86-07 (OTAK, Inc.)
DR 18-86-08 (Lake Grove Christian Church)
- PD 8-86-07 (Tri-Lee Homes/R.A. Lawrence & Assoc.) 1,' ,I
,n
VIII, ADJOURNMENT
;, The Lake Oswego Development Review Board welcomes your interest In these agenda Hems. Feel free to come
and go as you please.
Board Members: Richard Eslitk, Chairman Staff: Karen Scott, Assistant City Manager
Robert Blackmero planning and Development
Kenneth Zlnsll Renee Dowlin, Associate,P(anner
Curtis finch Michael Wheeler, Associate Planner
Vern Martindale, Vice Chairman Marian Andersen, Secretary
Anthony Wright 2450
E. Daniel Ingrlm
r1 .
•, r • . , RP, 4 M- `1. . 'A a d • s i' W ' gy' ' F' '
•Lr + ♦ yM .h! ,.`: .♦ I 1 , 1 , . a - n � ",: m f ` I I so �t \ „'
• . . f ,• , � 1 ,ai ,, 0 l♦ s `V14Y atl .,, 4N
S
....i2',.,:H . : :.., ,:‘,..• .:. ,
. . A , .. .,..
. ...
. , .
. , • .
• .. .
. •.... .
r— CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
. . , ..r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
FILE N0. PD 10-86-09
APPLICANT P Gholam men VAR 50-86-09 '
pararI
t nvestmentt Co.0 VAR 52-86-09 ",r•,
VAR 53-86-09
OWNER DR, Gholam Maleki DATE October 21, 1986
westerly � ��
LOCATION N. W. corner of Jefferson Parkway and the wes j
leg of Cervantes Road 4224
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Block 58, Mt. Park, Multnomah County Tax Map
NEIGHBORHOOD Mt. Park �. , .
;f REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of the following:
1. A 12 duplex lot planned development (PD 10-86-09);
'. ... fn: ..:,,,
a hard
2. A facedcpedestrianrpathtbetandard requiring
�. sur
adjacent multiple passenger exchange facility or to
paths which lead to the nearest loading/unloading + '.'
facility (VAR 52-86-09)1
3. A variance to the Site Circulation - Private Street
Standard requiring a 50' radius (100' diameter) for
cul-de-sacs. The applicant is proposing
cul-de-sac be 80' in diameter (VAR 50-86-09);
4. A variance to the Site Circulation
- Private Street
Standard requiring a maximum cross-slope of 5% on
any driveable area. The applicant :.s proposing an
r 8% cross-slope for the bulb portion of the proposed
o
r cul-de-sac, 53-86-09).
CRITERIA
ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE:
LOC 48.470`' 0 48.490 Planned Development overlay
• Authority to Approve Changes
LOC 49.125 in Development Permits � '
prior Approvals and
LOC 48.075 Conditions of Approval
LOC 49.30Y - 49,330 Major Development Procedures y . , �
Quasi-Judicial EVidentiary
LC�C 49.610 Hearing Procedures .'
Criteria for Approval !
•
: LOC 49.620 conditional Approvals ,r
LOC 49.620 2°a 5 k
,
� . I -. ' • . A
� r ,t AnA •,` 1(,+ an (+h.r�' : ., 4. : r �'. . '-. .,,
. . � : A 4 ,p .a • /' , , .� -' / .. . y
' " 14'.er r 6
,6
, 1f + w ` k' b -
STAFF REPORT/PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/
VAR 52-86-09/VAR 53-86-09
October 21, 1986 ;
Page 2
Mt. Park PUD (Phase V-B) - Ordinance 1446 (includes reference
to DR 3.75 Zone Requiremets) !
tom'' ,
APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Street Lights Utilities
Transit Hillside Protection/Erosion
Parking Control
Park and Open Spare Landscaping, Straet Trfes,
Drainage for Major Screening, Buffering •
Development Access a
, Site Circulation - Bikeways/
Walkways
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN .�' • A
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS
r~
Per LOC 49.315, the applicant has submitted a complete application. J
PREVIOUS ACTION
' on December 17, 1979, the Design Review Board approved a 35-lot
condominium project on the site subject to five conditions.
On August 4 and August 18, 1986, the Development Review Board d':nied
' a proposed 22-lot planned development on this site. See Exhibit 2
for explanation of why proposal was denied.
.
BOARD ACTION '
The Development Review Board is charged with the review of this major ,
development application in a Quasi-Judicial Hearing. The application
` and review is governed by LOC 49.300 - 49.oc33C; LOC Cr49.12525r(ChanChngesOsin
Development Permits); and the hearing p
49,610 - 49.620. The Board's decision is final unless appealed to
the City Council; however, LOC 49.125 allows minor modificat=ons to '
be reviewed and approved administratively.
•
Ordinance 1466 references Exhibit 'B' which is a map
ant that
t shouesthows heg
land use for this site as multi-family. The atol duplex. The Mt. r �'
to modify this PUD approval from multi-family p
Park Homeowner's Association'has reviewed this
proposal
mandfhavtion
• voted to support it (Exhibit i3'). Staff supports
to the original PUD.
0 . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (LOC 48.470)
Use of the planned development overlay is allowed in any zone. It is
classified as a major development and may be reviewed by the
Development Review Board if the project contains only one phase. The
Board must apply the following requirements of the underlying R-0 y4
"4 a ,y
zone: 2
,. ry Lr
A ram . '`. ::i ti; : Y r Ii1-1•ti .. r'.� °, ..'►1 :±' r-ytY P r4.1.,*., r� :'r 4♦ yu.:..w`'r 4„r'' : \., " ::} $0 (� a ,I,
+i.*,� t + • y " l k, Ar `j l «l y r 1.•r. L . t':
1 �' r, i 1 1 s A'+r r'
/ ` r' i r ,,, P 1 A I, , S 1 1 S -{#'1 > s ; e! is .yam • y, n ,e ', S , .
„ , 1- f /1 ', ,, i t >(A,. {,o�' 7 •1. ,,s,;F `,�lT,.,�� 1,., �t: L�,1rv4,:v l4't 17-4,, . �9)4' a,"r r r• ''' �r/2nd ,~�Fi _ '' `.
`d�' , ' r SI.y �4 , 1 4 V}�„ vui NCB-+.' S ;,?r,
' ,,, x ry r
+ s Y l 1'r
A,V
/i" t, y,;IF„.Y F,�r rvr tyl`' "rrr '�",f
''‘+� Y. 1t_
i7Y v t}
�' ;-K V4 % -14i1.k structure Height may
.;� A � t ! average 40' with no } �rf
'' � 3Fµ �yY,'r+ rf individual structure
1 4"ott4 /S`7 I a
I r Fly,1.'.:1� ,Yr„a,,fr.. exceeding 50'
• �" t<,�'t ; trot to exceed 1.2
'07 ,.,,,4,%., r°I 4.� }'t 1 r�,, • 6 t 1 (building a i
• 1 -2�b t, s,,. , ,"J:-1 ,, yv,..L, 0�'TiSs, required parking) ,rr t
.. x �-N4r.rt`'vi t 1 C 1/4", w'S did .4 J� ia,r J •Xi:, Any type of dwelling r / • 1
;1;00,�� ,,,rr,¢4, a+' 3 5 units t� 1
e 1r , gkn d � , n tY1,,,
~' {•fi'A " • 0 entare project, not individual ;, 4
�51 a
��' t a rry underlying zone may be
rpl, O. §�' 4 S if'.
p F of: 14 -• Alge,�4 k�,a r4., 1
4 cJ approval of 35 townhouses for ,» .,
wr:
1 f , the townhouse development are
1 � tt.,,,
��4 x; r If y,r eft alone the west property line, ,,, ,.; .
" f{� is t,kt lli,,,y{y�G ,'31.r44,i's` t s. .l,!rty lines and 15' along i_, N, i;
~' Xh 1 �tl{l�Vr
S '. ' 1 ISIS ta.:
1 frr 13l 4,, 4 /4
\ y t q?rK Y I �.�1.
"�'` vol,1 +�'.� �n 0 mpreensive Plan and is currently ;. i
? 4 i ��?yr, k-° iv 5; 7
` ". 1 1p- 01 downward from northeast to ,—
r`"A'�'`� r an vegetated consisting of alder
�w�t.
xen fern and native grasses. Ifs ^ 1.
4 ; ' rce3 adjacent to the north and
A'','+' ,, ) Cervantes Road in the southwest
t\
i NO R`w7'` .i-luctrates that some areas of the ..
ti',
� �� itit � rk ° it • /r th, northeast, southwest and
q �> ` �1`xeia 0 (north-central portion,
, y+,A.� _> + ral and southWest portions,
"e►S;r ' a ''� 4SR1y et; (c nd in the material submitted by •
May
d:T1 r ,:� „141 t_ntoibit 4)
+ 4)41, �Vt',tyC' } C_aUbit 6)
`. \ 4�`r�(� 1 rl � rryy.
gyp . �R� n r i
y P ,�� �1��'�i�t n� :i an 8" sewer line located in
,� ; .. .,.3'ner of Lot 6, • •
Vxt_�G U r
4 �,i„- 4ey e, L,, 2453
.d • r M � 4
, '
•
r -
•
/ STAFF REPORT/PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/
VAR 52-86-09/VAR 53-86-09
October 21, 1986
, Page 9 9
N
Cervantes is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as a local street
•
and is built to City Standards. Jefferson Parkway is designated in
., y the Comprehensive Plan as a collector street and is built to City '
Standards. a
1 PROPOSAL 0."' •
" , The applicant is proposing a 12 duplex-lot planned development with
lots ranging from 9100 sq. ft. to 15,500 sq. ft. (Exhibit 10) .
The proposed setbacks vary and are not all identified on the plat '
(Exhibit 10). The proposed front yard setback for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 yy.u,,
and 12 are 20' ; although, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 10 and 11 appear to have
15' front yard setbacks. The proposed rear yard setback is 10' in
general for the other lots. The proposed side yard setback is 7' in tti
general with 10' utility and slope easements on several lots. The .
required setback for this Underlying zone is 10' on all sides.
' ANALYSIS OF CODE REQUIREMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
' The 'Uilding Design Standard does not apply to major development
, involving the duplex units as proposed. The site does not contain Y
any significant Historic Resources, Distinctive Natural Areas, Stream
Corridors, Wetlands or Weak Foundation Soils.
Street Lights (5,005) - Street lights are to be provided
in conformance with the street light standard. While •
Exhibit 12 notes the proposed location of the street
lights, final street light location and accompanying
photometrics Will be required to be submitted to City
Engineer prior to approval of the construction plans.
Transit (6.005) - A variance has been requested to the '
requirement that a hard surface pedestrian path be
provided to the nearest adjacent multiple - passenger
exchange facility. The applicant has provided reasons i
for Why this variance should be granted and can be found
in Exhibit 1. Staff z`ecommends approval of this
variance. r
Parking and Loading, 07.005) - The applicant is proposing •�.
ia 12 two bedroom Unitsnd 12 three bedrooms. TWo
offstreet parking sbacesn are required for each o',.wo
bedroom while two and lone half parking spaces are
required for each three bedroom. Exhibit 15 is the
applicant's statement showing compliance With the
requirements, because this is not a single family
project, the garages may be Used to meet the parking
requirements.
Park and Open Spade (8,005) - This standard is met as
the Mt. Park PUD open space requirement 'Was fulfilled
` when the POD was approved years ago. 2 4 5 4 .
0
I
STAFF REPORT/PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/
VAR 52-86-09/VAR i3-86-09
October 21, 1986
a'4page 5
Landscaping, Street Trees, Screening, Buffering (9.005)
- A street tree plan has not been submitted. Staff
recommends the applicant submit a Street Tree Plan
` illustrating the size, type and location of the street
trees.
Fences (10.005) - No fences are proposed as part of this
project.
Drainage Standard for Major Development (11.005) - A 15"
storm line exists in Jefferson Parkway.
The applicant has not shown the size of the proposed
storm drainage improvements, except for the required
detention chamber. Further, the plans do not show the
• loation of the catch basin in the cul-de-sac. Staff is
concerned about possible overflow from the catch basin
if it should ever plug. Staff will require the
applicant's engineer to address these concerns prior to i
approval of construction plans.
Exhibit 12 illustrates detention facilities and the
storm system. Approval of the project will not mean
approval of the exact location of the facilities or
' storm system. Minor modifications will be required
prior to final approval of the construction plans.
Utility Standard (14.005) - The proposal Will be served
with an 8" waterline in Jefferson Parkway. An 8"
sanitary sewer is located in Jefferson Parkway near the
southwest cornet of Lot 6. Both lines are of sufficient
size and depth to serve the development.
Hillside Protection (16.005) - The applicant, although
indicating that the cut and fill slopes will be
hydroseeded and that haybales will be placed to protect
all existing and newly constructed inlets (Exhibit 1),
has not provided a complete Erosion Control Plan.
The applicant mu'stsubmit an Erosion Control Plan
illustrating compliance With this Standard prior to
approval of the fimall plat: Additionall'+, Exhibit 1
, states Lots 1 throihh 6 will drain to curb outlets in
Jefferson Parkway °and Lets 7 through 10 Will drain to
curb outlets in Malek 'CoUrt. Based on the preliminary
gracing plan, Exhibit 11, staff questions whether Lot 7
can drain to Malek court, Staff recommends that
positive roof and foundation drainage be provided to
each lot prior to approval of the construction plans and
that all utility services to Lots 1 through 6 be carried
to the top of the bank along Jefferson Parkway.
245
STAFF REPORT/PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/
VAR 52-86-09/VAR 53-86-09
October 21, 1986
Page 6
Access (18.005) - All of the proposed duplex lots have
the required 25' of street frontage. Access to all of
the lots having frontage on Jefferson Parkway except Lot
1, Will be from Malek Court. Lot 1 will take access
from Cervantes Road. Although noted on the preliminary
plat, staff recommends access from lots onto Jefferson
• Parkway be prohibited and that it be so noted on the
. final plat. .
. Malek Court is proposed to be a 28' public street with
vertical curb and gutter ending in an 80' diameter
cul-de-sac. The applicant has requested a variance to
• the required 100' diameter cul-de-sac (50' radius).
Exhibit 1 includes the variance request and states why
variance is needed. Staff supports this request for a
80' cul-de-sac. The Fire Department has stated they can
maneuver their equipment and do not need the 50'
• radius. A variance request has also been submitted to
allow an 8% cross-slope for the cul-de-sac. Staff
supports this request as an 8% cross-slope will not
adversely affect the motorist and requiring 5% cross
slope would cause more extensive cutting and filling on
the site.
The premliminary plat illustrates Malek Court flared out
at its intersection with Cervantes. This is necessary
•
to meet the 150' sight distance requirement for a
motorist turning from Cervantes into Malek Court.
Additionally, the preliminary plat notes the vision
triangle or sight distance easement on Lot 10 and staff
recommends this easement appear on the final plat.
Site Circulation-WalkWays/Bikeways (20.005) - A 5' wide
concrete sidewalk is proposed along the north side of
Malek court and Would continue on the northern boundary
of Lot 6 and connect to the existing pathway west of the
. side. Due to the potential cutting and filling,
curbline sidewalks are recommended by staff. Where
practical, propertly' line sidewalks are preferred. The
sidewalks shall meander around all obstacles (i.e.,
•
street lights, hydrants, mailboxes, etc.J:
Staff recommends the proposed sidewalk along north side
of Lot 6 be buffered from the driveway by a minimum of
3' of landscaping. This landscaped buffer Would
prohibit cars from backing onto the sidewalk, Staff
recommends this buffet be a condition of approval and
that it be placed within an easement and so noted on the
final plat,
CONE'ORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
As indicated in the Applicant's NarratiVe (Exhibit 1), the City's 245 6
Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged by LCDC. The proposed
STAFF REPORT/PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/
VAR 52-86-09/VAR 53-86-09
October 21, 1986
1Page 7
development is in compliance with or can be made to comply with all
the implementing ordinances and standards adopted by the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff rec
ommends approval of PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/VAR 52-86-09
and VAR 53-86-09 and modification to the original PUD subject to the
following conditions:
1. A reproducible of the final plat shall be submitted
to the City which clearly depicts:
. a) the location of the sidewalk;
b) the utility easement; and,
c) the sidewalks
2. The applicant shall submit a Street Tree Plan
. illustrating the size, type and location of the
trees for staff review and approval prior to
approval of the final plat.
3. That the final construction plans be to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4. The applicant shall submit an Erosion Control Plan
illustrating compliance with the Hillside
Protection/Erosion Control Standard to the
satisfaction of staff prior to approval of the final
plat.
5. That positive roof and foundation drains be provided
to all lots and be shown on the construction plans
prior to approval and that all services be extended
to the top of the bank along Jefferson Parkway.
6. That access be prohibited to Jefferson Parkway and
it be noted on the final plat prior to recording.
7. That the sidewalk along Lot 6 be separated
dtfrofrom
athe
driveway by a 3' landscaped strip. This
shall be designated on the plat as an easement.
8. That the applicant provide a utilities plan along
with final construction plans showing future
sidewalks and their location relative to mailboxes,
street lights, hydrants► etc.
y. 'toathe the
existingnpathway sidewalk
constructed the
alongcul-de-sac
with
1 ,, the streets.
.
2457
•
•
STAFF REPORT/PD 10-86-09/VAR 50-86-09/
VAR 52-86-09/VAR 53-86-09
October 21, 1986
Page 8 r
a
10. The applicant remove the pathway shown within Lot 12
and reconstruct it within the common area to the
north. This is to be constructed along with the
streets.
11. That the final street lighting plans and
photometrics be submitted to the City Engineer prior
to approval of the construction plans.
EXHIBITS
1. Applicant's Narrative
2. Findings for PD 7-86-06
3. Additional Narrative -• September 30, 1986
4. Subsurface Survey by Irvin Cooper
5. Memorandum from Wayne Halverson - October 16, 1986
6. Preliminary Boundary, Tree and Topographic Map
7. Site Analysis
8. Slope Analysis Map
9. Preliminary Site Plan
10. Preliminary Plat
11. Preliminary Grading Plan
12. Preliminary Utility Plan
13. Mt. Park Homeowner's Letter - September 30, 1986
14. Ordinance 1466
15. Letter from Don Hanson Regarding Parking - Oct. 22, 1986
1 •
4 08 5P/RLD/ma 2 4 J S
41
•
....r. A -say
eakt
p .-. w
•
LAKE I b-swErn✓•
•
•
Nt EC)
1 •
PART
yb6
iiiV'.~5TME 1
WAREGKS
• C' LA OK4►G
0011
.7r Al .�„IR r uh.vluuii V/p4V-in 0
I EXHIBIT.
� YW WY.YS
"1141::''''.�.�.1;. gyp y.,.,.77 i.m1
s s•c VntS :p1
2,159
•
1,
• _ I
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Lili Park
12 Duplex Lots
Planned Development
APPLICANTS: Dr. Gholam Maleki
Part Investment Corporation
409 S.W. llth Avenue, Room 113
Portland, Oregon
(503) 635-9801
' r REPRESENTED BY: OTAK, Incorporated
17355 S.W. Boones Ferry Road
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034
• (503) 536-3618
Project Engineer: Greg Kurahashi
Project Architect: Ralph Tehran
Project Landscape Architect: Don Hanson
REQUEST FOR: Development Review Approval for a Planned
Development with 12 Duplex Lots
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Block 58, Mountain Park, S.E. 1/4, Section
31, T.1S. R.1E., W.M., City of Lake Oswego,
Multnomah County, Oregon.
Containing 152,896 square feet, more or
less.
2460
.
• .x s., il..i • {i- I s: •.... WDci": nl.f
Ila •
IlltI711.11111
1 i i ili+ 'ii7i:
—• —
.3.. � i4 _i i ISeiire�si.54' ~ ,nH
n•" ol—r. bu •1
mot. ' t {( •�`• vyy 5
• V �•' J� rY Ifni,. - - ,21
_ .>. ✓V /1 r,�• \. '�4, 1 , 1 ti 1 1
w � /\!1 p — 1`` ..i.•Y'• .,..n 'f' '•c +...r+ i S' \
`r.,1 w w• •• •. •
• ♦f
I . , 41.1 L. �. ,,,t. ,, ,46 rr.1 i/ .J••7. • °•I„1 a..tl•• tit
loenu eou..rc t rr Colin t x 'z.r .M 6•'
ro 1 ••
in,lYLY1Mt 1 FX w ,r
t rid •Itnl t( "k,1 i• p.r •• ._-._..
,............„...„, 1 6.. : . ....,...-T-4-:2,6 . ..........1/4-4 • • 40 ., 4 C. '4- - —•"-..,. ',.4.4. 0,.\ 4.0.1,,*
• ... """ ---f----- ,, V...7.....f\---:irinf;'
I,•H .•+q 44J_ .
.... Lil
L'1
t hid u 1"„ i ;e �iiLi r- , ? _ W , •C I HT K `�
11,1, {. ,� , t r� •11" 'I n1;,4 •
r•• 1 y, "_r„)
- _ . •
r 1
IHII 4HH— i H\•�• -1
,•ct.11" . 1 , •I p'FJ >s,
' -.... \�• t�l" •••i ..Yam`I 1 v I •
I Y V
/ r,'''tterl ✓' I
et
4.
VICINITY .AAF
SURROUJpING ZONING AND LAND USE
The site is bordered on the west by the City limits and the
efts Sylvania campus of Portland Community College and a portion of
Tract 59 of Mountain Park. A trail system (common property,
Tract V) exist adjacent to the west and north property lines.
The site is bordered on the northeast by Cervantes Road and on
the South by Jefferson Parkway. Property to the north and east
is zoned R-0. Property to the south is zoned R-8 and R-5.
SITE DESCRIPTION•
The site, which is 3.51 acres in size, slopes from northeast to
southeast. Vegetation consisting of alder seedlings, black-
berry, snowberry, bracken fern and native grasses occupies the
majority of the site. There are groupings of douglas fir trees
adjacent to the north, south property lines as well as along
Cervantes Road in the southwest corner of the property. A
topographical tree location survey and site analysis map are
enclosed containing more detailed information.
a91LS
Soils are acceptable for the proposed level of development.
EXISTING UTILITIES
Sanitary Sewer. - There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line
located in Jefferson Parkway adjacent to the southwest corner of
the property line. This line will serve the proposed 22
dwelling units.
Water - An existing 8-inch water main in Jefferson Parkway will
serve the entire project.
,Storm Drainage - The entire site will slope from northeast to
southwest. The proposed on-site storm drainage system Will all
connect to an existing, 15-inch storm line in Jefferson Parkway.
Storm water detention will be accomplished by an oversized pipe
located on-site.
Refer to the attached preliminary utility plan for additional
information.
JJ OSION CONTROL AND L ,:ESCAPING.
Adequate measures in accordant..- with city requirements Will be
taken to minimize erosion on-site and onto adjacent properties
and right-of-Ways. Cut and fill slopes Will be hydroseeded and
hfbbales Will be placed to protect all existing and newly con-
e • structed inlets. Although We intend to save as many trees as
possible through design and construction, street trees will be
planted adjacent to Cervantes Road and the proposed on-site
right-of-way in accordance with City standards.
rn
LIGHTING
Street lighting along Cervantes and the proposed on-site
right-of-way will be provided to City standards.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE ,
Development Review Approval - October 20, 1986
Construction Permit - Spring, 1987
— Begin Construction - Spring, 1987
Expected Completion - Spring, 1987
4 VARIANCE REOUEST
Transit - The City requires that, when feasible, a proposed
planned development provides pedestrian circulation to the
nearest transit stop. The closest transit stop to Lili Par,
the Tri-Met Route No. 79 which ,stops at Jefferson Parkway and'
Kerr Parkway .6 miles from the site. The cost of constructing
a sidewalk along Jefferson Parkway would place an enormous
• hardship on the project and make it nonfeasible to develop.
The greenway appearance of Jefferson Parkway would be disrupted
. by a right-of-way sidewalk. The (1972) Mountain Park master
plan included a pedestrian circulation system which was
approved as part of the overall planned development. Construc-
ting a sidewalk along Jefferson Parkway would not be in confor-
• mance with the ad9pted plan. Therefore we are requesting that
this requirement not be enforced on the Lili Park planned
development.
Cul-de-sac Width - The City currently requires cul-de-sacs in
planned developments have a paved width of 100 feet curb to
curb. We are requesting a reduction to 80 feet paved width
from curb to curb. City staff is considering revising the
100-foot requirement to 80-foot width for planned developments.
Constructing a 100-foot wide cul-de-sac would require extensive
grading and disruption to the existing site and impact access
to Lots 5 through 8, making the driveways steep. Constructing
the cul-de-sac at 80-foot width, with a 5 percent cross-pitch
will minimize disruption to the site, save more existing trees
and provide more gradual driveways while maintaining adequate
turning radius for fire protection and other vehicles.
COMPLIANCE: ZONING CODE
The project as designed complies with applicable building
height, coverage, setbacks and parking requirements of the zone.
COMPLIANCE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
With the LCDC approval of the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan and
confirmation of the land use designations that have net the test
of the State Goals and Guidelines, it appears that the project 2461
is in complete agreement With its approved designution.
1
•
COMPLIANCE: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2.020 Building Design. - Not applicable, this is a duplex
project.
5.005 Street Lighting. - Lights are installed on the opposite
side of both Cervantes Road and Jefferson Parkway. Adequate
lighting will be installed along Cervantes Road and the
proposed on-site right-of-way.
6.006 Transit - The existing pathway along the north and west
property lines as well as the proposed sidewalk along one side
of the on-site right-of-way provide excellent pedest. i..v% circU-
lation to Jefferson Parkway and the nearest Tri, Met bogie stop. •
109..5 Parking—and_ Loading. - The parking requircr,ents by City
code mandate two spaces be provided by eac.k -^^.wing unit when
— the houses are constructed.
8.005 Park and Open Space - A five-foot concrete s.dewalk
within a 10-foot easement will connect the proposed on-site
cul-de-sac and sidewalk with the existing pathway along the
west property line. This complies with the established
pedestrian circulation system within Mountain Park.
g_nn La dscaping. Screening and Buffering - Street trees will
be planted at the building permit stage for each single-family
home. In conformance with the City street tree plan. Existing
•
trees will be retained as much as possible.
11.005 Drainage Standard - Drainage will be conducted to
existing utilities in Jefferson Parkway with on-site detention
to meet City requirements.
14.005 Utility Standard - Required utilities are available
adjacent to the site as a result of surrounding development.
15,005 Residential Density - Density for this site conforms
With current zoning and the overall Mountain Park P.U.D. •
concept.
19.005 Site Circulation Standards - The proposed on-site
eight-of-way and cul-de-sac conform to current road standards.
20.005 Site Circulation/Bike Paths and Walkways - A five-foot
wide concrete sidewalk will be constructed along one side of
the proposed on-site right-of-way and extend over to the
existing pathway along the West property line.
. •
LCDC GOALS
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement - The requirements for citizen
involvement is met through the Design Review public hearing and
the City of Lake Oswego Citizen Involvement process.
Goal 2 Land Use Planning. - Adoption by the City of the Compre-
hensive Plan, the Development Code and the new Zoning
Ordinances satisfy the Land Use Planning Goal.
goal 3 Agricultural Lam - Not applicable.
Goal 4 Forest Lands - Not applicable.
Goal 5 Open space. Scenic and Historical Areas—and_tiatural
Resources - There are no distinctive or historical areas on the
site.
goal 6 Air. Water and Land Resources Ouality - There is no
appreciable impact.
Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards - No
known natural disaster areas or hazard areas exist.
Goal 8 Recreat�ioaal - Recreational facilities are
available within the Mountain Park community.
Goal 9 Economy of the State - The development of this parcel
shall have a positive impact on the local economy and the State
economy. As the national economic recovery is in progress and
the State unemployment rate is still high, any economic acti-
vity, especially those that create jobs and increase revenues,
are welcome and should be encouraged.
Goal 10 Housing - This project presents another variety in
housing types in the Lake Oswego area.
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services - Sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and water are available to the site.
Goal 12 Tran6portatioa, - The parcel is readily accessible to
-• highway. As the area continues to urbanize, mass transportation
will become more readily accessible as it becomes economical to
serve the larger ridership. Pedestrian and bikepaths are
included within the development.
Goal 13 Energy Conservation - Greater efficiency and energy
conservation shall be realized as the Kruse Way Corridor is
urbanized. Travel trips shall become shorter, mass transit
available and land more efficiently utilized.
Goal 14 Urbanization - Property is within the City of Lake
Oswego and the Urban Growth Boundary.
2465
k,,,. +. `' ;,* •• .."N,, d Md ", ,,,, i,t1.tir /0,,,it,';•; ` p il i'', i ti ru a r ( ��V�i�tr1 4.y i„
WR"t ram,,
•
W 1 S 'I
BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD lO•' '. a 'r' t';
ti
hr 2 OF THE iA 'h t.
3 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO r} 5tr' ray b, y
A0 , o k
V Sa Ya F ! Crt,,`;. 4 a 4a r, l��ry
5 A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A ) PD 7-86-06VAR 29-'0,,••(t 4aMl,+04, -e' ' . r r' d-,,;
6 22-LOT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ) VAR 37-86-07/VAR 39-46 t ;. "' {�;.''�s�^8a5Y;� rti '
7 A VARIANCE TO THE 25' ) (DR Maleki/OTAK, Inc.) `,'' M' r`�r,
8 STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT, ) ,N,I,'tigk . '��.` ,
r1,0
9 A VARIANCE TO THE MAXIMUM ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, 6 U:''L t axr�'::r + r4;
r •
,111 d �,t1N
10 CROSS SLOPE REQUIREMENT, AND) �,
u0 are h' 1� ;rr,
11 A VARIANCE TO THE 50' RADIUS) j "` " `�°
12 FOR A CUL-DE-SAC )
13 t4 a
14 NATURE OF APPLICATION
15 The applicant is requesting approval of a 22-lot planned devw. M.-.
i 7
16 and a modification to the Mt. Park PUD. In addition, the o�&at '`tY.' - 'rM k 4,•
rA. ov "
17 is requesting approval of a variance to the 25' street front�v r4 ` r' +
Pte
18 requirement for four lots (VAR 29-86-07) and a variance try tLe r
19 Circulation-Private Street Standard requiring a maximum eror,o . L� .
o 20 of 5% on any drivable area (VAR 37-86-07) , The applicant ID P
yr
21 proposing an 8% cross-slope for the bulb portion of the i+ p 1,1 ` •,
22 cul-de-sac, The applicant is also requesting a variance to rip"
23 Circulation-Private Street Standard Which requires a 50' rada,;r, P
24 a cul-de-sac (VAR 38-86-07). (Block 58, Mt. Park, Multnora (. ,°
25 TaX Map 4224, )
26
^
PAGE 1 PD 07-86-07/VAR 29-86-07/VAR 37-86-07/VAR 38-86-0/-39
LMM:kh/996z r ill Fliltar €;
26
a ,.
J ,a. f � t'7
Liar Y ., 1 1, 1 N, gip 4
x"U;,;1i,,{'�uj,c}s1a�,��t 11 ,• OW I;<mrd held public hearings and considered /^�y
tr + ili, �:iNn , , C"�a r Oetings of August 4 and August 18, 1986.
'
m!:MµRi0
„,ra'�, V:t Ordinance:
1 +u
r� i'+c M'a s
4i•ttil i s .i11 et, 4,e Planned Development Overlay ,
�j'+ �,r«4 )Mr r.. it fit ��
3
I,�A #^�,;,'�,4�1`x"'U�, ',?A(use? , �''k, ,f., Authority to Approve Changes in
• i it '• irk ` '1' t r .0k
° ', .4.0 V, V y. Development Permits
- .dam 1,.'45�,+ �'$ ''
en ',4 iexi, E, 4.' 'iJ� Major Development Procedures
�4h.. (s` Quasi-Judicial Evidentiary Hearing
.. ' y1;r Procedures
r \i? t t° ,.[+1'`!w V.ua1 i.riteria for Approval
i ri'+`tom '411T�+' f '
',,L'40,4 >'if, 0 V--B) Ordinance 1446 (Includes Reference to
r K) c.y Il + "'''lIle,.': '"
01 p a"^O
, '�; r' n;rt}iIY.1 e4, a
i^ .thilStkkffil 14 ; :Eak Standards:
, .- 14`' �.;x`+ r;,:r ,tiR • 4.;.,,...-
Drainage for Major Development
• �' ,�'I b''rl,f r` 3
ic gi 4,q, Utilities
,y rat, ,R Rx� u�Kr E . Hillside Protection/Erosion Control
r r•w. 4j '} '�;�: IsP.It' s ..1 C.y Access
til "�� '1; ,,,t1 4"i i4 .. ..N r. Site ClrcUlation-PriVate Streets/
4 4 h
Y° ? .,6:,
iYv . , Driveways
2 4h 4 cf` "t,a e,Ilr
r
s:,,i'1iki t;ir 'i f Pc,.' x
,1- q * *; t•i,: r
�, i � •ii fx R ..
i
'± , {' ,wa r ?-U3 07/VAR 37-86-07/VAR 38-86-07-390 F, ,
w! "�'Ji
R4 ,' ,P,Z 24G'7
,
1 Comprehensive Plan
2
3 CONCLUSION
4 The Development Review concludes that PA 7-86-06 cannot be
5 made to conply with all applicable criteria, therefore the variances
6 are moot,
7 FINDINGS AN:o REASONS
8 The Develokacet Review /-4,4rd relies on the folioWing as support for
9 its decision.
10 1. The ,1,-gird four, / ' Oat the proposal is tor the maximum
11 potential density resulting in the creation of several flag
12 lots, lot size . under 5,00U square feet, and the need tor
13 numerous variance . Therefore, the proposal does not
14 efficiently anti a. t:thetically create a development as an
.15 intuurated whole.
16
17 2. The Board foune that the design of the project did not leave
18 adequate room for the maneuvering of cars on the flag lots
19 and adequate parting along the proposed public street,
20
21 3. The Board found . at the use of land for a Planned
22 Development is intended to develop open spaces and
23 clustering of spices and not to maximize the number of lots
24 to be developed ad this project does. Thereforeo this
25
26
4
==PAGE 3 PD 07-86-07/VAR 29-E86-07/VAR 37-86-07/VAR 38-86-07-390
LMM:kh/996z
2468
•
1 project does not facilitate a desirable, aesthetic and
2 efficient use of open space, nor does it create public or
3 private common open spaces.
4
• 5 ORDER
6 IT IS ORDERED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD of the City of Lake
7 Oswego that PD 7-86-06 is DENIED.
8 p1-10
9 DATED this 6,41 day of oG
,1 b-94, 1986.
10 e
11 R;,;4,„_.0 fry./� /,A
12 Richard Eslick, Chairman
13 Development Review Board
14
16 Lori Mastrantonio, Secretary
17
18 ATTEST: Vote at the August 18, 1986 meeting,
19 AYES: Eslick, Martindale, Zinsli, Blackmore
20 NOES: None
21 ABSTAIN: None
22 ABSENT: Wright, Finch
23 ATTEST: Written Findings - October 6, 1986
24 AYES: Eslick, Zinsli, Martindale, Blackmore
NOES: None
25 ABSTAIN: Finch, Wright
• 26 ABSENT: None
PAGE 4 PD 07-86-07/VAR 29-86-07/VAR 37-86-U7/VAR 38-86-07-390
LMM:kh/9962
246
•
OtakA,yeds PC
1,,-!Wm•Crn[;•a.._, • wild -)•Uro Vr Co , l
September 30, 1986
Ms. Renee Dowlin ,:,,u
City of Lake Oswego
P.O. Box 369 •
Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Project: Lill Park Plan., r ,rvr=ll r.r
Dear Renee:
/.� "`'" In response to your requ, t t t t i + 't is it =tt of items in our
original proposal, we he ` ' d* .'lgs and resubmitted
for your review. The fr? ". -:,ino i.rrt was also requested:
UTILITIES — Roof DraiDag!.. Lot.u;;.J. t 11iS .11_5
Roof water will be condur. •d to !,.!, : .itlr., in Jefferson
Parkway.* Lots 7 throUgh Ro .i wi' be conducted to curb
outlets in Malek Court. Ito 1 : .of Water will be
conducted to a proposed storm li.i,° • t ,t1 in an easement between
•
Lots 8 and 9.
To accommodate severe st• rm watt' ft conditions we are
proposing an overflow dr . page twten Lots 5 and 6, behind
the proposed cul de sag r _.tch ba
GRADING:
Regarding R.O.W. grading _.:3jacer, 't` roon Pkwy: we do
eido
not propose any reg rad in,, of th, F. uanitary a
and other utilities will i..e inst . , i:ar.kfilled and compacted.
Repairing these areas wil . be tl . it of grading. To maintain
substantial existing tr.at , we , ri:rgi minimal disturbance
of the bank along Jeffbr. n.
PLANNING ISSUES:
This project has been t.4t! nbive,_ r.c by-the Mt. Park
Architectural review bo,a:.11 and • . 11. the Mt. Park board of _'
directors. A letter sui,+marizint. .'4`tborhoods position is
attached. A Class II VatianCe I 1 fn attached addressing
t the transit access issue.
PD(o_•b-o9
ra
�UAR-so-tio!t
EXHIBIT
Lake 0§wey00Pore , r. _.,�,.����,_, „yy :UALA�''
Vtlncuuva C+6ze .• 2470
t( 0 .A
Ms. Renee Dowlin Page 2
September 30. 1986 --
Existing trees to be removed and retained have been marked on the
grading plan. Site coverage is in conformance with the R.O. Zone
• and Mountain Park P.U.D. restrictions.
Summary of Site Coverage:
Proposed Structures 43,200 sq. ft.
Roadway and Public Sidewalk 15,230 sq. ft.
Total Site Area 152,896 sq. ft.
Total Site Coverage 58,430 'q. ft. (38%)
BOILS REPORT:
We agree that a soils report for the ciLe would be valuable
information prior to final roadway design and the foundation
•
design of the proposed citructures. We question the need for this
report prior to development review board approval. We propose
that the soils report be provided following D.R.B. approval as
part of the final subdivision design process when the information
can be related to specific detailed design and engineering . I
Sincerely,
Don Hanson
Landscape Architect
DH:tef
Attachments
•
. 2471
IRVIN A. `;.is
octf ber >0 7
OFFIct 227.4123
Rt01.TU!to1 WILLAM(TTC BUILDING
OREOON ►ORTLAND,ORLOON u7aol
WASHINGTON Rt..249.3473
C OTAK, Inc.
17355 S.W. Boones Ferry hi.
Lake 0sw 0R 97034
}C c. ' : Park Subdivision
" It. Park
.� flock 58
ferson Parkway
) Cervantes
Oswego
OCj' •1 -nomah County
3 1986 SURVEY
Subject: Subsurface sur," ,r to id- z: strata, in the area
of the central l roadway: MALEK COURT, •
off Cervantes.
The development is a rouq;,'y tr.i . . 1 t, comprising approx-
imately 3.5 acres, situat&d at i f-ion of Jefferson
Parkway (575± feet) and Cervant t; `- - O. Surface terrain
is a gently rising slope In a '3W r I,r.tion of 85i feet
(Elevation 560-645 feet), in 52. _, nce. (Except a "knoll"
area of earth spoil deposition, r from roadway construction.)
The property has been subdivided . tf,i s twelve PLOTS. Lots
1 through 10 are provided .".cest.. il ' °-positioned MALEK
COURT (325± feet length), +:.ff Co' its cUl-de-sac terminus.
An initial site inspection o_K.tobe. , : led the property
limits, ground slope, and tattural ;, growth. The latter
entailed numerous trees: F'1`1 (to "'' . 4 o s..aple and Ash, with
dense vines and brush coot °tdence Was noted of Jvnc=
surface drainage channel( ;x appm mroff is naturally . J EXHIBIT
dissipated over the area. Ai o,
Investigation of subsurface strat. , JURT Was scheduled,
with reservation of backh: t.' excat + Her 7. Six OPEN PITS
Were staggered at 80 to 100 feet ', 1 the 325 Loot future
roadway length. Depths ut „enetr, + -;i from 7 to 10.5 feet
(progressively N to S) at 't'!=st Pit' d one through six.
Page 'J. 4ry
.rftucrtmAL ••au.lc't 4 (!gUNl1A+1�N.UIL
1Nsp6'OTIONs'.. - sv:�.. 2NIINYfi.9Y1r1A:lU;YS
•
SUMMARY
Surface unit of CLAYEY-SILT comprises organics to 131 - 2 feet
depth, underlain by tan-brown SILTY-CLAY, existing in a dense,
firm state. This is fine-grained soil possessing moderately
brittle characteristic (readily rated at 2500 Lbs./Sq. Ft. for
structure load bearing).
Gray, vesicular BASALT rock was encountered in Test Pits 3, 4 &
S, all at 8.5 feet. Test Pits 2 & 6 (10 & 10.5 ft.) exhibited
SI-CL full depth. Moisture content was low at all test locations:
moderately damp.
Construction of the access roadway, based upon the subsurface
test data, will find excellent strata to provide a stable pave-
ment, with necessary base rock, etc. The survey revealed no
indication of Unstable soil, as evidenced by straight alignment
•
of the large trees, known to possess shallow root fan.
4`
PROJECT development must necessarily include provision for inter-
ception of surface water runoff at each BUILDING SITE.
JiAqx
IAC:cc q . Cooper
c.c.: 2 Consulting Engineer
Soils-Foundation
Page 2 of 2
247.
A •
0
•
�'9 Itil Naoallo boa,rsa a,m PI 410
7: -I;i.1 urm.s.a arrry 1 C T G
h i II _... ii 1� 5i�va nn ll t e7
• •
i ti t t
` i F.
y II
U
.s FI1.i.S /® ,
p y -i ; �a.,.( t
Y :� Ya
z Fa77 233r 1 BIB �•g � t' 1,}313 r2
�y
1 5 .D ...F.ee:e.e:i:Y.a at , a r
. : ` .
1 I
y'1,,qy� ,l/(1 i , • -
fi.Y ;• )1, li). r /
,-a/J /4141541° t �
___...\ 7,,,
i " ri 4 0 'pe � A i itsr; — I
1► ti; • li 1 /1. •-7.11vi.), osA . . z .
. .1 . L.. ii., .fit .
1) \\,..„,‘„, c.)
At".
......, ftto to. ../i 1 ///r. /..,..\,1/4.• . ., „„ . 0
,,,
.„),„„‘-v .J
4 /• y
. u!
.ayo // J., ii , N J✓;, W
Is 1 \\*---'- I-
3t 'S .J
4 O
i
N
2:.i74
•
•
k •.i'
./
October 16, 1986
1 TMORANDUM =f
TO: Renee Dowlin, Associate Planner
FROM: Wayne Halverson, Engineering Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: Engineering Comments for Lili Park
Hillside Protection/Erosion Control
• The 12 lot proposed subdivision is located at the northwest corner
of Jefferson Parkway and the westerly leg of Cervantes in Mountain
Park, The site predominantly drains southwest. The applicant has
not discussed hillside protection and erosion control measures
extensively. It should be required that the normal erosion protection
measures be taken during the construction of the project. The app-
licant's engineer stated in his letter of September 30, 1986 that
lots 1 through 6 will all drain to curb outlets in Jefferson Parkway
and lots 7 through 10 to Malek Court. Based on the applicant's pre-
, liminary grading plan, staff questions whether lot 7 will drain to
Malek Court as stated, Also as a condition of approval, it should
be required that positive roof and foundation drainage be provided
to each lot prior to approval of the construction plans and chat
all utility services to lots 1 through 6 be carried to the top of
the bank along Jefferson Parkway.
Access/Site Circulation
The applicant has proposed that all accesses to lots having frontage
on Jefferson Parkway be from Italek Court except for lot 1, which shall
have access via Cervantes, A condition of approval should be that
access from lots onto Jefferson Parkway be prohibited and that it be
so noted on the plat, Malek Court is proposed to be a 28 foot street
with verticle curb and gutter ending in an 80 foot diameter cul-de-sac.
A variance request has been submitted for 8 cross-slope for the
cul-de-sac only. Staff has no problems with the request, since an 8%
• cross-slope will not cause undue problems for the motorist and keen-
ing a 5% cross-slope would cause more extensive cutting and filling,
which is unnecessary, The plans for sheet 5 received on September
30th show Malek to be flared-out at the intersection with Cervantes.
This is due to the applicant needing to meet 150 foot sight distance
requirements for a motorist turning from Cervantes into Malek Court,
Also, staff can support a request for the CO foot cul-de-sac, since
the Fire Department has supported an 80 foot cul-de-sac in an in-house
memo. The applicant, however, must request a variance to the standard
Which requires a 50 foot radius (100 foot diameter) ,
io-s -oq
l Eleai I T•
:K 7. .0
2475
October 16, 1986
Engineering Comments for Lili Park
Page 2
The applicant shows a 5 foot sidewalk extending along the northerly
side of lot 6. Staff will require that a minimum buffer landscaped
area of 3 feet be between edges of driveways and the proposed side-
walk. This is a safety related conditionso cars using driveways
• will not back onto the sidewalk or use it as part of the driveway.
It is recommended that this be a condition of approval and that it
Y,. possibly be set aside as a easement.
7 M
Transit
The applicant is proposing a curb line sidewalk along the north side
of Malek Court from Cervantes to lot 6 and then down the northerly
property line of lot 6 to an. existing pathway along the west boundary
of the development. Even though the comprehensive plan requires
sidewalks to be property line, staff can support a curb line proposal
since a property line walk would again cause more extensive cutting
back into slopes. All curb line sidewalks, however, will be required
to meander around all obstacles (i.e. street lights, hydrants, mail
boxes, etc.) . A composite utility plan will be required to be in-
cluded with the construction plans prior to approval showing the pro-
posed sidewalk location in relationship to all proposed objects.
Street Lights
Street lights will be required to conform to the street light standar
Final street light locations and accompanying photometrics will be
required to be submitted to the City's Traffic Engineer prior to
approval of the plans.
Utilities
The oic'osed development will be served from an 8 inch waterline in
Jei E,.t ion Parkway,
An 8 LRth sanitary sewer is located in Jefferson Parkway by the south-
, west corner of lot 6, This line is of sufficient size and depth to
serve the development,
The applicant has not shown the size of the proposed storm drainage .
improvements, except for the required detention chamber, Also) the
plans do not show where the catchbasin is to be placed at the bottom
of the cul-de-sac, Staff has concerns regarding overflows of the
catchbasin at the bottom of a street, should the catchbasin ever plug,
It will be required of the engineer that he satisfy the concerns of
the staff regarding potential overflow of curbs, Plans should address
this concern prior to approval of construction plans,
2 7
October 16, 1986
Engineering Comments for Lili Park +
• Page 3
ems
The applicant has shown detention facilities on the site along with ..
a associated storm system. Staff is not approving the storm system
layout as shown on the plans and will require that minor modifications
be made prior to final approval of the construction plans.
•
Recommend approval with the following conditions:
That the final construction plans be to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer and that the plans include hillside
4 protection and erosion control measures.
' That positive roof and foundation drains be provided to
to all lots and shown on the construction plans prior to
approval and that all services be extended to the top of
the bank along Jefferson Parkway.
That access be prohibited to Jefferson Parkway and it be
noted on the final plat prior to recording.
I . That the variance request for the 8% cross slope be grP .tPd
only for the cul-de-sac.
om
byaa landscapedlk stripng oflat 6 be minimum ofr3ted to 4rfeeti. ariveway
That the applicant provide a utilities plan along with final _
construction plans showing future sidewalks and their
location relative to mailboxes, street lights, hydrants, etc.
That the section of 5 foot sidewalk from the cul-de-sac to
the pathway along the westerly boundary to be constructed
•long with the streets and that the developer remove, move
end reconstruct the pathway shown within lot 12 to the
•
common area to the north: This work should also be con-
structed along with the streets.
That final street lighting plans and photometrics be sub-
"itted to the Traffic Engineer prior to the final approval
o.: the construction plans:
That the final construction plans meet all codes, standards
and specifications prior to approval.
Mini fl
I
1
2,17'7
It f 66EFf ..o....a..� r I
1.003110'wow.°men \
¢ Y i � mlw.cnm.a aMr'N • C T
! '�� ,� 4UVd nil V
I T-,
plf 11\ •.— I
il �'. 0 11 : •Q'V •
F€ M i 1 J o a 11;
3 t
Z
t
u s �S.ii, o
10 i-3 6 ii Il�y l = Q VW •
f at it a a
et tt f
t i ! lia�i19 6iEli�ii I , : m m
3f h
;III� ...i.l E76.0a11�90,=A 4 ti 3 �-
.
.4 71 7 .,.....____.....,,,c... _______ . e
•
( / \ , . .
7r.-----;7"--
''
/1d1 &
7 , ,
a ---1®�� ' p,
,..,,. i ,,if" \ ,1 •/ '( ' !
i . '
i %'/ '-I IT /• •- f� ,� ' \\ y , \ .
p is t • /~/ r• 1 • �\ —
/1� 7 , //1
Ak
�� W
st���� _
e '! g PDia•yb.oq
' !; 11 1'419-E X I I T
ii
Nq
, I
l'711 II NOM°'00IM5u awe t q,„e
a101 aaLM b- I w I • ' 'a
,I I
I, D.1.A1a.M aIMMry ,,IC in p
•
141 I! ._._ )W 1Vd nn +I I [s
I
F
I
r N
XX
� *
•a a F J i
W 0 i x •
» _
.- CC --
7/2/ . ,
•
I
i r
. D 1 li:1 — (( . N
'/, �;t � , I1 i I 4 S }
ii ,
` C .. ........_ /S i
. . 4 2 1 : ' #17,M9Iffiv; tin\* I .
r1% % %� � ' • ' °
-. � 4 " ae { _
• 4.......tetLitlit „,,, , .\.,.
rm:if„ .. ,
.. .,, ID .. - tvi-'' 4 ....0, a .
y �, r�L,i /7 Sri ��Y I � 0 .1` '{
......
. .
a
Y rr, r—\_
'•
t tr. 9 t 2 Pplo-su-o9
:$ ®le kv etotSd
EXHIBIT
4 .nq
2t479 o,
t• '
,. ' • ,1.‘...•A,okt,,t9:k /r ),.
‘•' " /',-r' -,.,..whx- 1 . .•',-, l,i, ,, i.„....,.;
' ... .:-
. . . .
. .
•101.1111.11 Irt . _r. ei i
: 1 i'
• . , .
1)111.011111110<mown.,
I I I
NtiVd nn fy i I. ,• ''''
1 1
ii 11 —
•
.,.1,2— , 1 •.=/,') -,
• ,.. .
.....,,,t, ,.,,_. , /, ••!..5.
— .
vAI,,kto- •,,•t
• .i4- ,'''' '
K It
, t
* 1 4
J
01
us.• ,,
e. ;
..,
. , ..,;:p ,
..-,...,,
4.
•
.1
Ji Ir .
•
. I. Cfi,-..,,,,,,,,, ,,
,•t,
.1 7••••"1:,;—2...„ .
,----... , .
* '
I rti
it 1
i ill 1
$ , ,
At
i
\ 4 8 ....J...., A vitr, ,:::.-- AA.•$• '.*:,r-,---3 • t•A% ;I 1 - ,
t ' ..4.4. • Aif .... .:41,„.. ”Y. t.. I I
,...4,„
10.,.."7 ti''''Kft.tte-Iti'4 .4 ,. t
` . ,_ .4... .14 4n,IN1111*-1 ..;,..k -.ok I. • •••I
•i
•
t.n.- --..lNtAltl' It..t;V--) 7 i
i
, • ......x.t, 'a..
i \
iir'' • i
v 4. i -. 144*
t
le it.tijat ,, , V\ * 1 -,... -,,,
[
""E'v lc i3.• • .
i
\\ ,,-
,-'4k4k,,,,tz
' 11 ; 4 4140.1 / if .I.- .• 413.
. a ‘,,,f ,,,r ,/ i , .6‘,..<0 •
-,..4.6,1 •.. •
''`• (LtZ$9 . \\
kir
'nn ti\. ' •. '
'# f 'S.e:,4.Q'''''P•`.% -.'0 -.-.`;'.1S''''s- ''' ''''.' 4. ' l'' \ ,•,.1..:,•,,,qi i 1 % •
i • X1`.2•• <'LL'AgPl." -41/4/tS 4,3 t ,\ "n . ...‘", N.V... ...,-•....,..f, 4141-4,'!`N c.,:. 17 \ ,;4r.,',,1•1,..t'lit,\
t -!:1•4 'tst•k.,, , A. .47. 4 j
.2
If lb--vv..t-.'..,.. ..,•. , s t le?''''4' 4%,Y..r 4.,*
mve.trJrii:44,4-.. ,:- ,.' • :',.:,
•f
1 i il
I
i,g , ,.. ## ... -
I'pm ,,".4. .4 ,L.-.1, , .;•,,k,'1,
I taxiiatr,7 •J'.
„,
) ,
21:1( 1 ' , , •
.
•,, ,•
a
n , ; , . . . , „ ., ... ..4'1.".4",..'n94', • •1 n' .";" Tr''' . '
, i '. ••• •• ,' ,', ,.* *,'!. '' ,• • ' ,,,, •'' ''' • .,, ,, ...,•-,,
''' " ', . , ' .,. ''•'Y‘ 4 '' t•'..t ' I r' .,, 4 4 J..4 i' W,t,f. . ,,,, ,-.4 '41;4,4,1:4,1. •
. • , . • , *, . ,.,.. , 4. . ;I , r .+'1 '. , tsi• ' • "'''-;t:'14')4• ."` '''').14. 1'.' ' ' '' ' .°
r� / , \ r I I' i''s Ss.1/:\ °+ 7'+ 1,1 i}'4;•/.Iy\f�r.L r r ` 't 1, ,- -.'i'' s
\ I rd, ✓', ).d' y Cr i 7a-iSt �1 4' +✓K\4V0k�' t.te�,1r fl V 4w ,I °w uFtr j+ „ 1 w•:+
T C ,, • • f\ L M 1 f. F
•
- 1 '. ° 44 •�1 / ,f.�,y 9(;:' q n.. .r Ar'Y 4:4 I ., ,' ,,,,rr �' f,! P r °.
? P..r4H\ry. 'j + ,oyt 7(,.L SL''; ,,f1 m
k d Jfr 4�k,*i 't w\n.111M ot..rw 1 V iO V
;"2 tA'i
•
,4 y!i �4. ,,itt', W e Zip` '7Rh,, ,, 4.. ,
1.
,a,, ,,,t/l,,„
. ,i1 .
y�•; q. yia., .k /rE
h { n„ �g?c j :, ,t I,i a ,0
it .r 4.' ''t�R i.. l'$1 y*t., A. Q !
j ,f �R t', , 7' 1
;
,i • a�`
VIL .,�d U- .% .,,, i 'f rk ,. t,s
i , Off:{.. tW{1, 4 \ 4.. r
"'F •t
i Y
,,,,,,t.,,.. Pt,..i...0,, i 7 .
.\+ dr. 4 i. •,,,r^4'''.i11;r tr. h•rY,1 •
1:r ,5., :att.: ''� „ `I't,,,ti�''r,r or s °'\
__, . /( .7
4 'r. a k- ' r,—C.,N
•�� i aV y
r, + ,.^ '`e7ri{tt.;,r{'bLL. �' ri^ r�. ` . ---_ "�`_ r� �
x Ftl .' q
p"' ry >n �ekki ! +i^� �{, Ryylfi■;p \// 8 4
• t- •i y,, �� of L1,"r4r� yr;,1 �q'!",° ,"!y•; �al��f•, —w 4 u.,tif 4aDa,ta y:q ,X A ' ro`^ 1 1,-4.:;,, V,_ LLLviGG.• �, r
' T}4ivrM,nd, N �y,,''j �to n � T!�l.►t, I r 1,
„t�r Try r i iq dig`4k1Y "'"l 7 ..Y 'Y�l°�•'►+„'Wv 1 r� ,
1+ •
• l\,* r�., c u. i.. ( _.. y �' � 4''���"_�r���I,"I, a-• `,, n•
L � ‘.
M tlt
r' tf t 1 i , ' A'
. ,
tl 4�,.Rim} i r; �" ! ,n.:. y• +� t , ,
1 C`�',rrc r 4 • ,,t.w ",,�H d, i,V+ Yf se 'br • \ /
,' , X it n,dn j t 9 .4.s 4/ i M"
pir
•
` t .,, ra,G+At�t„�R 5 p •P•.'t:. ,1�1, d �rft ' 3=,.•�,: 7,4,-�e/r� f , 1
,dl�t�t it �;^ "Y r1l w. (,6-4—17, �Y Y
{{
Si 4 {�,.,�i,,,,,q;a ;l a Al.t'KkL �. �.
4d 6 r{
� g' tr t,e \ rw,; 1 1 Pb 10-91.A
a ,� : `k•iibi Al�l�i a°� , , f tiF1 y,: f! x H 1 8 I T
CI r
a� a .��p 1=t K 4 1 n i bp e .
9
+ •,.a• - �,ti ,...;x• v _ r'� ,'\ 4 1 : !9+
-1, s{r ',\ ` o r !.. by +' �' p.. Y 1tF i i n1
1
• , r,.a• r, IWuwYV VYanwV°w.l •�^� .
J ♦ ♦ - •sa,[AYC II— r 1 •
r „>..�,./aa
li I li HHVd nn 1I '''i i I
1
ti
aaasiaa
�o1; Y
�g.�tl -a. dds-3ti C�
V 1'
§•
� 'aa ' �� ahi aa £
" § 4mN.:4l! d Cl z 1 4 +
J
y,
C
LI
,� - '�� I , •\
11
I I
d ,
• - ' 1 t ' i ili i .,/,L 1
�•�[� N 1
'\
n') , • q 1.\
.41
yl♦ I I I.� .\\• \ \lye, .
'\ I 5 Nb=
''..k.... ''...../, ,i /,,, .., .• .... V illi .
tik. t + ]
•
!1 k 6s1 � 3 PD to-v.-o q
� og.l ,.yti.,y
\ • EXHIBIT
YNL.4 6
•
4
.y�;I II N0�3tlO b'JHM50 ISM I�I�., -.
. '.7 ...el.n.n. ..- ',
'it�I 1, — YEW nil •u t-I
°`e�i � �� a / a e
, .MA M'i' g l r. ` E \,�
• itl�®■® i ailT r , 73 77(\\.\
. 4 / i'Atiq' r4. .7 'i .•.
., / itii,liiii.,;,. 4
-->1 '1\ / .Li liAlf4-#A )1\ly -——
-7— / ,
4 g I 'VI/ifi•"I Pt
,.,,A a .:1 t 31 I ,
k.2,3 ..i 41 q\01K if tit. I 1 ; .
•
, a `�. A+ ,/404.4 ..1 6, -2„‘ .17„ t xi i
f„off' . 1% , ',- — I •
9 ' Calif T.'
4 i 1 ire‘/#4,'046.SPtilill0,111\N.:. . \ . t ,
i I' riv,`i '
_'y4,1„ /&&A / /IJi ,,
F.
. 11 1 \\-''''''
ii jiiEr
2 4 8�` ' �vnQ.ss-i3 7bq-
.,
•
1 11
Hooauo rooaMao aNn t'IJ Lilt;
1101 1111IY'1 Ill
1 .M i
i ! I1 �.
11111111011A10 0111111E
imva nn ` inr' T
11 I
i
s el
ja 1' .s
= 'a74 y i
is 13 it CC 1
a
z
a I I i w
ll I
1 \
i t 7
3
1
j
a 1 q Y I w
a i el
•
. . ; i- .
r // !a __
` )
1
L� a\ i__I
' \ I : '
1 a y , 1 9
g , '' c
ol
i
. L. d',
.%,o4 *
.� t• 6 i
{*
r
''..� Et%i
tf ,'
a a
.01
r ii61
\ ` E PDSo-vi,oq
EXHIBIT
• 2 '#� uat 1Z a`t 4
e
cMopttaIn
• 'Park
'Recreation •
,o,Center MP;
#2 MI,Jellerson Terrace
Lake Oswego,Oregon 97034
phone 635 3561
September 30, 1986
City of Lake Oswego
P.O. Box 369
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034
' I
Gentlemen:
Re: Lilly Park, Replat of Block 58, Mountain Park► Multnomah County
Tax Map 4224, File No: PD 07-83-04
Since the Development Review Board denied the variance request for
P this project in August, OTAK has met with the Mountain Park Home
Owners Association several times. OTAK now proposes to place 12
duplex lots on the site. At the Board of Directors meeting held on
September 22, 1986. the Board voted to support the 12 duplex lot
concept. The Board has some reservations about available parking on
the site. However we feel this can be adequately addressed during the
review of individual building plans.
Sincerely.
Robert Ericsson
Executive Manager
Mountain Park Home Owners Association
i;Rieenpcflp
cc: Don Hanson, OTAK 0 ') rE.E.20V15
OCT, 1 i86
'a aPint.' Po 10-S6-09
IvAEXHIBIT
2 d 8 5 13
VAS 41.-46-01
• \/ ORDINANCE No. 1466
T
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1418;ADOPTING FINAL DEVSLOP-
MENT PLANS FOR PHASE V-B OP MOUNTAIN PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT;
CHANGING THE ZONING ON CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM
R-30 TO BECOME A PART OF SAID PHASE V-B; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 1418 is hereby amended by the addition of w •
the following Section 7.1. The provisions of said Section 7.1
(together with exhibits incorporated therein) shall be adopted
an the amended final development plans for Phaoo V-B as described
therein.
' "Section 7.1. The City does hereby approve and adopt amend-
manta to Phase V as shown on the development plane and exhibits
for Phase V-B as shown on the attached exhibits subject to
the following:
1. Mountain Park Planned Unit Development, Phase V-B is
adopted as shown on Exhibit "A" dated April 10, 1972 ,
Vicinity Map, subject to the conditions as set forth
in this Section 7.1.
2. Mountain Park Planned Unit Development Phase V-B is
adopted as shown on Exhibit "B", Land Use, Density,
Setback and Street Address Plan and amendmento there-
on dated April 10. 1972
3. The underlying zone for said Planned Unit Development
in SR-10.
4. Apartment shall mean a multi-family building which
shall be limited in height to four stories, with the
overall height of the entire structure not exceeding
a forty-four feet over the average point of the adjacent
grade. Apartments shall be limited to 30 unite per
structure with a minimum of 10 feet between structures
unless otherwise approved by the'Planning Commission
as compatible with the development as a whole.
5. Townhouse is a dwelling unit, for occupancy 6y a single
family, which may have one or both sidewalls contiguous
with another similar unit. Such structures shall be
limited in,hiehgt to two stories and an attic or 35
feet above the lowest point of the adjacent grade,
whichever is less. Townhouses shall be limited to
.8 units per structure with 8 feet between ntruoturos
Unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission
as compatible with the development an a whole.
6, Ono visitor,or guest parking apace shall be provided for
each living unit in the townhouse area, Mt. Park
Planned Unit Development, Phase V-B. .These spaces shall
be in addition to garage and driveway parkway spaces.
7. The height of four-plexes shall be limited by the stan-
dards as set forth in paragraph #4 of this section,
8, Chapter 50, Section 30.210, 50.220 and 50.230 of the
Code of the City of Lake Oswego relating to off-street
parking and loading regulations for all of Mt. Park
Planned unit bovolopmont, Phew/ V.b, except as provided
in paragraph 6 above in adopted.
VARio i�1°-o1
1 EXHIBIT
2486
•
•
• • Ord. No. 1466
t Page 2
9. Garages and/or carportn for single family properties •
shall be located to allow for automotile parking with
driveway lengths at least 22 feet, measured from the
• curb.
10. The building setback lino or, Kerr Parkway shall be five
' feet from the slope easement as indicated on Exhibit "D".
11. The removal of trees for the purpose of roadway construc-
tion in hereby approved in accordance with the street plans
•
as net forth in Exhibit "D", Grading, Street and Storm
Drainage plan.
• 12. The trailer and recreation vehicle storage area shall be
developed in accordance with the standards and plans as
' set forth in Exhibit "H" dated April 10, 1972.
13. Fire Zone II shall be adopted for commercial and apartment `
uses (including four-plexon) and Fire Zeno III for all
other lands within Phase V-B of Mt. Park Planned Unit
. Development.
14. All buildings shall conform to L.0.0. Chapter 45,
Building Code of the City of Laku G..wego.
15. In all instances where the provisions of the Zoning Code
are not modified, expressly or by necessary implication,
by the P.U.D. 0rdinancea of th7City or the oxhibite and
resolutions hereby adopted, the provisions of the Zoning
Code shall apply as follows:
• SR-10 standards shall apply to Single Family dwellings
DR-3.75 standards shall apply to Duplex dwellings & '
. Townhouses
Mt-2 standards shall apply to Apartment & four-piexea
GC standards shall apply to Commercial (with service •
stations as a permitted,
not conditional Use).
16. Mountain Park Planned Unit Development Phase V-B is adopted
• - an ehown on Exhibit "C" datod , April 10, 1972 , Preliminary
Plat and amendments thereon.
17. An.additional 10 feet of right of way shall bo dedicated
along Peters Road.
M'
18. Platting of subdivision is required in accordance with
City Ordinances and StateStatuten. Submittal of
properties to Unit ownership nhall be in addition to,
and net in lion of, complirtm.•e with subdivision require-
monks. .
19. Mountain Park Planned Unit Ievelopment, Phaar. V-H an
shown on Exhibit "D" datod _April ln,,1972 , Grading,
Street and Storm Drainage Plrn and rusendmonte thereon
is adopted.
20, Direct access to Kerr Parkway and Jefferson Parkway
from abutting Dingle family, duplex and four-plox lots
shall bo prohibited.
21. The portion of Jefferson Parkway outside the City limits shall -
be constructed by the develoi` r. The developer shall pro-
vide the right of way dedira ion. ,
24b7
' y" •. 1 " "' r:„k 'ra-SFr- _ v.70A491`+c'%"'
rt
.A
A
,
Ord. No. 1466
. ,Pa.K('.3
22. The right of way and fill sla,pet. on Kerr Parkway shall
n conform to the road alignment us required by Multnomah
County.
23. Mountain Park Planned Unit Development:, Phase V-B as •.
shown on Exhibit "E" dated April lay 1072.' Sanitary
newer and Water Plan, and amendments thereon is adopted.
24. Mountain Park Planned Unit Development, Phase V-B, as
shown on Exhibit "1" dated, April 10, 1472 , Street
Lighting, Utility Trench, Park, Trail and Landscaping
Plan, and amendments thereon is adopted.
25. The etandardnof street lighting shall meet the same
requirements as the street light system approved by
the City Council for Mountain Park Phase I, Planned
Unit Development.
26. The developer shall install street lights in Kerr Parkway.
Installation KeaParn ay. Thee typedshallebe with
the same ae n desiggnated
of Kerr Parkway.
for Jefferson Parkway.
27, The developer shall install trail lighting. Spacing and
type shall bo the name an approved for Phase V-A.
28. Exhibits C-1 through IS dated March 27, 1972 are
adopted as architectural sketches depicting the types
of buildings to be constructed in Phase V-B of
Mountain Park Planned Unit Development, an required
by L.O.C. 53.33o.
29. Exhibit "H" in adopted as the plans and concepts for '
the trailer and recreational vehiclett storage area
and is dated April 10, 1972
d Section 2. All other auctions of Ordinance No. 1418 ahall remain
in full force and effect except as necessarily modified by the
addition of the aforesaid Section 7.1.
' Section 3. The area conninting of 9.64 acres, more or lean,
described an follows: (Beginning at the northeast corner of
Section 6, T2S, n1E of the WM, in the County of Clackamas and
State of Oregon; thence south on the rant lihu of said section,
654.07 feet; thence west 646.92 feet: thence north 6,54.46 feet to
the north line of Said section; thrive east 646.6$ feet to the
i place of beginning; EXCEPT the west five feet thereof conveyed to
Clackaman County for road purxloson,) in re-awned from Clackamas
County n-30 to Planned Unit Devolopmrnl at, part of said Phase V-B
, eubiect to the oonditior* not forth in 5ectten 7.1.
Section 4. Inasmuch as this ordifan a it immediately necessary
for the preservation of the public health and welfare of the
citinene of the City of Lake Oswego, an emeierncY is hereby declared
to exist and thin ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its
I-,-...„,_-nassase,bv the Council and approval by the Mayer.
•
•
• Ord. No. 1466 , ,
` - Page 4
•
Road the second time and passed by mnortty vote of the
members of the Council prosent on tha 10tr, day of April
1972. r'*
1 .
Mayor ' •
v
April 19, 1972 .
Date
• ATTEST:
• City Recorder
Date April 19. 1972
-APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
•
Jim Cox, City Attornoy
.
a
,1 •.
11
. r
A
IIIG
• ot8lc Mthnndn,PC `
Nmmottwo•CrvdLnpwnn11n11•11,01,71nM w �F
Mn'.n, I,..1 u' .III 1'•°''1:,, i,.11'°,.1'"1•'11 i I, 1. • ,..
October 22, 1986
Ms. Renee Dowlin
City of Lake Oswego
P.O. Box 369
Lake Oswego, OR 97034
Re: Lili Park Planned Development
Dear Rene:
• The preliminary site plan submitted as part of the development
review application was prepared to better communicate the in-
tended character of the project to the MountainuntainaPark Homeowners,
Association. it illustrates building size,
parking, and setbacks. At this time 24 total units are proposed;
12 two bedroom units and 12 three bedroom units. Unit sizes will
vary from 1,500 to 2,000 square feet. Off street parking, which
ti is a concern on this development, will meet code requirements. •
At a minimum, the two bedroom units will have one garaged space
and two off street spaces and the three bedroom units will have
•
two garaged spaces and two off street spaces.
The buildings themselves will be two story and
have
osimilartforms
and exterior material finishes, givingprojectcoati ityeas
• as
well as visual interest. As part of the building, p the City and
these structures will be reviewed for compliance by
the Mountain Park Homeowners Association.
Sincerely,
ati(\ aOutt-let.----, • GlV 61 Lnt o M¢u 1
• Don Hanson M nnln¢O D�•
I
Landscape Architect .IC2r(1ti fL C3•
. DH:tef
. 'OCT 2 2 1986
E�Iml'T
vlw"
N ,. 1', 11.,..' .1. n. - • �, 1• . (
V1nenouf Oftnn•'_'1 I nll.. i••.0 0"L 111'1 ' .44 . 4 I•. 2(19