Agenda Item - 2024-01-16 - Number 6.4 - Approval of Meeting Minutes 6.4
o�c t COUNCIL REPORT
�� o
AEG%
Subject: Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: January 16, 2024 Staff Member: Kari Linder, City Recorder
Report Date: January 2, 2024 Department: City Manager's Office
Action Required Advisory Board/Commission Recommendation
0 Motion ❑ Approval
❑ Public Hearing ❑ Denial
❑ Ordinance ❑ None Forwarded
❑ Resolution 0 Not Applicable
❑ Information Only Comments:
❑ Council Direction
0 Consent Agenda
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as written.
Recommended Language for Motion: Move to approve minutes as written.
Project/ Issue Relates To: NA
Issue before Council (Highlight Policy Question):
❑Council Goals/Priorities ❑Adopted Master Plan(s) El Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS
1. December 5, 2023, Draft Regular Meeting Minutes
Respect. Excel'erce. Trust. Service.
503-635-0215 380 A AVENUE PO BOX 369 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 WWW.LAKEOSWEGO.CITY
ATTACHMENT 1
o s�
y.. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
December 5, 2023
ORFOo�'
1. CALL TO ORDER, CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Buck called the regular City Council meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. on Tuesday,
December 5, 2023. The meeting was held both virtually via video conferencing and in-
person in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 380 A Avenue.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Buck, Councilors Mboup, Verdick, Rapf, Afghan, Corrigan,
Wendland
Staff Present: Martha Bennett, City Manager; Ellen Osoinach, City Attorney; Kari
Linder, City Recorder; Ivan Anderholm, Parks & Recreation Director;
Shawn Cross, Finance Director; Jessica Numanoglu, Community
Development Director; Erik Olson, Long Range Planning Manager
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Buck led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Lake Oswego City Council will meet under authority of
ORS 192.660 (2)(d) Conduct deliberations with persons designated to carry on
labor negotiations and (f) consider records that are exempt by law from public
inspection.
Ellen Osoinach, City Attorney, read the legal parameters for the Executive Session.
Council met in Executive Session from 5:34 p.m. to 6:13 p.m.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Patrick Dohm stated his wife leased a commercial space in the Old Chamber of Commerce
Building, between A and B Avenue and 2nd and 3rd Street. The business, Ingrid Dohm Art, was
difficult to find without signage but a sign placed on the walkway was removed by the owner of
the property to the south, who objected to the placement of the sign and asserted the walkway
was his. The couple then placed a small sign above the door and ordered a sandwich board
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 8
December 5, 2023
type of sign, but a Code enforcement officer visited the business and told her to remove the
sign. Mr. Dohm felt his wife's business was being targeted because there were many other
examples of sandwich board signs in Lake Oswego. He shared pictures of nearby sandwich
board signs, including signs for Elite Realty, Fresh Acai Bowls and Smoothies.
Mayor Buck sought to clarify whether Mr. Dohm was arguing against the rule itself or felt the
the rule was being unevenly enforced. City Manager Martha Bennett directed Mr. Dohm to
speak with Jessica Numanoglu, Community Development Director.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
6.1 Naming the Lake Oswego Recreation & Aquatic Center and Renovated Clubhouse
and Golf Course.
Mayor Buck pulled Item 6.1 from the Consent Agenda, noting some offline conversations may
have indicated the City Council did not have much interest in renaming the golf course, but was
happy with the Lake Oswego Recreation and Aquatic Center (LORAC). He suggested it could
save the Parks and Recreation Department time in finding another name if Council agreed with
LORAC this evening; however, Council was interested in hearing from Staff about the matter,
including the potential naming of the clubhouse.
Ivan Anderholm, Parks and Recreation Director, noted Council recently passed Resolution
22-43, which outlined a new policy and process for naming City areas and facilities. Tonight,
Council was being asked to initiate the naming process by referring the item to the Parks and
Recreation/Natural Resources Advisory Board for Staff to discuss possible names and then
return to Council with the Board's recommendation. Council could offer preferred names for
Staff to present to the Board. When the naming came back before Council, Council could then
approve the recommendation, select a different name, or return the issue to the Board and
community for additional suggestions. While facilities were to be named within 6 months of
opening or reopening, both facilities needed names well ahead of that time for signage and
marketing materials. He confirmed Council could make a decision on the names this evening.
Mayor Buck confirmed that Council unanimously agreed the Lake Oswego Recreation and
Aquatic Center (LORAC);and Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course did not need to be renamed,
and that a majority of the Council was in favor of renaming the clubhouse.
Director Anderholm stated he would present Council's decision at the PARKS Board's next
meeting and discuss options for renaming the old clubhouse. He clarified Staff did not want the
name "Clubhouse" because golf operations would no longer be housed there, but in the
LORAC, and they wished to avoid some confusion.
Mayor Buck added the clubhouse also had new uses, such as renting out the space, and he
could see the reasoning behind renaming that facility for marketing purposes.
Mayor Buck moved to initiate the process to name the Lake Oswego Recreation and
Aquatic Center, Lake Oswego Municipal Golf Course, and for the clubhouse, a name to
be determined based on the advice of the PARKS board. Councilor Mboup seconded the
motion.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 8
December 5, 2023
A voice vote was held, and the motion passed, with Mayor Buck and Councilors Mboup,
Rapf, Afghan, Corrigan and Wendland voting `aye', (7-0).
Director Anderholm confirmed he would return with the three names when Council would
weigh in on the new clubhouse name and then officially name the three facilities.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
7.1 Resolution 23-35, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lake Oswego
Revising Fees and Charges and Updating the Lake Oswego Master Fees and
Charges Schedule.
Ellen Osoinach, City Attorney, reviewed the hearing procedures and asked if any Councilor
had a financial conflict of interest. None were heard.
Shawn Cross, Finance Director, presented the Council Report, noting that not much had
changed since the Council's related study session earlier in November. Regarding a prior
question about the $1 stall fee, he explained the fee applied to City-owned parking lots, such as
near the Gemini Bar and Grill. If the Gemini wanted to rent the parking lot for a special event, for
example, the fee would be $1 per hour per stall. In addition, the updated franchise agreement
with Republic Services was now included and on Page 30 of the Master Fees and Charges
Schedule, the fees charged to the Lake Oswego School District (LOSD) for the parks athletic
field were changed from Category 3 to Category 2 to reflect how the City's charges were
described in the District's manual.
Mayor Buck opened the public hearing, confirmed there was no testimony, and closed public
hearing.
Councilor Mboup moved to adopt Resolution 23-35. Councilor Rapf seconded the
motion.
A voice vote was held, and the motion passed, with Mayor Buck and Councilors Mboup,
Rapf, Afghan, Corrigan and Wendland. voting `aye', (7-0).
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
8.1 Ordinance 2928, An Ordinance of the City of Lake Oswego Amending LOC
50.03.002, 50.03.003, 50.03.004, and 50.10.003 of Chapter 50 (Community
Development Code) Establishing Psilocybin Time, Place and Manner Land Use
Regulations; and Adopting Findings (LU 23-0001).
Jessica Numanoglu, Community Development Director, presented the Council Report via
PowerPoint, briefly reviewing the background leading to tonight's ordinance, which reflected
previous Council direction to remove the buffer requirement between psilocybin facilities and the
buffer requirement from tenant spaces occupied by businesses with an OLCC liquor license as
well as to eliminate the ban on psilocybin facilities being in the same building as healthcare
facilities. In addition, Staff was directed to not bring forward Ordinance 2933, the non-land use
ordinance regulations for adoption or an ordinance that would repeal the temporary ban on
psilocybin facilities. The revised Ordinance 2928 was included in the packet as Exhibit A1-2,
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 8
December 5, 2023
along with the attached Draft Code amendments and the red line edits to show the provisions
Staff had removed at the Council's direction.
Director Numanoglu clarified for Councilor Wendland that if adopted, the Ordinance would
allow psilocybin manufacturing in the Foothills Industrial Zone and the Industrial Park Zone,
which is the southwest employment area. However, the buffers would still apply, so
manufacturing facilities would have to be at least 1,000 feet away from any school or registered
childcare facility.
Councilor Wendland asked if the State required the City to allow manufacturing or could the
administering and manufacturing of psilocybin be separate? Director Numanoglu replied if
administering and manufacturing were separated, the question of whether to repeal the ban on
manufacturing would still have to be referred to voters. The Council could allow client
administrative service centers and keep the ban on manufacturing, which would then go to
voters in November. She confirmed if Council passed the ordinance tonight and if the voters
repealed the ban on psilocybin in November, then manufacturing in Lake Oswego would be
locked in. City Manager Bennett added the advantage of enacting the ordinance for industrial
areas was that the State required a buffer around schools, but the Planning Commission
ordinance also included childcare centers. The subject ordinance would be more restrictive than
the State level if the voters elected to lift the ban.
Councilor Wendland believed there was a difference between creating the drug versus
administering the drug. Council needed to be aware the ordinance would allow the manufacture
of psilocybin in Lake Oswego if voters overturned the ban. The explanatory language needed to
be clear and concise because it was sort of a double negative, and the City should avoid the
confusion associated with Measure 110 or the City's parks issues. He wanted to be sure voters
knew exactly what they were voting for.
Ms, City Manager Bennett noted many other jurisdictions had already sent bans to the ballot,
and Staff could look at how those jurisdictions referred them. While she did not know whether
the original measure had a requirement regarding what the referral had to say, Staff would be
back before Council in the summer to have Council make the referral, so they would have a
chance to review the ballot title language and all the other associated submittals.
Director Numanoglu understood that when drafting the explanatory statement, Councilor
Wendland wanted Staff to be very clear on what the voters were deciding, including the issue of
manufacturing versus service.
Council Wendland reiterated the language should be clear regarding the delineation between
manufacturing and administration, which had been a discussion point throughout the process.
The Council should consider whether administration and manufacturing were desired. He
clarified his question was whether Council felt comfortable moving forward with having
manufacturing of psilocybin in Lake Oswego. Mayor Buck replied if the voters overturned the
ban, Council did not have a choice.
Councilor Rapf understood Councilor Wendland wanted to bifurcate manufacturing and
administration, but there did not seem to be an option to eliminate manufacturing from the ballot.
Director Numanoglu confirmed the matter could not be bifurcated. She understood Council
wanted voters to be clear that their decision was not simply whether to allow service centers,
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 8
December 5, 2023
but they must grapple with the fact that if they allowed service centers, they would also be
allowing manufacturing.
Councilor Rapf asked if the City could put the time, place, manner restrictions on the
administration of psilocybin to the voters and leave the City's existing time, place, and manner
regulations on manufacturing in place. Director Numanoglu believed it would be difficult to
bifurcate the issue in that way, but she would research whether it was possible.
Councilor Wendland suggested voters may want administration of the drug, but not drug labs.
Councilor Rapf noted that allowing manufacturing could also prevent those who wanted
administration from getting what they wanted. Director Numanoglu responded that while
manufacturing and administration may not be able to be bifurcated on the ballot and voters said
that even considering manufacturing, they wished to have administration, the Council would still
have the opportunity to decide what time, place, and manner restrictions it wanted to place on
the manufacturing side. If the voters approved the manufacture and consumption of psilocybin
in Lake Oswego, the Council could still initiate a process to impose regulations on
manufacturing, particularly because the findings indicated the Council believed some impacts
were too speculative for the City to feel comfortable regulating at this point, and they would like
to see how the issued played out. If the manufacturing issues identified by Council were also
issues the voters had, Council would still have the opportunity to address those impacts. She
understood the voters needed to be very clear about what they were choosing to vote on and to
the extent that maybe, some voters would like information about Council's ability to impose
regulations, which Staff could consider when drafting the explanatory statement. Mayor Buck
said that was a good question, noting by summer, Staff would be able research whether the
ballot could be split into two questions.
Councilor Mboup sought confirmation that if Council prohibited manufacturing or the
administration of psilocybin in Lake Oswego, but voters agreed with Council, there would be no
way to manufacture or administer psilocybin in Lake Oswego. But if the voters said, "yes" to
time, manner, and place restrictions, it would allow both manufacturing and administration of
psilocybin. Director Numanoglu replied that was correct, manufacturing would be allowed and
limited to the industrial park and industrial zones.
Councilor Afghan suggested when the issue returned to Council in July, Council should
discuss what manufacturing meant. If it was pharmaceutical or chemical manufacturing
company, that was a different conversation than an agricultural, farming, growing process.
Councilor Rapf moved to enact Ordinance 2928 and adopt findings. Councilor Afghan
seconded the motion.
A voice vote was held, and the motion passed, with Mayor Buck and Councilors Mboup,
Verdick, Rapf, Afghan, Corrigan, and Wendland voting `aye', (7-0).
9. STUDY SESSION
9.1 Citywide Parking Reform (PP 22-0001).
Erik Olson, Long Range Planning Manager, presented the Council Report via PowerPoint,
noting parking reforms were required for continuity with Climate Friendly and Equitable
Community (CFEC) and that the City already complied with Phase A of the CFEC rules. He
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 8
December 5, 2023
reviewed the background and purpose of the CFEC, as well as recent updates to CFEC rules,
including less stringent bicycle parking requirements; highlighted new information on how
parking requirements had impacted businesses in Lake Oswego and other Oregon cities; and
presented the details, pros, and cons of the proposed parking reform options for Phase B of the
CFEC parking requirements. He also highlighted the public engagement plan and revised
schedule for Council adoption in November 2024.
Mayor Buck noted that regardless of the option Council chose, commercial parking mandates
would be repealed in Lake Grove and the city's downtown, the two main town centers. Mr.
Olson added there was a half space per residential maximum requirement in Lake Grove under
Option 2B. Mayor Buck suggested Councilors consider what benefit would be gained if Council
implemented expensive, complicated, difficult-to-understand, regulatory schemes in scant areas
of the city as opposed to a citywide universal parking mandate repeal.
Councilors unanimously favored Option 1, which would repeal all parking mandates citywide,
but expressed concern about parking overflow into adjacent neighborhoods which would
happen regardless of the option chosen. Councilors agreed the City needed to be ready to stay
in good communication with and assist neighborhoods that would be impacted as well as
supporting local businesses. To avoid losing businesses in Lake Grove, the City should
consider urban renewal, which had a couple remaining projects in the area, one of which was
parking.
City Manager Martha Bennett explained the proposed set of regulations shifted the burden in
commercial areas from the private sector providing parking to the public sector providing
parking in the long run. While there would be immediate pressure for Lake Grove's business
community, the impact would not be limited to that area. Parking was necessary to support the
continued redevelopment of downtown. The public sector would face mounting pressure to
provide parking unless the lending community requires it. Consolidated, well-placed parking was
a healthier, long-term solution compared to dispersed parking, which burdened individual
businesses. The City would need to make strategic investments in parking over the next 10 to
20 years.
Mayor Buck noted this parking reform was not a repeal of parking, but a smarter, more
responsive way to manage parking, and businesses would adapt to meet their specific parking
needs. The proposed strategy was also part of the City's broader policy for climate friendly and
equitable communities, and aligned with City initiatives like safe pathways, bikeways, and
connecting neighborhoods to schools and the business community, and continued investment in
active transportation and things to create a healthier community.
Councilor Afghan asked which neighborhoods would experience parking spillover under
Option 1. Mr. Olson replied no specific neighborhood could be identified. There could be
potential for spillover downtown and Lake Grove under all the options. Staff believed the
commercial areas outside of downtown and Lake Grove would have different regulations as a
result of Option 1, but it was hard to predict. Councilor Afghan suggested that since the
majority of areas already experienced parking challenges, and it did not seem any other
neighborhoods would experience spillage, perhaps spillage should not be listed as a con for
Option 1. Mr. Olson agreed, adding spillage was speculative and a concern Staff had heard.
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 8
December 5, 2023
Mayor Buck added that even though parking management was not on the list for Option 1, it
did not mean the City would not look at parking management in the future if parking became a
greater issue.
Councilor Wendland expressed concern about Staff's workload, time, and well-being
balancing parking public outreach and engagement with other priorities, such as the Housing
Production Strategy (HPS), when parking reform seemed to have a logical conclusion. He
preferred that Staff focus on housing or other policy items, including ministerial mitigations.
Director Bennett noted if outreach was focused on a discussion around Option 1, as opposed
to weighing all three options, it could be more of an educational campaign on how the City was
working to repeal parking mandates to comply with State law and sought to discuss the potential
impacts on neighborhoods, which could be done faster and with less resources. The City
needed to have more of a dialogue, particularly with neighborhood associations, to understand
the associations' concerns and how the City could mitigate them, as well as their perspectives
on when the City should consider parking management, such as at what points quality of life
would be affected.
Director Numanoglu agreed focusing on Option 1 would compress the timeline, streamline the
public engagement process and reduce Staff's time and workload.
Mayor Buck confirmed the Council agreed community outreach would focus on socializing the
idea of Option 1 and soliciting feedback and concerns from the community, rather than vetting
the differences between the options.
Staff confirmed the matter did not need to return before Council before a hearing unless
significant policy questions arose during the public engagement process. Originally, Staff
intended to do parking reform along with the HPS work, however knowing Council's direction on
parking reform would benefit the HPS work.
Mayor Buck added the Planning Commission did not need to labor over the issue extensively
since there was clear consensus on the direction Council wished to go. He advised Staff to
concentrate on things that would make a huge difference long-term for Lake Oswego's citizens.
Parking reform
10. INFORMATION FROM COUNCIL
Mayor Buck shared results from the Sustainability Advisory Board's (SAB) EV charging survey,
which found that home charging was the most popular option, though charging in multifamily
was more challenging. The biggest need was to have more fast charging in town, which
Amanda Watson, Sustainability Program Manager, was working on with SAB, which had put
signs around town identifying the location of EV charges. The Board was also working on a
greenhouse gas emissions inventory update, though weighing the cost and benefit of that work
was a challenge.
Councilor Verdick commended the Parks and Recreation Department for the recent holiday
tree lighting event, which was fantastic. She recognized the event was a challenge to
coordinate, but she had received feedback that this year's lighting was the best one yet.
11. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 8
December 5, 2023
City Manager Bennett requested Council's approval of a letter written in response to the River
Grove Water District Board who had asked the City to build a sidewalk on Childs Road, which
was a good idea, however, it was difficult for the City to juggle its funded priorities, let alone add
an unfunded priority. Building the sidewalk would result in the City breaking commitments made
to other projects. She confirmed Council was in agreement to have the Mayor sign the letter.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Buck adjourned the City Council meeting at 7:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kari Linder, City Recorder
Approved by the City Council on {insert approval date).
Joseph M. Buck, Mayor
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 8
December 5, 2023