Loading...
Agenda Item - 2024-02-06 - Number 9.1 - Presentation - Staff, AP 23-03 9.1 Planning and Building Servi - s ru— E (D 3-001116-TREE [AP 23-03] RE Appeal of Type II Tree Removal 2800 Wembley Park Rd . City Council Public Hearing, February 6, 2024 Daphne Cissell , Associate Planner 2800 Wembley Park Rd . Update to Type II application: Tree #10447, 18" pine withdrawn from application „R ; I i4rw — -- Dw Or A Springbrook Park NMI ---'60 r .• - . \ co to t.4 ) , . cs u) 40: 111j- ry t1 rdVernhlQY A �� I �� z7 '� ---- - -. Sri [T� 1% � t. it r • . . 0., ._________. .__ ic, N i9� N • '!i • IN.) w _____/, cb r Ridge Rd ' . . St; t f‘.1c) , . cDoirl A 5 0 . 3009 "W ry" 2g - 4, 1 �' 3015 �{f — . ,,,, \ 11111, 15) a A 3,039 �'1.0 ales Ti} 1 `i��� 'rn\ n� • kik �o H z�Z I risTi �— V .001111) _ °REGO : --- 2800 Wembley Park Rd . 11 trees total: 9 for development, 2 for landscaping improvements (poor condition) - •: !:arA Springbrook - • . sv ..., A Park ' co to ry ca.) :sti -,.,. • All [3� Verl7°I p4 (11‘ 1) ` % Q tdilikl, ca O �r CO }Ny N _______/, cio r Ridge Rd "' liZip elly •Me _,„ 1. CO lifil4r-- 3015 �9 ' : f'79 t4 $ o m �11 y• 3U39 # � a-ales TiI • 1 A. 1' n�\ n ;— �• -- ... -x,... „,, 4 ii -4 -- C.) I LO Maps 2022 EIN.____ _____EGDta LOC 55 . 02 . 080 : Criteria for Issuance of Type II Permit Criterion 1: Review of Reason for Removal — Development and/or Landscaping This criterion is met. Criterion 2: Review of Erosion, Surface Water, and Windbreak Impacts This criterion is met. Criterion 3: Review of Significant Negative Impacts on Character or Aesthetics All subcriteria are met, as follows... Subcriterion 3 ( a ) : si gn if icant Tree First 3 Elements Significant Tree : a healthy, noninvasive, and over 15 in. DBH that is considered significant to the neighborhood due to size, species, or distinctive �,�,' �Av� \ \:�,� \\ character, or the only remainingtree � ,; �� , T 383 \T o,�° 18:- ,^ -u GWAArlisER8�84 WmiO fiE/ \ B.)G IiY� - EMERPP ETA Y Ewe1MCs \ A, \\ '`�\n WITHDRAWN PORBPET`S ElEwER 5 �P $'� on a property. .. / / \ me.41 4r 9r \\, D08G-FR / . 1\ , y a104'� ,y ti4'(T1PE 77��( E>ffi1NG I'RATER ME'TE2 \, u1 PRIDERCGA PRE r. .'yi /' r 5 f�6, .24'(TYPE 7) `/ L L. A.\ V CCAOH51RI1C�110M \ A _ / �:- - ENTRANCE M11]a, \\ \ I PRoPosED / ",'i —�.110143 \ LONG,II7.Did .g \\ i ELECTRC GdA / `� 2/. 7 / Y} p I •a�TR4W PRE ROCK,8•DEEP \ METERS / I11B455 f'� ,Apj,. - T%- Y�.`i`:'I 15•(POOIF 1TPE 77 .ffil� \ ELEC.ROUTE 386 PCNOEt08 PINE AREA. - / fy Ityt \MOW 4^ \ \ TSO SY FC,E �y n'(TYPE,3 .. �� " ;0`"�7' - SNORE PIE �, \\ \ /. �j�1P ,../ ll9i��p; tiA•'F / s,(.�.��\ 419!DYING}! c Q \ REGRAGE RN NEL KARE / Remo 7P Ga, w, ���` ..�,,,,. / lC�' .\\ \ -4,. �93 ADC RETAINING WILL PONDEROSA- q81 ,,\,N T. '' (t \ \ \ 'F.` �� : \' IBI79\ i1•9 UIOT i0 ExOEEG d'-0.7 \ B,74•(TYPE I) � .rp•/`,:" ,.hh � / OW4R l�� .9 PRE\ �+ / 38l B. # fir, ) uiB iB� ONG=-. hTPEI `'6•(PCC+R TYPE 1) 8 of the 11 trees were found to meet e`0•uNOE EAeEMEN FOR • AV ` .E �-1Ri3B GAS A"m WATER LINE PER ♦ iiiii;- "{4 \\� ♦\ J DOCUMENT HO.. 1 ._3 151OLEAF MAPLE /GARAGE '�J'', G08G'FR :a'.•'IT \\ .SPINE '`tl 37(TYPE _ • // 388'. 75;� ® �T // , \\I\ 5(POOR ,, ,,,, 368// the first three elements #10147 10152 - ,-RR\A !\\ // 35941/4 1 \ _ i=•.E%.is ii:iii iiiiiEE!.iiiiiiiiiiiii:.. 389Ain \� FIB131'.t 10153 10432 10435 10455 10520, and 39a, PROPPSEDHWSE ,NG�G.aR _ , ` "T - \ R EL 386 T5 - U'CORJ a a 7fi \ 1 1 1 1 IB546 18544 SI'(POCMAPLE 6.1.NAENvE)IV i 14'(POOR TT?E ik e•UNVA&vE) • �.w BI34 ????�Ek15•ING•rCLE jjjjjj�'�jj'!ijjji�jjjjjijjjjj 'Y!\ + F EL 93 ' �� -LNCERCBA PRE A�.Bw 10539 i 7 389 • B(POOR TYPE 7) �„( •_S WRHM Sf IB541 , 1 38� nft DOIICartiR - EHG.HAWTHORN \ 4 FIel36 la'WvdgvE] h 13{DEAD) • `7/-�'93 6•{PRINT? l\ '� PR01EG TREE ..:ii u':i'rU \ , �j° 1N51ALL STRAW PONDEROSA FIDE % ,�// 3B� �..IB631 WATTLEe Bm. eB46' j GOU"iiR\�, / ' �i1E \.. EC.11EA88RE8 \O\ \�\\, \\\\\� newer, - ;as rd `_y 1� ���\\, neeea awl) iee24 i•A. 391 s' Wl -1 :r t . IL6'4^RR PLUM�."- 388 ) 386 4167*, s(POOR \ \aTDooR �% lir% \I . v^"\ \ coyERED 10B®4LT Wvl!YG AREA ... . VP' EL 3858' �. ---mrI F8A1 V 7 J\. .. 0 AD RATE FOR mEwWA HOS7E 4LIAY F_AMMENT THIN 15'%��M. t - it` ._. .(, ADD RETARlrY WAIL 6(iRJT7 4` `,-:. UJOT TO E cEE7 4'-el TccurENT \�,` . \\i - -:1 �B)G kAWTHORII+ \ EL aril.' Subcriterion 3 ( a ) : Significant Tree Remaining Elements Significant Tree: a healthy, noninvasive, and over 15 in . DBH that is considered significant to the neighborhood _ .- l I , j 363 \ ,T CL, \ EL aa7.i "�. \NZ) \ due to size, species, or distinctive -;3g, ;Y , `' *A E 84 \RRE�WALLLL TO BE ; \ '4'B'46 character, or the only remaining tree , .._ � EPoPEcs �P \\ N. � ;:^WITHDRAWN ./ Bruacur �' \ .IBIdT / 4� j _ DLUG•RR / \ \ �� / -16435 ZL ITtPE 77 o n a property.e rt pq pETtA P j �q� >p, EaA NG l ecru METER \ p p Y• \' ,4 I PE,) .•s.T CREATE!ffiU \ �\ ,1 •$ y l �ne43s! �y�P�,'' .� \ ��\ ENTRANCE° MIN \\ \ ! PROPo3Eo GA5 / `l - DOJG FIR 1�S\ ��4'� \• \ 1;7 TMA. \\ 4 ELECTRIC '�2�• 79•ITTPE 7)j 1:41:��,� -y, `" \/_me"' N P NE /Ey ROCK,8•DEEP \ Y MEio. / 610458 r°... CONC.' ib l 101b1�i4 ,.•.( 16•IPMR TYPE 77 ..'UA5L ppqq 7LUG-RR�J} i�•dj. \ 71ELEL.RLUTE }q8 PLNDBt PNE AREA-s •Y. ♦y`73°(-'PE 1�,'r, i:\•,S, Vti COM 1 BY PGE Jy 27(TYPE 7� ` I.qi v4.♦�,�p '.*1 •) �'©. 9NGRE PINE \ \ \ REGRAGf FOE NEL FOJSE 1 :p0570 3�,A�•��y+PreP;��"� lU��•i�� \\�\`\ \31. � y_ • The 8 trees a r e not individually significant AEG RETAINING W4LL _ `•• P'(TYPE9A P - Y'�,�P �p y (t�..=��.:: 4 \ \ kC UIaT TO ExGEEG 4 , 8=r. (TYPE 77 � 'Q P'I�r�A°y`4 I014J�,y ±I%', 0179\ : \ ,i,,,, / 38T 0, ,!/ 4Zr, " '�VI6,53 LWFR, /j.. .;PINE / 9�• d��:'!'a'��•RR\�,_• _"hrPE I ��`-6•IProR TYPE 17 to the neighborhood character due to9W ' ` � ; � .►7;`Y�z' ��\� DOCUMENT NO 50-14443 'x10539 I �� I8i3B :s \N 'Ns" FVra FAf MAPLE � iGARAGE mod \ - 4,� '' IBId0� G1'JIKxPe ' OTS PNE / 385�. rs\TYPE /' E '/ Ai '' T Eusrolls' ize, species, or distinctive character. 369 .® 1:..::::TR :::::::::: 36 . :.__ }. /IB137' - . PRE 390` .� � EF�3aE� \� - ..`� W.1G-Re� `�� ��� \ \ t i 76• � \ • 105d6 10544 The 8 trees are not the last remaining �"391 . 013d\ -\ :: FEL•3889::5jjjj.,?jjjj3"ejjjjj��.,jjjjjji'^° •',� 1. ONCERC9A PRE AFID.RP P� 359 �lr 0•WOOR TYPE 7) -,( .;;e ...1WN., 410541 `•* / (DEAD] 4 e®130 iiiiiiiiiii; - Issas a � �&. ENGuawruLRN T. see b r on the ®GNA81vE)tees 3904. � 6Na®� �N97ALL STRAW 2 ti .. PONDEROSA PINE 10631 WATTLES 180Y NEAR TREEiiiii y 20. =00. \� \r OCIYa4\,g 4pRoTECTICN 6...f Mi1E N.. FFF-0-0-0ORRRR EC.MEA816iEe \D CHDRIRT 3.91�IE] 0074 391 N -y'. .L . `'.. LY011G RR PLWM��. 38& � ;• 7386le(cickilfp4... O� a'7PLOR FR„ � \ ` \ouTcoLR ` R �l �� \70 °'.-„7 I. W-LY'''''' `3'..N:SLH. t`ti \34 rG) ��IruIN Is`�FW 4� REGRADE FLR NEW HOUSE SE ��� AMG L.• \.~ * .Nor r ADD TOExCLED%-eC..) ar ` 3431 \`,,`,\ N �` : EL WA °Rz °`� Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service. ----------— Subcriterion 3 ( b ) : Alterations to Distinctive Features & Skyline With the proposed retention of a dense group of tall, mature Douglas-fir trees, the proposed removals would not significantly alter the distinctive features or continuity of the neighborhood skyline. B.Mi ` I� • \ y � 1 O4a�®Of ` `` CCC il% 9.9•49 NI WITHDRAWN "..�°.� 1�/ �''• ••° a j= 1 , -3 YCZ 7.51..e _ m"nfl--ea�ecr rrecene.uren. 1 \ +t ` ' v1N. /4;?F , • i x, .( e+vrnr.eu 4�12T,7 `M► „7.„:,, -% a e.. KM is `� e�ereura r� is 6% -%e ro. xr U bi h... p�v.Pn \ ` m� r 1 .e- +k7 '4 ty w�0er �y rtnsn a`O bF •• `���\..n.•' � �y.`�i of `.'1}�'��. 1 r� >�L.' / rio,, f ; �. :. 90992` .wnx .� .a.e,.a.ec, ! ..., r mr. F . '. C\•,\„ nacre •p"4 • - 4 b � a.:.i N"A �'no �v f ,` rnaeas+w.ux -`. • .aw i,.\''z t.•'�,.. `. - , '�'S?J141 j�'�.-+,. pr t., r e�.ar wa er.wrr+.a ., \ ` �� as' `", ,, it? _ AIitC4 K '-, l '�. w 999,: .oHmw qz� \ a. s . 10053 e: • �: ate. .v..s !.-..s� ii \\\ � ..... re. ..�12E --+�.�'l N 1ti ._ I' � 5 �' a, r.� a won d `yx ` ,�+x=a ti� � � _ ' �_."��' - • s- .. tree fee - - - , - — — '4 y'":= ... \ bm�. . , blif „,,..._ magke Exhibit G-502, fig` Subcriterion 3 ( d ) : Removal of Street Trees . . _ _ ..., .,.zIN4k1,11r 10147 { ti� `. i, , - 10143 - 't� ' . x � i�F`.• -..- . 10141 .';it.. ' . ,� 'Y it-c. 4. X -. ' 4 of the 11 trees were identified 10140. �. ,2 .* ` ',``.;,„„i4, 4 4or. .r , ^11, l; w e F�. : 1• • as street trees (#10140, 10141, .t; - ` �.�� x: i p 10143 and 10147) 14! y . - .'� ryV . it -/,. •F* fY tl may4,4 , ?�.' ,:v. � i''.. �,� ,.. k :; Subcriterion 3(d) is not met for d - .= I , = . : ; • these four trees; an Exception -,. _ analysis is required .. . _ 01 , eir . ' 4,-,,,,,NA.L.:1 71e. A 40. , Mt' • 14100111101 , , ,. Image taken from Exhibit F-001, pg. 19 Criterion 3 : Exceptions Analysis for 4 Street Trees ....,, .• . .. . . . . . . , i. ,.... . .i ,„,t,„ „, . ., ...„,„. .,„, .F.. - r,• 10147 --. • . • . . . -. • 4. Trees #10140 10141, and 10143 ffff `� . ,. ' d*4.. *AI: 4.' he ' . . , _A, *FP ,, - f �l ' are all in poor condition, with • ' ' poor structure making them . 4 : 10140 • r �tr. more susceptible to windthrow. . .: 4, r'' �f• ' ' `°� {�`°• r 'F There are no reasonable R ' �; ^ � * alternatives to removal for these : -: . : ;: - ,' 1'' . r te :4 A. tri„'..,..„ ,,,„,. ,i,L, • � ; *, . , ., .w ' : L . ..,.. ,. ,,,.. , - three street trees. r = : r .. itt 4 f Tree 10147 was listed as fair ' . _ -— - �"`• {y R r . h+" N _ih 1 condition . = ` ' . =Iwo .14 Y .%'.;*-- ' - - '.';'-.4. "L--...: , ' -4.,,k,-,---,-.1"1- _.. :-'-'-' ,,--,. t- • - '111. '4.-I'''.' -, '' •, 'n_ ..10,.• 4 .INVOINV i - S ± ' I .' LIkr. 7;,"14 ..*. i 4PIP p iiisiµ., w-, 'y . - .-,- - , Image taken from Exhibit F-001,, g._19 1 ..-- ^ ' ' Criterion 3 : - Tree # 10147 Flipping the footprint would require removal of more trees, ,.., ~ 4 UREMIA or i . , � - 1. \46 which are part of a larger group. �`. :} . } , , �SIt , yh / F ta+' n.;,,,a='{_ L.{ .• _ RIM AE KY+K,i']� \ lYEEXd Y\f}CCx Y,L dr l]C}.RL 1 mot` 6 # Staff finds that the proposed R t': N- ` � ' ',,. .4-:\ -- s ;' \774.4 , :;. \ ■ k moo+ ., I.; r.' a id. r removal of Tree #10147 is a '}1 17 '\7 `"�" " ' N. N. reasonable alternative to removal ' ' '' `-\\N` ` , - � of additional trees that are part "- ` F - � ; V; ikV % of a larger group of trees 1, s. - 6�6F .,.' 'N A, 0'*0A 75i131 `y 1Y. 7 [ 714°Ei■' , proposed for retention . :.:31 , row1\ 4- [ MIDEMIlt -0v,\Vc�r.\e . r Staff Recommendation _____ LA E p �� �� � J� Approval of the Type II tree removal application, subject to � � � ' � the following conditions of approval : v � � o _ A. Prior to issuance of building permit, submit a final mitigation plan for 2800 Wembley Park Rd. showing ° R E G �� the location, size, and species of 11 mitigation trees, nine of which are required to be native species. B. Prior to final building inspection for the dwelling, plant all required mitigation trees per Condition A and request a site inspection by staff. Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service. LOC 55 . 02 . 080 Criteria for Issuance of Type II Permit 1. The tree is proposed for removal because it has outgrown its landscape area or the removal is part of a landscape plan, or in order to construct development approved or allowed pursuant to the Lake Oswego Code or other applicable development regulations. The City Manager may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; 2. Removal of the tree, considering proposed mitigation measures, will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the character or aesthetics of the neighborhood. This standard is met when removal of the tree(s) does not involve: a. A significant tree; b. Alterations to the distinctive features or continuity of the neighborhood skyline, as viewed from all public streets and properties within 300 ft. of the property; c. A tree that serves as a visual screen between a residential zone and an abutting non-residential zone, or between a low density residential zone and a medium or high density residential zone, or between a medium and high density residential zone; d. A street tree; or e. Greater than 50% of a stand of trees. Exceptions: This subsection (3) is not applicable when: a. A tree is likely to or will continue to cause damage to a permanent, viable existing structure, or to infrastructure, such as utilities or paved landscape features, that cannot be remedied through reasonable tree maintenance or pruning; or b. Alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures (development purpose) or alternate landscaping designs (outgrown landscape area; landscape plan) that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Lake Oswego Code. 4. Removal of the tree is not for the sole purpose of providing or enhancing views; 5. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree pursuant to LOC 55.02.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Respect. Excellence. Trust. Service.