Agenda Packet - 2011-12-12 A GBNDA CITY OF HAKE C SWHGC
LAKE C9\MECO
lentennial1110-2010 PIJANNING COMIVIISSSICN MEETING 3FICIAAvenue
POI Box 3651
Monday, December 12, 2011 Lake Oswego,ORI S1;1CI34
6:30 p.m.
`ICI3-E 3`I-029(1
City Hall - Ccuracil Cliamblar www.cii.oswlegol.or.us/plarl
Cantlact: Iris McCaleIb Also published on the intlerrieit at:
Email: imcclalebPai.aswelgcl.or.us www.ai.o51wego.or.u.siplan)planning_commission
Ph one: 503-6S11-E1991
11h e meeting loaatian is accessible 1lo persons with disak ilitliers. lb request acaorrmoc atioris, pleases aantlact
Iris M Kaiak at 903-697-6591I, 48 h ours k afore the meeting.
1. CALL 110 ORDER
2. ROLL CAUL
3. CI1IIZEN COM MENTI—Regarding Issues Not Cln the Agenda 13 minute limit pen irldividt al]
This is an opportunity to raise issues regarding Plannir g or Citizen Involvement.
4. COUNCIL UACJA11E
•5. MINUTES
5.11 Sleotember 26, 201I3I
6. PUBLIC MIA RINE
6.1 L U 11-003E1—Code Reorgarliaatlion
PI proposal by the City of Lake Oswego to consolidate, reorganize, and rr ake rr inor text amendments
to Chapter 50—Corr rr unity Develapmentl Code, Chapter 57—Solar Access, Ch apter 98—Hisitaric
Preservation anc Article 45.15—Fences. The proposal also inck c es renaming the following zoning
distlrids fora clarity and aonsistlenay (no changes to regulations or c ensitly are proposed]: OU I10Ic
Town C esign District),, IR (Waterfront Cabana District), R-2.5 (Resic ential 2,50C sq.ft.), OC/R-2.5
IlOfficre Camglt 51/2,500 sq. ft.] anc OC/NC(Office CampL s/Neighborhood Comm ercial Disc rid:).
Staff coordinator is J e<sioa Num anoglu,, Sen ion Alanrlen
FOR MORE ANFIOFINATIONvisaT-htt, //WWW.CLOSWegCLo/.Uj/purl/Ca±Eflan. (Select LU 11-0036)
7. WORK SESSIONS
7.1 PP 09-001I9—Lake Gila%EI NI illage Center ILGVC) Hinanairie Strategy
The con5IL lilaritl tlean will present alternatlh El methods for ft nding tlh El projects listed in 1Ih e Lake
Grove V illage Center Plan. The Commission will t e asked to provic e feedback on preferred
meth ods so that a draft funding strategy aan be presented to the City Cot nail in early January. Staff
coordinator is Dennis Egnell Assistant Fiann,irig Director.
(Continued on Other Side)
Jon Gustaf son,Chair • Puja Bhutalni,Vices Chair
Bill Gear • Julia Glisson • Jim Johnson • Russe 1 Jones • Tlcidd Pla€ler • Jefil Gudm an,Council Liaison
Page a
8. OTHER BUSINESS—PLAN NINE COMMISSION
Revieew of 2011 acaomptis hments anc goals for 2012. Stdfj coordinator i5i Debra Andreaaei, •
Senior Fllanner.
9. OTHER BUSINESS—COMMISSION HCIR CITIZEN INV CIL VEMENT
10. SICH EDU L E REVIEW
11. ADJOURNMENT
STAFFI REPIG RT
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
. PILANNING DIVISION
APPLICANT: HILA NO:
City of Lake Osiwego LU 1111-0036
PRCIPERTI AV11 N ARS: STAFA:
N/A Jessica Numanoglu
' LOCAL DESCRIPTION DATA OR REPORT:
N/A Novemterr29, 3011
LOCATION: OATH OF HEARING:
Citywide Decarr ber 112, 20111
• COMA. ALAN DESK NATION: ZONING DASIIGNATION:
N/AI NIA
NBIGHBORHCIOU ASISICICIAIIICN:
All
I. APPLICANT'S li BQU BST
The City is proposing Lakes Oswego Coc e and Comprie&F ensiive Alan and coning Maps amendments
to:
1. Adopt a new Chapter 90 consolidating, rrerorganizirig, and making rr inor text amendments to th El
following chapters or articles of the Lake Osiwego Coder: ,
CFapten 50—Carr rrunity Development Coc e
C F a pten 57—Sole r Access
C F a pter 58—Historic Preservation
Article 45.15—Fences
LL 1111-CI0:IEI
Rages 11 of]1a
2. Rename the following zoning districts for clarity and consistE ncy 'Ithere are no ah anges to
regulation's or de risity proposed):
•
UD zone (Old Mown De sign Dlistrici) to be re named R-DD
WR acme Waterfront Cabana District] to be renamed A-W
R-2.9 to be renamec WIG R-2.9 (We st Lake C rove R-2.5]
WLC OC/R-2.5 to t El renamed WLC RM U West Lake C rove Residential Mixed Use)
WLC OC/NC tot e ne named WLC OC West Lake C rove Clffiae Commercial;
WLE R-3.5/W tote neriarned WLC ALW (West Lake Crove Lige/Work]
Onc ironic* 2579, which would erect these change's, is atilac'he c as Exhibit P•11.
II. APPLICABLE REGULPITIONSI
P. City of Lake Clswego Conprep a nsive Alan:
Coal 1 Citizen Ing olvement, Policies 1 and 9
Coal 2 Land Use Planning, 9e('tion 1, Lard Use Policies and Ret.lations,
Aaliciy 33
B. City of Lake Clswego Conrr unity Development Coc e:
LOC 50.75.009 Legislative C1e c'ision Cleifinec
LOC 50.75.0110 Criteria fon Legislative C1e aision • •
LOC 50.75.0119 Required Notice to DLCD
LOC 50.75.020 Planning Con rr ission Recommer'c action Required
LOC 50.75.025 City Council RE‘AieW and Decision
C. Statewide Planning C oal or Pc IT inistrative Rule_adapted pi rsi ant to OA51 Ch apterr
1197
Coal 1 Citizen Involvement
Coal 2 Land Use Planning
III FINDINGS
P. Backgrounc arc Disci ssion:
In the si rr rr eir of 2010, the City(complete d an audit of th a Com rr unity Development
Codec (CDC] and relate d chanters to ide r'tify prof lems with its organization,
re adability, and usat ility, and to define an approach for creating a rr ore useir-
frienc ly c evelopment code. The Auc it Report IRE port; recomme r'ded a two-ph ase
strate€ly.for updating the CDC arid relatec chapters/ar1 icle. Phase II consists of
reongar'iaing the CDC in au'coric ance with the annatated outline pre sent€d in the
Report and Masa 2 woi Id address si bstar'tive issues identifiec di ring the audit arid
Phase II of the proje'c't. The CDC text anc Corr prep einsive Alan and coning Maps
aim endrrar'ts being proposed in Ordinan'c'e 25751 im Fllement Ah arse 1.
LU 111-0(136
Hage 2 of 110
Below is a detailed description of the proposed amenc ment?r.
410 a. Community)Clevelcipment Code Text Amendments'
llhe CDC and related aodEis F M El beEirr amenc ed and exipandec ni,meirous
tin-IEislovEir tF El years anc are complex in terms of aontent, format, and
• orgarriaation, mak ing it difficult tor the user to navigate anc uric ersitand. As a '
.groi p, the CDC and relatec de%elopnent codas:
E1 Are difficult 110 nay iga1e-tF are are over 65 separate ari ides in the CDC
• alone and i sers F 2114 El to flip t etween code sections to finc key
information and ciF Elak several different ah apters to flint all standarc s
related to one sut ject;
Larcrk clarity-miany refit.lations are not w nitten or presentee clearly and
are scattered among difilerent aoc e sections"
41 Are repetitive-standarc si that are th El same in certain zones are repeatec
in SEN era! c ifferent articles, yet are often presented or wore ed in slightly
different ways;
a lacik integrailed graphics-all the croc e gnaphias are contained in
appendiaesi, whiciF requires tF e raac er to flip between the 1 t and the
€iraphicis anc nee uces the effacrti‘mess anc L seflulness cif the graphics
•
Lack cilear Clevelepment Review Firaiceduresi-FirocedL res are scattered
among many different artiales anc chapters, making it diffici It to
® u nderstanc wF at aomt ination of FlroceduiiEis will apply beibrEi filing an
appliaai ion;and,
o Lack user-1 rienc ly formatting-tF e F eadens anc lbciters in the crcides do
riot.F a.%El enough detail to help orient tF e Ileac er,tF EI indenting pattern of
tF
e test mmalkeis it difficult to read and unc Eirstand tF e F ieranahy of tF Ei.
new lations, and many subsections lacik titles, w F ich fbrces.the i sen to
raac tF rough lengthy text to Hind the information tF ON are sieekirrg.
lb ac dress these ism est,tF EI applicant proposes to consolidate, reorgarriae,
and make mirror taxi amenc mErnts to the following chapters and article of
the Lake Clswe®o City Code:
Chapter 5CI-Community Development Code
Chapter 51- Solar ACCIEIss
Chapter 58- Historic F reservation
Article 49.11-Rendes
11F EI abo%Ei-listed (IF apters anc an ide are proposed tot e repealec and
neplaced with a aonsiolic ated new CF apter 50. Ilei 511 bsitantive ahan€les to tF e
content of these cihaptersi on article is intent ed or proFlosrec. The goal of tF is
FIF ase of tF EI Flro,'Eiat is to present the existing content of tF EI above-listed
codes in a more logical,, consistent; concise anc L ser-friendly manner. In
otF er worc s,,the content oil the code is the same,, bit presented in a
• • different way.
LU 1i1=0CI3EI
Page 1 cif la
•
The reongianizeld Planning Commission version of the Draft CDC (Attach rrient
B of Clydinance 25191 contains explanatory!footnote!'tlhat will be removec
w h en 1 he final Ordinance version of CIraft CDC is pnelpared for adoption by •
the City Council. Th E'foollr1otle5i is enilifyI major relocations of text neferElncina
their location in the EDI isting codes,, flag substantive issues to be c'onsidened in
Phase 3, and provic e explanations for sorrse minor text changes. Also
inciludec in 111"El footnotes sire explanations of ah alrlges'than were made sifter
consulting 1 he Code Reorganization Work E rot,p. llh El Work E roup siervec as
an informal slot.nding k oa'rd to 1 he project consultant when situations arose
h ere it was unclear whether a propossec change might result in a
511 bstaintive ah singe. 1I El Work C roup consisted of memk Elrsi of 1Ih e City
Council (Councilors Olsson anc Tierney),, Planning Commissiion
(Commissioners BF utlani anc Finagler], Development Review Commission
(Commissioner Needham), anc staff.
On November 114, 3011, staff helc a work session with the Planning
Commission iia review the draft clot e. At th is work session, the Commission
also provic ed recommendation's on three illElms 11h zit were still pent ins w ith
the Work Grou p. A list of all 11h El ism es forwarded to the Work Gros,p and the
Planning Commission and their recommendations is a1Ita'cih ed in 9)h ibiti FI-1.
In addition, an errata sh eetl showing major corned ions/edits mac El since the
last glublica'tion of the draft aoc e,, datec September 2011,th it was previously
reviewed by the Commission is attached in Exhibit F-S1.
In adc ition to c'onssolic a'tion anc reorganization of th El CDC, Solar A acesss%,, and
H istorricr Preservation chapters, and 1Ih e Hence article, the following ah singes
%Eire made to improve arganizzatlion,, reac albility, anc clarity of LIFE' code:
1. 11h El content of the chapters has been rearranged and glrouFled by su bjeci
into 11 new sections, is listed below: •
LOC 50.01 General Pno%isions •
LOC 50.02 Base Zoning Dissllniats
LOC 50.03 Use Regulations and Conc illions
• LOC 50.04 Dimensional Standards
LOC 50.05 CI%E'rlay and Design Districts
LOC 50.06 Development Standards
LOC 50.07 Review and Approval Proaedu res
LOC 50.08 Adjustments, Alternatives'rind Ndarianaes
LOC 50.09 Enforcement and Penalties
LOC 50.10 Definitions and Rules of M EMS.rermenll
LOC 50.11 Alppendic€s
2. N EMI tables of contents have been crea'1 E'd that inch,c e a general talk le of
contents all the beginning of the Code anc more detailed table of
contents for each of the 111 new sE'ct ions. Illh El tat le of contE nts is rat
Ed i.ally E'doglte d a's Plaint of the Ordinance, k ut1 clan be incdu ded in the
LU 111-003E1
Rage 4 cd 110
codified eirsiion ZIrid rErvisiec k y the City Recorder from time to time.] Al •
reverse index of all tF El sections in tF El existing ciode and the
aorresiponc i"rig Citation far th El SEMI ions in th Er draifil reorganized aoc e is
attach ed alai ibit F-2.
3. Nerve titles have k Eren sic ded to sections zirid some sr,bsiecitions to IT EINEI
information easier to locate arid to create a more complete table of
contents.
4. Descriptive h enders have been addec to each FlagEl.to help orient the
reader to their location in the ciode arid indenting and formatting h as
k eren improved to ent ante Ileac ability.
5. Where appropriate, text F as been reform attac into tables so that tile
informations is easier finc and uric ersllarid.
6. M inor text edits for clarity have been made Ilshown in underline arid
}rte in tH e draft]. In son.e classes,, new subsections were added fon
explanatory' purposes. As an oamiple, preciec ing the Use Table in LCIC
50.03, a new sir.Inaction was included to e)plain h ow to usEI the table.
7. Many n.zips anc grapF ics ha%Ei beEeri naplaced with L pdated versions that
convey th a same information but in color and/on w ith enhanced
readability. Most maps and graph lost a\El beer nem oved from
® appandicies aric plac ec into the body of th El Code near tH a test to which
they relate. At ere regulatory irifbrmation Ilfar example, a height lin-it)
was contained or a map or graphics it has eith er been moved into the text
of th e Code or eliminated if that stanc and was alneac y contained in the
tot.
8. Cross-references have k ElErn inn prmec anc nL IT bering has k Eren
stanc ardiaed. The numk Eirs ten arid k Erlow H alt a been spelled out arid
numbers ill aric gnEratErr are in Arabic. M east ren.ents have beers
abbreviated.
\N hila tF El Ileac ability and user-friendliness oil the CDC Has been greatly
improved by tl e reorganization;; it should k e noted that some sections of th e
reorganized CDC,, such as.the permitted use table in LOC 50.03,, may k El
SOFT ewhat difficr, It to read. By consolidating all the i se information in one
table, it has exposed 1 H e conflicts and weakrlElssEls presernt in th EI existing
CDC. Because no srr,bstaintive ch ariges are being made in this nH ase of tt e
project, the task of overt auling 1 H e i se table will be recommended as part of
Phase 2.
As stated previously, the proposed amenc IT Esntt are riot intended to mak EI
auk stantive charges to any of th El code cit voter's. Although staff t eliErves 1 H at
none of th e proposed amenc m ents are suk stantive, in the event tH at a
change was rr ac e inadveri Eintly 1 H at would clause a different outcome for a
proposed development tF an would h al,El occas rred unc er tH e prior version of
LU 1111-0036
Rage 5 01110
tk a C DC, staff proposes a transition period in whic'F an adminis trati%a"Code
Raorganiaation Vaniance" woulc be perrritted if an applicant can dhow that a •
different oL l coria fora a proposed development would ocicun as a result of the
coda reorganization. Staff r€rc'ommends,tF al th El Code Reorganization.
Variaruie be sur ject to 14-c ay pr,blia notice and 15-day appeal periods
Ai rslt,ant 10 tF El Ni inor Development pnciciessl; F ow El%er, in one err to
streamline the appliaai ior', staff suggests Ei)emiptir'€I the application from a
pre-application conference. lih a Code.Reongar'izatior'Variar'c'e sF ould
include a sunset alai se so that it is effective for a limitec time period, sr,ah as
tF ree years. A?I-yeah effeal ive 1 ime period for tF e Code Reorganization
Variance woi Id allow a reasonable amount of time to identify'and address
ism est car sed by tF e adoption of tF a reorganized CDC, while pros iding a
neasonable period of time for applicants to obtain a va riance so they do riot
ha%El to wail for a code amendment process to be completed.
Staff also recommends'that a pnon inion be inch ded in Ordinance 2579 that
would give th El City Recorder authority lo conreat an obvious' mistake or
omission to a listed use, numerical s'tandarc, or pund r,al ion without 1 he •
need 10 rlroaErss the ah ange as a code arrendmeni. Fon example, if a "R" for
rlarmitllec i,se was inac ertently omitted for a salon use in tF e NC sone in
tF El L se table, t L t tF El prior aode shows that it is a permitted usEl anc it was
riot nElrroved by another aoc a amendment, i he City Recorder could mak El
tF Eli cornedion as a clerical error and woL Id not have to go through a code
amermc merit or require 1 he applicant to apply for a Coda Reorganisation
Variance.
2. Compreher sive ar d Zoning Maps Amer dments
Th e appliciar't is requesting to ch ange the at breviation of 1 he DD and W R zoning
c istricts fora consistency with th Ei abL reviations of other nesic entiail zones wind to
rename 1 he Wes'1 Lake C rove zoning districts for clarity ni.rposes, as follows:
a an sone QCIId.Tlown Design Clistrict] to be renamec R-DD
a W R cone IIW aterfront Cabana District) to t EI renamed R-W
a R-2.5 to 1 El renamed WLC R-2.5 QWesi Lake Grove Town HorrrEl Residential R-2.51
a WLC CIC/R•2.5 to be renamed WLC RMU QWes'1 Lake Gro%El Residential M ixed
Use)
a WIC CIC/NC to be renamed W IJG CIC IWest.Laid El Grove Office Commercial)
a WLG R-2.9/W to be renamed WLG RLW Med UNE! Grope Live/Work)
11F e DD arid WR conies sire both residential sone districts; however,tF El abbreviations
for th ase districts do nd match the others res'iden'tial sone abbre‘iations in the City,
all of which begin with an "R" to signify tF al tEl ay are residential sones' Ie.@1.,, R-119, R-
110, etc.). TF e applicant proposes to ch ange tF e at breviai ions of tF ase districts to R-
00 and R-W. The ft.II names cif the sone c isi ricts, Old Town Design District and 4111
Waterl ront Cabana Disi riot;, respectively, woL Id not aF singe.
LU 11I-003E1
FIage 6 oil 110
•
•
The W est Lake Grove sone designations are proFlosiec to be renamec in orc er to
reds cm the appeararicie of split zoning on these properi iesi. The W LC OC/R-3.5 and
W LG CIC/NC designations are zones th al are unique to the West Lake C rove Design
Clicitrict, haw ever, t Eiciar sie there are general OC and h C c esti®riatiansi in other areas
of th e City,,the West lake C rove districts can be c'anfusec ibr a split gorier. To
elim'in'ate th is confusion, the names and abbreviations are proposed to be cihanaec
as listed, at ove.
The proposac ComlpreH ErnsivEi aric Zoning Maps amenc mentsi woulc result in
ch angesi to the abbrevial ion anc/on name ofhth El sone districts only. No changes to
zone nagulations or densiil y are proposiec
B. Compliance with Criteria for Approval: •
LOC SC.75.0]10'indicates that a legislative decision is generally a policy c eci<.'ien
which is up to the discretion cif the City C olunail, but shall:
1. CcImply with any applicable state law;
11.Erre are no known applicable sitai El laws to review L rider this crit Errian.
2. Comply with any applicable Statewide Planning'Goal or
Pldmiriistrailive Rule adapted pursuant 110 ORS Chapter 9197; and
9tatewic e Planning Goal M. Citizen Ir'volverr en11
This Si atewide Planning Coal 1 requires jt,risdictions to develap a citizen
involvement t Flrogram tH at insi res the opportunity far citiaens to t tEl involved in all
ph asiesi of 1 he planning process. The City's aciknawlac ged Comprehensive Illan and
CDC contain all n'eces'sary requirErrrants for a citizen' iri%alvement pnagram wH ich
cleanly defines the prraaec ures by whict the general public will tEl natifliErc in the on-
going land use planning process anc enat les citizens to corn paeh end the issues anc
become involved in decision' making.
All reqs,irec nal ific'ation rrieasii rErs and opportunities for input as specified in these
documents werre pro%idec dr.ring this process. An informational open hot,se was
heic on October 911, 20111, to flrErseril thEl draft reorganized cot El anc to answer
citizen's question's'. Public' H earings will be H eld before th Er.Planning Corn rn ission arid
City Cot ncil. TiherErfbre, tH Er process followed for tH is amendment is in torr pliancEl
wit H 511atE1wic a Rlanning Coal 11.
StallErwide Planning Coal 2. Land Use Planning
TH is Goal necluires jt,risc ictions to c evelop a lanc Lse planning process anc policy
® frarr Erwork as a basis tor all decisions and ad ions rErlatec to the use of tH e land and
110 assure an adegi ate tactual basis ton sL ch decisions and actions. This application'
provic es the required information arid respanses to 11h a applicable approval
standards for Code text arid Compel ensive arid Zoning Maps art endm ents.
LU 11-0CI3E1
Ha 8 e 3 cif 1CI
FL rtherimore,the proposed amerldmenls c o riot invol%Er any slut sitantive chanties to
Code text or the Comprehensha and Zoning M apse, therefore,, the reqi est is
consistent with 9tatawic e planning Coal 2. 1111
3. In 11F e case 011a legislative amenc menu'RIM Community!
Development Code, cicImply with any applicable provision of 11F e
Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan.
Goal ]I. Citizen Involvement. Policies ]I and 5
1. Prior ide opportunities for citizen participation in preparing and revising locial
land t,sie plarisi and ordinances.
5. Seek citizen input through sermicie organizations,, interest groups anc
indivic uals,, as well as throi gh neighk orhood organizations.
Findings': This application adc resisesi policies 1 anc 5 above.
Pt rsuant to the requirements of a le8islative process, announcements for th e
proposed Code text amendments have !r can provided to all neigh borih ood
associations. Flublia hearings will !r e held befoul the Planning Commission and City
Council. Citizens, inlarest groi psi, and neighk orhood associiations will have an
oFlporti nity to participate in the review of the proFlosec amendments during the
City's pi blia hearing processes. Notiaa has bean provided consistent with City
reqi hien-ants. Pc equate o flpori L nities have been made al,ailak le for citizen 40
iri%olvement with regard to this application.
Ccnclusion: The application complies with Goal 1, Citizen In%olvernent policies 1 and
5.
Coal 2, Land Use Planning, Section 1, Land Use, Poliav 213
23. Coordinate th e del%eloFlrr ent and amendment of City plans and actions
relatec to land i sie with others county, state, Metro,,federal agency and
special c i5itrict pians.
Findings': 111.is application provic es the reqi ired information and responses to th e
applicable approval standards and c oes not iri%olve any substantive cif anges to Coc e
text or Com prep ansive or Zoning Maps, and is therefore is consistent with 9tatElwic e
Planning Goal 2. Pc ditionally,, notice of th El application has been pros idec to
jt.risdictions and agencies such as DLC D,, Metro,, Clacikamas County and flake Oswego
servucie pros iders as required by Goal 21.
Conclusion: The application complies with Goal 2,, Section ]I, Policy 23.
C. e Oswego Community Development Code Procedural Flequirementsl ®.
LCIC 50.011.0110 Flt,rpose
LU 11I-0(136
Rade 8 of 110
LCIC 5C1.09.009 Zoning Districts
® LOC 5(1.05.091CI Zoning Map
LOC 50.79.030 Major OENeloprrent
LOC 50.77.001 Bt,rden of Hrooi
LOC 50.77.030 A ppliciation PnociErc ures
LOC 50.82.005-.020 Review of Major' DEI\EiloprrlEint Applications anc
Alclpeals
LOC 50.83 Hearings efore a Hearing Body
LOC 50.75.005 Legislative Decision Defined
LOC 50.75.010 Criteria for Legislative Decision
LOC 50.75.015 Reqs,irec Notice to DLCD
LOC 50.79.020 Planning Commission Recommendation Regt,irec
LOC 50.79.025 City Cot,mil Review and Decision
Aindings: TF e application has been submitted, noticed arid re%iewErd in accordance with th e
City of LINEI Oswego CDC regi iremients.
Coinclus ion: llhe reconc indicates that the application complies with all of the above
a 1plicfak le prociedi ral reqs,irements.
IV. CONCLUSION
411 The proposed amendmeni s are in compliance with City ComprEIN endive Hlan policies, state
laws, anc statewide planning goals.
V. RECOMM ENDAl1ION
Staff recommends appno,al of the pr'apo<.iErd amendments to the Coca text and tile
Comclrahensi‘e Plan arid Zoning Mapsitci improve organization, reacability,, anc cilarity.
Staff alio mon-rriErnds that(1) a 'Code Reorganization Variance" k e ac optec as part of
Clydinance 2979 in order to pro%ide relief to an applicant in the merit th at th E' arr endments
inadveri EIntly ciaii se a different oul come for a proposed develapment that wot.Id have k E'en
allowed by th e prior code and 12, a provisian is inch,ded in the orc inancie to ailaw tI e City
Recorder to make connections to listac uses, numerical si andanc s,, on puncitt,action withaut
the need for a ciode amendment if the Errror was caused k the ciode neorganization.
9XH1 BITS:
A. Clydinances
A-1* Dnafll Ordinance 2579, darted No%Errniber 29, 201111 (inclt deer Attach mErnt B,
*PVlease note that onlly the ordinance is attached to tile sitafj report. Copiesi of
Attachment El have been pan idea to the Planning Commission urider separate cover
The document can be found on the City's web site under Case Fiile EU -0036 at:
http://www.cia<lwego.oll.wi/p/an/cosEfhtrr).
LU 11-0C136
F a@1e SI ail 10
B. Firic ings, Conclusions and Orden (No current exhibits,; reserved for hearing Lse)
C. Minutes (No current exhibits; reserved for hearing Lse) S
0. Staff Feporis (No current exhibits; reserved for hearing Lse)
G. Grapl-ics/Plans INonel
R. W rit1Ier' M aterials
F-1 Cade Reorganization W ork G roup I11Eirr s and Recommenc ations
F-2 REI%Elrsie Inc ex ion Coc e Sections in C L rrerit and Draft Code
F-3 Errata Sheet(lists major corrections/changes rr ade since the put['cation of
the Septerr t er 2011 Drafll Ccide)
G. Letter5l
•
•
410
LL 1111-0CI3E1
Ram 10 a1]IO
•
• ORDIN AIN CN NO.2579
AN ORDINANCE OF THB CITTA COUNCIL OH THB CITYI OF LAKE OSWBGO REORGANIZING THB
COMMU N ITIA DEVIELOPMDNT C ODE (IIOC CHAPTER 5C); C ON SIOLI RATING THE COMMU N IThI
DEVELOPMEN11 CODS WITH CODE PRCIVISIONS RELATING TO SOLAR PKCESISI (CHAPTER 57),
'HISTORIC PRESBRVA11ION (CHAPTER 581 AND FENCES (ARTICLE 45.15); AMENDING 11HE ZONING
MAP AND COMPREHENSIVE ALAN MAP TO RBRLEC:T CHANGED,,: AND ADCIPTING
FINDINGS LU 11-0036-��
WHHREAS,, th Ei Comm,pity Developrr ent Code has been amenc ed and, expanded nl rr eros,s
times over the years wind is complex in terms of content,,,iorrnait, and organization,, rr asking it
difficult for the L.seen to nal,ignite anc understamd and can be in-proved by reformatting,
reorganizing, and rr ak ing rr inor text an-Elndments for clarity;; and
W HBREP SI, the Solar Access anc Historic Preservation chapters and th E' Hence ArticilEi are part of
the overall development review process t the City, but are containec in separate chapters fnorr
the Community Development CodEl, and rncorponating thesie chaptersinto the Community
Development CodEl woulc nElsult in a more'consolidated set of developrrEant regulations; and
•
W HEF HAS,, the reorganization, rElformatting,anc consolidation of th`e Commis nity Development
Coda Solan Access and History 'reservation chapters, and the,Fence Article are riot intended to
40 rest.It in any siubsitaintive changest,the existing content of these codes; and
W HERBAS, sorr El zone,;names are abeing changed in th EI text of the Ccirr Triunity Development
Code, necessitating corresponding changes for;;,-zone names on th EI zoning map and
ciorr irehensive plan map, and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing for consic oration of th is Ordinance was duly gi%erl in the
rr ariner;regt,ired by law; and
WHEREAS,the. Rlanning Commissiion has nElcorrirrianded that 111 1I1I-00JI6 be approvec by
th El City Council" and
WHORE/19, a piblichearing on LU 1I1-0036� wasi held before the City Cot.ncil of the City of
LakEI Oswego on , 2011].
The City of Lake OsiwEl€CI ordains'as follows:
Sled ion 1.The City Coi riciil hereby adopts)the Hindingsi and Conclusions (LU 11-0036_`m "<<) aittacihed
as Hxhit it"A". �
EXHIBIT A-1
Orc inance No. 2579 L U 11-010131E1
Rage 1I of 23
November'29, 2011
•
4110
Section 2I. LOC 12.51.035(3) i<,i hereby a'm'ended as follcws'(new cleat shown in bold.double-
underlined type;deleted text show ri in ctnkethr ugh type;
12.51.035 Historic Res°urcEIS Pldvisory Bcaird.
211 * 711
3. DL ties. It El Historic Resources Advisory Boanc shall
a. Carry out the purpose section and c utiesi described ini LOC Chapter58
50.06.009 and 50.07.004.5 J Hisitoric Pneisiervation) and otherwise assist the City
Cor,mil on historic pneisiervation matters. ,
b. Disseminate information to edL nate the public as to state and federal las
aritigi itiesi and historic plaaeisl
c. Acct as a coordinator for local preseationrv4grouFls educational works l•ops,
s'ignin'g and mon'mentation projeaaric other srmila'r programs.
d. 1c vi5IEI interest boards, and citizens on matters rela'tin'g to
historic preservation within the city. • •
• e. Conduct historic inventorieson a periodic basis anc ersune'that information on
inventoried historic properties is' upc ated and maintained.
�fRese�'rah and recommend,property owner ince'n'tives to City Council to ass'is't in
nv
continued preservation of historic reisioL ro'e's.
Section 3 LOC 12.52.010 is hereby amended to read as follows(new text show n in bold,
double-underlined type; deleted text show n in type):
12.52.010 Specific Recordable Irisllruments.
Y
lihe followingii strumerts' maybe recorded in the apFlropniate cioi my records:
1. Wall in oro‘emeint Districts.
a. Petition' for Fonmatior of local improvement or assessment district. See UOC
40.02.02011S:•
Oiic inance No. 2579
Rage; of 221
November 29, 2011
b. Waiver of F ighil to notice, 1.earing, remonstrance or assessment for a local
improvement district 1111.IDI, put Iia impro%erriEant1,,faciility or sEirvice. 115 ere LOC
40.020.050..1
ci. Notice cif Pendency of Flormation of a local improvement district or assE'ssmEant.
115 EIEI LOC 40.C12.040 anc 40.02.06011111.
d. Rea€Ipor1 ionr anti cif Special Assessment for LIC's or public Impro%emEints. See
LOC 40.02.160.1 a > `
a. Corltini ing Reqs estfor Public.lnmpro%Err Elnts or Services approved for
rEiciordirig t y City Manager or designee. IISee LOC 40.012.020 (3)). a
q �
a. Development REr%iew. Development restrictions relating to a major
dEe%E'loFlr ent, minor development, or rr inisterial developmenll,including but not
limited to land divisions,variances, conditional use permits, and the Conic itions of
Appricrval imposed on the sut jectsreal property w hen approved for recoric irig by
the City Manager ar designee. (See LOC 50.79.04050.07.003.5.:
r, .
3. Agreements tozPavCharges.
a. System development charges. 1I9eEi LOC39.OE1.]IO]I;. (May be recordEic or may
be posited In the•Mun icipal Lien Docket
b.Any impact fees or taxes Imposed on real properly pursuant to Lake Oswego
Code.
c. Agreement for Publics Im provements, to ciorisitrL cit or r aintain put lic
improvers ents recluirE d t y the City Manager, City hearing t ody,, or City Engineer'.
IISee LOC 50.87.020 50,07.003.9.)
c.aone Connection Charge to reimbt,rsie a person'fon the oasts of financing a
sewer, street,.surface water management or water impro%err ant. (See LOC
40.04.050.)
4. F Eial Property Conveyance Acceptance.Acceptance of llrarisifen or PcaE'ptance
of Dedications of road right-of-way or other put lice interest in real property
approved for recording t y the City Manager.
Ordinance No. 2579
Rage? of 23
November 39, 301131
9. Property Linea Aldi�stment. Property Lot Line Adjustrr ent Approval, or
agreement pursuant to Approval. (See LOC 12.92.CI10 (2) 50.79.010, 50.79.020
0M-50497030 50.07.003.12.50.07.003.14..and 50.07.003.15.)
6. Change of Street Name. Change of Str'e'et Name'approved for reracrrding k
City Eingineer. (See LOC 43.02.090.1
7. Building Department Notices. Notice of Hinal Inspection,Notice cif Occii panay
Approval, Notice of Failure to Clbtain Final Inspection, and Notice of Haim re to
C btlain Occ' pancyl Approval if approved fon recording by Bt ild'ng Off tial.
8. Declaration of Nuisance and Related Documents. Notice tF at a property is
suk ject to a pending Declaration of Nuisance F aisi been determined ticibe a,
Nuisance or a Nuisance Lien amok nt F ass been:approved for recording by City
Manager' or designee. (See LCIC 34.08.409, 34.08.411 and 34.08.42]1.)
9. Permit)of Untrv.A permit or license of entry authorizing City, its employees,
agents or contractors to enter onto private°pnciperty.
110. Seizure or Forfeiture of Property Notice of Iritenito Seiae or Intent to Horfeitl
Property, Certificate°of Forfeiitunei or Sale approved fcir neiciordiri€l by City Manager
"te •
or c esignee
11. Verificaticin.of,Official Act.Resolution and Orc er, Minute Orc ear car tither'
comparable order evidenciing anofficia,act°of City board on acimmmission approved
for re'c'ording bythe CityRecorder or designee.
112. Agreement to Construct Public Improvements.Agreement to C crnsllruct
Public lnmpro%eirrients ifapprmeid ty the City Manager or de'signe'e for recording.
113. Agreement to Hold Harmless or Indemnification.Agree'me'nt to Hold
Harmlesis`Ao irndemnify', or defend City of Lake Clsweigo„ its officers employee,
agents or acintractonsi approved by tF e City N anagen or designee fon recording.
114. Land Use Required Doaurr ents. Any docs,meant required or dineciteid tot e'
reaordec pi,rsi.ant to or in flurtF erance of a land L sae,, development appro%al or
building permit issiLainciei and approved for recicirding ty the Planning Director,,
Building Clfficiial, City Managers, or any designee thereof. Examples inch.de:
Ordinance No.7579
Page4of23
November 751, 301111
Restrictive CoyEinant Nori-AlccessiStrip, Waiver, Joint-me Agreement, Alccess
Restriction,, Maintenance Agreements,, Development or Use Restriction.
15. Roac Agreement. Road or Ri€Iht-o1-W ay Maintenance AlgnEIEimient appriciy adfor recording LI' the City Manager, City Engineer, or any c Eisi€Inee thereof.
16. Encroachment Agreement. 9nclroauiF ment AlgneEirr Ernt approved for
recording City M anagen or designee. iSee IJCIG 42.]18.1010 )
117. Tree Permits'.
a. Tree Removal or Tree Presiervation Permits approvEidfor recording by the
Alanning Director orl designee. iSee LCIC 5S 02`.084, 99.02 094, 95.C12 130,and
59.02139.)
b.llrEie Heritage Designation evidenced in a covenant and authorized for
recordin€I by Plannin® Direciton or designee. Q5Iee LOC SS 06 03C1.)
v e
18. Historic ArEiservation. Historic Landmarkor Historic District DEisii®nation, or
Removal of Designation. iSee UOC A+tic -58.0 50.06 009 and 50.07.004.)
410 19. Annexation. Anneation Documents executed by Flroperty owner or by City
officer!or Eimployee in ft,rtheranc e. of current or ft,ture annexation,, including but
not limlitec to consent to annexation anc waiver of timelimitations for consent to
annexation (See ORS;222.1731. INo1IEi:Annexation contracts ane authorized for
reccrdingander.ORS 2221]15).
Section$4. LOC 15.06.610(5) is hereby arr ended to read as follows (new tEixt shown in
double-underlined type, deleted twit shown in stakethfeuglq type:
15.06 610 Oregon Fire'Code Ada rIted.
111•ere is hereby adopt`"ed for the pur�Iose of Flresiaribiri€I regt,laticins governing
conditions ha dous tlo lifEl and priciperty from fire and e)iplosiorl the Oregon Hire
Code lase enacted'on Clcltciber ]I, 2004, or asi thEireafter amended by tF e
Department of Clregon State Rohm, Clffiae of State Fire Marshal]. 9i,ciF a clodEl is
erlacitec anc adopted ir wF ole by til is nefarence as though stet forth at length
except such port ions as ane henEiinafter deleted, modified or amended by 1I1.
flection.
* * 31
® Ordinance No. 2579
Page 5 of 23
November 39, 2C11111
5. Section 6031.11 is americ ed to ac d, as additional slut siecticinsi, th e fallowing: •
A. -'lubsieation 6C3.1.8. 5.Itorage may be permitted in residential zones subject to
th El following reqs,ireirrieintsi:
13. 5k bsieict ion 603.1.E Al. Screenins.Above ground tanks area to be surroi nded by
fences, walls, cir plant materials that are sufficiiEint to fully screen their
appearance from neighk oriing properties. If plant matlenals are usieid to provides
th El screening, they shall meet the reqs,ire meintlsi of Section 50.47.015 50.06.004.1
of the Comm.nilly DER Eilopmeintl Code.
C. SL bsiecition 603.1.E.2. Sett auks. All structures support ing tanks shall bedlocated
a m inirr um cif five 1I91 feet from any property-line. For tanksi larger th an 27,57i,,
gallons, the rr inimu_m sett acik shall be increased tics teen feed. Additlicinal setbbaciks
shall be as sipeuified in the Oregon Hire Code.
D.Subseci ion 6C 3.11.8.3.Tank Requirements.A II above ground tanks shall display
a sticker inc icating acceptance by Undeiry riters Laiboraitories cir a acimiparat le
onaanization 1e.g.,ASME or Aactory' Mutt,ail).11anks:sh�ill betdoublei-walled or shall
w
oth erisei prci%ide containment for leaks.Tarek s m L st be rr aru faicitured, installed,,
s
and mairitanned�in�compliamce�witlh the rnanufactunEir's mstlnt,c1ions, NAPA
Standard 3I1 (Installation of Oil Burning Equipment), and be a_ipprci%ed t y the FIN
Chef.
E. Subsection 603 18 4 .Clean-uD.The property ownenshall bear the
responsibility for the prompt and thonough clean-L F� anc proper dispcisal of ainy
fuel oil that i?i spillled.on or around any tank, w hetlheir th El tank is Iocaiteid t,nder
grqi.nd or above ground.
F. Subsection 6031.8.5. Closet system. Above arounc tanks shall tel closed
systems,fueling only oil•fired appliances.. A ll other disitribL tions of fL ell from such
tanks shill be unlawfi,I.
Section 5. LOC 40.06.0110 is herd y amended to reac as iollows 11riew texi Sih own in bold'
double-underlined tyjpe;deletlec text shown in riles type):
40.06.0110 Definitions'.
City.The City of Lake Cswcoo.
C rc inanae No.25751 •
Pai®Ee 6 of�I3
N o%cunt eir 29,, 201]1
•
City 9rigineer or Engineer.Tile parser' appointed by th El City IV ariager to perform
the du ties of City Engineer pursuant to ICC Article 40.06.
City N ariager.1W a person appointed by the City Council as the City Manager
pL rssi ant to th el LaN El Oswego Ch arter,, or the City Manager's designee.
Gravity Sanitary Sewer. A pipe located with in a public right-of-way and/or public
utility easement that i_ designee to convey sewage by gravity
Line charge. A unifonrri ch arge established to recover the cost of extending th a
sanitary'sewer system to serve properties within the L5IB.
Parcel of Lane or P_aruciel.A lot as defined in LOC 50.0_2.005 50.10.003.2.
Persson.Any person or legal entity.
Press%Lra Sanitary Sewer. A pipe and related Flt.rr ping:fecilitias located with in a
put lice right-cif way anc/or pt.blic utility easement that is designed to ciors%ay
sewage I y presst.res. c
Property Owner.The owner of the title to real pric'perty,or th e contract purchaser
411
of
of real Nlrope o °'record as shown on trig lash availableacimipleitei assessment roll
in the Clffice o he Cot.rity Assessior.
SElDtic Tank Effluent Pump/Gravity(STEP/G' Sanitary Sewer. A small c iameteir
pipe located within a puhlia right-of-way and/or gilt.blies utility easseimEint th at is
designed to convey sewage by pries.%u re or gravity.
bay:
Urban Service Boundary(USB).The area consisting of the inciorporatec city limits
of the City of Lake Oswego arsc th El area outsic E' of the csorponate limits I ut with in
the' area identified pursuant to the Lake Clsiwel€lo Comprehensive Rlan ass 1E rritory
for futureannexation anc service ry the City of Lake Clswegcs.
Section 6. IIOC 42.03.085(3] is F ereL y amended to read as is!lows 'new text show ri in bold,
doubles rr nderlined tylpel; deleted texil sF own in staketiwough tylpe):
42.03.085 Cul-de-Sacs and Dead Eno Streets.
* * *
3. A esu 1-de-sacs on dead end street shall be no longer'than 200 feet in length and
Ordinance No. 2579
Page 7 of 23
November 29,201111
shall serve no rr ore than 25 c w ellingsi, eNceptl where ext nEirrmEl tlopograrlh y, the
presiEincEI of Sensitive Lands as desiciriibec in LOC Article 50.16 50.05.0110.and
50.07.004.10,floodplains as dEiscrit ed in LOC 50.02.005 50:10.003.2 freeways,
Ei>isitling c evEiloprnientl patterns on abutting property or arterial access restrictions,
precfi c e tlh e logical connection of streets.A ai I-de-sac.sih all provide a ti rnaroi nd
without the use of a driveway.
* * :.
Section 7. LOC 42.03.110 is hereby amended to read as follows (new text shown in bold,I
double-underlined type;deleted text shown in st kcthrough tyIpei]• �
42.03.1110 Hrovision for w ideriirig streetsrr
Whenever Eiristlirig streets adjacEintl to ar witi tlractare of iradegr-atEe width,
tlhe provision of additianal right-of- h'in;a
way may required his ca condition of
c Eiverloprnentl permit approval pursuant tlo LC C 5115:6;040 (1)(c)50.07.003.5.a.iii.
Sleet ion 8. IIOC 42.1l2.E110 is hereby amended to a id,as follows(new Volt shown in bold,
double-underlined a deiletleid tlei)t shown in type4
): Volt
421.1121.6110 Permit Required,.,
10
11. It shall be unlawful for any person,withor t first obtaining permit therefore
t1a: v
a. Dig up,break into, excavate, disturb, dig under, or undermine any street for tlhe
purpose ofPlaying or working L.pori any water pipe, wailer main, siewer, t ranch
sewer, or pine of any kind; ,
b 1 akEi connection with, obstruct, or interfere with any put Iici sewer or drain
c. Cit or break into an brink, clay, terra cotta, cement pipe or others siewer;
d. Connect with ny sewer, El)tient at the branches di ly provic Eid in siucih siewer
for connection therewith;
e. ExcaR ate or dig t,p a stlneet for the purposes of laying dawn, installing or
constructingi ridergrouric conc uitls for electric wiri is or steam, on for rr aNing any
connection therewith;
Clydiriancie No. 39151
Page 8 of 33
November 29, 201111
f. C onnecit the blowoff or exhaL sit pine of any t oiler or steam engine with any
sewer on branch thereof;,
g. Do any otil er aavation work in a roac way.
In caste of leakage cir t reakage in any pipe;, main, sewer, on conduit, reqs ining
immediate action, any person otH erwislEI auttF orized to c o so; ay(iornirr ence tF e
repairs on 511 CIH pipe, main sewer, or conduit without first bboraining tF e pleIrnmit;
bit he it all, as soon as practtiaable,, file 11F e application and deposit hereinafter
providec anc ot1afin the necessary permit.
2. The permit nEiquired t y this section is a minor development permit and is
ottainec 131 rsi ant to the pnocec ures set'forth in LOC Article 50.81 50 07.003.3
and 50.07.003.14.liF a 511indanc si for approval set forth'irf LOC Section 50.79.025
50.07.003.14AX apply in addition to those sett forth in this ahariter.
Section 9. LOC 42.19.010 is hereby amended`to read as follows(new ilea t shown in bolda
double-underlined type; c eleted text shown in strikethceug14 type):
42.19.010 Definition�`�� �
.,.
410 1. Adjacent sidewalk area That portion of the public sidewalk between 1 he curb
line, on the lateral line of a roadway, zind,the property line of the food or
beverage sales businesis, delineated by extending the sic e t i ildin€I lines of 1 he
premises until they intersect with the curb or 1 he lateral line of tH a roadway.
\,kms
a.. Commercial.zone Property that is designai1ed Neighborhood Commercial,
General Commercial, Highway Commenaial, East End E enerail Commercial!, Mixed
Commerce, Office Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial, CampL s ResiearciF
wind
Development, Campus InsititfLfional cir Office CampL si on di e Lake Cswego
Zoning Map pursuant to UCC 50.05.010 50.01.004.21.
3. Operate a sidewalk cafe.Serving fooc or bevera®es fncimi a fciod or beverage
sales business to patrons seatec at tablEis located within tFEl adjacent sidewalk
area.
1111
Ordinance No.2579
Page 9 of 23
November 251,203131
Seicdliani 10. UOC 451.]17.5310 is hereby amiendec to read as followsi Knew text shown in bold, 1111
double-underlined type;deleted text sih own in stfikethfeugh type):
45.12.530 BL ilding Permit Rem.irEid
F r,rs r,art tics the State Structural Specialty Code, er forced pursuant to IJC C
45.09.005, a building permit is NE quired for all buildings movedtoa locatior
within tF e City.1Ih E br,ilding permit HE quired is a minor development pun,.ant
to LC C 5049 50.07.003.141and is in adc itlion to, not in,liu of,the moving
pE rmit required by LOC 45.12.510. In ac ditiori to all requirements set forth in
tlhE br.ilding regulatior s, ilh E followir€ must also4be1flet tici the satisfaction of
the City Maria{err t afore a developmE nt FIE rrriit may I El is5 L Eld:
41(
1. llhe building to tEr movec s h all bE located arc r,sed it a mariner cicrnsistent
with all acrnir g anc land i se ordinances of the.City,together with any otF er
applicable ordir antes, las on goverr rr E ntal regulations.
2. llhe building shall be sufficiently similar to othE r buildings in the immediate
vicinity in size, age,, archil act i ral style arc 5 tructurral conditions so as tci bE
compatible with other buildings in the area.and.5 ci as not to�cai 5e property in
the area to decrease in-value
1111
3. Llanial of a developmentpermit application for fail.re 10 comply with
51 bpanagraphs(narid (2),ofthissectionmay=be appealed to the DENelorlmant
Review Commission, as providedfor„minor developmE nt, unc er LOC 5042
50:07.003.3:C-50.0T,001.7 and 50.07.003 15.b. In any event, tF E C ity Manager'
may refer the applicat c*to.ilF e Developmiert FE view Ccirrimiissicin fcir a
detlerminatior of compliance with subparagraphs iI1] ar d (2).
Section 11. -The general description and It e definitions of"Architectural Detail,” "Commercial
Zcriesi" and"Residential Zones"in LOC 47.03.0119 are hereby amended to read as follcws(now
tlext sh own in bolsi double-underlined type; deletlec text shown in strikethrougl, type):
47.03.015 Clefilriitlio ris.
Flor tF e purpcise of tF is chapter cE rtain lIE rms arid worc 5 are c efir E d as follows:
the worc s "r,sed for" incdudE "c e5 igned for" arc vice-versa; wards used in the
present tens E incduc E tF E fut.re, the 5 ingular tE rise it dude the pIL ral and vica-
vErsa; the word "shall" is always mandatory,;the word "may" is disciretlioraryl;
the masculine gender includes the feminine @E rider, E>cept as othE rwise
Al
OndinancE No.2579
Page ]IO of 23
Novembers 29, 3011
• prior ided.TF e definitions in LCC 50.02.005 50.10.003.2 apply to this ciN apter to
the extent that tF ey do not conflict.llhe follow ing tarry ss shall rr ean:
4I *1 411
Architectural Detail. Elements of building dEissi@Iri commonly used in LakEl
Oswego E uiidirig styles, inchdiriEl the Arts arid Crafts English,Tudor and the
Oregon Rt,sitici city less. (See phcitoss and desscnuptions in Lake,Oswego Corr rr C ni11y
OEN elopprr wit Code, LOC Articic 50.65 50.05.004(Downtow Redevelopment
DistFiet Design District Vis), PInpenc ix 50.65 A A-Lake Oswegog).
*I dl *
Commercial Zones. Corr mercial Zones shall mEiari the CR&D, EC, GC, HC,
NC, WLG RMI OC/R 2.5, OC, WLG OCOC/NC d WLG.RLWR 2.5/W aoriesi as
c Ersicril ed and EistlabIlisN ed in the !lake OsiwElgo Community Development Coc e.
*1 AI 41 •
REISIic Elntial /ones. Residential Zones shall meanuthe R 0, R-2,.WLG R=2.9, R-3,, R-
5, R-EI, R-7.9, R-10,.R-119,RIDIDI arid RW -zones ass described and esitablisshEic by
• the hake Oswego Community Development"Code.
Section 12. The section listing in LOC 47.10 is he reby amended to read as folic wss(new ilext
sihown rn=bo'd double-underlined type; deleted text sihowri in strikethrough tyFie].
ArtllckI47L1C
P ermitl Req Iui rementls,
•
•
Sections ,:, p,°`
431.110.400 Signs,Requirin g REerrr it.
4110.405 Permanent 5lignage Regi.iring harry it Allowed in ResidE ntial Zonesi IIR-0,, R-3,
WLG R-2.5, R-3, R-5, R-El, R-7.9, R-10, R-115,RiUD arid BW R .
47.10.410 Perimsarient 5lignage ReqL iring RE rmiit Allowed in Commercial 3onesi (C C;, NC,
WLG RMUOC/R 2.5, WIICI OCA,, and‘81116_11_064R 2.5/W;.
47.10.412 Permanent SiElriage Reqs iring nem it Allowed in the BC Zone
47.110.4115 Permanent SiElriage Requirin Ei Permit Allowed in Commenciial Zones ISM C; HC,
C R &I D aric OC;.
Ordinance No. 35.19
Page 11 cif 23
1r oVElm ter 29, 20111
47.10.420- Permanent Signage Requiring Rerrr it Allowed in Industrial Zones I and III.
47.10.425 Institutional, Rt.blici Facilities clr Open Space Land Uses Listed As Conditional
Nonconforming Uses.
Section 13. IOC 47.10.409 is F ereby amended lc read as IC!lows(new text sih own in bold,
double-underlined type; deleted text show ri in:stfikethcough type)
47.10.405 Permanent Signage Requ iring Perm it Allowed rn Residential Zc nes (11-0, 11-2,
W LIG R-2.5, A-3, A-5, R-6, A-7.5, R-10,, R-15, Rice ands$WR)
In adc ition to th e tEirr poraryl and permanent signage allowed without,permitl in the
residential 'ones th e following signage is allowed subject to permit and`fee.
Section 14, IOC 47.10.4110 is hereby amended tc read as follows`(new text shownsin bold,
double-underlined type; deleted text show n in striketh f,g#type):.
47.10.410 Perm a nent Signage Requiring Perim ill Allowed in Cc m mercial sones IGC, NC,
WLG RMUQC{R' ,5,WIG OC1 NG,and WIG.RL.WR 5/W).,
In adc ition to th e ten ponaryl and permanent signage allowedwithout perrniit in the
following aorr rr erctai zones C C,, NC WLG RMUOC/R 2 , WIG OC/#G and WLG.RLWR-
2.51W, the following,signage:,is allowed,subject to permit and fee.
•
1. FlreEI Standing Signs '
a. Alllowable Area Maximum 32 squarefeet.
t. Number:',OnEi sign shall t El allowed for th e prim aryl frontally. Another sign shall
t e allowed on any secondary)fronilage that is 3013 feet or rr ore in length.
Cl. _ Heigh t: Maximum 118 feet)for pole signs anc 8 feet for monument signs.
c.\Sign-Types: Monument signs sh all be allowec. Pole signs shall only be allowed
when necessary to FIrOViC El vision clearance at drib eiways or intersections anc w hen
th ere is no alternative, Ni isible on-t uilding or monument sign location. No pole signs
shall t e allowed in the WIG.RMIJO'�, W LG CIC/ .G anc WLG RLIWR 2.5/W
zones.
e. B cieptionsl in C C Zone:111-El City N onager rr ay grant)exceptions to the size and
I•eight limitations for rrclnurnerlt signs under sut sections 1(a) and 1111ci) of this section.,
as well as exceptions to the design starlc ards of IICIC 47.0E1.20C (4),, as necessary to
Ordinance Na. 3519
Pal®El 12 of 23
Noverr ber 29, 20111
411P
allow an exulting pole sign in the C C zone, that was non-conforrr ing prior to May 21,,
2004, to be coni erted to a rr ons,rr ent sign on the same premises, pro%ided that:
i. the existing sign isl widely recognized in the ciorr rr unity as a t.rlique symbolic
icon idertifieic with a particular era;
ii. tF
e sign has been continL ously displayed, L richanged,for at least 20 y ears
Prior to the conversion;
iii. the area cif the sign c oes not excieed 50 square feet; .,% ;;,
iv the cion%ersion rest Its in rio change to the facie of th El sign; and
v. the height of the monument sign, including the base, does riot exceed 10 feet.
44.
Flollowing tori%ersiion to a mons rrient sign, anyexception5r allowed L riders this
subsection Ile) shall apply until there is any alteration on change of th El sign,,
inch dinganychane of co 6 ,
g py,.or until any change of,u°se of tF El pnerriisErs,, at which
time the sign sh all be made to comply with all requirements of this Chapter.
2. 5 ign Attached T Buildings.Avir
40
a. • A Ilowable Area: The 32:sqi are foot mm,axim allowed far freestanc ing signs may
be tnarisllerred to allow signs attachec `tobuildingsi as an alternative. Except in th e
WLG RF4 OC/R 2 5,4WLG OC,1NG and WLG RLWR 2.5/W zones, an additional sign on
gnssharll be allowed with in a two foot h igh honiaiorital sign I:arid.The sign t and
'` length signs may be 75'percent of tF El bi ilding or business frontages w F ichever is leiss.
•
.. Numbers: Clne 32 square foot sign shall ter allowed on each street fnontage. 11h El
maximi.rr nL mit er•of signs within tF e sign band or each street frontage sh all eqi al
the number of frontage t usinesses located on th El grog nd floor.
c. Height;The naximum 212 square foot sign 5ili all not t El placed h ighen than 18 feet
on any structure. The sign band shall riot emceed two fleet in height anc shall extenc
along one or mom aides of a structure located tetweeri the windows and the paraclat
on a one story building with a flat nclof and at or below the fascia on a one story)
building with a pitchec roof) On a multi-story I uildirig it shall be located abo%El the
windows and below the seconc story lisle (retail cornice height;.
d. Sign Types: Wall signs and sign bands are allowed.
Orc finance No. 2519
F age 713 01123
November 29, 2011
3. Additional Signs Allowed.
111
a. Awning or canopy signs meeting 111'El same .'IiaEl anc nL rriber resmtrictiansi as sign
bands may be slut stlituted for the sign baric signs allowed by LOC 47.10.410 12).11h El
awning or canopy may EIx1Elrld over 11h EI dight)-o1 way„ bLt sml all come no closer than two
feet f norm arieas subject to VElhICIL lar 1 ravel. No s%L clh smignsi shall be allow EIC in th e WLG
RMUOC/R 2.5, WLG 0Canc WIG RLWR-2,51-W zones'
b. IV ulti-building complexes smh all be allowec anlidditioWalmonument sign of 32
sqc sire fElElt.This sign sh all be located zit th e primary Elntlrance:to the complex and shall
��
not extend more than ten feet in height. No'such signs shall be allowed irl the WWI
RM 3, WllG CIC{ anc WLG RLWR_2.5/W zones.
a. Any businesswh ich is regL ired by lawtto;post specific)signs, !IL Clh as service
stations, shall be allawed up to an ac ditionalr22 square feet)of signage to
aommuniaa1IEl the mandated message. it El sign may be installed with the.primary!sign
or installed as a separate 9-1/2�f otitall monurr entw.sign No such signs shall be
allawec in 11h EI WIG RMUOC/R�2 5, WIG�OC E and- WiG=RLWR 2.5/W zorlElsl.
d. A theater or mlo%ie [OUSE! with morethanl oneauditoriumm sit all be allowed and
additional 48 square feed of signage. No such signs shall be allowed in the WLG
RMUOC/R'2.5, WLG OC/N anc WIGRLWR 2.5/W zones. •
El. Second story businesses sh all be allowed an eight square foot sign erected at th EI
send story level No tenairlt signage shall be allowec abo%El it El secondsecondstory.story. No
such soils shall be allowed in the WIIG RML OC/R 2.5, WLG.CIC,LN•G and WIG RIIW&I
y k 9
2.5/W acines.`
•
f. Blade signs which.,hang from canopies or awnings over 1 he right-of-way
perpendicll,lar to thedirection of pec esitrian movement shall be allowed, bit sit all
come no closer than=2 feet from areas su,bled to vet icular tnavel.The sigrisi shall be
ciorlsistently 8 inches in height and shall riot El�ceed 6 feet in length.Ti e t ottlomm of the
sign shall have 8-1/a feet of clearance 110 the walhway or ground below. Clne sign sh all
be allowed for Elaicih ground floor tenant. No frontage is required.A blade sign shall be.
allawec in th EI WEE RMUOC/R 2.5,, W11 OC/NG and WLG RIIWR 2.5/W zones only as'
an alternative to a anoni mielnt or wall sign.
•
g. A single overly singing sign may be substitL ted for the 32 squaw foot maxim),rm
sign).The overhanging si€Irl shall be allowed 11a overt ging the right-of-way l:IrovidEld it is
Ordinance No. 2579 411
Page 114 of 23
November 39, 20111
attached to th Eli 13111C ing, comes no closer than 2 f eet from areas 511 bled to vet.iculan
traitel,, maintains 8-71/2 feat of clearance tothe walkway or ground reilow anc does not
extend more th Cin 714 feet above that sic ewalN on groi rid surface. No slLah signs shall
k
El allowed in the WLG RMLIOC/R 2.5,WLG OC{{4 and WIG RLWR 2.5/1/V zonas.
_ * * *
Seciilion_15.. IICIC 4 7.]171,50011) is hereby arr Eindec to read as follows(new ilexlI shown in bold
double-underlined e; deleted IIext down in e
type; � filp )
F
47.12.500 Variances.
1. A II sign variances shall follow the same4proce`dure as a Class 1 lmirior}
variance to the CommL riity.ClEl%eloprrEintCode and shall be regulatec pursuant
to the following procedi ral provisions: ;
a. LCIC Article 50.81 50.07.003.3.a. 50.07.003.14.di,-and 50.07.003.14.d.iii.
b. LOC Article 50.82 50.07.003 3.f.50 07.003.7 and 50.07 003.15.b Qexcepll that
the staterr Eint nequired by LOC 50.82;020 (3)(c?.50:07.003 3Jfiv(5jl shall not be
given).
d i 1
c+. LOC A►rticic;50 83 50.07.00i4, ei)cept that:
i. In lieL of LOC 50 83.005(5);50 07 003 4.a.v;a staterr ant shall r e gig en that
the evidence and testimony rr ust'be directed to the applicable criteria
described by the staff orto othen ciritenia in the Sign Code which th El parson
believes to applyto th e decision.
ii. In lieu of LOC 50 83.005 (13),50.07.003.4.a.xiii,following testimony and
argument,th El hearing:body'si deliberationsrr ay incic de questions to or
ny1
testirrioby City sillaffregarding tF e criteria, ENidence and testimony in the
record.The hearinga ody rr ay alio direct questions to any person present. If
any person other than City staff is quesllionec or allowed to make cicirr orients
dl ring deliberation, the Chair shall allow any oth Eir person to responc to SIL ci
comments.
iii. In regards to LC C 50.83.030(2)50.07.003.4.f.iij the 120-day Rule is riot
applicable.
d. LOC A ri icle 5044 50.07.003.7,e)cept that:
4 Ordinance No. 2579
Page 15 of 23
NovEIrr ber 29, 201111
•
i. In regards to LOC 50784065-{1) 50.07.003.7.n.i,the 120-day RL le is not 111
applicable.
ii.The statement required by LOC 50.81.075115] 50.07.003.7.p.v s F all not be
given.
* * *i ;t,"''
� l Y
Section 16. LOC 47.10.400114] is hereby amended lIc read as-follows(new ilea SiF own in boldj
double-underlined Woe; deleted inext shown in trketh
iro gh type):
47.10.400 Sigr si Requiring Perri'ill.
* *1 *1 .
4. Pin app lication for a sign permit s F all iric lude,,in addition to s i ch information
as rr ay be s near ified by tF a City,IVl anagen: `' '
a. PI Corr plated 5lign Permit Application-form,anc fee `'
b.A Sita Rlan and/or Building Blevation Hlans drawn to sc ale'and c irnens ion
s F owing Ilas ap plicak le):
1111,
Exisiling Sltructunas ;,i, •
Driveways NI,'
Street and Right of-Way
Existing Signs
Proposed Sign
Vision Cleat ranee (LOC 50`.21.,:.095 90.06.01111
All Inc idental 9ign
c Aproposed sign plan drawn to scale and c imerision showing (as applicable':
Height
Width
Squares Footage
Thickness
Size arid style of letters
Colon
Type of ilk rr inatiori
Materials
Circ inance No. 2579
Rage 16 of 23
No%ern bar 29, 2011
Section 117. LOC 47.10.412(7) is hereby amended to read as follows (new next shown in bold,'
double-underlird type,; deleted text shown in ctrikethrougli type]:
47.30.4 12 FlermanErnt 5 ignagEl Plequiring Permit Allowed in th e EC Zone
In addition to the penmiar ent,temporary and El)err t signs allowed pursuant to
LOC 47.06.205,47.08.300 and 47.08.305 th e followir 8 signageiis>alloweic in th e
BC lone sit bjeat to permit and flee.
*1 III *
7. Hxception to th e Requirements Of this Section.
.44
a.lit Er reviewing atthority may allow exceptions to this section without the need
to of tain a formal variance in one or more of the following curer rr stanaesi
(1)Th e appliciar t deirr on$itrates thatthe physical charecteristicis of the site or
existing structure MI6 Ei compliance.impractiical.
b. A nequesit for exaeFlticrn i nder this provision n a;,be processed as part of the
uric eriy ing application on separately a major development pursuant to LOC
Chapter 50.79.030 50.07.003.115.
Section 18. LOC 55.92.035(1] is hereby amended to read as follows(new text shown in bold,'
double-underlined type;deleted text shown in canikcthrough tylpe]:
20
55.02.035 Tree Removal in Conjunction with Major or Minor Developmenil
Permit.
1. II a Major or Minor Developmer t Perrr it applied for pursuant to LOC Article
S 50.07.003.15 or 50.17.003.14. respectively woL Id reqt ire or resit It in tree
removal and/or a tree,cutting perm it as c efineid in th is C h apter,, complier cie with
LOC 55.02.080 shall be a ulterior' oil approval of suah development permit.Tree
rerr ovals in conjunction with a Major car N incrr Development Perrr it shall t El
R�.
consic ered inconjuncticrn with such perm it and shall be subject to the
a ligation notice, h eiarir and appeal procedt res applicable to the proposec
FIP !� PP P FI
Majon on Minor! CIel\eiloprr ent punsuant to LOC Articles 50.82 and 50.81
50.07.002.3.f.50.07.003.7.a. 50.07.003.15.b.and 50.07.003.7.The required
Notice fbr Major or IV mor Clei‘elopmeir is that wot;Id regi,ire or rest It in tree
remm als sh all iricilude a site plar it diciatirig th e lociatior of any trieeis proposed for
rem o%al on th El 5iub,1e1c1l site. llhei pnoposied trees shall also t El fllaggec with yellow
Ordinances No.2579
Page 117 of 2.3
November 2 SI, 2 C11111
•
11ai@l@ling tape on sites.Si ch flagging shall l:e maintained until a final c eciisiion on IP
th El proposal is renderec.The rerr mining,, notice, heiariri8 wind zipped frocedL reisi
in LOC Chapter 95 shall riot apply to tree removals corisic eared in conjunction with
a Major or IV incir Development request.9t,bsieiquent treses remm als that have riot
t e'en reavievtl ad throe,€ih either Major.or M inor Davelopmsarst procedi,rest shall be
ne'%iewec ass pnovidac in 111-ass Ch apter.
*1 *1 *
Sled is rs 19. IIOC 55.02,042(1)arid 131 are hereby amended to read as follows(new text she wn
in bold.double-underlined ty pe;deleted texil shown in strikethrough type)
55.02.04 a Perrrsiiil C lasasifacatic ns and Review Prciciedures
A parson u<ho desires to remove a time shall first apply/for and receive one of th e
following!tree cutting permits tafore tree removal occurs:
11. hlype 1 Heermill is required for
a. A property that is located in a residential none and iss occupied t y a simile
44
family dwelling!; 14 �
b. F ernoval of u to two trees, 10 iricsh caliper or less per tree at DBH within a
talent ar year;and
c. AI tree that issnot � z
i ,Protected`by acondition,of approval of a development permit pursuant to the
Laity ea 05wego Community DeveloLlrr ent Code;
ii.,Lciclatec with in cin area or parcel th at hast e'en placed on the Historic
iz Rey x
Landmark Cleasionation List iaursit,ant to LOC Chapter 58 50.06.009;
•
iii. A Heritage Tree per LOC Article 55.06;
iv. Located within ars RC on RR sensitive land overlay district;
v. Locallec within the Willamette River C reenway (WRG) ciy E'rlay c istrict;
vi. Located within the 25 foot Oswego Lake 5Ipeciial Setback;
41111
Orc finance No. 2579
Hage 118 of 23
November 29, 2011
•
vii. Located on property owned t y the City o1 Lake Clsiwertlo or dec icated to the •
put Iia,, irialuding parks, open space arid public nights-of-way.
Ty pe I permits shall t el iSsl ed with out further rein iew upon appliciation and
demonstriation by th a appliciant th a1 the reqs est qualifies as a Type I pelt-mit
purisuant to this subsEicition. A
I. Clerac llneei REim oval Hermit: \v,Y
a. The City shall issue a tree a ttintl perm it for`aidead tree, excerpt as p ovrdEid t y
sut section (3)(b) of this section, if the applicant demonstrates that a tre st1ead
arid warrants removal.
t. In one Eir to provide for w ildlifephabil a1 anc natural processes, the City
M onager may reqs,ire the retention of a dead tree.Dead timers shall riot t El
ream oved if located in wetlands, RC Protection Areais IILOC150.16.055
50.05.0110.5.bl, stream crorridor5i, parks or apenspaace areas reqs ired to be
FlrEiser�iec as a aoric ill on o1,c eiveiloflment approval,u lless>th El tree presents a
potential haaanc to pensoris cirproperty ---
Section 20. LOC 55.02.130(4);is hereby amended loci read ass fbillows(nEiw text shciwn in bold,'
tea
double underlined type;deleted text show n in stfikethfeugh t11FIE11
X55 02.130 Penalties
4. Restoration.
•
a. A penton Who remo%EIS a tree withoL1 first obtaining a Type II,, deac tree, or
hay circ 1IrEiEi cutting permit from the City pursuant to this Chapter', removes CI
tree in%iolaition of an approvec Type ll, dead tree, car hazard tree aLtting permit,
or violates a aandition of sib cih a pEirrr it srh all pay into the City's Tree Hi,rid a
stanc gird fee per caliper inch for th El totail number of cralipEir inah est of th El trees
rem oved in violation of this Chapter in an amoi,nt as established t y resioli,tion of
1 he City Council.
Ilk Clydinancie Na. 2919
Page 19 o1 a_I
Nchemit er29, 2011.
t.The City may requ inEIthe person to pay into the City's Tree Hu nd an increased
i EIEl per caliper inch for tF e total number of caliper inches of the tree removed in
violation of this Chapter' in an amount as established I resiolLtion of the City
Couriciil or the value of the tree as deterrrinec by an arborist in accordance with
the meth ods set forth in the "Guide fcir Rlant Appraisal" an official put liciation of
the International Society of Arboricull ure,, whichever is greater,.if any cif the
following apply:
i.The person has committee a previous violation cif a provision of this Chapter,
or
ii.Tree protection measures as required by LOC Article 95.0a were riot installed
or maintained, or
iii.The tree removed was any cif the followin8
1 J 36 caliper inches in diameter or greater,
QB; a heritage tree, per LOC AlrticlEi55 06, E
(C) e)presisly protect ad or required to be preserved asa condition of apprci�al cif
a c evelopment permit pursu ant to tF e Lake Clswei8o Community Development
Code,
(DJ located within the VVillarrette River Greenway per LOC Article 50.15
50.05.009.
part cif a Resource Conservation QF C) cir Aesou rce Rrotectiori IRP] anew per
LOC 50.16 50.05.010,
(F; located on public.47itight of way, City owned or c ediciatec property, a pu blia or •
x x c
private open space area or conservation easemant.
41,0,2
Section 21. IIOC 34 061164 is hereby amendec ilo ret d as lollawsi Qnew 11€ixt shcwn in bold,
Bout le-underlined type; deleilec llexil 511.own in ctrikcth _ugb type):
34.136.164 Violations of 111.e Historic Preservailio n C F enter.
Violations of tF e Historic Rneiserviation Chapter nrovisia ns of tF e Lake Oswego
Coc e ILO( Chapter 58 X0.06.009 and 50.07.004.5;, e>'cieFlt a violation of the
demolition provisions of LOC 58.02.125 50.06.009.6 and 50.07.004.5.b, as now
•
Clrc inance No.2579
Rage 20 of 221
No%ember 29, 2011
or hereafter constituted" are F Eireby c eclared civil violations and sc al- violations
may, in adc ition to or in lieu of other remec ies or enioraerrieint rrieasunes
grovideid t y State law or City Coc e, be enforaed under tF e provisions cif this
chapter. WF enever the City Manager beaomes aware cif violations of tF e
provisions of the abo%a eF aptlen, tF e City M onager rr ay eau se enforcement
measures tci be initiated as prescribed F erein.
Section 22. Reorganization of Chapter 50: Incorporation of'Cheaters 57 and 58. and Article
43.313.into Chapter 501:liable of Contents.
I. The Lake Oswego Code is h eireby amendec ty repealing Articles 50.01-50.91 of LOC Chapter 50
IICommiunity Developrnent Code] and ills liabllmand Appenc lees, Chapter 57 iIsolar Access],
Chaptlen 5Fl IHistoria Preservation], and Article 45 15 Ileeriaes) and adding newArticles, Tables,
arid Appenc iceisrion Chapter 90'ICommunity DENelopment Code)as stated in Exhibit"B".
2. TF a general table of aontents fcir lIF a newly adopted Articles of Chanter 90 anc detailed
tables of contents' beilore eaciF article orrsection of Chapter 50 contained with in exhibit "B"
are intended to be of asi:iisitlanaei tlo tkitreeder.°of exhibit B The tables of ciontentsi ciontained
within exhibit B are riot ac opted as part of CF apter-90 ICon munity Development Code). TF e
City Attorney and City Recorder rr ay add tables of contleint.1 to the cioc ifiaation of Chapter 50;
and rr ay edit tF a tables of contents,from tirr(e4Ici tirr El.
Section 23. Amendment of Zoning
M
eap and Comprehensive Plan Mab Due to Change of Zone
Names. Zfl
11he map designations of the`following zones,, as -arr enc ed in Exhibit B ISection 90.0]1.0041" are
amended on the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Map:
Zone Category`'' Former Map Designation Revised Map
,fit, Designation
Design District(Old Town) I DD R-DD
Waterfront Cabanas I W R I R=W I
WLG Live/Work Zone I WLC R-2.9/W I WLG RLW
W LC Office Corr rr eraial /"flown W LE OC/R-3.5 WLG RMU
HorrIEl Res is entlial
WLG Town Home Residential I R-2.5 I WLC R.2.9
WLG Office Corr rr eraial / WLC OC/NC WLC OC
Neighborhood Corr rr eraial
Sec'ion 24. Revision of Code References'. The City Reaorder is authorized to revise all neiienencie$i in
Ordinance No. 3919
Fla€lEl 21 of 33
N o%err t er 29,,2011
11FEr Lake O5iwego CodEl to repealErc ArtialEis arid Sections of CFI aptersi 50 i]Commuriity DevelotvIrrErrit •
Code', Chapters 92 (Solar Access), and 58 QHistoria Presiervatiori;, and ArtialEl 45.115 (Fences) to
nErfeneriae appncipriate Sections in tFEl newly adotvltErc Articles and Sedionsi of Chapter 90
(Corral.riity Development Code) waded by this Onc finance.
Sectic n 25. llransiilian la New Ccc e. All obligations now existing pr.rsuant to LCIC Chapters 50, 57,
and 58, and Article 94.715 incite ding without lirriitlatiori: a�
a. Rees and changes,
b. Conditions of approval,
c. Covenantscondii ions, aric resitrid ions, aeric
d. DleveloKlrr ent restrictions,
on otherwise airisiing as a result of an ad, omission Oniac1ion, or development permit,5iF all sir.rvive
the repeal of the Articles' of LCIC Chapters 50, the''repeal of Chapters 52, and 58, and the repeal of
Article 54.115, and shall continue L rider the applicable provisions�of th Er newly adopted Articles] of
LCIC CFarItEir50.
Section 26. Code Reorganization Variance. The City Manager upcin application, grant a Code
Reorganization Variance tci any subs1 antrve provision of CF apter 50,if thea�lpliaant demonstrates
that a i se, sett aak; e)aeFltiori, adjusitrr ent, or other development.right is not permitted under
the newly adopted Articles of Chapter 50, but would l avtbeen.permitted L rider' llh Er provisions
of Chapters 50, 52, 58, and Article 45.]15 repealed by this] Ordinance; unless the use, setback,
exception, adjustment, or other development right was amenc ed or modified after the effective
date of O.isi Clydiriance. It El procedi.re for application, notice, hearing, deciisiion, and appeal of
the Code Reorganization Variance shall to the same Eisi a Class 2 Variance, except that rio Pre-
application' ConferEenciEe shall requirec
Section 27. Sunset Provision: Codification of Code Reoreanizatio n Variance.
]I Se on 26 sh all expire for all applications filec afiler three year's from th El effective date of
this finance].
2. The City Recorder may include Section 26 of tF is Ordinance within th El Lake Clsiw Ergo Coc e in
•sr' ah 510c1 ion or sections asi the City Recorder c Eiterminesi appropriate. If inefi.c ed within the.
Lark El Oswego Code.."'
al. 11h El expiration c ate of Section 26 shall be adder to the codified section. arid
b. 11FEI City Reconcer shall remove the codification from the Lake Cls%Eego Ccide Lpon the
expiration c ate cif Sectio' 2E1.
Section 28. Ccrrection of errors in Clear and Objective Stanc ards. The City Reconc er shall
conned errors or omissions to the listing of a Lse or to a statec numerical sitanc acrd, and cicirrect.
punctuation that substantively alters the meaning!of a requirement or stanc ard,when necessary
411
Clriaiae
dn ri No. 2579
F age 22 of ail
Neat Err29, 2011
•
tci conform to the u$IEI, nt.rr erica! sitandaec, or meaning of a requirement or standard as e)isiteid
I,riders the provisions oil Chapteirsi 50, 57, 58, grid Article 49.919 repealed by tF isi Onc inaricie.
Sectic n 29. Severability. The pro%isionsi of this ordinance are severable. If arty portion of this
oncinance is for any neia.sion held to tEi invalic, such ceicision shall riot affeci the validity of the
remaining lortiorsi of tF is ordinance.
Enacted at tF El rEi L lar Meeting of the CityCot,rich of tF El Cityof LaeC swe o held on the
® g
day o11 ,2012. •
P YBS:
NOES:
A 99TAI N: aY
\tir
got
DXC USED:
Jack I] Hoffman,Mayor411 '
Elated:
ATTEST:
•
Robyri C F risitiei, City Recorders
APPROVED AS TC FIC RM; ,•'
Da%id DI. Pow Eill, CityrAttorney•�'"
Crc irancie Na. 25a5.I
Page 23 of a3
Ncr%err teir 29;,2011
DRAFT' ORDINANCE 25719 - A111ACHMEN11 El
IS PIRCVICIED UNDER SEPARATE COVER
Copies Of Attcicihmeir t E can be found on the City's web site unden
Casei File LIU 11-0036 at:http://Www.cu.osweigo.on.us/1gIan/casef.htrn.
•
•
PHASE 1 CODE REORG ANIZATIC N WORK GROUP
RECOMMENDAIIIONSI
This doau mEirii summarizes the issues that were forwardec to the Clcic a Rercmglanizaticiri Worn E new FI
(Work E nciu Fl; c i.ring the drafilini€1 of th El reorganizec Community De%elclFlment Code. Th El
recicimmerric aticiris of the Wonk Grou p are included E elciw th El desanirltion of each issu a in red lettering.
Threes items that were originally fcirwanded to th El Worn C nau n were shill pending at the time of the first
work session with the City Council arc F laming Commission i ci rev ieiw th e drafil racmgariized code on
Nov ember 8, 2IC111. Ii was deciic ec at that worn session that the Planning Commission i would nrciv is
dined ion on 11-a 1h raa remaining ii Elms at the!wcirk session tci be held with the Commission i on
Ncivembem 14, 2011. The recommendations of th El Planning Commission on these three issues are
included below th El desuniFltion of the issues in red IEliteiririg.
1. rsl ar-Conllarmirgl CNziracterristics of Use[Sere LOC 90.011.006.7 in the Reorganized Code]: The
1 ime femiod at the end of the paragraph, below, has expired. Is th El deletion cif the last sentence
Qsh ciwni in strikeiciu 1, h elciw; a SIJ bstaritiv a change?
NON-CCNFORIMING CHARACTERISTICS OF UNE
Any matter regullateid by this Cade not directly related to a structures or types of use', that does rcil
conform to til e i reiquirerr int of this Ccic a rr Cly coir l it u el, Liu t shall not be Inc areas ed, enlarged,
eucFcirceid or reiccirstrucited. Any changes it such characteristics cif usei must not ircrecisei tiles
ronccir forrriity, but may lake place to c eicreias El the r an-c cinforrr IN. The rights granted by this
section do not apply to the rralters regulated by LOC 50.21.005 dvis icin clearance]. Ao),
\ CIRk GROUP RE_'F CIN_'H: The c elation of the sentence sh own in strikeout, above, is not
su r stanl
1 ease oaring Districts, Residential Districts ISee LCICI 50.02.aalLII.b in the Reorganized Code]:
There is no titins crit(except names; in the descriptians of they Iciw, mEIC ium aric h igh density
riesic erntial disc ricits l:Elaau se once 11-a U ses and c imensiorls were mov ec Ou 1,there was nail'inl€I
left. A II other zcirieis ilciommerciial, industrial,special Flt.lipase) h avec purposes statements.
Usually a moderns uac a wou Id inch c e a nurKlose statement on intent statement. Is th El ac c ition
of three purpose statemerii s, t Eilciw, sut starts K ei?
PFIC IPOS ED NEW AURAOSt3 S TA 71EMENTS
Residentia I Low Density(R-19, R-10 aim R-7.5): lb provide lands for singier fs muly residential
devalopmarl with densities ranging from twb tci five dwelling uniills per grass acre.
Page II ciil EI
1 of 10 EXHIBIT R-1
IUU 11.0036)
Residential Medium Density(R-6,R-5 andR-DD): To provide Janda far single-and multiple-i
farriiy residential develaprr ent with densities ranging from sieveiri tci eighil dwelMng units per gross
acve.
High Density 2bnEIs(R-3, R-2, R-0 and R-141): Tb prcivide lands fcir single and rr uIEipile-fart ily
residenel ia/developrr Entwith densities of E111 least 112 dwelling L nits per grass acre.
RLA NNINE CON M IS5IICIN RE$IACIN$I9: TH E Flno flcisE c purpose statements are factu al and as
c rafted, would not be corisid ered a su L stantiv e chang EI; h cewEev er, the purpose stat emerits
should L E rewritten 1a be alig nod with tEl EI ComFIrEIF E risiv EI Plan. Insert tF E purpose stall emerii s
as draflled'abovE for now,uric flag tH is SE ction la be rewritten as F art of RhasE 2.
?I. Height of Structure it the FIF Zone ISee UOC 9a.02.003.3.b.ii in th Ee Reorganized Code]: TH El
method of calculating h eight in this section is written out, but ii is c ifficiu It to head and
u nc enstand. \P au Id insert inig th El formula shown in underline, below, Le substaril iv e?
Height of S&L cline
Except as cilherwisEe peva itted by 11OC 50.04.003.4, the rr aximurr height of anN F ciriion of a
structure shall bei thea greialer of:
11 ).93 fG., cir
12) A ileiig11l as determined by thea ratio of one ft. in height for every three and one-tlal f1, of
dislanceirorr the portion oj the sir uclure10tile lot lir elcif tile realest res idE2eoned
property, tci a rr=in um ileiiSlill cif 75 j [Heiiahl =Sletbac k frorr Residential Zine/3.511
VVCIRH GRCIUP REISACINS9:The addition of the formula is not suLs1anitive.
41. Commercial, Industrial art Maryllhurst Land Use Policies. The text refers the neader to the
following AF nem ices,which are policy doct ments.
o LOC 50.1111.009:ApFIE nc i> 9, Commencial Lanc Use Policies IReferenciE d in LCIC
9C1.02.002.2.a.iv.11]: Hach commercial area identifrEic on the City's CompreF Ensive Plan Map
also is described in UOC 50.1111.009:AppE nc ix 9. TF El specific caret itiori9 for eacih area, al h en
1 F and 1F ose id entified in Su L SE cltions ciQi), Ail:, and clliii), below, are by this rE ferenue made a
Flare cif tF is(lac El arc arE condition's and limitations all eacih zone .
• LOC 50.1I1I.0CIE:AFIFIEuric i> R, NI aryilF u rst Campus Iris'itutional Area Policy [RE llerenciec in LCI(I
S CL0;1.003.11.ci:TH El arinrov ed Fllari for the Mary11F a rst Campus Irisi itutiarial Area is contained
in LCICI 90.111.006:Appendix R. TH TEl land a SEI c Eesignal ions and condition's of that par-lion of
11.El Rlan are by this rElilerenue.madE a part of this Code and are conic Wars zinc limit aticirss of
tF
El zone.
• LOC 50.1111.003:AFIFIEirmc i> 9., Indu s1 rial Lar'c USE!Policy) Filament 'Referenced in LCIC
9C1.02.002.2.L.iv.d11):1F El specific conic itions for eacih area arE by tH is rElfenenciE made part of
tF is Cklc El arc ane conditions and limitations cif ElaciF zone;. 1
PagE 3of6
2 of 1 C ®XIII HIT F-1
(LU 11-0036]
The consultant requested direction an F ow to incorporate the at CI%e-IiS1EIC,C bCIU marls into th e
new Cac El. Cris clptionl wou lc be to diflerentiatEl th El regulatory and the policy si atements in
each Appenc ix,then incorporate the regu tai city statements into the new Code. Is this
sur starlth e? AriClth Eul option wau lc be to leave them as separate reference c aciumenits in
appendices at the end of the Cade.
WORK GROUP RESIRCt'_E EmbElc graphicis llnam the appendices thai are specifically neferElnced
in th El text all th a Clac e aric lea a the nemaining text in separate Appendices for now. As part of
Phase 2, is entify the negulatoryl policies in the resu 11 ire€I appendices, mave them into the coc El
text, and delete remaining non-regulatory text.
9. Downtowrl RedevEllopni Elrlt Design District a nc LOC 90.1111.001 A pini Inc ix A, La he Oswego Style
—F a ilding Design Elements ILCIC 50.05.CIC14 in the RElarglanized Code]. This Appendix is
refElrElncec 14 times in LOC 90.CI9.004I. WE ile th a AppEinc ix inch c EIS a narrai iv a cif 1 h El origins
zinc id sale of thEl A xis zinc Crafts Style in E nlgllarlc aric th El contrit u tionis of curl ain architects aric
designs 1 Cl thEl movement, etc.,the Clac El rElilerences ails to 11.El"illustnations" in general ar to
specific'@Inaphics, never to the c cicumeirlt in Hs entirety'. The citec graph ics h ave been emr EIC CEid
,in Seaticirl 50.05.CICI4, DawrilclHin RedElvelapment Design District;what is left hehiric are MEI
ilk strations cal specific design sty las chic the descriptive text. S imilar to the t`Inevious clu Elston,
shoulc 1 h EI rest of this document, minus th El maps aric graphics that have L eon embedded inta
th El tElrt, t:EI11I) inaorporli EIC into the Clac El, or 1121 maim aired as a separaiEl referencec aciument
in an appendix at the end of the Clac El?
WCRK GRCIUFI RESPCINSE: Ellmbed graphic's from Mel aippplend-ices that are specifically rElilerencled
in the text of the Code arid leave thEl rElmaininlgl Text in sElFla nate p nnEInd ices lion naw. As part cli
Phase 2, identify 11-El role%ant port iar1s in 1 h E rEISL(ting apperic iciEl9, moV El 1 h EIm irll cl the Clad e
tE xt, aric c EllEll El remaining text.
6. Sltneet Front Sethi c k.Ria re ILIOC 50.CIEI.0011.2.b in the Reorga nil ed Coc EI]: Th E:Clae El clout iins
c e velopmE ri1 starlc arias thai are aPnliciahle icl a numren cif zones(e.g.,the Street Fnonit Sletbacll
RIarIE1 ane 11-E Sic E \and Setback Plane apply in th El R-Cl, R-2, R-3, R-5, R-EI, R-7.9,R-11CI aric R=119
zclries]. Rather than nepeaitthe standarc,the Reorganized Clac El places common cElvelopmElrll
- standards together under Resic erilial Stru cture Design. However,the langluager or Street Front
Sett ach Wanes is not consistent th nou ghout the Clac El as to how far up 1F el Plane ElxtElnlc s.
E>istinle text:
• 3CL06.060(2)and 50.07.040(1)ir existing code: "The p►ofiki of Cl structure Coat frcir is on a
street<hahi fit behind Cl plane that sllartu cit tile SEitbacklAine(frcir t yard or side yard atl u tt it 5
Cl•
street)and extends upward, to 20 feet in height, then silopes towa►d the center of the clot
up tci 28 feet ir height t at thci highest point cif tile roof..."
S
Pagle 3 cls EI
3 of 10 EXHIBIT 11.1
LJUI 11-00316)
a 50.O8.C45(5,1 in existir,q code: "..slopes'toward the center of til el Ilot up tel Mei maximum
a Ilclweld height at thei highest point cif the roof..."
If the language wEIIIEI stark allldizec, are code section could address it. The COC El section cm lc
railer to 11-El 1 at IEl wherEl maximu m t ase h eights arEi outlined. Staff!su Eigests tH El Plane extend
"up to 1h a magi imu m base h eight cdl i h El zone" - t ElCI IL SEI the peak-a-1 cio height exception allows
a FICIr1 ion of the rad to extend up 1a EI feat above the base height,tH El`original sentElrlcle is
internally inccirlsistarlt, LEI., ;Ifs fElat in height is not necessarily the high as1 point cif the rcicif. Is
standardizing the text substantives?
HllclDCl9 EIC tEIx1:
The FlllcifslEl of a stru ctu rEl til at fllcirlts on a 51 llaet sh all fit I ELh irlc a plane th at start s all th el setback
line Qfrorlt y alnd cir sic a yard abutting a s1 met) and ext arld s upwalrc to 20 ileet in heigH t,then
slopes toward 11.a center of the lett u p to MEINimum base height of the zcirlEl, as ilk s1 rated t Blow
irl Figu res 0.06.0011-A.
1,1‘1G RESPC NSE: TH is change is richt•substantive'.
7. Additional Sletbaclll Standards ROC 50.04.0011.2.e.42)1a] in th e Reorganized Cloc EI]: Th is section
is hard to u rlc Elllstc'Irld. Will almendirlg the tex1 far clarity as proposed, below in strikeout and
u rlc arsine, t e a substantives change? IIAIsCI aprilies 1a!I0.04.0011.3.e.iii foil R-a, R-2 and R-3;.
Existing Tex 1:
Where a lest aoned R=5 abuts a Ilot honed R-6, 7.5, 1 CI, or 15, thei buildir 5i s halA be setback from hies
common either riot Ilesi i than thei required yard setback or a distance equal to hies delight of
the primary building in the higheli density zcirleli, whic1l elver.is gre crier.
RroDOSEIc Text:
Where a lot zoned R-5 abuts a lot zc roc R-EI, 7.5, 110, or 115,th el bu ilc irl@I on the R-5 lot shall be
setback from the common line! dist alncEl am all to either not Tess thar 1H El rEiclu iced R-5 yaf4
sEltbacik on a distance equal to the height of the Fliimary built in€I on the R-5 lot in the higher
density zone,wh iclheveir is€InElalter. 51ael Appeirlc ix 51(1.06.050-A.
WG RESRC NSA: TH is change is rich .substantives.
8. Front Rorch Fiegc,ired ins R-6 ILCIC 50.06.0011.3.b.i in the Reorganized Cac El] : 5511 aff suggests
bringing 11-El minim m d elpth cif 1 h EI pc rch forward in the text, as i1 is "stand allCirlEl" and does nal
ha%el alrl Slither/or ciao se!Mei!.El width see proposed tElxt in strikeout and underline, t EllaIw;. Is
this substantive?
Pagel 4 cif 6
4 ®f le EXHIBIT F.1
(LU 11-0036)
Existing Texi
'Anew dwellings shall includes ci covered front porch ci m iniim u m width cif MAI cif tile tl u hiding
width cit the frcini tl u llding dine and!ibi feet deep.. Porch siuppcirts_hall be provided and shall be
wood Or masonry on a scald mateiniall with thei.amlieialiance cf wcicid cin mcisciniry.
Rnopo<.iEid Text:
A II rieiw c wEillirig<.i shall inch c El a aovereic frcirii porch a minimum depth of six ilaet and a
minimum width cif Eii1 h an 90% oftb e builc ing width, as mean%roc within 4ICI feet of the ilronit lot
line,an 119 feet,wh id aver is greater Q Seer Illi€lu res 9C1.06.001-D)and six feet dccp. Porch supports
shall be provided and<.ih all be wcicic or masonry an a solic material with the appearanncei of wood
or masonry.
WORK GROUR R95IRON513 The pnopo<.iad iaxt change is riot 5Iu t 511 antive.
9. Lanic mark Designation List[LOC 90.0f.009.4.b in the Reorganized Code]: llh ei li<.rt of landmarks
has Leen kept separately t the Clity F Eiaorder,so that when a landmark is addec or namo%ad,
th El list can easily bEi updatEic. 9y Meiasu ne 96,all lane use decisions mu Si be adoptee by
ordinance. Shall 1F a li<.i1 t El cronitinu Esc tci be maim ainEic by City Recionder on shall ii be
incorporated into the Codeil
9xisil Ina TEixt:
Appenidui A iriciludes a Ai_l cif grcipertiesi cinid tile field form, graphics pilciSlei and statement cif
significance fon each property. This hi an abbreiviaied listing, which is nicit officially codified per
LOC 58.Cl2.O25i12)(ci). Documentation for each property may be obtained from the Planning
Department.
WG R9$ROW 9: The Work Grou pi gErriEuially wanted tci c Eder tci 1F El City Attorney an this aria, L ut
first wanted to know how o111 all jurist icticins dealt wil h ac c itions 1a th El Landmark List. A survey
of niEiauity cities reveals an inicronsistenii aiplplrciaah: Portlanic, Elu gene anic OrEi@lari City a plc ale
1F air landmank lists administratively, zinc mosl oth ails th al werEi surveyed d a rich inciludEl the
lark mark lists in 1 h air Codes. The Cii y Ati cirriEiy advised that we can tontine.a 1a amend the list
ac ministratively, as th El process tci ac c or nemove lane marks is a land use c eicisiciri arse th El Work
Group corm rired.
10. gelation of theta="resource buffer" in various code sections[see attached memo to th e
(lac El Reorganization Work Group,,datec A lu{u st 23, 3011„ fcir affeicteic acic Ei sect icer is and th air
loc ation in the graft Clcic Ei]: llh a 5en<-iil i%ei Larics A ri seder was amended in;I0]Ia tci replace the
1Euim nElseil rcre buffers" (also neiferrec to as "buflleir' zinc "t Lifer area": with "prcileiatEic riparian
anea.'' The term was replaced on dEiietec in th ei Slen<-ii1 iv El Lam Si A nide, but is also rEdlerenced in
some cath err articles in the otic El,whicih ware inacvertEinlly missed. Is th El replacement Meir
c EilEil ioni; of"resource!L u filer", "Id u filer",anrc "t Lifer area"with "protected nipanrian anea'°' in
Flap 9 of 6
5 of 10 EXHIBIT F-1
(LU 11-00361
•
these other roc El sections a su t sta ntive ch ainige? Please SEIEI attach ed memo, c ated August 23,
20]1]1,for more informaticiri.
PLANS ING COMMI'.ISIICIN Fi9SIPONSIE: The proposed cihe ri€las a rel riot substantive. As a separeiEl
issuer,the term "priotec 1 ed ripe riani a ream needs to El ala rri9ierc in the c erfiriitions th at it is part of
01E1 RP district. This shoulc be addressed in Phase 2.
11. Change 01 terms"'Dwelling„ Multiple''to"Dwelliri€, Multi-falmiily" ILCIC 50.10.003.2 in the
Reorgariiaed(lac e]: At the Cii y Clcru nail H ening ori Oct oh er 4, 20111,for 11-er F roPlosed CDC
e mendmenrts QCInd.29291, it was.suggestec during the deliberaticrris stage the t the term
"mu Itiple c Hidling" shoulc t a cihangerc to "multi-family dwellini€1" as that is the more commonly
u
nc errstooc term. Since it was too late to mall 11-at chain®e as pe ri of Clyd. 3935, it was
suggested that this migh i be ch a nged as F art cif.tF a Coder Reor€1a nizaii ion. TN er au fluent c Erfirlition
would rremain exactly a s it is today, t L th El term 'Dwelling, Mu Itipler"woulc be replaced with
i h er i eurm '"Dwelling, M u Its-family" in the c erfiriition and in other parts of tF er code that multir le
c welling" is re llerred to. Is this a su t si antive ch angle?
FI LA h NING CCIM M ISISIICIN RBSPCINS9: Th El proposed cH an®e is not su b stainiti‘El.
ATTACHMENT: Memo to tH er Coder Reorganization Wcirk Group, del EIC Au€1u st 23, 201111
1111
110
Pane 6 ail El
60f10 EXHIBIT' F-1
lIU 11-00361
CITY]OA LAKE OSWEGO
•
torwirjv •
.c'1 2180 Avenue
PO Hax:IE 9
lit I' Lake Cls wago,ORS171(134
MBMO R.ANDUM5(13-E 35-012710
www.ai.aswegcuar.us
110: HF aisle 1 Code Reorganization Work C roup
FROM: Jessica Numanoglu, Senior' Planner
SUBJECT: Feedback reqs,estec fon proposed CDC EIC its
DAZE: August 23, 3011
Background Ir fbrmallic ri
In DElclerr k er of 20110, City Cot,nciil adopted C rdirlaincie 25E11 amending Sensitive Lane s Article 90.116 to
t Etter c efinEl terms used in the Code anc pro%ide rr ore flexibility to land owners. One of the alrr Elndmerlts
incluc Eld tF e neFllacement of tF e tern "resloL rcIEl bi,filer"with tF e tern "protected riparian zirea" associated
�with RR disitiliclt resources. The RP c'strict inch.des botF th El delinElatec resource wind tF e ""pnotElcltec
rliparicln area." Below is an excerpt from tF El Council IlElport eA plainirl8 the CIF ange.
"Ike full Coh nail report anc Orc inarlcle 2567 are available at the following link:
htto://www.ci.oswEleo.or.us/talent air/courlclilrntt;<I/dociu rr Elntsl/1a]1310Daclketpart]I.Ddf.
Clarifiicicition crj Termi
A secciric fire up el chances Keret pragcis ec 1 aciarifjl It e ternis"c itch,""nelciunae buffer'ar d"nom truction set hack."
Prapciaed changes would incaagcuiai a the Division ai State U rids c eifinilions 1k i "c itch"anc incorpanala the
deflnil kin ci11"non-ju His dicticinal c ii ch''' Ey Ili Terence.
The pro asec Ondir ar CE wau Id also make a nu nib fill oil c hang es in 1 he cac e to ner lacer the term"resciu nciei buffer,"
with "prot eictec nipanianareal,"anc car sistentlyrefer tcithe wateinresouncearid ifsrirlarianbuffentoga het the
''P F1 Dist aic1."' This change is inter c ed 1 o simplify 1 he 1 earns arid a lirrunai e 1 he"ccins nucticin se til ack on 1 he reisciu rce
buffer an tile RP district." A c iagnam illustrates the neem and cilc let rns applied.
71 ®f 10 EXHIBIT FI-1
ILU 11 -00316)
Page 2 •
Construction I.RP District anc Associated Bi;ffer
Old Setba ol• ; --__
! ? RP Distfct Buffe i RP District
E t t
E t
I i t
I I t
I k i
I I I
I l 8
t l I
I %111
€ i
@ I t('1
•
I Consrtrcctiori RIFI District
New Set back ___ ___...-_._..L.. ............_-___
i I
Prat bed Riparian Area i Stream
To Ieirdcrrce the ch a nge,a definiliar of"prcteiclec i ipa;ian arena"wcwld also bei a cdeic tc I hei dedinilicins secticiri o+J
1
he den elopmeini cac e.
4110
ISSUE!kr ciansiderairian by the Ma rk Gra ua
Dr,riri@I the Phase II Coc e F aorganiaation reg iew, staff f or,nd that although the term "resiouncie t uffer" was
replaced with "protected riparian area" in P rticle 90.116, the term was not ch zinged in oth err articled of the
Community Development Code IICDC) rErferieriaing RP districts. Staff believed that replacing the term
"resiounce t uffer"with "protected riparian area' or deleting th El team where it isi riot necessary, isi not zi
substainthe (IF ange; it is clear th zit the Ordinance intended to corn pletely replace "resource k uffer" with
"proteclEIC riparian airera'-" arid that th e terrr was I.rlirltElntionally overilooked ire oth er articles of the CDC.
However" staff would appreciate hearing i nom the work grot,p whether th Ery concur with staff on this!issr•e.
Belaw is zi li5rt of the clot El sections where the term "resource buffer" ar"buffer!" Qreferririg specifically to RR
e isitricts) i<i found. I've copied anc pasted affected sections of existing code lanai age anc used strikeout
aired r,nderlirie in rElc to sh ow the proposed changes. Riease advise whetherth e Work Grioup won,Id
ciorisic er til este sr,bsitaritive changes th zit sill ould be c efElrred to Rhase 2 of the prioject ar whether th este
ciorrrElcrtions can be mac e as! pari of Phasel..
An isle 50.02.005 De uniitlia ns
Buffer Area (Resource).An area adjacent to a designated RP District resource where development is
11
Staff comment: Delete entire definition! of"Buffer Area". "Protected Riparian Areal" was
- adc ed to th e definitions by Otic iriaricEl25Ela and replaces' '°'t r.ffer aireai dresourae)."
8 of 10 EXHIBIT I1-1
AMU 11 -0036)
• Page 21
,In-tiling Vegetation. vegetation.similar tci vegetation found in the impactea resource on resource
buffer Drotectea riparian anew in type and size.
Thee G ravel.A stand of three or mote trees (of thei slam ei sip eiclieis or a Mixture) which form a visual
and biological unit, including the area between the latest floor and the car lop y, including stilyline
trees, ana including any a riders dory vegetation existing within the canopied area. A stand of trees
rn unit be at least 5 feet in height and must have a cortigu oust crown width of at least.120 feet to
qualify as a tree grove.
a. Associated Thiele! Grove.A tree grove that is contigucwsi with Mei boundaries of a
deisigriatea stream ccirnidor or wetland and contributes ib the resource uaiue of thei iupaniari
areia by exteindin51 and opeiratVing in conjunction with the Habitat of the riparian area and
Aroviairig flood cicinttol and water quality enilancemeirit. Such tiee groves we iocatea within
thei buffer-protected riparian areas of a weticina or stream corriaoi but may extend beyond
thei beilprotecteid ►ipatian cirea.
b. llsculateid Tree Grove. A grove cif trees that is reit associated with a stream corridor or
wetland as desciribea in subsection (a)cif this definition.
Article 50.46 Flank and Open Space
510.46.025 Froceauresi.
410
...4. lianas shall be seleictea by the City fon reiservatiori as opeiri sipaca areas or parldsi iri accclydance
with the f cullciw it ig p riot itiesi:
a. Delineated RP nesourcesi nd b -x'r arca.
b. RC District Protection Areas.
a Proposed Public Open Space and Flat Ail'in cludin g intra-city bike/p odeistriari pathways.
d. Wocidlaridsl, tree grciues.
e. Sp eicum ein 'recs.
f. Natural m eicidows.
g. Topographic vaiiatiorsi such as rock ou tcircipsl, c ffs. extreimei sulopes, riverbanks.
h. ConuenieintIy Located areasi where►ecreatlicin opportunities can be create°. Examples
include trails!, natu►e Study situs, picnic areas, or uieiw p cants.
i. Scenic views and vistas.
j. Others.
91 of 10 EXHIBIT F-1
1LU 11 -00316)
Page 4 •
Article 51C.7I9 Nags c f Development and Review C,[Medal fon Each Nag of Clevellc pm enil
50.79.01 0 Ministerial Deveilo meet Classification:
. dei'elopments inclluce
...b. Construction or exteriorrrod�ification of a cetacheid single family d welding, auplllex, aero
Aot►lir ie a weilling on a structure accessory to s ucll structures w hich:
.:.iii. As not located within ci aelineateid RP resource on btrff-eF-er-eapnoteietea nioanicirn
circa or FIC proteic tion area punsivant to BOC rticle 510.16.
...h. Construction or alteration of public trarisiportation or utility facilities corsistent with
• the Compinehensuve Plan and Ian use regulations ana isi not ilocated tri a delineated AP
Rlesiounce or buffer cr FIC protection area pursuant to LICK I nick 510.16.
90.79.020 N inor Clevelopmm er t C lasisiiliciation.
'Al "IV inor Development" inch des:
...q. ConstrLciion of ary pudic or private road, or rrajortransportaticin cir itilityfacility within
a delineated RP Clisitrict or buffcr c r F C F rotection area.
S
I
10 of 10 EXHIBIT FI= ■
ILIH 11 -0036)
REVERSE INOBX FOR CCIDE RIEORIGANIZAIHON
lhW Ct30E � 1?CQDg:AfgAft ', .TITLE `[ha ter 50 :" %1 '
I50.06.004.2.a 145.19.005 ;fences ;Purpose
150.(16.0C14.2.Ii ;49.19.01(1 ;fences ;Applicability ;
4100.10. 14515015 [Fences IDefindlianis
5(1.06.004.2.c 145.15.020 IFences !Location and Height
S0.06.004.12.0 [45.15.025 [Fences IMatEirials;;Standards fon Construction
50.06.010.3 ;45.15.030 ;Fences • ;Standards for Maintenance
50.C17.004.1 ;45.19.039 FencEi9 _ ;Procedures
50.01.(101.1 [50.01.005- _ [Title,Purpose,_Authority [Title
50.0].(101.21 150 01010 [Title,Purpose,Authority [Purpose _ I
I
50.01.003.1 j9q al(119 Title, Purpose,Authority ;Official Action -
50.01.003.2.a ;50.01.020 [Title,Purpose,Authority ;Authority o1 City N anager
9C1.CII.aa.z ;50.01.025 [Title Purpose,Authority ;Development Permits Restricted for Unlawful Uses
9C1.01.003.5150.01.030 150.01.030 [Title,Purpose,Authority (Development Restricted an Illegal Lot
50.10.003 1.a- 150.02.005 I Definitions I Definitions
D
50.10.003.2 ;90.021.009 Delinitions I efinitions
50.01.002.1 ;50.03.005 _.___;Applicability ;Application cif Cade
30.01.C1021.21 150 03.010 -[Applicability [Compliance_
5001.002 3 450.03.019 [Applicability ;Maintenance of Minimum Ordinance Requirements _ . __
90 01.002,41 50.03.C12a.1 Ap'p'licability Relationship cd 01 hem Lama anc Prig ale AgneEiments;Prim
Approvals and Conditions of Appproval
90.01.0(121A1.a 50.03.021C1.2 Aq'p'Iia ad ility Relationship'cif Other Laws and Prkale A€Ineiemerits;Flricm
Approvals and Conditions cd Appproval __
50.(11.0(121.41.b 50.(13.030.3 Applicability Relatianisdip of Othen Lams anc Pri%aie AgnEiements;Firkin
Approvals anc Clonic itions cif Appproval
50.01.0(13.21.a ;50.04.005.] Rules of Interpretation �Interpretation,Regulations and Pnacedu nes,Delegation
50.01.003.2.b __-150.(14.0C15.2 ;Rules cd Interpretation ;Interpretation,Regulations and Procedures,Delegation,.
.01.003 2 150 04.005.3 . [Rules_of interpretation Ilnterpretaticini,Regulations and Procedures,Delegation'
50.(11A(13.21.c 150.04.005.3 (Rules of Interpretation Ilnterpretation,Regulatiori9 and Procedures,Delegation
50.01.005.1.a 150.04.010.1 ;Rules cif Interpretation ;City Manager Intepretations
50.01.0051.b 150.04.010:2 IRules of Interpretation . . ;City Manager InitEipretations
50.03.acia.1.f 190.04.011 [Rules cif Interpretation !Authorization fon Similar.Uses
50.01.:1(141:1 5(1.(15.(1C1.9 Zoning Designa l ions,Sou ndarie;, Zoning Districts
Maps _ __
50.(ILQ(141.21 ;5CLC15.(I1(1 ;ZoningDesignations, BoundariEi9, Zoning Map'
,
1 ..-. .. ;Maps
90.(11.0(14.3 50.05.015 !Zoning 0esignal ions,9ounc arie9, Ini eupratai ion cit Di91 rict Bau nc arias ry
!Maps
50.05.009.4 [50 09:0[2:[ Ronin€I Desi€Inas ions, Raunc arias, Zoning of Ar flexed Areas.
;Maps
9CI:CIl.(Ia43 90.09.:129 Zoning Designation's, Bau nc arias, Clomp Plan Map Designations Automatically Applied L pori
FMaps 'Annexations Exceptions
9a.ai.aail.E1 5a.09A3CI Zoning Designations, Boundaries, Effect of Conditions ofAp'p'nahalo10Melop'mentorDesign
Maps__._-_ -._ Regulations Imposed Rnior is Annexa'iani
30.03.C102.21 50.0€1.0]0 Medium and F igh Derisily ac'r'es Plcmmitteid Uses;R-CI,R-21,R-3 and R-3 dories
_ _ -I
90.03.0021:21 +90.0EI.C115 FMec iu m anc I-igh DEinsity ZonesConditionalUses;R-0,R-21, R-21 and R-5 acmes
50.03.C1(121.2 90.0E1.0;10 Mediu m and High Density Zane; Panmitted Uses in'1 h e VV R Zana
T50.04.(IC11-11 50.06.025 Mec'um a rid I-igli Density Zones N inimu m Dan;ii y
50.04.001-3 50.(1€1.0215.2 Medium arid Ilei Density Zane9 Minimum Density
E)III IBIT F-2
Page 1 at 15 LU 11-0036
REVERSE INDEX ROIs COI]B REORGANIZATION
I ag%)E OT.ii?CObtaT A ttttM* f * ,TITLE -chapter 50 __.. a :_ x .� f .
Mwwwww .s__..ew'�, a �.
T50.(141.0(I11-3 90.0EI.C13C1 N ediu m anc High Density Zones Maximum Density;Density Bonus
T90.(141.0(11-11 90.0EI,C13C1.1 rN ediu m and High Density Zones 1Maximu m Density; Density Bonus 0
9CI.C14.Cia1.3.t 90.0EI.C13C1.3 Medium anc High Density Zones Maximum Density; DE nsity Bonus
T50.041.001-11 90.06.0311 Medium anc High Density zones Lat Slize,bensity Tranisler&I Maximum Floor Area
F i
50.04.0CI1.1.d.i 90.06:039.1.b Medium anc High Density Zones Lat 5IizEI,Density Tranisler&I N aximu m Flgcm Are a
T50.04.001-11 90.0EI.CI39.3 Mediu m anc High Density Zones Lat Size, Density Tranisler&I N axin um Fiacm Area
----,w ____ -- --------------4
9CI.a4.cIaL3.c 90.0EI.C139.3 Iv ediu m anc High Density Zones Lat Size,Density Tranisler&I N axinw m Flaan Area
]a.a4.ciai.3.c.ii 90.0E1.039.9 Medium and High Density Zones Lat 5IizEI,bensity Transfer&1 Maximum Floor Area
9CIA4.clal.2..f 90.0EI.a4CI N ediu m and High Density Zones Lat CavEinaga
3cLaz1.cla1.3.c 3a.0EI.C14CI.1 N ediu m anc High Density Zones 1Lcrt CovEinaga
190.(141.0.(11-11 90.0EI.CI4CI.1 N ediu m anc High Density Zones Lat Ccivana&Ei
]a.a .cIaL3.c +90.0EIA4CI.3 FMedium anc High Density zones iLcit Cave Naga
50.0z1.cla1.3.c 90.0€1.(14(1.3 N ediu m and High Density Zones Lat Cove nage
9q.aicIoa.l.a ii 90.0a.a49 N ediu m anc High Densily Zones L.niliec Site Alan Reciu inec 0
9a.01I.C101.3.e.i 50.0EI.C19C1.1 N ediu m anc F igh Density Zones Y and!lett a cks, BufilEins
T50.04.0C11-11 50.06.050.1 M• edium anc F igh Density zones Yand Slettacks,Bufilans
T50.CI4.0CI1-1:I 190.0EI.a9C1.1 FNec iurri and F igh Density zones 1Y and!lett acks,Buffers
50.041.C101?I.e.iiii 90.0EI.CI9CI.41 N• ec iurn and I•igh Density Zones Yand!lett a cks,Buffers
--------- +-------------F--- ---4------ ---______
------- -----1
3a.0lI.CI01.2.e.i 50.06.050.41.a Medium anc F i€Ih Density zones Yand!lett acks,BufiIE1119
1901.04.001-11 50.OEI.CI9CLE1 N ec ium anc F igh Denis ity Zones Yand!lett a cks,ElufilEins
9a.0i1.C101.21.e.iii 90.06.050.7 N▪ ec iurri anc F igh Density Zones Yand!lett acks, BufilEuis
9a.0z1.C101.3.e.i 50.0ELCI9CI. I N ec iu m anc I•igh Density Zones Yand!lett a cks,Elufllkins
90.0z1.001.2.e.i 50.06.050.9 Medium and High Density Zones Yard!lett a cks,Buffeus
901.01.CI01.31.e.iv 50.0EI.0I9CI.51 N ediu ni anc F igh Density Zones Yard!lett a cks,BufllEins
-
50.04.001.2.g.i 50.06.055.1 Medium and High Density Zones F eieiil of Structures
-----------------------
9CLaI.cla1.3.1 90.0EI.C199.1 M ediu m anc High Density Zones I•eig111 af Stn.ctures1110
T50.041.0(11-11 90.06.059.3 IV ediu m anc High Density Zones F EligH 1 of Structures
rarniesli l r-2"
Page 2 a fl 15 11 ll 111-0036
REVHRS0 INDEX FOR CODE RHOFIEANIZATION
•
NEW F4761 ;iDl'i3 iGC)AE 4rARtgtt f t Ch�era0 �le c _ r
T50.C14.0C11-3 5011E1.035.2 Mec ium anic F iah DEinsity Zones Height of 511 nu ci a reg
0.041.a0L2.g.i 50.CIEIA93.3 Mec ium anic High Density Zones h eiglht of 511 nu ci urea
30.041.a01.3.f.iii {50.06.055.3 _FMedium arid High Density Zanies 4Heiglht cit SIirucl urEis
50.04.001.3.f.iv 50.06.055.4 MEicium a rid High Density Zones Height cifStruciures
50.CI&0CI1:3.f.v i {50.(IE1.035.5 MEic ium arid h igh Density ZanEi9 Height cif Structures
50.Cil.0CI11.3.f:vii 5(.[161.095.51 MEicium arid High Density Ganes Height cif Stn.aiures
5CI.C141.001.2.g.i ;50.06.035.51.a Medium arid High Density sanies HEIiglhi afStn.clures
50LCI4.0C11.2:.gl.iii 5C1.C16.0951.9.L Medium and High Density Zanies Height ofSIM ctunes
. - --- - - - - - _-. ._ r ..'t
5C1.C16.0011.2.a.i 9CI.a6.(IEIE1.1 N Eidium anc High limey Zones Stiiuctune DEiligln-.R-CI,:R-2,R-3 and R-5 Games
50.06.001.2.ti 50.65.060.2.a Medium anc High Clens iiy 3ones Structure Design-R-CI,R-2,R-3 anc R-5 Tones
50.06.CIa1:3.c 90.aELCIa(L4t: Medium anc High Densityaories Structure Designs- R-CI, R-2,R-3 anc R-5 aomes
so.aEI.CI01.3.c 30.0E1.CI6CI.3.c IV ec ium anc High Der9iiy sones Structure Designs- R-CI, R-:1, R-21 anc R-9 dories
9a.aEI.CIa1.3.e 90.0EI.C16C1.3 Medium and I•igh Density cines SI nucture Design-R-a, R-2,R-:1 anc R-9 sones
401 0.06.C101.2.f 50.06:060.91 Mec ium anic I-iah DEinsity Zcinie9 Struci ure Clesign-R-0,R-a,R-3 anc R-5 Zories
- a
9a.aELC1a1.e1:1:iv 90.0EI.06C1.5 Mec ium anc F iglh DE nsity Zones Structure Design-R-0, R-2,R--3 and R-9 Zones
3a.0(1.C101.3.1.v 50.0ELaE10.61 ;Mec ium arid High Density Zones Stru ct ure Design- R-0,R-a, R-3 anic R-3 Zclne9
9a.0EI.C10141.a,i _{9(I(1E10EI5.1 FMEic ium arid I-iah Density Zones Garage Appearance and Local ian-R-0,R-2, R=3 arid R-5 Janes
•
30.0E1.001.41.a.iv 5CI.C16.0E15.2 Mec ium and 1-igh Density Zane9 GailagEl Appearance anc Local ian-R-CI,R-2,R-3 arid R-5 3anes
{. I-: H
50.06.001.4.a.% 50.C16.0E15.3 Medium and High Density&ones Gaiagle Alpipearance anc Lacal ian-11-CI, R-2, 111-3 and R-5 acmes
5C1.(161.001.4.a.v i ;5CI.06.065.A1 Medium and High Density sanies GanagE Alpaca rance a rid l acai ian R-C1,R-2, R-3 and R 5 Zones
50.06.001.4.a.ii 15006.065.3 IV Eldium anc High Danish y Gomes Ganaga AIppEaramce and local ion-k-0,R-2, R-3 anc R-5 2onies
__i: L_ 1 ---- - - -----1
50.02.001.2
50.07.005 ,FAN ,Purpose
50.C13.(1C12 ;50107.[111[1 ;FAN I
PermittE c l Ms
50.03.002 i3a.a2-CI119 ;RAIN --- Conditional Uses —4
T50.C14.001-3 150.07020.1 1.11AIN [Lot Size, Lot Dimensions,Density Transfer. 1
50.04.001.2,c.i 150.07.1)20:2-. LFAN. . _ !Lot!lb e,Lat Dimensions,Density Transfer
50.0z1.C101.e1.c.i ;90.02.020:3 ;FAIN ;Lot Size,Lat Dimensions,Density llransfer
50.04.001.a.c.ii ;9a.02.C12C1.41 ;RAIN Lot Size,-Lot Dimensions,Densityllnansfer
li0 04.001.5 #150 07 025 1 [RAN RAN 1Yanc Setbacks
ta04 0012 a i}(2) 150.07.025.2 .FAN lYarc Elul banks _ .
115CLC14.0C1]1-61 ;50.02.025.4 ;FAN a;Yard Setbacks
750.04.001 3 ;50.(12.0:12 ;FAN -_yMinimum Density;R-6 Zone -_ ;
T50.04.001-3 ;50.074)30,1 1FAN lF eight of Primary Structure
Cylriilsi 1-r-2------
Page 3 01115 - LLU 11-0036
REVERSE! INDEX FOR CODB FIEORGANIZA1IION
N_E_WicODE� ivu4t0DE ARTICLE >7- TITLE C#iapter50 __- _ .
50.01.0012:g 150.07.030.2 ;FAN ;Height of PrimaryStructure ;
150.04.001-3 150 Oa a a.3 ;FAN ;Height of Primary 5Itru ctu re
-
50 04 001 2 1 ii .150.07.035 (FAN (Lot Coverage ��
50.04.001.2.d.iii 150.07.0_9.9 (FAIN __ __ 1LatCoverage !
3a.01.C101.3.c.1 t50.0i.a:1.1 _FRAM — -INaximumFlaanArea
t ._r
75-0.67170-63.73 :50.07.037.2_ ;FAN ;N aximum Floor Area.
50.04.001.40 150.07.037.3 1 FAN - I N aximum Floor Area
,
3a.01.cI01.c.iii 150.[17.0:1.5 !RAIN !Maximum Flaan Area
50.06.001.3.a 50.07.040.1 !FAN -_ - 'Structure Design 1
___
50.06.001.3.b 50.07.040.2 !FAIN (Structure Design
• � a r
5Ig0EI.C101.3.L 150.07.020.3.a ;RAF IS1 nuctu no Design
50 06.001 2 c 450,07,040„3„b FAN ;Structure Design 1
50.06.001.2.d 150.07.046.3.c IFAN !Structure Design 1
30.0EI.C101.3.e 150.01.04(1:41 `RAIN lSltnuctune Design
50.06,001.2.f - 15.0.07,04Q5 (FAN - _ _ [Structure Design
50.06.601.2.f 150.07.040.6 _[FAN ;Slnuctuii Design
9a.ocI.C101.2I.1— — {5o.o7.a1 a.1 TRAIN Structure Design
50 04.001,2 d.iii 190 07 045.1 IFAN !Accessory Structures
T50.04.001-3 150 07.045.2 !FAN' Accessory'-Itruci ures __________r.
T50.C14.001-9 150.01045.3 [FAN ;Accessory Structures
50.06.001.21.e.ii 150.07.045.4 ;FAN ;Accessory Structures
♦ r ,
90.0ELC101.411 150.(11.0111 IFAN !Garage Appearance and lacalian
50.06.002.3.b +50.07.050 `FAN • !Parking
90.06.001.3.c 150.07.0519 [FAN ;Alleys
50.0ELCI013.d 150.01.06C1 VA N I9tneet Times
50 08.001.1 150.07065_ _VAN (Administrative Modification
50 01.0------ 1500707- AN IFAN Advisory Opinion
--I --All
50.03.CI01.1 190.(18.0(19 `R-7.5,R-10 anc R-19 )Purpose
50.03.003 (I
150 8.01C1 111-7.5, R-10 andR-15 !Permitted Uses; R-15, R-10_and R-15 Zones
50 03.002 ;90.08.015 1R-7.5,R-10 and 11-15 ;Conditional L ses;R-7.9,R-1CI and R-15 Zones
T50.04.(Igl 1 150.0803q R-1.5,R•10 anc R-15 Maximum Density,Der sity Ban us
T5004.001-1 15-6-3-8-.025.1 1R-7.5,R-10 and R-15 1Lot Size;.Lot Dimensions;Density Transfer
150.04.001-1 150.018.025.2 1R-7.5,R-10 and R-15 !Lot Size,Lot Dimensions;Density Transfer - 1
T50.a4.clC11-1 150.08.025.3 1R-7:5,R-10 and R-15 ;Lot Size; Lot Dimensions; Density Transfer 1
150.04.001-1 1`50.08.027 1R-7.5, R-10 and R-19 !Minimum Density:R-1.5, R-id and R-15 Ganes
T50.04.0C11-1 150.08.0:0.1 1R-7.5,R-10 and R-15 !Yard Setbacks4 I- 1
50.04.001.1.e.i :50.08.030.2- 1R-71.5,R-10 and R=15 1Yand Setbacks
50.04.001.1.e.ii 190.08.030.3 __ R-7.5,R-10 anc R-19 ---- 1Yand Slettacks r
50.04.001,1.e-iv. ;50.08.030.4_.__1R-7.5,R 110 andR19 ;Yard Setbacks
50.041.001:1.e.iii 150 08.030.61 1R 7.5 R-10 and R-15 ;yard Seth acks
150.04.001-1 ;90.(18.0:19.1 1R-7.5,R-10 anc R-19 !F eight of Stnuctunes
90.04.CI01.1.g30.08.0213.2.a LR.7.5,R•10 and R-15 Height of Structures_ r
50.04.001.1,g 150.08:035,Z,b li:7.5,_R-10 and R-15 [Height of Structures
50.04.6014.f ;50.00.040 ;R-1.5,R-10 and R-15 ILdt Coverage
,
90.041.CI01.1.d 190.08.042 IR-1.5,R-10 anc F1-13
;N aximum FloanAnea
T50.04.0C11-1 150.08.0113 1R-7.5,R-10 anc R-19 1N aximum Floor Area 1
50.06.001.2.b 150.08.045.1.a 1R-7.5,R-10 and R-15 !Structure Design
50.06.001:2.,c 150.08.045.1.b 1R-1:5,R-10 and R-15 1Stnuctune Design
50.OELCIO1.21.d [50.08.045.1.c IR-1.5,R-10 anc R-19 1Stnuctune Design I
510.0E1.CI01.2.e 190 08.045.2 FR 1,5,R-10 and R-15 :Structure Design _-_ -____-- ----- ----------------------s
50.06.001.2.f 150 08.045.3 1R-7.5,R-10 and R-15 :Structure Design
50.06.001.2.1 150.08.045.3 1R-7.3,R-10 anc R-15 _ ;Structure Design —
90.0z1.C1C11.1.c ;50.08.050.1 1R-1:5,R-10 anc R-15 ;Accessory Structures 1
IT50.04.001.1 150.08.950.2 1R-7:5,R-10 and R-15 ;Accessory Structunes !
cxrnDII r-e
Page 4 of 15 L 1111-0036
REVERSE INDBX AOR COOK REORGANIZATION
1NEW�CDir *HT1: C00E AitTICLEY � *1 .. �pk...�.., - c
�� ��.,� ��, �_ _..� .. � � , �b. TtTLE��Chapter 5Q r
15CI.C14.Cia1.1.E1 130.0E1.050.3 1R-7.5,R-10 and R-15 ;Accessory Stru c1 urEis 1
400 0.06.001.4 150.08.055 1R-3.5,R-10 and R-15 ;Garage Appearance and Location
05.(1(12.1_---- 150.08A.005EvEirgreen Overlay Purpose --
50.05.002.2 150.08A.010 _IEvergreen Overlay _:Applicability _ I
50.05then.002.21 :50.08A.015 ;Evergreen Overlay :Relationship to ODevelopment Standards
50.05.062. 1.a ;50.08A.020 ;Evergreen Overlay ;Accessory Stn a1 ure Roof Pit ch ,
• �
50.05.002.zI.b 150.08A.025 ;Evergreen Overlay - ;Yard Setbacks _
9a.a9.0021.z1.c. 1.9a.0EIA.Cl:IC1 IEvergreen Overlay ;Front Setback Plane 1
50.054101.1 150.086.005 IGlenmorrie Overlay IRurpose
50 05.001.2 _ ;50.0813.010 Overlay :
010 IGlenmorrie Applicability - I
1
50.05.001.1 ;90.08.019 ;Glemmcinnie Overlay ;Relationship to Other Slancand s
90.05.001.4 150.086.020 IGlenmorrie Overlay • ;Limitation on Certain Elements
90.09.001.9 50.08B.025 IGlenmorrie•Overlay IRlantings and Buffering :
50.05.003..1 .150.08C.005 :Lake Grove Overlay IRurpose 1
50.05.003.2 150.08(.010 ;Lake.Cl rove Overlay ;Applicability
90.09.001.31 ;50.08C.015 ;Lake Clrave Overlay ;Relationship 1a Other Standards• -
50.05.003.4 :50.08C.020 :Lake Grove Overlay - :Yard Setbacks :
50.05.003.5 150 08C.025 :Lake Clrave Overlay :Limitation on Certain Elements
50.02.001.2 _ _ - ;50.09.005 .- 10ldTciwn DEllign :Purpose I
50 03.002 ;50.09.010 ;Old Tawn Design ;Permitted Uses
50.021.0021 150.09.015 ;Old Taw Design ;Conditional Use9 _ I
!OWT50.04.001-3 150.09.020_ IOTown Design r :Lot Size,Lot Dimensions, Density
T50.04.061.3 150.09.0212 Old Tawn Design i Minimum Density:DD Zone
50.04.001.2.e 150.09.025.1 ;Old Tciwn Design ;Setback Requirements,Bufilens _ __
50.04.601,2.e .— — —
150 09.025.2 ;Old Town Design ;Setback Requirements,Buffers
415f90.,9 .001.3 1.50.09.025.4 101d Tawn Design :Setback Requirements,Buffers
.08.001.2.e :50.09.025.5 :Old Town Design :Setback Requirements, Bufilens
50.04.003..2.e 150 09.025.6 :Old Town Design :SetbackRequirements, Buffers
50.04.001.3.e 150.C19.0215.7 ;Old Tawn Design ;Setback Requirements,Buffers
•
50.04.001.2.e ;50.09.025.8 ;Old Town Design 1Se1tack Requirements,ElufflEns
T50.04.001-3 ---4------:50.09.030_1 :Old Town Design Height of Structure
90.04.001.2.g.ii 150.09.010.2.a 101d Town Design (Height of Structure
50.04.0012.g.iv50.09.030.2.b__ QId lown Design Height of Structure
50.04.001.7J.g.i% ;50.09.030.3 ;Old Tawn Design ;Height of Structure
50.04,001.2.f.iii 150.(19.0319 ;Old lawn Design ILcil CIo‘dEnage
, r
50.01.003.2.a 150.09.045 ;Old Town Design :Old Tawri Advisory Opinion
50.(19.0(19.3.a 150.10.0(19.1 !West Lake GrcivEI Zones ;Purpose
150.10.005.2 :_West Lake Grove Zones IRurpose
50.03.0Cl2h 150.10.010 ,We91 Lake Grove Zones ,1Office Commercial/Town Home Residential(OC/R-2.5)
1
50.03.002 -_150.10.015 West Lake GrciveZanEi9 ;Office Commercial/Neightorhacic Commercial(OC/NC)
50 03.002 150 10.020 :West Lake Grove Zones. (Town Home Residential(R-2.5) .
so:a:i.002 150.1(1.023 :Westlake Grove Zones ;Live/Work Zone(R-2.51W)
50:02.002.1 ;50.11.005 1CommercialZones ;Purpose
•
50.03.002 ;50 11010 ;ComUse
mercial Zones ; s_.. _- . w
50.02.(102 130.11.013 1Clommencial Zane9 :Site Development Limitations
50.04.001.21 :90.11.019 ;0ommEncial Zane9 ;Site Development Lirni1atians
T50.04.001-14. 15.0.11.015 ICommercielZones ;Site Development Lirnilatianis :
50.02.002 ;50.11.020 ;Commercial Zones ;Specie'
al_Requirements ,
50.09.007.1 I90.11A01a I I Ely CIO !Purpose .
I
0.05.007.3 .130.13.A.013 :l EIS 00 1Relation9h ip to Other Development Stan4
dards l
05 007 3i5011A 020 ;LGVCO 1Applicat ility
50.05.007.41 ;50.11A.030 ILGVCO ;Site Development S_tandards-
9a.05.001.3 I90.11A.040 ILG\40 IBuiilding Design Standards
50.05.007.E! 150.11A.050 1LGVCO :Site Rlarining Standen(9
_—' — tAI1 bl I Fr--
Page 5 of 15 IIID 111-0036
REVEFSIE INDEX FOR COCE REORGANIZATION
NEWODE e:LD°CODE &AA12TICLE tr qlWt:hapter 50 fi x
9a.03.C101.1 190.11A.a6C1 ;I GNA C10 ;Special Requirements and Standards
90.01.006 15011A.070 !LGVCO ;Adjustments
9a:021.C1031.1.a !90 12La1C1 ICI Zanfi !Purpose 411
50.03.002.2 190.12.015 iCl Zane: inei mitlec Lies 1
50.03.002.2 150.12.020 ICI Zone :Conditional Uses
9a.a2.C103.1.1 190.12La;i5 1C1 Zane !Site Development Limitations
50.02,003.1,c 150.12,030 !CI Zone !Special Requirements
50.02.002.1 150.13.005 Industrial Zones :Purpose
9a.ai.cio;i 150.13.a1CI 1lndustria!aones IPeumitteid l9es;Ind ustnialZane
90.03.002 150.13.015 :Industrial Zones :Conditional Uses,_Industrial Zone
50.03.002 190.13.020 I Indu 91 rial aones I Pei mitlec Uses;Industrial Par k Zorie
50.03.002 150.13.025 Industrial Zones :Conditional Uses;Industrial Park Zane ' Y
50.0I.CI01.9 450.13.030 ` :Industrial aones 4Prahibited.Uses;AnyIndustrialZone 4
19C1.C14.0CI1-14 ;50.13.x39 . 11ndu91rial aones Site Development Limitations
50.02.C102.2.b.iv 150.]31.040 Industrial Zones Special Requirements -
50.0z1.001.4.c.v 150.13.a4C1.3 ;Industrial aones !Special Requirements
9a.o3.cio i :50.13.10C1 IIndustrial aones 'Inidustrial Park Overlay Diilrid 4
50.02.003.2.a 450.13A.005 :PF Zone I Purpose
9a.03.C1021 150.13A.CIla I PIF Zane I Permitted lies
50.03.002 150.13A_010 .. IPF Zone !Permitted Uses
-----=---------- ---•_:_ --=----=_ ----►= -=__----------- -----_- -------- 4 --
50.03.002 150.13A.020 1PF Zone !Conditional Uses
9a.021.C1031.t 50.131A.0219.11 ;PIF Zane :Site Development Limilatians
90.02.003.b 150.13A.02.5.2 PF Zone :Site Development Limitations
:-
90.02.003.1 150.13A.02.5.3 ;PF Zane :Site Development Limilatiaris
50.01.003.1.ii 150.13A.025.4 IPF Zone !Site Development Limitations
50.02.0033.a 450.139.005 :PNA Zone !Purpose '
90.031.CI021 150.1318.0]10_ IPNA]ane IFIEurnit'Ied Lies 1111
50.03.0021 150.138.015 IPNA Zane :Conditional Uses
90.02.003.3.b 190.13E1.020 JPNAZane ;Master Plans
__y
90.01.C1041.81.a ;90.138.0215 ;Parks N asteir Plan IN aster Plan Element, r ,
50.01004.8.1D :50.139.030 Parks Master Plan IN aster Plan Procedure
50.01004.8. c 150.138.035 !Parks Masten Plan !Master Plan ariteria . :.
50.01.0041.81.d {90.]138.0410 1.Parks N aster Plan IN aster Plan Conditions afApproval
50.01.004.8.e 150.138.045 ;Parks N aster Plan IN astern Plan Modification I
50.021.003.3.c 15(1.138.090 1PNAZoniei :Site.Development Limitations
50.03.004.150.14.00.5.1 Accessory anic Temporary Uses :Accessory Uses . I
,90.03.004.1 150.141.0(15.2 !Accessory and Temporary L 9es ;Accessory Uses w_ �_��_a
50.03.004.1. 150.14.005.3 ;Accessory and Temporary Uses !.Accessory Uses
50.03.004.2.a 150.141.005.4 !Accessory and Temporary Uses !Accessory Uses
90.031.CI041.2.b 150.141.0015.5 !Accessory anis Temporary Uses !Accessory Uses
50.03.004 2 a 150 14.005.61 (Accessory and Temporary Uses !Accessory Uses
50.031.0041.2.a +5(114.005.71 Accessory and Temporary Uses Accessory Uses
90.031.ao3.1 19(1.141.01x.1 __!Accessory and Temporary L Ns !Temporary L 9es;511 uctu nes
90.oa.aosA1 !9(1.14.01x.2 !Accessory anic Temporary L Ms :Temporary L 9es; les
90.03.005.5 150.14.010.3 :Accessory and Temporary Uses Temporary Uses;Structures_
5b.03.005„2 150.14.010.4- !Accessory and Temporary :Temporary Uses;Structures
50 03.005.3 :50.141.019 Accessary anic Temporary Uses it se of Recreational Vehicle a9 a Dwelling L nit Prohibited
3a.03.CI09.1.a 50.19.009.1 Grmum ay N anaoement Overlay PurFlose;AA1Plication
—111111
50.05.009.1.1 +50.19.005.3 FGneeniv+ay N anafiemeint Overlay iRurFlosei;AA1FIlication
9a.09.C1051.1I.c 50.15.0(19:3 Gneenv+ay N aniaoment Overlay Purpose;Application
___ 1(f111S11 1--L-L____
t
Page 6 cif 15 IIID 131-0036
RUVBRISE INDEX FOR CODE REORG PIN IZATION
7-7777777777-777.77
•
�
h _ RTCltS . ti�W. ,TITLE .0apter,SU - .,._ . _, �. xlts44
Y
90.09.009.3
50.19.010.1 Greenway Management Clverlay Development REIviEIw
00.05.009.2 9(1.19.010.2 Greenway Management Clverlay Development Review
90.05.009:3 190.15.010.9 Greenway Managlerr ant Clverlay Development REIN ie!w
1
90.01.0(13.3.a 90.15.010.4 Graenway Managleirr an1 Clverlay Development REIN iEiw
+ I-=--------- --=---- ---:-• - =- 4--=---
50.(19.0(19.3 50.15.015 Graenway Mana®err ani Overlay Permitted UsEi9
50.05.009.4 150.15.03(1 GreenwayMaragemen1 Clverlay ‘Al illarret1aRiven Clreanway Raundaryl .
1
T --- -
50.05.010.1 . 150 16 005_ :Sensitive Lands :Overview
i.:_- h= = ------. i
50.05.010.2 150 16.015 ____ Sensitive Lands :Applicability
5(1.(19.010.4.a 5(1.16.016 Sensitive Lands " Rebuilc ing Nonaanllarming Single Family on au pllEix Dwelling
5(I.C171.0C14.1C1.a 5(1.16.020 Sensitive Lands Criteria fon Designating Property W itF in an Clverlay District
-- f F i ------I
50 07.004 10.b 150 16 025 :Sensitive Lands 1 Removing an Overlay District Designation 5a.
(1.07.004.10.c 150.16.090;50.16.0210 ;Slansitive Lands ;Environmental Review
50.07.0_04.10,d 150.16.035 ;Sensitive Lands_ _ ;Delineation of Streams,Wetlands,and lima Chimes
5(1.C15.010.4.b 15(1.16.040 ;Sensitive Lands Modifications tc!Dimensional Slandands anc SlEnbacks olth e
j a Underlying Zane ______1
50.05.010.4.c :50.16.045 :Sensitive Lands ;Density Transfer"-. ..
5(1.(15.010.9.a 50.16.(19(1 !Sensitive Lands RC District Envinanmantal Review Standards;Applicability and
'1. Purpose
�
_____________,
Lands
RC District Protection
—`50.05.010.5.c '50 16.060 SeinslivLanc9 SCI QistriDevelopm t Standards
-I
5(I.C15.(110.6.a 90..1(1.(1619 Seinsil iv E!Lanc 3 RP District Env inonmeniat RENiEiw'_Itandand9;ApAllicability anc
Purpose
50.05.010.6.-b 50.16.070 FSeinsitive Lanc 9 :RP District and(lansl nuctian Setback REiquIremenl s
50.05.010.6.c 150.16.075 ;Sensitive Lands _ 1RP District Development Standards
50.C15.Cl10.EI.c 9a.1E1.C183 Semi.:NEI Lands Exceptions WhEluiEl 1Fe RP 0isinict Prohibits all Reasonable
Development Opportunities
50.05.010.6.e ;50.16.090 ;Sensitive Lands - _ _ - _ . _. _ , - _-;Special Standards for the Oswego(lanai
50.05.(I10.zI.c 19a.1EI.(199 Sensitive Lands :Construction Standards
50.05.010.4.a . 150 16 100 :Sensitive Lands _ !Miti ation; Purpose
9a.as.(11(1.z1.1 150 1E1.105 !Sensitive Lands ;Progressiva Mitigation Ste s Required
50.05.010.4.g ;50 16.110 ;Sensitive Lar ;Mitigation Requirements
- --------------------+-rim---- ----------i. ,----
50.07.005.4.a50.11.005.1 ;Planned Development Overlay_ 11Purp_ose,Applicability.
50.01.C109.41.1 190.11.009.2 :Planned Development Clverlay ;Purpose,Applicability
50.01.005.4.c 150.17.010 :Planned Development Overlay _iPracedunes
50.01.005.4.d 150.13.015 - Planned Development Overlay Authorization
90..01.003.4.e
;50.11.3.1(1 ;Planniec Development Overlay. ;Special RegiainemEinits
50.01.005.4.f" ______"150.11.025 :Planned Development Overlay :Expiration4- 4 , Revocations
50.07.005.3.a 150 20. 005 :Flag Lots :Purpose;Applicability
90.03.0(19.2.a.iii 150.20.010.1 ;Flag l ats Authorization;Application Requirements
50.07.005.2.a.iv 190.1E010.3 ;Flag lats ;Authorization;Application RequiremEints
50.01.005.2.1p __-.-.150.20.015 ;Flag Lots Exceptions
50.07.005.2.c 150 20 020 FFlagLots i:Access
}
.(13.0(19 2.e 150.10 030 `Flag Lots 1 Building and Site Design Standards, .
0.07.005.2.d 150.20.025 [Flag Lots :Lot Configuration Requirements [
150.07.005.2.f [50 20 035 ;Flag Lots :Screening, Bufile ring anc Landscape Installation 1
150.(161.011 � 150 21.005 ,Visior Clearance Vision Clearance __- ;
CAM in'i F=2-----
Page 7 o1111.5 LLU 11-0036
• REVERSE INI]BX ROR CODE REORGANIZATION
f+tEUfl.4: 3t7,?;.‘. .,If}LD CODE _, _.IARTiCI E VRS.K & 5: TITLE&chapter 50 04th,. . 1 gs ,u
56.04.003.2.a 50.22.005.1 . Exceptions Gelneral Exception 1a lot Area anic Dimension Requinements
50.04.0013.2.tl SICI.22.C109.3 ' '
Exception's General Exception lo Loi Area anc Dimension Flequinementi 0
----- 1
50.04.0033a ._- _ ;50.22.010.1 :Exceptions :General Excerption 10 YamRequineiment9
50.04.603.3.1a ;50.22.010.2 ;Exce• ptions ;G• eneral Exception-1_o Yard.Requirements• .
50.04.003.4.a ;9CLa2.C119.1 ;Exceptions ;General Exception 10 Structure Height Limitations
--r-
50.04.003.4.b 150.22.015,3_ . Exceptions :General Excerption 10 Stru ci u re I-eight I imil atians
50.04.003.5 5o.22.020 Exceptions One Velar Excepl ian tci Height/Setback/Lot Coverage
• ` Req'.inements far Nevi Si. div isicin Lots ---------a
50.04.003.6.a ;50 22.025.1 ;Exceptions ,;Special Determination of Yards and Yanc Requinements;
•50.04.(ICIc".6ai ;90.22.025.2 Exception's :Special Determination of Y arcs aric Yard Requirements;
50.04.003.6.c . [50„22.025,3 150.22.0253 Exceptions :Special Determination afYarc s arid Yanc Requirements;
50.07.00.9.24.1.2 a:50 2.2.025.3 :rExceptions :Special Determination of Yards and Yard_Requirements;
W
9C1Cl] (ICl9.1.a ;90.221.3CL1 ;Exceptions W ;OswegoLake!leiback
50,07,005.7,0 :;50.22.030.2 ;Exceptions ;Oswego Lake Setback
50.04.002 _ ;50.22.035 :Exceptions :Special Street Setbacks
50.06.001.2.g 190.22.040 :Excerptions IFlaofticap Decks
50.06.001.5.h 150.22.040 :Exceptions :Rooftop Decks
9a:aW1-CIa3.El.a ;90.:13.049 ;Exceptions ;deenenal Exceptions fon Building Projections
9a.azl.cia3.Sl 90.22.0901 Exception! Excepi ion far Slurvey/Canstnuction Errans. llreie Pnatealiari,
ante Alignment fa Adc it ions tci Existing Si nuctu nes
90.0z1.00.3.10 50.22.C1a Excerptions Excepi ians to the N inimum Density Requiremenl for All
Zones
9a.o3.cio3.41.t 50.30.0(15 Special Reduineaments hype cit F ame Oacu pial iarus
FFacilityIII
90.03.0103.1.1 so.3a.oia Special Requineamentsllvpie of Specific Staridauds for Saconicary Dwelling Unit
facility_ ---_,
50.03.003.3.e.i 9(1.30.019.1 Special Requ inEarnents lIY pea of Specific 51 a rid ands fan Telecommu niaatians Facilil ies
FFacility
-- ____--------_____
50.03.003 3.e•ii 50.3 0.019.2 Special Hequ inemen1 s 11Y pe cif Specific Sl a rad ands fan Telecommunications Facilities
_ �_-�_ `Facility
90.(13.003.3.e.iii 5(1.3 a.015.3 Special Flequinerrieni! hI'pe cif Specific Si and ands fear Telecomm uniaatiansNacililres
_ Facility
50.03.003.3.e.iv 50.30.015.4 51pecial Requinament1 llv pea cif Specific Si and ands fan Telecommunications Facilities
F
Facility
50.03.004.14 5(i.3a.ois.5 9pecialRequinemen1s11Ypie cif Specific Siarid ands for TelecommunicaliansFlacilities
Facility
50.03.003.-3.e 50.30.015.6 Special Requinerrientsllupeacif Specific$11andardsfan Telecommunicationsllaciiities
Facility _ _
50.03.0(3.2 5(i.30.020 Special Requinerraenit1 llypie cif__ - Specific 511 aridands fan Resicerilial Cana Housing arid
Facility Congregate Housing
50.03.003.1.d 50.30.025 I5lpecial Requinemenila Type of Specific 511aridands far N abile Home Pall cm Si.bc'vision'
;Facility
50.OEI.0(13.3.a.i 15(1.40.0C 5 ;Drainage- IV'nisi.Arid Minor —1Applicab ility r
50.06.006.3.h.ii ;50.40.010 . -_- `Drainage-Minist.And Minor Standards for Approval
50.06.006 3.a.iii ;50.210.015 ;Drainage-IV inist,Arid Minor ;Standards for Construction
50.06.006.3.a.iu 15(1.40.020 ;Drainage-N inial.Arid Minor ;S1and ands fan IV ainleniance
50.07.004.2.3 50.40.030 :Drainage-Minisl.Arid Minor [Pratte(u ne'
90.06.006 3.b.i 150 X11.005 Drainage-Major - ;Applicability - _ : _ -_ ig.
50.06.006.31.ii :90.41.020 :Drainage- Major ;Stand aids fan Approval :
�� - ~-------- --------351 - .
50.0EI-QOEI.3.b.iii ;50.411.035 ;Drainage-Major ; a rid ands ;
• __r_rrr_ ._r
50.06.010.4 150.41.030 iprainage-Major ;Standards for Maintenance
. - CA171D11 F2
Pare 8 31111:5 LU 11-0036
•
REVERSE INDEX NOR CODE REORGANIZATION
1909331= QDCOE - .
5.6.67.664.i_...—„t_
0.07.004.2 DYD�31inage- aj �TITE Ober 50 ; �
-
'
50.411.035 Proceduresy
0.06.006.3,b 150.411.040 lanainage-Majon ;Miscellanecws Information
ii0 06.006.1 a 150.42.005 Weak Foundation Soils Applicability .
50.06.006.1.c 19a.ci.(Ili(1 ;Weak Foundation Soils ;Standards fon Approval 1
50.C17.004.12 150.42.025 :Weak Foundation Soils 1Procedunes
5C1.C16.0C16.1.t 13a.43.(13(1 ;Weak Foundation Soils ;Miscellaneous Information
50.06.006.2.3 ;50.43.005 !Hillside ;Applicability
5(1.10. 150.413.010 !Hillside-_ 1Definitions
50.06.006.1.c 193.43.(1]19 'Hillsic a !Approval Standards '
50.06.006.2-.e 150 43.020 ;Hillside 1Con9truclian Standanc 9
50.a].aa4.z1.a.) 150.43.030:1 :-Hillside 1Procedures-
50.07,004 41 a_iii 150.43.030.2 1.;Hillsica !Procedures I
9a.07.004.41.a.iv 150.43.030.3 jHiIIlside 1Pracedunei9 1
50.a1.CIaz1.41.t 190.43.C13C1.41 UHillside !Procedures
50.07.004.4,a.i 150.43.030.5 !Hillside 1Procedunos
9CL0].004.4.a.ii 1-50.43.030.6 !Hillside ;Procedures-
9a07.0044,a,ii 150.43.030.71 [Hills tcel !Procedures
50.06.006 150.43.035 !Hillsideri: 1N i9cellameou9 Inlormatiori
90.05.01]1.11 s0.z14.a0s ;Flood !Applicability
90.05.011.2 150.44.010 !F1ood ;Purpose
50.09.(111.3 156..44.012 ;Flood 1 Definitions _
50_05.011.4 __ ;50.z141.0]I5 ;Flooc !Map Administration 1 .
50.05.0111:5 150.4141.020 !Flood !Development Ren ieiw
50.09.011.61 150.414.024 !Flood !Encroachment within Floodvvay
50.05.011.7 1.50 44.030 _ ;Flood !Flood N anagement Anela Development Standards
50.09.311.8 150.414.036 ;Flood (Standards for C ansl nuctiori _
0.05.a]I1.9 15(1414.0410 [FlocidFlood Management Area Variances -___----_-
50.05.011.10 50 44 045 _ .-_ !Flood 'C alculation9 llor Dei!erminiing Sutstantial Improvements
50.0E1.001I.5.a ;50.45.005 ;Building Design . !Applicability
----
50.06.001.5.b_-150.45.0310 ;Building Design ;Standards fon Approval
50.06.005.-1 450.46.005 !Park and Open Space -1Applicat ility
50.0E1.0(19.3 15(1.416.010 !Park and Open Space !Standards for Approval
50.(161.010.71 -150.46.020 `Park anic Open Space :Standards fan M aintenance
5(1.(17.004.9 150.46.025 Spark anc Open Space_ 1Procedunes
50.C16.0C15.51 I9a.41E1.C13(1 ;Rank anc O en Space (Miscellaneous Information
50.06.004.1.a 450 47 005 ;Landscaping !Applicability
50.06.004.1.1 :901 4]CI1(I :landscaping !Standards for Approval
50.06.004..1_c.--: . -150,47.015 !La ndscaping .1.51 anc for Installation and Construction
50.06.010.2 150.4].020 I1.Landscaping
1S1ancands fan N ainlenance
50.03.CIa3.3I.c.i\ 190.4E.C109-
1Manufactu red Homes - lcleneral Provisions .. ..._ ...
50.03.003.1.0 X50.48 015 [Manufactured Homes !N anufactured Home Placement Standards
50.03.C103.1.c.iii 150.48.020 :Manufactured Homes !Placement Permit
50.03:003.1_c.iv 150.48.025 !Ma nufactu nec Harries ;Occupancy •Certificate
30.061 a03.1 150.55.005 ,Parking 1Applicatility
50.0€.002.3 50.55.010 LParking Standards for Approval
50.06.003.3 150.99.015 !Parking !Standards for Construction
50.06.002.3.d - . 150.55.020 !Parking !Pracec ure9 '
50.06.003.5.a 150 56.005 ['Transit1±Vplicability
-
N
50.06I.0(13.5.b 15(1.56.010 Transit IStandanc 9 lar Approval S
0.(161.0(13.1.b 150.97.005 'Access !Applicability 1
illiD.
06.003 1 a X50,971.010 Access befinitions
:50.06.003.1.c 150:57.015 ! -
,Access. aStandarc 9 for Approval
150.(16.0(13.1.c ;50.57.020 ;Access !Standards for C anstruction Access
150.06.003_1.e 150.57.030 ;Access !Procedures
tAMtDu r FT--
Page 9 of 115 LU 11-01(136
REVERSE IN DEN FOR CODE RBORG AIN IZATION
NEW ojt* -'(LD CODE .;n:4#t!.CLE, . `" , MA I ftl:E Chapter 30 --':::;,*K-1444.,44:40
50.06.003.1.f ;50.91035.1 ;Access ;Miscellaneous Information
50.06.003.1.g ;50.51035.2 ;Access ;Miscellaneous Information
50_06 O(13 �a _ :50.58.005 ;Cln-Site Circulation ;Applicability Ill
50.06.0(13.2.a :5(1.98.010 FOn-Site Clircu :Definitions 4
50.(IE1.003.2.b 150.68.015 IOn-Site Circulation :Standards far Approval
50.06.003.2.c ;50.58.020 ;Ons-Sites Clirculation ;Standards far CanstrL.ction
50.0€.010.5 ;50.58.025 ;On Site Circulation ;Standards for Maintenance ;
50.01003.150.58.030 :On-Site Circulation iProcedures .
50.06.003.3.a ;50.99.0(15 1U alkways :Applicability :
50.06.003.3.13. ;50.59.010 :Walkways :Standards for Approval 1
50.06.003.3.c ;50.59.015 ;U aikways ;Standards fcin Construction '
90.0EI.a1CI ;50.99.030 Walkways :Standards for Maintenance 1
50.01003.1 4:50.99.025 :IA alkways iProcedures ;
90.0EI.003.41.a 150.EI0.0C15 Streel Connectivity lApplicability
K06,003.41 ;50.60.010 _:_.._.;Street Connectivity ___ - ;Purpose and Intent
50.1CI. ;5(1.60.015 Street Clannectivity ;Definitions_ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _
50.0E1.003.41.a 5(I.E10.030 Street Clannectivity Stand ands fan Apr nov al cd 0ev elor merit Wit id Regt.hies th a
Construction of a Street
50.06.003.4.d +5(I.EIa.035 Streel Clannectivity XStand andsfan Aprinov al cil Clonsl ru ci ian oil 5-Mich nes 1h al 0a
Not Require Construction of a Street
50.01004.6 ;50.60.030 ;Street Connectivity I Procedi.nes
50.06.003.4.e 150.60.035 :Streel Clannectivity ;Standards for Ccinstruction. l
50.06.004.3.a 150.63.0(15 :Lighting- :Applicability
50.1CI. :50.E3.010 Lighting l Defiriil ions
50.06.004.3.b _150.63,020 ;Lighting_ . , _ s IStandardsfor Approval
50.06.008.1 +50.64.005 Utilities ;Applicability ____--�--
50.1CI. :9(LEI4.010 :Utilities .Definitions
11111
50.06.008.3_ 13(1.64,015 .._ _:Utilities - :Standards for Approval '
.=-==------== - --- --j---- -----=--- ----h X51
50.06.008.4 ;5(1.64.020 :Utilities ;Stand fcin Cciristru cl ian
90.06.010.8 5(1.64.015 ;Utilities ;Standards for Maintenance- :
50.07.004.13 _ 150.64.030 :Utilities iProcedures __ _
50.06.008.6 150.EI4.035 ;Utilities IN iscellaneaus Infarmation _ _f
50.09.004.1 15(I.E15.0015 :Downtown Design : urpose I
50.05.004.2 19(1.65.010 IDowntown Design ;Applicability '
50.09.0041.3 ;50.65.015 ;Downtown Design ;Relationship,to Other,Development Standards R
50.05.004.4 450.€15.020 F owntown Design :Definitions ______ _
90.09.004.9 19(I.E15.035 LDoH nitciw n Design :Building Sit ing anc Massing
50.05.004.6 _.. :50.65.030 _ _;Downtown Design. ;Building Design
50.05.004.7 150.651.035 ;Downtown Design ;View Pnol action
90.09.004.8 ;SO.E15.09a Downtown Design ;Landscaping and Site Design Requirements
50.05.004.9 _____ 150.65.055. 1 Downtown Design :Parking Requirements
50.05.004.10 _:50 65.060 1Downtown Design Paul ing Lot Design --
_90.09.004.11 I90.E19.OE19 -- ;D ntawn Design
__-;ParkingStrudures
90.09.004.12 ��- 190.69.033 :Doan ntown Design ;Street,Alley and Sidewalk Design-
90.08.005.1 50.65.075 . ._ :Downtown Design_ ;Exceptionsto Standards
50 05,0061 150.66.005 :Old Town 'Purpose __—__�___________ _____—_____—_—1
90.05.006.2 :90.EIEI.010 :OIc Town IDefintions
90.09.00E1.3 ;50.EIEI.a15 ;Olc Mown ;Applicability .
50.05.006.4 150.66.020 ;Old Town - _ IBuilding Siting and Massing
90.05.006.9 450.66.025 Fold Town __1Building Design and Natenials
9a.0E1.C1OE1.EI 150.(IELa3C1 IOlc Mown :Fencingaric Landscaping
_ • - - - : 11011
9a.09.C10E1.1 190.EIEI.aa9 :Old Town, :Garages.
90.05.006.8_-____ 150.66.040 ;Old llown 'Additional Requirements fan N ultiple Family Dwellings
EXH IE111 R-2
Pale 110 of 39 11L 111-0036
REIVBRSE IN DEN FOR C ODE REORGAN IZA11ION
WaR .RC).l,DtoDt..,5 TABIC LE .... '.., -__- TITLE� Clap er g"07 45 ,�
77-77.77-7,7
so_ .. . i .
50.(19.0(111.11 w ;50.EI7.00I5 West Lake Gno E Design Stanc a ras Ru npase
V0.C15.005.2 '5(1.617.(1110 West Lake Grave Design St ant ants'Applicability
50.(161.0(15.3.b -+50 67.(119 West Lake Grave Design Si ant ards West Lake drove Design Standards --I
5(I.(161.0(15.4 50.67:02(1 W e91 Lake Grave Design Standards Standards AIpplicable to 1 ha Enn ire District
5(1.(15.0(16.9 +50.67.025 West LakeGravE Design Sia ndands�Design 9tancares fan OCI/R-21.5
50.05.006.6 50.67.030 West l aka Grave Desi€n S1 andands Design Stanc a lids fcui OCI/N CI
50.05.(Ia6.1 90.611.(139 IWEIst lake Grave Desifin Slandanc s Design Standauds fcin R-2.5
1
9a.a9.(Ia6.f 90.611.(14(1 Most Lake Clrave ClesiE n Standanc s Design Standards far R-2.5/Vii
1
50.08.002.11 190.68.005 !Variances 1 Purpose
50.08.003.3 150 68 005 FVarianaes !Purpose
90.0f.002.2 150.6f.010.1 a :Variances
Variance Si and ands
-
SQ 08.003..3 150.68.01CI.11.b 1Vanianaes ;Variance.Standards-
50 08.002.4 159.68„010.2 ;Variances . . ;Variance Stand ands
50.08.002.3 150.6E.015.1 ;Variances !Classification of Variances
50.08.003.2. 150.68.015.2 iVariances !Classification of Variances
50.0E1.0(12.41 I-5'0.68.017 IVariances !Variances not Allawable
50.08.003.4. .50.68.0317 !Variances ;Variances ncrt Allowable -
0.07.004.11.a 5C1•E19.0C15Y Clanc it lanai l ses Intent anc RurFlose; Effect of Use Under Polar Cade Which is111F + Conditional Under Current Cloc a
50.07.004i.c 50 69 010 1Conc it lanai l ses !Authorization to Permit ar Deny Conditional Uses
90.(171A(14111.10 150 69.015 ;Conditional Uses. IRnocecure
50.07.0.04.1.d 150.69.030 !Conditional Uses !Modification of CUP
50.07.0(141.1.e 150.69.025 =lConditionaI L ses (Abandonment of CUP
50.071.0C141.14.f 50.69.030 (Iona'tonal L ses Review cif CU1113;Amenc ment and Revocation Pnoceduues
50.03.0(13.3.a 50.69.(15(1 Clonditional Uses Specific Standards for Churches,Clonvent anc Relalec Faaility
5CI.CIc1.(ICIc1 11 .- 9(1.619.(159 Canditianal Uses !Specific Siandands far'-Ikillec N u nsing Facilil ies in the R-CI,R-
-- _________________ - _______._--------_;2.5,R-3 and R-5 ZanEis ____
90.03.(103.3. 90.69.C151 Conditional USES SFlecific Siandanc s Applicaille 10 Residential Clare 1-ausing
Facilities and Can€ne®a1e Housino in R-1.9,li-1CI and R-15
50.03.003.3.0_ _.!50.69.060 1Canc itional Uses :Specific Standards for Schools _
90.03.003.3.f 50.69.0E15 Canc itianal Uses SFlecific Standards llor11elecammunication9 Faailities in
Residential or Mixed Resic enlial/Commercial Zones
50.03.003_3.L 50.E19,02a (lanc i1 ianal USE 9 Specific Static ards for Malan Rut lic Fan ilities anc Institut lana!
L ses Nat(lav ered 11y Other SFIEIcillie Stanc arcs
50.03.0(13.1.a 50.E19.015 : ((anc it ianal l ses Specific Stanc arcs fan Clonc itional 1.ses LiitEic in Clcimmencial
an Inc us1 vial Zanes and N cit Covered by ather Specific
Stanc arc i
-0.(13.0C13.3.c 5(I.E19.080 Conditional L ses Specillia Stanc arcs fan N an-pinaflt Ccinditional Uses in Certain
. Zones
5(I.C13.0C13.4.c 5(1.619.(189 Conditional 1.ses Specific Stanc ards fcin N cin-prcdit Office l 5E15 in Si nuctu nes an
the City's Histaniaal I and marls Lisa anc W N ich are Located on
Arterial Si neets
--- tAl'1I b1I F:2"--
Fl age 11 of 115 LU 111-0036
REVERSE INDEX RC R COOK REORGANIZATION
N CEDE ow, 00E ARTICLE; ,M lk,� 'TITLE 0Chapteiii$0 3 x s _ = ry
9a.a i.(lai.I..d 9a.6s.CI9(I Conditional Uses SpecificStanicards fan aoriditiorial-1 ies in 9e R-2 arid R-8
Zones
.9C1.01.(IOCl.1.a .9a.7(I.clo9 rh an-Cloniiorrr irig Uses :Non-Canfarminig L le,S1 nuctupe Defined;Rig his Cluaritec. 0
____________
50.01.(106.7 19a.71c1.ciici -in cin-Clorilorrr ing Usel :Discontinuance of a l'on-Conforming l le
50.01.006.3--_-__ _;50.70.015 -_;Non-Conforming Uses ;Applicability to_Approvals,Incompleted Construction
50.01.006.21 150.70.020 ;Nan-Clorilorrr ing Usel ;Destruction,Movement arid Replacemerii af Structures
50.01.006.5 .9a.71(1.C129 'F cin-Clorilorrr irig Usen EAgansioni cif Nene-Confcmrr ing Inc ustrial ar Carr rr ercial Usel
or Structures
50.01.006.6 150.70.030 r Ion-Conforming Uses iRepains.arid Mainilenanice
50.01.006.7 ;50.70.040 ;Non-Conforming Uses ;Non-Conforming Characteristics of Use
50.07.004.7.a 150.71.005 ;ODPS ;Phasing al Major Development
5(LCI7.(1a4.1.c j9a.711.C11(1.1 10D FIS IONS •
50.07.004.7.g 150.71.010.2 . ODFI9 :ODPS
56.07.004.7.13 ;9a.71.015 : ;ODPS ;RurposecdODE
50.07.(104.].c ;50.711.02aIODPS ;Density Bonus within Phased_Development-
50.)7.(1a4.7.e;.i isa.71.025,1 FODPS Application Procedure --I
50.07.(laz1.7.e i9a.711.025.2 IODR9 _ r 1Appliaatiani Firciaec I.NEI
50.07.004.7.g50,71_025_3 __ `ODPS __ :Application Procedure
50.07.004.1.e ;9_(_1.71.030 ;ODPS ;Review cd ODRS
y
5(1(17.(104.7. ii :50.71]1.(139
g.i ,ODPSI " ,Hearing Body Action
50:07.004.7.g iii 50.71.040 FODPS IContenil of th a Approved Finial ODPS_____
50.07.0a4.7.h 190.711.049 h;ODP9 :Changes to.the ODPS
-I
50,07.003.16,a_ ;50.72:005. :RID ;Flurpose
50.07.003.16.13 ;50.70.015 IRID ;Applicability
5(1.CI7.00I3.]IEI.a }90.71:1.(12(1 ;RID ;Authorization and Criteria- ._ '
50.07.003.16.a - 19a.75.005 :Legislative :Legislative Decisions Defined
56.07.003.15.b {90.75.(11(1 FLegiilative __ ICnileria fan Legislative Decision'
50.07.003.116.c19a. 719.a119 ;Legislative ;Required Notice to DLCD .
,50.75.020 ,Legislative :RlaniningCammissionReiaamrrenicationRequired
50;07.003.16.d
50.07.003.16.e 150.719.(129Y1Legislative City Council Review arid DecisiarM .
50.C17.003.18.f 190.75.030 :Legislative.. - :Effective Date if Legislative Decision
- i
50,07.003.4.g.i 50.76.010 `Hearing Rnocedure IRecard af Flnaceiedings
50.01.003.a.d 13c.76.015 ;hearing Rnoceidure ;Concurrent Hearings- ,
50.01:003_.3 ;50.76.020 ;h Baring Procedure ;Jurisdiction of Hearing Body
50.07.(IClcl 1.a.i 91.77.(109 Applical ian Requirements Aplpllicatiori for Develorimeni
50.07.003.1.b 150.717.007 :Applicatiion Requirements IBunden of Rroaf
5(I.C71.0CI3.1.c 19C1.717.(11(1 ;Application Requirements IMethoc cif-Application
50.07.003.1.d 150,.77.015 Application Requirements :Signature on Application
50.07.0C13.1.ei 150.717.020 :Applical ian Requirements ;Pre-Application Canference
9(I.C171.0C13.1.f ;50.717.(129 _-__ Applicatian Requirements 1Neighborhood Contact Required for Certain_Applicatiorps J
5CI.C171.0C13.1.g ;50.717.(130 ;Application Requirements ;Filing_an Application; Determination of Completeness
50.07.003.1.h_ -_- ;50.77.035- ;Application Requirements ;Extensions or(lantinuances
50.07.003.1.j- :50:77.045 :Appliaatiani Requirements :Modification af Renk ing Application
50.(11.0CI3.1.j 15(1.77.(1410 1Appliaatian Requirerrenit iWithdravving and Application
5(1.(171.0C13.17.a 5(1.79.(105 Types cii Develement ReiviEl% arid Exert"pit Devedapmeint Classifical icor
Criteria
50.07.003.13.a 50.79.010.1 Types cd Uevcdapment Rciview arid IV iniilerial Oevelorin•enii Cllassificationi
}Chiitenia i
50.01.0(13.13.a 5(1.19.010.2 Types cii Om elaplrr enit Review and IV iniil erial Oev eloFlrr evil Classifications 410
Criteria
56.07.003.13.c 50.19.010.3 1 yples cii Om elaplrr ant Reviciw arid IV miss erial Oev elopirr Brit Cllassificationi
Criteria
•
tAMM'I I--L
Page 12 cf 15 LU 11-0036
REVERSE INDEX FOR CODE REOAGAN IZAIIION
IUEl.W- E YC=)La CODrE RtC4Et .> - 'TITLE Chapter dl;Ngk.�_. . ..,_ : 1y_
50.07.003.13.1 ~50.19.(I10.cI Types cif Development Review anc Ministemial Development Classifical ian
Criteria
•O.O7.0O3.13.c.ii50. 9.(I1I Types af Deiveilapment Review anc Review(Initeniia fan IV inisterial Day elarlment
Criteria ,
5CI.CI71.0CI3.141,a 50.751.(12(1 Ty pee af Develapment Review anc Minas Dmeloplmen1 alaseiiliaatian
Clritemia
5CI.C17.0CI3.13 c 9C1.71SI.CI28.3 Types af Development Review anc Mincm Developlment Classification
Criteria
50.CI7.(ICI3.141.d 9a:75.1.CI23 Types af Develapment Review and Review+ Clnitenia for Minor Developmeinl
Criteria
50.07.003.15 50.79.030 Types df DEivelapment Fiero iew anc Major Development lopmEent Classifical ian
{ aritenia __--a
9CI.a1.CI03.19.d.ii 9a.79.839 Types af Develapmenl Reviev+ anc Review Clritemia ilor Majcm Development
Criteria
30.03.C10213 30.751.C14C1 Types of Devedapmen1 :ilei ie% amc Conditions of AAIprcwal
Criteria
90.01.(102l.13.b 150.80.005 FMinisterial Review :Review by City Manager
50 07003 14 d i 150 81005 - !Minor Review :REIVIEIW by City Manager
9a.07.C103.3.a 150.81.010.1 !Minor Review ;Notice of Minor Development Appliaatian
50.07.003.3.a 150.81.018.2 ;Minor Review :Notice of Minor Development Application --�
50.07.003.3.0 *50.81:010:3 ;Minor Review IN atice cd N inor De ve lapmeinl Applical ian
90.07.CI03.14.c.iii 150.81.013 :Minor Review IIlinal Decision !
50.01.003:,14.d.iiii - 150.81.020 -I Minor Review IN atice cif Final Decision
50.01.u03.7.a 50 82 005 1Majos Review ;Review by Heaning Body
50.07.003.15b 15(.83.01a ;Major ReviE11A :Applicant's Evidence
50.07.003.15.b 150 82 015 ;Major Review :Staff Report
0 0.(11.003.3.f ;50 82 oiIa Major Review :Notice of Public Hearing
0.07,003,41.1 i50 83.0815 `Hearing Befcme a Hearings Body (Conduct of the I-earing _
50.(I1.003.4.b ;50.83.010 ;Hearing Before a Hearings Body-__-;lime Limils an Testimony
50.(I1.a(I3.41.c 150.83.015 'Hearing Before a Hearings Body ;Testimony,Exhibits and Other Evicence
50.87.083.41.d _ 150.83.020 lHEiaring Elefemei a Hearings Body :Objections
50.07.003.4.e 150.83.025 :Hearing Before a Hearings Body 1PnEiservalian cd Dude!:
90.(I1.aa13.41.f :50.83.030 :Hearing Before a Hearings Body Continuance
50.CI71.003.4.g 150.83.035 Hearing Befcme a Hearings Body IDeaIlion of the F earing Body
50.CI71.003.4.h ;50..83.040- ;Hearing Before a Hearings Body ;Nal ice of DEicisian
5(I.CI71.0(13.7.b 150.84.005 Filing of Appeals Appeal of Minor Development Decision
50.07.003.7.d 150.84.010_ _ (Filing(Filing of Appeals Filing an Appeal of a 1-eaning Body Decision
5CI.C17.0C13.7.e 19C1.82I.CI15 !Filing of Appeals ._ .;Multiple Appeals;.Consolicalian.
50.07,003,7.f. I5a.821.020 ;Filing af Appeals ;Withdrawing Appeal
eal
50.07.063.1.g 150.84.025 _ ;Filing afAppeals ;Preparation ail Reccmd and Staff Report;pranscript
50.a1.003.a.h T90.841.C13 (1 riling of AppealsNcitice.of the Appeal Hearing . .
50.07.003.7.i 150.84.035 _ ;Filing of Appeals ;Scope of Ccwncil Review
30.01.8'1 1.7.j ;50.84.040 ;Filing of Appeals Conduct of the Appeal Fearing
50.01003:7.k 191.841.8145 ;Riling of Appeals I Time Limits on Testimony
50.07:003.11 150 84 050 . !Filing of Appeals !Presenting Testimony
50.01.003.1.M 150 84 055 :Filing of Appeals •:Clblections
9a.01.CI03.41.e 190.841.CI6CI :Filing of Appeals :Preservation of Orc er
50.07.003.1.n I50.84.CI63 ;Filing oil Appeals :Continuance-
50.01003 7.o _ _ ;50.84.070 ;Filing til Appeals ;Decisions of the Council
50.01.0031.p - +50.84.075 _FFiling all Appeals :N atice cif Decision
03.(I1.0(13.8.a - 150.83.005 :Remands !Remands from the Clou ncil la the I-eaning Body
0.07.003.8.b ,50.EI9.01a ,Remands ,Remands from LUBA to.the City Council
! ;
50 07.003.6.0 150,8.6.Q0,5_ ;Effect of Approval cm Denial IEffiectiv a Dale all a Decision
50.(111.0(13.9.b j50.86.010 'Effect cit Approval on Denial . !Effect oil aecisian to Appuave
- -"tAM 1 til 1 F-Z-----�
Page 13 c f 15 IJ U 11-0C 36
REVERSE !NOM HOIl CODE RIEOIIGANIZAIIION
NEW CODE; _. .f OLD CODE ` jARTICLE *Z r 1 E Chaps 50... _ M. .:3 r : 1
56.01.003.2.c ;50.86.015 ;Effect af Approval an Denial ;Interpretation of Approvals
50.07.003.6.c ;50.86.020 ;Effect of_Approval or Denial ;Effect of Denial; Resubmittal
t - -r _. - ., - - - - - -.
50.07.003.11 +50.86.025 :Effect of Approval or Denial Modification of Approved Permit
5C1.C19.0C12.3 150.86.030 1 EfilEicl of Approval an Denial 1 Rei%mai ian oil PEuimil
5C1.C17.0C13.1C1 50.87.(141 CompliancEi m it h AppinoyEic PEuimil Certiflaate af Occupanc))
5C1.C17.0C15.3.a 50.87.010 CompliancEl H ilh AprinmEic PEuumil Pnerleration aric Submittal af Final Plan an Plal
50.07.005.3.0 50 87.015 Compliance with Approved PEirmit Review of tH El Final Plan or Plat, Filing Requirements
L r
5(LCI71.0CI3.5.1 50.87.(13(1 Compliance Hiih AprinoyEic PEulmil Obligation to Canstnuct Public Facilities;Secu'lily;Accepllanae
all Improvements
5(1.09.002.9 94.817.(139 Compliance H it h AprinoAEic PEnimil Failure to Fulfill Obligation;Lien ClnEiated
. L J -1
SCI.C17.0a3.:1.a ;50.88.(145 1FEiesFees and Deposits y
50,05.002.1.a ;50.90.005. ;Enforcement ;Enforcement
50.09.0031_ ;50.90.010.1 ;Enilorcemenl ;Violations;Abatement;Injunction
SCI.CI9.(ICIl_1 110.9(1.01(1.:1FEnllorcEimeril Vicllations;Abatement;Injunction
50,05.002.2,.? 150.90.010.3 ;Enforcement :Violations;Abatement;Injunction
.
50.C19.0C13.:1 ;54.910.01(1.2 ;Eniorcemenl ;Violations;Abatement;Inijunctioni
50.09.001.2 ;50.90.015. ;Enforcement ;Evidence-of Violation-
50.09.003.250.90.020 (Enforcement - ;Cumulative Remedies 4
5(1.10. 19A:1.CI49 [Solan .Defmitians
50.06_007.1.a }57.04,0 (1
1 Solar ;Purpose
50.06.007.1.b ;3x.04.015 ;Solar ;Applicability
5CI.C16.(107.1.c }5 .44.(13(1 :Solar :Design Standard
50.04.004.1 19x.04.025 [Solar [Exemptions from Design Standard '. ' AD
50.04.004.2 151.44.(13(1 Solar 1AcjustmEintstaDesign Stancarc
50.C16.(1a7.1.e X51.04.035 Solar ;Protection from_Future Shade
50.07.004.11.d.v ;3'4.04.035 ;Solar ;Protection loom Ful u ne SH ade
5C1.C17.(1a4.11.d 15 .44.(141(1 Solar :Application
5CI C16.007.2.a 15 06 050 )Solar :Purpose :
50.06.007.2.b 157.06 055. Solar :Applicant ility
50.07.004.Ei ;3106.060 ;Solar ;Solan Site Plan Required
50.06.007.2.c 191.06.065 Solar ;Maximum Shade Flaint Height Standard
50.C14.0C14.3 57.a(I.C17(1 Solar �Exempl ian fiiam the M aximu m SH ac El Paint F eigFt Standand
5(1.(14.004.4 . 3 .06.075 Solar Adjustmentstalhe Maximum.Shade Point F eigHl Slancard
50.06.007.2.d ;57.06.080 ;Solar ;Analysis a9 Allowed Shade an Solar Feature
S0.C16.0C17.:I.Ei 15. 4(1.(189 Solan (Solan 9alancEi Paint
5CI.CI8.00I1.:1 �9 .a6.(19(I Solan Yard Setback Adjustment :
_._ L J _I
50.(17.004.11,4 157.08.100 Solan ;Purpose 1
50,97.004.1.1,1? ;51.08.105_ ;Solan ;Applicability :
50.07.004.11.g 157.08.110 Solan :Approval Stant arcs fora Solar Acces hermit
5CI.Cl7.0C14.11.h ;57.48.115 Solan - :Dui ies areal ec by Solan AacEiss PEmmil
5CI.Cl7.004.11.f ;57.x8.120 :Solar :Application, Contents 1
1
50,CI7.004.11.i 157.08.125 ;Solar ;Application Review Process 1
50.07.0C14.11.j 157.48.130 ;Solan ;Permit Enfcmcemetn Pnacess .
5(1.071.004.11.k +5 C18 139 :Solar 1Expirption and Extention of a Solan Access Permit 1
0 50.01.003 2 158 02 010 :Historic Preservation [Purpose
50.10. ;58 02.015 :Historic Preservation iDeilinitions
L__
5(1.06.0(19.1 15E1.(12.(130 ;Histania Pneservatian ;Scope alit Compliance
9NHIBII1I F-2
Page 14 all 15 LU 11-C 036
REVERSE INC DX HOF;CODE REORGANIZATION
° : :.,. .V; 0-t.O Ctia 1AA -' 3•I .� �4:.. ...;, .7011€74:t60.001.54 . . ....-R „_-_-_
ii
5CI:CI1;0C13.21 58.02.C121E.1 F isiaric Preservation Au1hcmity10 Reiview anc Make a Decision;Acapikin cd
Landmark D_ esignation List
•.C16.C1C19.4 ;E 8.021.0123.;1 His1 uric Flreservation Authcuiity to Rev iew anc Make a Decision;Adoption of
Landmark Designation List
50:06.009.2 .58,02.030 ;Historic FlreseirvatiorlExemptions .
50.09 002 ;5802 040 ;'Historic Preservation ;Enforcement.
5CI.C19.C1C13._I ;E 8.aaci45 !Histaric Flreservation 'Penalties
50.01.003.1.a :58.02.050 :Historic Preservation IOffiaial Action
50.09.001.1 153.'62.055 ;Historic Preservation, .Abatement of Violations
50.09.002.41 � a
Ea 21.Ciaci IHis1aric Praseirvatian :Injunctive Relief
50.09.001.2 ;58.02.065 ;Historic Preservation. .- - ;Evidence oilNdialation
3CLaSLC10.3.2 158 02 070 ,Historic Preservation ;Cumulative Remedies
50 01:003 2 a .58.02.075 .Historic Preservation 1lnterpretai ian,Regulations and Procedures
50.07.004.5.a :58 02.080 `Historic Preservation !The Review Process -
Ea.a].ciazI.E.a.ii 1E8.021.085 IFis1oricPreservatian ;Application Requirements
50.01.003.1 ;58.02.0904 IHlstoricPreservation-----------------Revievil Rracudunes anc Nolica -
50 07.002.5 :58.02.090.2 Historic Preservation Review Procudures and Notice .
50.07,002,3.c 158 041 C19C1.3 IF isioric Preseruatian 1Reviev% Procudu nes and Notice
--
50.07.004.-;.e 158 02090.4 •;Historic Preservation -_. .Review Procudures anc Nat ice
50.0].(1021.1.a 158.02.090.5 ;Historic Preservation - ;Review Procudures and Notice
50.01.002.1.b -.._ .158 02.090.6 ;Historic Preservation ;Review Praau dunes anc Notice
50.06.009,5.a 158 02.095 1Historic Preservation -Criteria for Designation of Landmark
50.0EI.ai i. neseran ion of
09.5.1 58.021.10CI !Historic PvaliCriteria for tor a Historic District
-
50.06.009.5.c 58 02 105 (Historic Preservation ------;Criteria for Designation of a Contributing REisou nae
L0.06.009.5.d 158.02.110 ;Historic Preservation ;Criteria to Remove a Designation
50.0a.004.5_b.i 158 02.125.1 IHistonic FIneserval ian ;Moving an Demolition of Landmark
00 07.004 5.b.v :58.02.125.10 ;Historic Preservation 1Moving or Demolition af a Landmaul
50.0E.C105.I.E.d 158.(12.1215.11 IHistaric Preservation - ____ Moving or Demolition of a Landmark---------- ----- -- -- -_--
50 07.004 5b.vi ;58(12.125.12 ;Historic Preservation ;Moving an Clemcditian ofa landmark
50.07,004:5.b.ii 158.02.125.? IHistoric Preservation _.I Moving or Demolition of a Landmank
50.07.004.5.h ail 158.(12.125.3 Historic Preservation Moving or Demolition of Landmark
50.06909,6.a 08.02,1:25,4 ;Historic,Preservation !Moving ar Demalilian oil a Landmank
50.06.009.6.a 158 02.125:5 ;Historic Preservation- :Moving or Demolition-oil a Landmark
50.06.009.6.b 153.02.125.6 IHistonic Flreservation ;Moving or Demolition ofa Landmark __
50.(16.009.6.b 158_,Q2,125.7 Historic Preservation !Moving arDemcdilian oil a Lanc mark
---- - ------------------
50.CIEL009.8.c :58.02.125.8 Historic Preservation iMoving or Demolition,of a Landmark
--- -4-- i-._. .._. -I
50 07.004.5 b.iv 158.02.125.9----`Historic Fires ervation Moving ar Deimolition of a Lanc mark
-�- ----
50.06.009.6.e 158 02 130.1- !Historic Preservation 1 Moving ar Demolition of a ContiuU uting FlEis aurca
50.07.004.5.c :58.C12.13(1:21 1F istaric Rreservation ;Moving or Demolition of a Contrubuting Resource_ __- _
50.06.009.1.a 158.02.135.1 !Historic Preservation ;Alterations cif a Lanic mark cm Cloni nibuting Resource
50.06.C1C19.1.0 158.02.135.2 :Historic Preservation ;Alterations of a Landmark on Contributing Resource
50.03.005.7.c 158.02.135.3 `Histanic PreservationAlterations of a Landmark on Contributing Resource
50.06.009.7.d 158 02 135.41 ;Historic Preservation_ -. _ . ;Alterations af a l anc mark cul aontrid uting ResciurcEi 1
50.C16.CI0c1].e _ 1`_18.03.133.3 1His1aric Preservation ;Alterations of a Landmark or Contributing Resource 1
50 06.009 8 a 158 02.14(1.1 ;Historic Preservation iMajor Development,Otlien than Alterations
50 06.009 8 c 158 02 140.2 ;Historic Preservation (Major Development,Others than Alterations I
50.06.0093.1i
:58021403 ;Historic Preservation_ - ;Mayor Development;01hEm ttlan Altenations
50.0E.C1051.El.c 158.021.14(1.41 ;Historic Preservation ;Major Development,Otherthan Alterations
50.0E.C1051.ELe 58.02.15(1 F iii oric Preseruatian Alterations to Nonaantribui inE;11esou aces v\ii hin a F isi aric
4nisi nisi wll ict is nclt a Major aev elopMent
AI) 4- - - —- --F
.07.C1041.3.c 158 02 155 ;Historic Preservation IAapSp:41tylsCuDEislnuci ian all a Historic HEisounce
.0.0]003.].c 158 021 1601 ;Historic PnesEiniaticrn
150.06.009.10 __-___,15802.165 ;Historic Pnesewalian 1Econamic Incentives
EXI-I BIT H-2
Page 19 c 19 UU 11-0036
RHVIIRSe INDEX HOR CODE RRORE ANIZA11IO11 -AAPENDICES/TAE 11951/RIGID RES
;NEW CODE 101,D CODE TITLE 4
0.110. ;App 50.021-A :Bt,ilding Height .
. 4
10. ;App 50 02-B ;Lot Depth,Lot LinE s
90.10. App 50.02-C Side Loading Garage
Fig 5006.001-E ;App 5(1.06.069 ;Garage Appearance 81 Lacatiar for Clutc oor Living Space I
Fig 59.04.001-13 ;App 59.06-A [Height Exceptions.
Fig 50.06.001-C 1App 50.07-A ;Primary,Secondary Roof Forms
Fig 9CI.C16.00I11-F ;App 5(1.071-8 rGarage Setbacks
Fig 50.06.001-A !App 50.07-CI :Street Front SEtbac k RlanE s :
Fig 50,06.001-B jApp 50.07-D !Exceptions to the Setback Plane
1 1
Fig.50.06.001-G ;App 50.07-E `Sidehirc Setback Plane ,
Fig 90.36.0(1141 ;App 5(1.(17-F ;Treatment 3 ElcneE n ing Options l
Table 50.06.001-2 App 50.07-G IStanc arc Rlant Units
Fig§166.001-B App 50.07-H ;LongWall-Planes _ 1
Fig 90.0(1.001-0 ;App 50.07-I ;Setback Planes-Down Slope Lots- 4
Fig 50.0.6.001-E !App 5(0.(17-J :ME asurE mer I Lacatior s
Fig 90.0,6.001-F ;App 50.07-K ;Front_'lett acik RlanE -L pslope Lot
Fig 50.04.001A ;App 50.07 030.3 `Height Adjustment for Sloping Topography
Fig 90.09.(102-A ;App 9C1.a8A ;Evergreen Overlay y
Fig 50,05,001,-A
+-App 50,086,010-A ;GIEir murk Overlay ----
Fig 50.05.001.-B ;App 50.086.020-A ;Mixed Paved Areas
_Fig 90.09.CI01-C ;App 913988 025-A ;Plant Unit Placement 4
;App 90.1111-A IFloan Anea Ratici :
Appendix E -.!App 50.11-B_ -------------`Commercial Land Use Pellicles -
Appendbi F _!App 50.12-A ;Marylhurst Appendix -
pendix 8 App 90.1'3-A ;Industrial Land Use Policy Element- y
r
App 90.16-A ;ESIEE Analysis 119E11
Fig 50.07,004 ;App 50_16_035.1.c :Stream Corridor Examples
Tom- 4
Fig 50.05.010-A 'App 50.16-C :Oswego Canal '
Fig 50.01 C109-D ;App 50:11 C119.9.ci ISideYanc Standard Setback a
Fig 50.07.005-A App 90.2(1.(125-A I Fnor t V ands for Flag Lats
Fig 50.00.005-B 'App.50.20 030._5.0 _ -_-FSetback RequirementAIccic 99 Lana - 1
i_
Fig 50.06.011-A ;App 50:21 ;Vision Clearance Triangle I
Fig 5(1.(14.003-A ;App 90.412-A ;Oswego Lake Setback
Fig 5(1.(19.011-A ;App 50.441.13121-A ;Flood Managemeril Area A I
Fig 50.05.011-8 , 'App 50.44.012-B 'Flcioc Management Anea 8 '
Fig 50.05.011-C ;App 50.44 012-C Flood Management Area CI_- .
Fig 50.05.0111-D App 5(1.44.0112-D 'Flood Management Area D I
Fig 50.07.005-C " l
05.------_App 50.48.01(1 `Fish &Wildlife I-abitat
Table 50.06.002-1 ;App 50.55-A_-_ _ _ ;Parking _
Tat le 50.0(1.C1041-A ;App 50.55-B ;Parking_Dimensions " _
Tat le 50.0E.C102-2 App 5(1.95-CI ;Parking Modifiers
Table 50.06.002-4_ ;App 50.55-D-- ;Bike Parking ;
Fig-59.00.003-,A !App 59.80-A _-- !Local Street Connectivity ;
Table 50.06.094-1 :App 5063 020=1_ manage and Sheilding 1
Tat le 50.(IE.004-2 I.App 59.63.029-2- `Lighting PowerDensity
Tat Ie 50.2619041-3 ;App 50.63.020-3 IMountingHeight :
Tat le 5(1.(16.0041-4 ;App 5(1.613.0210-4 ;Performance Method-
r 4
Ta-le 5(1.06.0041-9 App9Cl.EI'1.020-9 ;Curfew lliMEI ;
1
ble 50.06.004-E !App 9Cl.E:1.0210-EI 19treeI & Roadway Lighting :
ig 50.03,095-A- ,App 50.65-A 'Rec evelopment Boundary Map
1
!Appendix A !App 50.65-A :Lake Oswego Style
• EXHIBIT R-2
Rage ]I a f 2 LU 11-0036
REVERSE INDEX HOIR CODE RBORCIANIZAl1IIC N -APPENUICES/TABLES/FIEIURES
NEW CODE ;OLD CODE :TITLE
i• jek4
Appendix C .App 50.66-A 101d Town-Oswego Styles Description
Incorporated ir text;App 90.E 171-A !West LSI ke Grovel Design District Standards
Tad la 50.06.009-1 App A `L1 ridmark Designation List a
Fig_50.06.001-C ;App 50.07040-A -_;Extension of Street Fnon1 Setback Plane
Fig 50.06.001-D I ;Minimum Front Porch Width
Tad lei 90.0E.001-2 ;Tad lei A 1.51hac a Paint Height
Tad le 90.0E.CI013 ITad lei CI lAc jacent Slhade(lalcu latiori
- � }TablE5006007-4 Table B MaxIHt of Shadow atSolar'Feature
i__ f
i
Appendix D I `Master Plant List
i
•
4110
EXH 1E1111 F-21
Paige 2 oil 2 11U 11-0036
0 FRRA FFT
Chanees made since publicatio September 2011 Draft rode
$0,0041 X 7,13 li ,i .. R�
a.�UONAL___ 4AC�'I�SN�S�,, REA$ N C� ���,.,�,,,�, ae---rev Jan .. .. fy�,,,,
50.01.003.2.c -
'50.04.O0S3 Add Omitted in latest draft (City manager may delegate
50.02.00 . .h,ii 50.07.005 Add Omitted in latest draft 'FAN purpose statements
50.04,001. .d.lii 50.07.045.1 Add Omitted in latest draft 'FAN-floor area_f arro«_ry ct_ruc±ure '
50.06.001.3:a.ii 50.07.OAc,a Add Omitted in latest draft IFAN-roof pitch of arceccory ctrurture. j
50.06.002.3.b 50.07.050 Add Omitted'io latect draft FAN-parking standards 1
carjA.00i. .d - 50:07.060 Add Omitted'in latect draft !,FAN'-street trees 'I
50:01.003.2.a.ii 50.07.070 Add Omitted in latest draft . ;!,FAN,-advisory opinioe
50.04.001.1.e.iv 50:08.0F0.A Odd Omittedin latest draft 'IFront:lot line on corner lot, ';
50.04.001.1.g.i; 50:08.03S.7.a Add Omitted`io,latect draft (Base Bldg height increase ,
,50.01.00.7.a.ii 50:09.045 Add Omitted'in latect draft ;'.Old Town Advisory opinion
50.02.002.1.h.ii s0,10,00c.7 Add Omitted in latest draft NAG-How-to accomplish purpose
50.03.003..5.b s0.13.0q0 Add nmi±±ed in latest draft (Explosive materials prohibtion
50.05.009.E 150.15.010.3
lAdd dron ac deleted h/r redundant in WRG
1Added;
w1Conditioning
.
I
50.07.003.3.a IcQ.1c.01n0 !Add ,(;Omitted in latest draft IFitra noticing for WRG development
50.07.004.4.b 1,50.41.00.4 !Add !'Added:shown as deleted b/c redundant (File erosion control plan
50.0A.D0R.7 150.58.030
III Add Added;shown as deleted b/r reduodaot Site pian reauireme_±c
I;
50.06.010.8 iI50.'+4.° !Add 'Omitted:in latest draft 'Utility maintenance standards
50.10.003, 2rotested Riparian Area 'I. (Add 'Omitted:io latect draft 'Definition
50.10.00 , 2roterted'Solar Ruildine I ine !Add IOmitted'in latest draft Definition
50.06.009.4.b I !Clarified field form!_ration Historic Landmark Field Forms
c0.0 .nn1.A.r.lii 50.11.015.2.a (Add Omitted in latect draft cR&D Setback standards-add'!
Table%,n1 D0a-1 50.11.01 S.7.a (Add 'Omitted in latest draft rPRn cethark_ct_aodardc-add.'
50.07.003.7.c.i 'Deleted, (Redundant Historic Appeals procedures
50.07.003,7.c.iii 'Deleted' IReduodaot Historic Appeals timing
5(01 pn1.7 Solar Purpose statements re±aided
I lelsewhere
50.10:003.2 definition,of"'Public Facility, chanties as approved by Ord.2571
Minor" 1c0.07.ong
II; 1Made
50.0q.00 50.11.010 Made changes proposed by Ord.7S7C.
which are still pending as of thepublication
of this draft:ereen highlighting added for
easy ideotlfiratiao
EXHIRIII E-3
PAGE 1 Lu 11-0036
FRRATA 4HFFT
Changes;made since publication of September 2011 Draft rode
lry ' .s. � 41 A Y, Y 4 �R�ONl i S
Table 50.01.0044 Moved
�;.n.
IPO to"Overlay Specific" list
c Iar.i=riendly Tree i ict-cee'We and latest I I I
ordinance
Entire code Removed Blue highlighting showed changes proposed
hlue by Ord.2525.which became effective on 12-
highlighting 1-1 i. all rhangec to the nrdinanre made by
the City Council are included.
Section Tables of Contentc (Reformatted as recommended by PC
Throughout rode deleted The word'"buffer".only in referenre to
Sensitive I ands,deleted per 2r
recommendation;footnote added for each
change
Thrpughnut rode Replared the terra"multiple dwelling"with
"multi-family dwelling"per 2r
recommendation;footnote added to each
change
Throughout rode gage numbering'iccue(overlap in page
(numbers)fired
•
EXHIBIT F-3
PAGE I U 410036
CITY Cf LAKE OS WEG C
• 380 A Avent.e
� � PO Hcix 369
Eat a Oswego,CR 517034
viEMORL7NLVM5103435-Cf:'20
www.c Las wieglu.ar.us
110: Alarming Commission
F ROM: Derr) Egnen, Assistant Planning Director
SUBJECT: Lake Gro%el Village Cleinter F inariairig StrategH IIFIP 05-0019)
�AITFJ: December 8,, 209191
Qn W ec nest ay, C email eir 7, 3011, the c1o11511(tent team presented fciur scenarios to a grow p of about-20
sitakel olcarse. On Cleiciemteir 913, the consultant team will present the samel inform atiori to the
Commission. At tF is meeting tF e consultant team and staff are seeking the Hlannin8 Corn Mission's
cion.m ents anc thoughts regarc frig w F at scenarios or combinations of financing tools you think wou Ic.work
best for the Lake C rove area. You r innu t will t e used to F elp guic e tF e consultant team in preparing a
•recommerlc atiori for the City Council. The dons Itani"si pneisentation to the Council is schedu lec for
.lana ar) 10, 30912.
ATTIAC HMfNiis
• Project Hrioritiaation - ECONorthwest Memo 1121 CIO/3131], includes information from stakeholder
interviews and dost elstim al e151
41 A Question and Answer Fact Sheet about the Lake Gra%e1 Village Center Project (12/07/3131;
41 M atrix of Func ing Options
41 Puojeicits-5 cieriario Sheets-•Blaine) Howard/HCONor1 l welstPlari
•
•
•
S •
•
ECONcrthwest
•
ECC.I CMICEI • FINANCE PLANNING
Phorel•115031 222-606( Suite'1600 Othdr Offices
RAX (503)227-1504 2229W Cokim6fa Eugene•Q54'1;6871-0061
info@ecorrw.alm Portland,Oregon 5720'1-66'161 9riattle1.1108;U2241403
72 1
Decrelmble=102,2011 Project'#:20
TO: Denny Egneir
FROM: The ECO Team
SUBJECT: DRAFII TA SIK 1 DEEIVERABLBB, PRIOJECI PRI ORIT IZATl ON
ECONorthwesit, together with Illaine Howard Consul ting and OTAK,are undo
contract)to the City of lake 06 wego to evaluate options for funding infrastructui e and
other projects that are id entified in the Lake Grow Village C en ter Plan.The first talk al
that evaluation is to prioritize infrastructure projects for implementation, with specific
attention paid to the redewlc pment potential associated with the infr astrci cture
imfestnnlents„and to the public and stakeHoldei1 input)received as part cf the process.
This memorandum provides that prioritization in the folllowing sections:
• E Itud y area
• Project prioritization meth od s: d Elveloping an implementation timeline
• Nexus betwleenn projects and redevelopmlent
• Next steps
Sluppglrting appendices provide:(1)a more detailed summary of stakeholder feedback
from interviews as well as from a public meeting,and(2)mon a detailed description of
cost)estimates)for projects,provided by O1IAK.
1 STUDY ARBA
• The geographic boundary of this study(shown in figure l bele w1; isi larig;elyl
contiguous with the Lake Grow Millage Centers Plan boundary,but was expanded to
ind ud e a f ew red evelopalble parcels that could influence the financial capacity Ity of the
area.The boundary was also! influenced 1;5i the outcome cf a publlic meeting)
lisummarized in the appendix to this memorandum) that recc mmended the t certain
residential and pulllic properties bel left out of the boundary!.
The stuldy area boundary is not intended to be a recommended boundary for a
potential new urban renewal area„nor for any other financial tool. Instead„it represenitsl
the geographic area that is most likdlyl to include the vfarious infrastructure projects and
associated redevelopment)parcels. Future analysis may result in boundary
recc mmendations that are different fro m the one shown in Figure 1.
ID
•
°RAFT: Lake Grove Village l mplemental ion 9C ON orth went December 2011 Page 5
Fligure 1 : Stuldy Area for Evaluation Gil Flinancial Fleas Minty; Lake G rove
II
Ne ighborhooc; Lake' Osweglo, Oregon
It
-:____ - .4*_..--• • , 004
• - , Ly../
--� ' d� Y N r +� ' 2 S
441r4Tlaffp
- . /
ie nor. * •• y iffir
le R r.. 1
. 4Iw 1kr A
-I
_ f
__
7-i-
- T• ,
0• r Cr e
Jf R
' P JdtI1 ' 1
- ., , ,: d,..11:111:
"*4 a
re' 11
•
.)
1� ti r ;Y, ,, �.it __- _ .
Ir','. ''.• - y--9_ ,. Z hiblik i Q Glove Med Wes Lake ove ed }..
A
'- �` O LH.GrovelFInende Sbady Acer Bounden
.. 1 Lake GSM Viso Centel Bounded
a
e, •- ! ` - pp UnancorpaMer Cleckmasi (mint)
1 ' , ,vi"ji.„vf# 1 'la r' .iiii
~ SVeetl
li - - ., ECONc rthwest
it
it} *
Vlif ECONOMICIS . FINANCIS PLANNING
1...7 "ell', x i rvi
ri
- { "` - 1I'I Miles A
- .
.a.'
Source:ECONortlnwest based on date Brom the Lay of Lake Oswego OAS,20'11.
DRAFT: Lake Grave Village Implementation ECONorthwest December 2011 Rage.I
0 2 PROJECT PIRICRI11IZA11ION ME11HCOS:
DEVELOPING AN IMPILEMENI1ATICN TIMELINE
The Lake Grove Mill age Center Plan identifies and prioritizes projects based on the
res u]t si of bra ad-'lased community process undertaken during the Plan's development.
Tlx projects include the following'shown with preliminary cost esitime tes.
Potential projects for implementation with in the Lake Preliminary cost estimates
Grove Financial Study Area 42011 dollars)
Booties Ferry Road improvements between Kruse Way anc 91251.CI million
Madrona'Street, including acting bikes lanes anc accinlg and
improving signals an Bocinee Ferry Road.
A Festival steel at Hallmark I $11.0 million
Improved pedestr'an connections to the surrounding I $31.0 million
comm unity
Gateway projects that improve t ikEi anc auto access 1112.6 million I
Bike HacilitiEis along Bryant and Quarry Roac s 1111.1 million
Put lic parking lots/facilities anc access I $31.0 million($30,400 per space) I
A Villat e Commons space and'String of Pearls:"plazas that $11.1 million
are c isltirict put lac spaces and clrr ate ccimmu nity-ga th erincl
spaces and establish a common identityl for the area
41111 llechnics I assistance on development issues 19130(1,00(1 I
IStorefront improvement grants/loans 9120(1,000
IRec evelopment grants loans 1113.5 million
ILanc acgluisiitionlloonsckdation I Ill million
I TCITAL $44.8 million
Source:Project gyioritizatior from the adopted I lOrd:Id 54 Exhibit B, Lake Grove Village Centel Hari.Preliminary owl estimates
provided b11 C TAM.Boones Flerry Road est'mal era from the 20'11 Boones Ferns Road Ref nement Plan.Redeveloprr ent assistance
project estirr aces b)ECO Northwest.
As with many]community redevelopment efforts,,resources will be insufficient to
simultaneously'fund all all the projects included in the Plan—cr even all of those
identified as`high priority." This is espe Glial]y true giver)the high cast associated with
improviementS to Boonesi Berry Road.
The outcome of this financial I easibilityl project will bel an implementation plan the t
will tie projects to a timelinle for implementation. It is important to Frioritizd projects
that will catalyze redevelopment in the area. Because same of the todis 1 under
consideration generate more revenue to pay]far projects when the assessed value of
property in the area increases,the potential far inlvestmlentS in infrastructure to catalyze
more development is1 an impolrtant consideration.
Boil these reasons,,the implementation plan must prioritize potential rr..;;...:,based
AA
I. c n the timing for implem entatic n,,which is a slightly'different lens than was used in the
DRAFT: Lake Grove Village!Implementation ECONortt'west Decerr ber 2011 Pagel 4
initial Lake Grave Village Center Plan.'Mel project will develop this timeline this using
1110
the following steps:
11. Preliminarily assess the connection betwleeni project implementation and
redeye]opmenll potential,;
2 Gather stakeholder and staff comment regarding for timing of
various projects„
3. Develop financing scenarios that attempt to acicc mmodate the timing
preferences,and test these scenarios with stale ehc ld ers for feasibility,
4. A djustl findings and recc mmen d a financing strategy.
This memorandum pro vi des findings kr r the first two steps of this process.As this
feasibility analysis progresses,the lateil analytical step and the estimated capacity of
the selected financing tools will strongly influence the recommendation far the timing
al project implementation and the final)development!schedule. This memorandum
described the goals f c r de ielopin g a timeline for accruing costs.The financing scenarios
that will follow in the coming weekd will attempt td tie these costs to a specific set of
revenues.
3 NEXUS BETWEEN PROJ EIC11S AND REDEVEILOPIMEIN11:
'TIMELINE GOALS
In the Lake Groote Village Center PlanJ many of the projects that arc described and 411
prioritized for implementations area infrastrulcture projegts.They are improvement to the
puillidy-owned built enviirc nment the t help tcl create safe access to businesses,
imlprolved connectivityl for multi-modal transportation, and improvled visibility of the
ai ea as a business district. In total„these infrastructure projects seek to create a bettelr
urban form td support fu titre redevelopment
EhaarptfronlLail!Grove VhlageCuratelrPiet ViaiOd Sfaterrned: "Idr"a.inities.I onprivklte Au c.:
Iniproviements to public infrastructure are a
Thea Lake Greve Village{Center ii e i welcoming,comfortable cornunky very impc rtani l step tclward achieving the
nuaeus fol the defy adiv'ties d the residents of take Oehwego's west vision for the fu ture of the Lake G rovre Villa ge
ant...This charade has been shaped by a reaped fol and preservation
cel the natural resources d the area..There is a sense ol place where C enter!.
harmonj exists between these nature I elements and those elements of
deveiopmer>I the provide opportunities col comrnerca,service,avis, of those infrastrticture . :o,site rvieweesl
social calk rat and related activities fa I the people whc live and work in r y i
and near the Village Centel and attendees of publid meetings widely felt
The I Village Center inc udes a IMeh commune( of local busnesssei, that the Bodies Ferry Road project should be
sunouxaed by neighbors and aromas who use these businesses. the first step to encourage deveia pmentl. The
Decision makers have consideree the eoonomk Milne of weir Lake Groote Village Center Plan calls far the I
decisions on loca business,leading to ori econom icalll viable business reconfiguration of Boonesl Ferry Road tot
corn when lovely cored independent businesses are encou agec td
flourish.Property owners,business menu and residents have works( im prc vie access to Businesses„create a better
together to maintain and enhe nce the village charade!of Lake Grew', and safer pedestrian enlviremmenik l and
preserving and highlighting historical featured,activities a nit improvestdrmwater run-oft. Hle
owverl, some
businesses...A vi lags common!!vein the Mercantile V lags urea and
a series of amales community gatherini places comprise a"skill of interviewees indicated that there were other
pearls-which provide important focal points n the I Vnlag a cents!I. projects than could potentially spin activity in
Community members have worked with the Celt ci tale Oswego enc
other government agencies tcl ensure that public uses serve the I
corm unity enc heighten Lake Gm's sense of identity.
DRAFT: Lake Grave V Ridge Implemeriteltiori 9CIONarthwest December 2011 Pagel 9
the area.Giver the laiig le price-tag fon the Hooves Ferry Road p rojlect,a]ternative
in ve s tri lentsl could be more feasible and macre directly and immediately connected to a
return in private investment.The alternative investments included the prclvision cf
parking in key locations and the"string cf pearls)" and gateway projects that would
create a distinct identity foil the Lake Cm)vel area.
At the same time, the vision statement in the Lake Grove Village Center Plan •
describes the need fon property owners and developers to play a pari in redevelopment
on private property,such that the privately-controlled built infrastrdcture(businesses
and residential) aligns with and supports a high quality visual aesthetic and al vibrant
nth of budinesses.
Per that reason,we recommend the addition of anode] sea of projects to assist with
the redevelopment d I process by providing tools that the cc mumunityl and the City can use
to engage property owners and developers in the conversation about redevelopment)in
the Lake Grove area.These redeveloprner;t projects include:
• Technical assistance on development issues.Prdvide direct sup port to property
owners and developers as they seek to understand the highest and best use of their °
properties and create plans tc redevelop)the site 11$2,000 to$6,000 per project;.
• Storefront improvement grants and loans. Provide support WI property and
business owners as they seek tc improve the markets bili ty and visual appeal of
• their storefronts ($2,000 to$10,000 per project).
• Red evela pm entl grant and loans. Allows for partnership with developers and
property owners as they seek to overcome redevelopmenit barriers and impralve
their properties in ways that align with the Plan's vision (up to$1 miilli o n each).
• Assistance with property acquisition and consolidation. Ira some cases, it may bd
beneficial for the City tci acquire key redevelopment parcels 1k more directly]
participate in assuring that redev elcpment aligns with plan goals,and to catalyze
redevelcparent on adjaclent sites(up tel$]I million).
The c ombinaltic n of infrastructure projects with redev elc pmient projects can create a
more complete approach to improving the Lake Grieve Village Centel area by remcving
barriers to red eve]opmentl that currently exist in pnbllic i infrastructure configurations i
and,,at the same time,incentirig and catalyzing redevelopment.
As part cf the process of developing a timeline fon implementation,one of the key
questions related to the catalytic potential of each cf the projects. Some of the funding
tools that the FCC team is ev aluatirig(such as urban renewal and GO bonds; have
gre a t lei capacity as property values increase. Figure 1 provides i an overview cif how the
projects might catalyze redevelopment,and on what timeline.
I
I]RAFT: Lake GIrove Village!Implemental ic n EC CINortme51 December 2011 Page 6
Lake Grove Village Center Plan Potential Impact on redevelopment oppclrt unit es
infraatructt re projects
Boories Ferry Road tetweeri Kruse Way and Short term:could reduce redevelopment potential
Madrona Street including adding t ike lanes during)ccinstructior
ant iritersectic n improverr erns Long term: Improve the redevelopment potE ntia kr
the entire La kEl Grove Area
Notes: Nol directly lied tcl redevelopment potential an a
specific!site
Gateway projects that improve)bike arx auto Rem:es aes be crier td rade veloprr ent; benefits entire
access area by creating c istinct identity fc r the area
Improved pathways to the surrounding Improves access fou nearby resident:
corrimt nifty
Public parking lot: d faoililie:l and access Often directly catalyzes adjacent property
redevelopment by reducing the cost of redevelopment
Ilbecause property owners dc n't have to pay tcl provide
parking)and bye freeinK up redeye topat k lark Ilii th E
palrk'ng is structured;.
hi short.what the ECO team)has learned is that many sttake&c lders f eel strongly that
firprcvements to Boc nes Berry Road,while costly,are mery imFUt:wdi to finance as socn
as possible.At the same time,, other„ lower cost projects also provide direc t
opportunities fon achieving the vision in the Lake Grove VillaSe Center Plan,and foil
catalyzing redevelopment and increasing the capacity of potential funding tools) to
cover the cost of infras truc ltd re improvements. hi an ideal world„ all could bd
fir plemen ted right away„but that might not bel feasible gen the realities of the
cape city of financing too ls.
GiMert this outcome,the goals fan creatine the financing strategy tol implement the
Lake Grove Village Center)Plan should be as f c lloiws:
• Seek to fund the implementation c f th e Bodnes Ferry Road impravemental as early
in the timelinle as possible
• Seeld to prioritize the that most directly c atalyze redevelopmenit
• Use a mix of todld that will have the�,�a.��� capacity tcl fund r,.�;":s and
distribute the burden of payment among the beneficiaries of im plemeMaltion
DRAFT: Lake Grove Village Implementatic EC IC IN orthwes1 Decembei 2011 Page 7
4 NEXT STIFFS
• Determine caipacilty c f a variety of tools!:GO bonds,revenue bonds„TIF/" urban
renewal,economic improvement districts,business improvement distril.ctt,local
innprc vemen ll distrikitS„and SDCA
• Create"straws proposal' packages of tools than illustrate the impacts of various
funding chc ices on the timing of prop ect implemerr altion
• Gatheil feedback from stat ehold ersi and decision-makers
• Recommend financing package
•
S
U
Appendix 1. Stakeholder Comments S
This appendi, prolvides a summary of initial sitakeic Wet feedback
around the Lake Grove Developmen i I F easibility Study.Stakeic hie
outreach included meetings with nine area developers,planners civic
leaders,and property owners. In addition,the team held a pu iblid
meeting in October 201111.This appendix has tie following sections:
• Key findings summary provides an overview of findings ft all
interviews and the pt 1blIc meeting.
• The silakehlold er interviews section provide mere detailed
findings from interviews.
• Pdbllic meeting provides meeting notes.
KEY FINDINGS SUMMARY -L
▪ 'Ilam increment financing was the most widely)supported financing toll„
with several participants preferring it.A Entailer LID was also considered
tc be feasible,especially when considering funding I the String of Peals or
Gateways.There was interest in exploring other options for fund ing 1 certain
projec ts,sic h as a sole source SDC funds.
• The Boones Ferry Road project was widely seen as the first step to
enc ou rage development However,some interviewees indicated that there
were other projects that could potentially spud activity in the area,,and,,
especially given the Iargel price-tag for the Bodne.s Ferry l4oad project,
investment could be more feasible and more d irectly and immediately
connected to a return in primate)investment.
• In terms of a vision for the area,most participants saw the area as a
commercial and ser ice: Huitl the t is easily accessible td local residents and
workers.Howe,scime al so wanted to see the area with an anchc r store
that would halve a wider draw and capture through.traffic.The overall
vision for the Area was to implement the vision described in the Lake
C rc ve Village Center) Plan.
• The existing Lake C rove Village Center Plan is the backbdne tor future
d evelopment,as it had wide community support
• Technical Assistance tcl p ro perty owners was seen as a necessary)
c,,.: t to help facilitate development.
• There were mixed feelings on whether the City should proactively
designate parking in the Area.
Appendb 1:Stalh eholc en F eedba ck Summary EC ClNorthwest Clecem't en 2011 Page 1
•
STAKEHOLCIE R INTERVIEWS
The pluirpgse of theses interviews was to assess the potential for catalytic
dewelopmlent within thle Lakes Gnome Flan Areal. Conversations with Cit51 staff,
local demellopers„and property owners provided local knclwledgel of which
Flroperti es are ripe for d evellopment,the challenges and barriers to
red envelopment on these sites„and what projects are necessary!to help these
sites overcome redevelopmernit barriers.Intern iewees were:
•
Chu k O'Leary: LO Chamber Presid evil,Hankers Inmestment Service.'
▪ Mike Buck:Guibarks Pdbl and Restaurant
• Ken Sand bllas t:Planning Resauu ces Incorporated
• Dr. Eill Korach/5jtuari Ketzler:Lake Oswego School Didtrict
• Deanna B itail,Baneittel Pik perties/Eric Shoemaker,Beam De'elopment
• Marty Stimen s,Planner contracting with Providence
• Carolyn Krebs,CAC member of Lake G rove Plan,Co-chair of
neighbcirhood association. -
1.2 DETAILED RESPONSES
1 . What are the specific '''major" redevelopment
opportunities in 1He Lake Grove Area?
There are a few parcels which are large and ripe for developlment.In add iticm
to those b intelrvieweesi noted that there are many smaller parcels that hd ve
red emellopusent opportunities brit would need to be assembled to achieve that
pgteritial.S i'i'i major development oplpc rtunitles include
• Late parcell direct y north of Krusdl Wlay„across from Providence
• I-acre Providence-owned parcel al corner of Hallmark/Mercantile.This
site was that was considered lox senior housing,bull the deal did riot
4 materializd. The siitEI has wee lands issues which can be mitigated.
• Pacifica Limbed
• Prdvidence,Mercantile Village
• Pailsons'farm plroperty,southwest ciorr eni of Knise Wlayi and Carmen Drime
• Parcel at NWl corner of Boone Ferry and Krdse{May!(Nicld Bunick parcel)
• Husi bard behind Lake Grome Berner tary School on Beasley Way
• Floss Office site cm Booneis Ferry Road.
• Round liable Pizza and bank to south
• West End Building parcel at NEI corner of Kruse Way and Carmen Drime
• Current La Provence parcel will be redeveloped byl Mike Buck.
S
Page 2 Decemt en 2011 EC ClNorthwesi Appendix 1:Stalkeholdeu Feedback Summary!
1
•
One interviewees noted thai the Boones Ferry Road projeci is the catalyst for
red evellop m ent because ii wail l increase bdsinessi potential.Thel pila'ecl will bd
like a hip replacement surgery-'awful to go thru,but a renewed lelase on the
future."This participant noted that there siHou ld be specificity on the timeline
fon development of Boc nes Ferry Road and that should be a specific outcome
fon the ECC analysis.
2. Whal are the barriers to awry oil tl1 esiel redevelopment
opporl u Mlles?
Interviewees mentioned a range'c d barriers to i redevelopment
•,rr„. ani tie`s,including those relating to local pg liticsd the current
conditions in the area,and concerns about the area's ability to achieve
the ambitions of the plan.Some barriers to redevelop=ent within the
stuldyl al ea ind ud ei the fragility of small businesses in the area during
Boons Berry Road construction,trust issues within the City and
ca mmunityl,,uncertainty abodt the location of center line on Boones
Ferry Road,, the perceiaed lack ad City attention given to Lake C rove.
▪ Several in tervieweeisi noted barriers)abcluii the cuirreni ccniditions on Boones
Ferry Road includ ingt fast traffic,poen ccnnectivity a poen
pedestrian/bicycle atmospheres and limited and difficult left turns.They
also m entioned a lack of public gathering spate.
▪ There is a perception thai the City is toil focused on downtown and not
focused enough on Lake C roves.hitervieweesi spqke of a need to have a
ooncrei a focus on implementation frcm elected officials.There was some
concern abodt ability of the area to reach the requlired densities,meet
packing require=en ts,and overcome any opposiltic n to increased density
from neeghbc rs.In ad ditionj the)e was uncertainty about the impact of the
LC VC zone on development.
▪ Id addition,interviewees had concerns aboult the upcoming Bodnes Ferry
Road pre'ect,as it will look'wry different"aesthetically.Some concern's
re gaildln g this project include uncertainty abdut alignment,center line,and
when c'onstrection will occur.Within the area,th ere is a perception of
loosing ac'c'ess to businesses due to limiting left turns off of Bodnes Ferry
Road once it is Zmprc ved.
3. What ere the positive conditions to support these
op portun itielsi?
The area has a vsariety of assets.The study area is in a strategic lace tion dose td
large populations of workers and res idents)and also td 1-5/Kruse Way.Existing
businesses within the area are stable,,with a stable business organization The
inter iewees poir ted td a latent demand fos new, high quality bulsinesses
within the area.They thought thai demogra phid within the area we ilk'
siupporl new businesses.In addition,the City has shown initiative by having a
detailed land use plan in place with consensus and support from stakeholders.
The City could build new gathering spaces on vacant ant or underu sed parcels.
Appendix 1:$tslkehcider Feecbad(Summary ECIONorthwest Decc eniber 2011 Page 3
I • .
Finally,since the speculative era is over,more solid real estate d eta]s will
emerge to support redevelopment within the area.
4. What is your vision for the Boor es FelrrylLake Grove
Area? (Including the parcels identified or Kruse Way)
This area would bd a commercial center that would serve residents'and
emiploylees in the area.11 would have good connectivity fon multiple
transportations modes,including pedestrians„bikes,transit„and automobiles.
Boones Ferry would need hi be more attractive and safer without as many)
driveway's.Two par'ticip'ants said the area shaul d try hi attract an anchor
department stone not available it downtown LO,such as a Target or a small
Wlalrnarl (going into former Nature's on Pilkington.;
Interviewees.would like to see thie City implement the Lake Grove Village
Cer ter PI an,trans l orming the area into a thriving Town Center,which is
prescribed by Metro.One participant summed this up as:"If we don't
redevelop it„well never achieve the vision.Doing nothing is not an option"
5. What is your input on the prioritization of the projecllsi
What projects do you 1h in H will help catalyze'
development in the Area? irasiruclure, String of
Pearls, redevelopment assistance, etc.)
410 Several interni iewees indica ted that the City can rely)on the backbone of what is
in the Lake Glove Villalge Center Plan in order to determine project
prioriitization.Some of these projec is could include a Hallmark E treet to
activate)the area, pu blici spaces to bring people to the area(acting as a"String
of Pearls"I).However,interviewees alsc noted the need to red ucie barriers to
redevelc pment in the area by completing the Boc nes Ferry Road project.
Relalted steps incilud ei doing the engineering hi establish the raaid centerline,
ad dressing left turn issues,and cenduAting further studies to identify where to
place parking to help catalyze development.Interviewees noted that new
development will not occur until road issues are resolved.
Participants noted the need for technical assistance to help facilitate economic
development,specifically technical assistance case studies to look al
devek pment issues related to zoning and overlalyl requirements.
Interviewees felt that the Zuipan's Market in the Lake Grove Shopping Center
on Bryant Road and Boones Ferry Road will stim'ula'te nearby redevelopment.
The Krnise Way/Boones Ferry'load intersection parlcell acniosis from Providence
is seen as a significant and could benefit from public-prilwate partnerships.
6. What is the political feasibility of the following'
financing tools for this Area?
a, Urban renewal finarciirg
Pagel 4 December 2011 EC C INorthwe SI Appendix 1:Stalkeiholden Feed bel ak Summary
There was general c onsensu s'that this is di a most viable tool and least harmful
for the area. There was strong siupporl for use of the tool among most c the
interviewees.One interview ee mentioned tha I this tool is nc t good for
residents as the timing makes it undesirable.This person mentklned that the
study!teams should be roc king at an LIE or"Economic Improvement Diltrid t"
b. Gelneral obligation bond f ralncing
There was not muc h suppclr1 for the possibility of using) general obligation
bonds.One participant thought that hr proviemen its to the Area should be
fur ded through the General Fund and Ca pita] Improvements.However,these
projects would need kIng-term commitment from the City{.
c. Local insprovemert disltriictfinancinc
There was interest in he w an UID weu ld work and howl much would be
required.May be useful toll as'a supplement and could be used f or String of
Pearls,,Festival Street:need to look at what the coast td the property owners
would be. Some property owners woul d not suf port this tool unless they
would directly belief t.Bdundary f or LB]could be much larger than the study
area boundary.
d. SDCs1
Creating a sole source SDd district is also pari of the equation.One participant
thought that stormwatei funds cot 1d be used for development of the green
street.
41111
71, What is the need for/location of parking !acuities in
Laakel G rover?
Barking needs in the area will be driven by redevelopment potential.There was
some concern that the are tai would not be able to meet the City's parking
• requirements. There were mixed feelingsl about whether the city should pre-
designate parking within siubarea .One interVietweeimentioned tie potential
benefit of area parking that comes via permit parking should an entity like
Provid enc a expand sometime d c wn the road
Wl�ile some'interviewees indicated that this was a very WI pc rtant issue„others
said it was'secondary to addressing the inipiediments to development in the
area:knowing centerline of road and restrictions to development.
2. S u M MARY OF LAKE GROVE CO M MUNITYI
MEETING 10/2412011
The study area team held a public meeting on October 24„20111 at Lake Oswego
O ty Hall.The following nc tea summarize the feedback received during tha t
meeting.
IP
Ap pend ix'I; S takehc Ider Feed back Summary EC ON orthwest December ICI'I 1 Page'5
• Feedback about the study area boundary
Th ere was conaerri about cc Immerciaa encroachment int o residential areas.The
group indicated that the stuldy area boundary sHould not include the triangle
properties and any other properties that might have potentia: encroachment
issues.
Participants felt that West End Hull ding should be eliminated from the
boundary because it is a political Hot spot and may turn peoples against the
economic'study al the stall.There was also concern over off er properties along
Knisei Way.
Th e group had support for the inclusion of the Bunicik property on NW cornier
of Krdse and Boones Ferry.
Input on projects
Partici pants completed an exercise where they were given one orange!dot and
foul blue dots.They put the orange dot on the most ire portae t and first project
in terms of timing and th e blue dot would represent other priorities.If they
"spent" the orange dol on the Boones Ferry R bad project,they had to also use
all of their blue dots on that project If they sper t the orange dot on another
projeclt,they could then use all of their blue dots on other projects.This was
due to the�.. �.;r 1 costs of the projects,;Hooves Ferry Road is projected tc cost
m area than all of the other costs together.
Among Participar ts4 there was unanimous suplpclrt for Bodnes Ferry!Rload as
the fit t and most important p o;ect.Thea e was also support for parking
investments,,but the way the exercise was drawn up„it could not be shown
with the"dots."
Ir put on funding mechanisms:
L TIE Participants were concerned about the boundary being too larges.
Some sta ted opposition to the use of TIE and urban renewal.
2. LID:There was discussions about wieth er tc make a TJ1D boundary chat
would also inclu d e residential propert'es and unincc rponated
prop ert'es that would receives befit from the improvements.Some
concierri abvolt the amount of money each business/property owner
would pay. Commercial rate versus residential rate?
3. Sole Source SDIC:Thee were no major concerns or issues,with the
exception whether theses would have the capacity tc generate funds.
4. GC Bond s: Somei felt this would not be politically viable.There are
many other city projects'which may be in linea fc lr GC Bon d financing.
They mentioned that GC bonds would be funded by1 city tiesidents6,and
many of those who benefit from the project area residents of
Clacikamas County.
Its addition tc the above sources,,the group also wanted to consider the
following fun ding sources:
Page40
6 December 2C111 ECONorthwesl
Appendix ' :Stake!•older Feed back Su mmEory
11. General Fund: Discussion abcut thea neer fon the City to make a
commitment to Lake Grows and fund somei of tie projects through i he
Capital In1provement Plan
2. Siormwater and other fees/revenues
°I. laeMenue Bonds
91. Business Impagomement Districts
9. Giants
The public meeting inalud ed a sturve31 about potential funding mechas.
Table X shows the nesu]ts from this exercise.
Survey or fur dine sources resiultsl
C consider fon Lakes Grovel)
Tool Yes No
Sole Source SOC 3 2
LJ RAI TIF 2 4
CICI Bonc 3 1
LIG J 4 12 _ r
S
Appendix 1: Stakeholder Feedback Summary ECONorthwest December 2011 Page 7
0 • 411 .
T_s��,���:—�n—r _ _s+`�_��YL�S ax��a r5 G� 2f � �mio 4 �ir53_ L _a—um.net,nr
y:
1 11,j- 'ft (i ' ! 'i'
ift � t 11
1111'
1'!111'IUI1III(I11
11 mil ' a
1 11; 1EE Hili: l IR _ ll
ilif P!!!! !WI I 41' - 1
101
ri ' Pla iii $ 14 , I # Y s t /' g 1 1 N 1
iii! ifiiFt 11111 R
—+�-----111 i 11111111 ! flflfl
[( E[I[1I
fiftH!!
w p
IP i iiiili IiiiIIIIg 111
1111 111
4 3 3 4 3 ill milli
tlqiqi
111
a
s x ; :
1 ___i1 —_,.�— ----- __ —
t I_ i
. ../ ii_LL_Liii 1._ _ 1_11_
r
W
Queistli dins and Answers
•
Bake Grove Mill age Center Alan - Bin an cing Strategy
What is the Illakei Growl\lillagle Center Alan Ainanciingl Strategy'?
ThEI hake)GIOVEI Vlillage Center Filart Financing Strategy)was contracted to aanfilrm construction
cost estimates fcir the prajeicts is edified in the Than, identify palanitial funding sourcles and
financlir g stDategias for the prajacts, forecast nein einues tF at cloulc be raised by these fund iris
saurueis, and help the City prioritize iheise projects based an the availability of revenues, and the
ability cif the prcijeict to acit as a catalyst far private redevelopment in the Area.
What tools area being evaluated Ian potential uEiei in imp lemen t i ngl the IlIG VC P1ainil
ThEI tools bding evaluated area all tools which could ble used in funding the projects identified in
the Plan. Th EisEI include),in alphablet dial order:
Anna)ationi
Business Improvement Districts
City of Lake Oswego C mural Funds
Economics ImprovemEnt 1ai5itncitS
General Obligaton Bonds
Uoca Imp r iavEimiEnt Dista jag
• MI TIRC Tlr iansp oritation Fund ing
Revenue Bond s
Stale cif C regent Tramp or it ation Funding
Systems Devieacipmient Charges
Max Increment Ilinanaing provided thr ough Urblani Renewal
These tools are identified further on the attached financing a ternatihes chart.
What is thea process fon review of the Stuldy?
There are a variety of op pontunities for citizen input in the study. The first was a public meEltirl g
held in Cctoberi. The seciand is the meeting tonight. The thirld is a meeting where the Uaklci
Cswcigc City Council Will rEIViEIW thEl sttldy, scheduled for January 10, 2012.
In addition, the Blaming Commission will receive an up date)on the study and p rovride their
input on December 13, 2011. Tlhis meeting is not,,however, sch eiduled as a publics blearing,, 510 na
publics testimony will ble taklen.
There is a feedback fcirm being hlaridEld out tonight which adds for your input to the City
Cauncii. We will gather these farms and summarize the comments for the City Council.
Revisec: 12107/111
QueEticns and Answers
Bake Grove Village Center Flan - Financing SItraltlegy .
what is the Lake Gicivel\li111age1 Center Flan?
TY e Lake Grave Village Clelnte'r Plan(ILGVC Plan)was ailclorlied by the Lake Oswe'gla Cityl Clauncil ir
February 10(I8 after oven a deicaclel af planning invcilvir g a high le've'l ail c.itihen participation.The LCIVC
Plan is Lake'Osweaa's plan to in tomato land use,tianspartaltian,and t ell an clesig n to create an active,
Fledestrian-friendly center an tie west end of the city. The bon:ndary consists of 1(15 acres inch dir g the
commercial core alciingf Boanes Harry Road.
What are the key concepts of the IIG%IC Mian?
The Vii age Center Plan ir dentifies tt e following key cance'Flt
• Transilorm Booms Ferry Road info a"Great Steel" by p iicviding green medians,bikeways,wide
sidewallds,and safe pedestrian cam sings.
• Enhance all ernath e modes of travel]l y{ prom atingi tie safe and convenient i;se cif pt ll lic transit
ser.ice,walking,and bicycling witt in,Ia,arlc from tie Vii age Center.
• Enhance ti-a pedestiian environ ant and connectivity' by providing a betlei net arld af
pedestrian pathways and idewalids i a the district and sane cncs sir as cm Booms Ferry Road ant
cross street.The design concept features a linear series all public spaces and natal point with a
vii age commons and glateway features.Gathering places ane linked visually and geographically
by enhanced Fledestrian routes and feature haiic scapi arc suss air able element.
What are the prollecits envisioned in the IICVC Han?
•
Key projects than have been inch ded ir the LGVC Plar arae:
• Boanes Fear) Iaaad improvements-n ed ian,sidewalids,sigrials„crossings„and access controls;
• A \till age Commons-a Batt Bring place for community events;
• A Fersti\al St]eetl -a"wooneiift" style street cannectirlgl tt e V:il'lagel Clammians witt tt e Lake
Cleave Elementary School;
The"suing-of-Flearbi" -a series cif small plazas at key sites,connected by sidewalks and
path ways;
• Bit eways,pathways,ar d siclewalks-pedestiiar arc'bicycle cannectians linking the center io the
surround in neighborhoods;
• Restoration ail Three Sisters Creek-a triht tarry tci Sprir Fibrook Creek;and
• Public parld ing facilities.
Woonerf i; the Dutct name fon a "living street"in v hich the needs of can drive ns ane seconclany to the needs of user; of the etneet
as a whole. It is a"shaved space'designed to bE used by pEidest ians,playing children, bicyclists.anti low-;peed motor vehicles.
becoming a public place for people instead of singles-purpose conduits tion automobiles. In a woonerf,vet ides may not impede
pedeslnians,who in turn may not unreasonably t inden tie progress oil drivers.
there are flue criteria:"...clatewa}s that announce that onei has enileirec the woonerf:curves to slow vehicle biaffic;amenities such •
as trees ant F lay equi,ment that serve the c ual F ui c ose of;bncinc t vehicle is to slow c own:no curbs:and intermi I tent par?ing so that
c<
is do not dorm a wall oil steel between the noac wa}i and houses."
Revised: 11/107/11 I
• • Rough Estimate of •
Definition Who pays? Typical projects funded constraints Capacity
Captures growth in assessed Property owners,indirectly(TIF Property acpuisitioi,cto•efroet For every$tpm in new
TIC/1.1" value inside a boundary for is a re-allocation of property tax and steetscape imp•o-emnetc, Rnguires urban ren-...al plan AV,roughly$11111 of
reinvestment in capital projects revenues,rather than a new fee gap financing,public acd repot borrowing capacity is
that reduce blight or tax) _infrastructure provision generated
A fee on property owners for District marketing,streetscape Taxpayers must••oluetner I imitnd by capacity of
Economic Improvement
the purpose of improving and Property owners improvements and indi-iduaty,so them is Intl= prupnrty owners to
Districts
maintaining the district maintenance,signage incentive to agree conntrib,we to them
A fee on business owners for the District marketing,streetscape Taxpaverc must"oluetner limited by capacity of
Business Improvement
purpose of improving and Business owners improvements and icdi"idual!v,su there is little business owners to
District
maintaining the district _ maintenance,signage iecncti"e to agree contribute to them
A local improvement district is a
geographic area in which real Mustt mnnt state and county A$110 project
property is taxed to defray all or Paving streets,building law.rag have relatively high benefitting all
part of the costs of a public sidewalks,installing stormwate' admin costs.Usually requires businesses inside the
Local Improvement District Property owe�rs
improvement.costs are management,improving extensive political outreach,as boundary would
apportioned according to the streetscanes property ee•'ners must agree to require nearly X9,000
estimated benefit'bat will the tat iccrnasn per business
accrue to each property
About$1.6M to$2.2M
per 100 new
cors are only generated by households
Keeps SDrs generated by the Parks,t•aespnr=t-tine,water,or new construction or
Sole Source SOcs area in the area,rather than Developers or property owners sewer-r'latnd projects rehabilitation.SDr<are not Typical commercial
available for use city-wide (depe=dice on mnc source) intended to cover the full cost property can ranee
of infrastructure provision. from$500K to u-er
• $2M pe-100"sguarn
feet of cn'•'built£pace
n type of municipal bond that is Revenue redirected from Bonding capacity
repaid by a future revenue Rate payers or residents Major capital projects:roads,
Revenue bonds stream.That revenue stream (depending on source of bridges,water treatment typical recipient to debt service determined by the size
payments;the revenue isn't of the revenue stream
could be a utility or other rate or revenue) facilities,etc necessarily"new" being bonded against
fee
The city borrows against its Financing a$27M
future stream of tax revenues to
generate capital to cover costs. Maio-capital pruiects:schools, project with a GO bond
General Obligation Roods Projects typical) h f'L r t water acid sn••'agn treatment must be authorized by a vote of would raise the
y bene I l y prope y owners
facilities,bridges,major road the public average property tax
community as a whole,and
loans are hacked by full faith impro"eme
nrr bill in Lake Oswego by
2.2%
and credit of the City.
Notes on rough estimates of canacite:
'For TIF/URA:In the Foothills area of l ake Oswego,Fro recently evaluated the notential for a new urban renewal area to venerate sufficient capacity to^n••o-
$2rtid is d-ht la that'.— - round that•noeh!v^••nry<tn in Au RAO n•atnd<t of beading capacity.This estimate is probably roughly applicable to I ake
Grove,though mu a detail-d and ne. ssary to c-rtaisty.Is a" r'.g thn ratio may be lower,because of the revenue
generated by existing properties.
'For I In:About t to commercial properties in the area.source:ctc
u-cote ca'." cnrr:oared on r.'cnslty-cump!ntad n alotation of transpo—rtrtation mors iR the Foothills area in l ake Oswego.caveat:this is for more traditional
construction.SDCs rob`_-ie institutions hnsoitals an•'cull'ees o"-n go-._ti hieb•�•.
See the SOC tab for breakdowns of the reslcom numbers.
Lake Grove Village Area Plan Financial Study
Plan Projects
This financial study will identify an implementation
Potential projects for implementation within the Lake Preliminary schedule for the Lake Grove Village Center Plan.These
Grove Financial Study Area cost estimate boards describe scenarios for funding projects,each of
(2011 dollars) which uses different tools,to support a public
conversation about implementation.These scenarios
Booties Ferry Road improvements hatyyaan Kruse $2R•n millinn are not recommendations.They are intended to
Way and Madrona Street, including adding hike lanae, bookend the conversation and provide a range of
improving sidewalks and pedestrian crossings, and alternatives for discussion purposes only.
adding and improving signals The scenarios fund all projects with dollars that are
A Festival Street at Hallmark $1 1 million generated in and near Lake Oswego:they do not rely
on regional,state.or federal 4ources.The availability
Imprnved pedestrian connections to the surrounding $3.0 million of these evterpal resources is uery limited apd d fficu!t
rnmmunity to project.The City will continue to pursue these
sources,and, if successful,the City portion of costs
Gateway projects that improve bike and auto access $2.R million may be reduced.
Bike facilities along Rrvaot and ( carry Roads $3.3 million Cost estimates on this table are presented in 2011
Puhlic parking lots /facilities and access $3.0 million dollars.The financing scenarios escalate the costs to
the year in which construction is assumed to occur,
Village Commons and "String of Pearls" plazas that $1.1 million using the schedule below. OTAK,an engineering firm
are distinct public spaces for community-gathering and providing support for this project,expects construction
establish a common identity for the area costs to accelerate over the next 4-5 years to catch up
to the losses since 2008.The longer it takes to fund a
Redevelopment Assistance Projects $5•n millinn n_roject.the more expensive it is to do so.
- Technical assistance on development issues 1300,000
• Storefront improvement grants/loans $2nn,n0Q
• Pedeuel_Qment grantslloans 13.5 million
• Land acquisition/consolidation $1 million
IflTAL $44.8 million
ELAINE HOWARD ECOIlorthwest
• CONSULTING,LLC ErW'MI c - EItiA CE • Pa®Ndlhin
ILakc Grove Village Area Plan Financial Study
Scenario Overview
1
All CaUital
Projects
GO Bonds Funded in
2012
A GO Bond fund•aIIcapital
projects.Redevelopment projects
unfunded.
Paring of RF goad Gateways
Urhan RanPwiI String of Pearls Project Redev
Pearls Projects Parking Lots
nii,n cacilitles Parking Lots
Urban renewal in the only iml used
to hind All projects. Festival Street I Pedestrian
Connections
Festival SF Road 5,3d o•elen". Parking Lots
MIXEr1 TnnIs Street, Project Pedestrian
caring^t
connections,
Pearls Urban Renewal t=ateways,pike
A variety of tools e coordinated. i ID,General Facilities
Fund;u
a I_rti c IU•bai oene•�al Urban Renewal
D funds Revenuee a^nds
11111111111111
BF Road Rede- Festival Gateways,
Urhan RPnAwal/ Project Projects, ctreet, Parking Lots
Sting of Pedestrian
GORoni1 Pearls connections,
Pike ceilitles
A GO Bond krAs Boor...carry Road o, , �, no o..,_� r,ti, no 0
imptntmtnents.Urban nanewej funds all CiQ o,__ V o B000...al U bac o_ —o n wai
others. a 1 n IN
i
2012 2020 2030 2040 2050
''' ELAINE HOWARD ECONorthwest
i CONSULTING,LLC Fr:mg-MI(•.IS - FlhjAlynP - ELAfyfsilbn
• it
•
Lake Grove Village Area Plan Financial Study .
Scenario:
General Obligation Bond
I
About Implications
This scenario's purpose is to evaluate the All capital projects would be funded In The Impact to property taxes would
implications of electing to fund Lake Grove 2012. decrease over the 20-year life of the bond.
capital improvements with a general The rate for the GO bond in 2012 would be
obligation pond (GO Bocci). Redevelopment projects would not be 10.5720 additional property taxes per 51,000
funded through a GO bond.These projects in assessed value.As assessed values
A general obligation bond Is secured by include property acquisition and technical increase,the tax rates would decrease.
I the city's pledge to use its resources. assistance, which could instead be funded by
including property taxes,to repay bond the general fund. n a pmpertye Payment In I Payment
holders. It requires a citywide vote. GO _"= =Iu_ 20±2•±3 2032-33
Bonds are typically used to fund large- GO bonds require a public campaign.which
I
scale capital projects that benefit an entire meats that there must be support for the X00.000 S171.60 105.01
city proposed projects on a citywide scale. Sem.= $343.20 I $990.02
Who Pays? A Lake Grove area bond could compete Unlncorporatad areas would not pay*or
with other potential City projects requiring the GO bond. If these areas were annexed
All property owners in the GO bonds. into the Citty,they would be required to pay for
City of I ake Oswego pay in proportion to the general obligation bond.
the assessed value of their properties.
At prnjgctc
funded in 2012
all 61*
2012 2020 2030 2040 2050
- FLAINF HOWARD ECONorthwest
i CONSULTING,LLC ECONOMICS • FINANCE • PLANNING
Lake Grove Village Area Plan Financial Study
Scenario:
Urban Renewal
About Implications Potential Urban Renewal Boundary
This scenario assumes that the City creates a new Boones Ferry Road would not be funded A t r . _
urban renewal district, and uses tax increment dollars WO2Q9Q-2Q3S hecause sufficient TIF �'� '' -
to fund all project costs. As with all scenarios revenue is not available in the early years. _ -
presented here,this is not a recommended scenario. ;�- s...
but a bookend to evaluate feasibility of using various All protects would be completed
tools. by 21115-205ar>aht
payments continue It J,.
into the 2Q . - _ '
Urban reoewal is typically used to fund projects that %`
support redevelopment and increases the tax base, Maximum indebtedness is S146M, which Is �+ .SYN. ..including some infrastructure projects. Because of the more than the S75M allowed by State ,-- • Y `' `�
timing of cash flowing into a new urban renewal Statute without concurrence from '1 :.„1 i 4 t/',, i "'
district,funds are typically not available,especially for impacted districts. -' n ,_ '
expensive projects, early in the life of the district. t`` v . €, Airy.! % `4' ' "`
A larger UR boundary could fund ir
projects sooner, ___& 111144,41' "°.
Who Pays? • Adding�500M in assessed value to the _'. jilt fl '' ,
URA(about 10%of total AV in the City) ..
Property(taxes inside the boundary generate the would fund Boones Ferry Road by 2019, w'• r
revenues,but urban renewal does not Increase but might not be legal under state law. "ilv . IP �"""""•`-"
taxes. Instead,growth of assessed value,which • Annexing and adding adjacent —; ECONorthwest
translates into increased tax revenue, is redistributed uninrrporated areas to the URA boundary
to the urban renewal agency to pay for approved would increase equj y and allow faster `i`..'i "' f atm.
projects in the URA. pay-nff.That area has about S200M in AV.
Frozen base:1171.3 million
Area:168 acres
Tax Rate lot TIF:$11 yseM
Aucape prQiect..d sed" I 'j +wth 2012-2052:
3.8%
curing of \ C Feati"'I .%\ BF 1 /Redaxalopmentl Ped(nooections
Panda Street.Bike eoad Prnl..,,ea natgMaye,Psrkirm
Fndi'tine Protect Lots
/ J IUe=Paid h M'G01EOe
. ELAINE HOWARD ECONorthwest
20i2 2020 2030 2040 2050 IN CONSULTING.LLC ECONOMICS - FINANCE - PLANNING
410 IP 1110 -
Lake . 0
Grove VillageArea Plan Fnancial Studydy
Scenario
Mixed I
About Impiinntinns Potential' Rr it ,
This scenario assumes that the City uses a variety of tools Boones Ferry Road project funded =, } '
iocludiog an EID. BID, urban renewal district, general fund in 2025-2030. To
A1tl > _
dollars, and revenue bonds to fund projects.As with all _'
scenarios praseofed here.this is not a recommended Req""Ires leadership commitment �f illk r"
scenario but a hnolreod to evaluate feasibilityof using
time. 'IQ anti R/Q both1 '�
g over e. require • ,' ttL. . ,u illir
various ttols,and to identify the most viable alternative. voluntary contrihastioa from property `-, ' _ lanai_ h
_
[Cost meatal Iia Source(s) and business owners. ,,,,R� 1•T{2IDGE
Booms Ferry Rnad $28m uthss umiak say. ISA, ! •
Gomel Mit 11ti About 95%of project costs paid hY _ ' 4
soca 2% Lake Grove properties via malty i roZ
Revenue hoods:5Y EID and LIDs. - '- � '
r LAKE GROVE g
Festival Street at Hallmark $3., al^_/EID ( • i
Pedestrian Conoactioos SAM URA Annexation of unincorporated areas Ii , o ..j Or
Gateways $2.6m URA would simplify LID formation process. I III:.1.4 PAr,
Bs.a Faal"ies $1.1m URA ' .
Park! Lots $3= URA
Rough eStimata fpr RID Impact Q�,-1101, "" w}'�
• On avaragw 51,700 per business per your for i �r' eP ,..F�'a
String of Pearls $1.1 m BID/EID jp yssm fnr businesses within V2 mile.Small rr.', o .8 _ �+ wL.�..2.r
Redevelopment Projects 55m URA busioas-ass would probably pay lass And large ,:. 4#I ; .•of 5 '"011""'D°"""••"
�! ? bual_ more. 0" i i . 'w -ner.sw� -
Who Pn 1 S Rough estimate for LID Impact r,tle o . .,
(—p av1. 'awe below2 1,- •, b; FtAdortlawest
I arra Gro'e groperty owners - Within 0.2 miles property owners a —n,50
•CitywideprpewA
and businesses owners per$1.000 Au fro=2025-2044. 4 ,
• Properties within URA boundary pay pay fnr general r,.ed • within 0.5 miles.property owners gav 50.25
forrhal property tax ratan a=4 revenue bond per Si,000 AV from 2025-2044. The above map shows the two tiered local impmvamant district
- Tvo-tle^ la,--.4d Il improver ao4 dlam+ ports determined by dis=oro from the B000aa Parry Road prolect.
(see Tap)
- Economic Improleamaot district(EID) R prni ertv'o AV L... I Payment In 2027-2028 ' Payment In 2056-2057
BusioeAA impmvamant distrl"(BID)
i I venom(CIO mi)181_(0.5 sell I yellow(Q.e mil I °lue(0.5 mil
Festival BF Road
st.saa smog -n erat �c \t \ 5- ►,000 I $150 I $75 I $51 I $27
J aadev eroJe'" OA Par king
of Pearls LID,GeneralFum. Connar1lnns,Gateways.
aotElo snne.Revenue
�„ Bike FacaiSes Lots S�n,000 I $300 I $150 I $102 I $54
\ urban RJ Urban Renewal
°`°'E'° D MU p`° • ELAINE HOWARD ECO
Northwest
URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT
mi CONSULTING,LLC E' N^MICQ • FINAti' • aLAbININr_
2012 2020 20a0 2040 2050
L_akP Grove Village Area Plan Financial Study
Scenario:
Urban Renewal/GO Bonds
About Impjinatinns Potential Urban Renewal Boundary
This scenario 2ccl Imes that the c=it,(uses GO bonds Allows faster implementation through -
to fund the Pi-tones Ferry Road project and creates a early year financing for all projects
*
naw Than renewal district,that will use tax increment 4,,. " �
"%'
dollars to fund all other projects.As with all scenarios The impact to property tsvec ii o..frl r t =
rat ila
prey ed here,this is not a recommended scenario. decrease osier time.The rate for the$2R.R
but a bookend to evaluate feasibility of using various million rn_hond in 2012 would be$0.4016 e` .
tools,and to identify the most viable alternative. additional property taxes per$1,000 in 4
assessed value.As assessed values t ,
Urban renewal is typically used to fund groiects that increase,the tax rates would decrease. h Ilk t '41,-;
support redevelopment that increases the tax base, ` ' ';. ,
including some infrastrur turn projects. General if a Ps , ' - 1 r
property'. Payment to RaytlNlnt
obligation bonds are used to fund large-scale capital assessed value 2012.15 203243 '� •'. ' }� --
projects with citywide benefit. is... 4 ' ` ' ;• �._
_ : -
t-q00.000 $g2o.d8 $66.71
+
Who Pa s? $600.0001 $240.981 5133.431 a 't`t
All residents pay for GO bonds. , : >�4 ;
stioder term for urban renewal area. Debt ,
- Property taxes inside the boundary generate the paid off by year 2040. ,, ` c'"-' ,-
revenues. but urban renewal does not increase r', IP w 0.,,,,-.4 Dr......".....,
taxes. Instead.growth of assessed value,which ` ECONorthwest
translates into increased tax revenue, is ,- _ _
redistributed to the urhan renewal agency to payw p abrt.1 - A
for approved projects in the URA. U
- overlapping tax districts forgo revenue to the new Frozen base:5171.3 million
District for the purpose of increasing the tax base Area:168 acres
for long-term benefit. Tax Rate for TIF:$7?°"
,-- AverBge projects =seed'talus
BF Road Redev Festival Gateways.Parking Lots growth 2012-2062:3.8%
Profr' Projects. Street.Ped um..Rim'
MCI Baa. String of P.nnnectlpns,
Pearls Bike Facilities ;
�_„ crew Rommel um.,arrrr
i
ELAINE HOWARD ECONorthwest ,
2012 2020 2030 2040 2050 - CONSULTING,LLC Ecnynuirs - FINANI(E • el ANNINI(
ip, III •
DRAFT;
For Ili sciussion P unpciscis
• 2012 Planning Commission
Glcials and Wcir' Plan Project Lis1I-December 20111
Wonk Plan Items Time Comm i<,isian
(r cit it Wailed Ey tile PC) Bram El Involvement
Boone!' Ferry' Rd Implementation Fllan/Code Alm eric rr ants January High
Action: Reciommeric of ciodei ameinc merits to facilitate plan 20112
Foothills Coriaept-Coc el and Plan Am eridmentsi Febru any F igh
citicir: REiaommenid code amendments to facilitate plan —June
Perioc is Review of Compreh ensue a Plan Cnflains
Action:A c option of 4 sets cif policy packages: Starting in
1. (Immunity cIL Itu re—work session and h Baring Jut aril- High
2. Inspiring spaces arid places and Complete Neigh bonhaac s minimum of
anc F ousing (irialuCEIS annexation, USB/UG9/51taflonc, anca meetings
cammunity c esign issu es). on each
policy
.I.
Economic Viialityand Connectec Clammunity Package
4. Community Health, F it lie Safety & Healthy Haosystems
Compreherisive Plan Related Issues C risoing all
Action: F otenitial reciammendatian fon clot El mem merits yean, Hioh
1. Clear anc otjeative stanc ards far mull i-family h ausinfl; carinectec
elimination of clot El barriers fon mEIC use IIDLCO- grant la Clamp
• fu nded work Alan
2.AffordaIle Hau sing c pc ates
Natunal Resouuce Planning Ongoing High
citicir: Respond to 2nd Look flask Florae reciammendations 2012
Boariesi Ferry'Road Refinement Fllan—ROW isisuesi 9pninig High
citicir: REN iew and recommend ac justments as needed
Community Development Code Re-write-Rh ase I Ji nu- F igh
Aciticir: REiaommeric amendments to the Use Tables Deuemter
Downtown Ranking Strategy anc Coc a Am eridrr entsi Jam En- F igh
Acit,iar:RE cion rrendalicir of code amendments to fadlitatE February
511 rategy 2012
e 01; CIP Review March Law
Action: ReviEiw and Recommendation to CC 2012
Trarisporlation System Plan Update-ipart of Comp Flan Ongoing Law
A cit,icir: Rev iEiw and Cammenl
Lake Osiwego-Portlarid Transit Pnaject/Foothills: Ongoing Law
A cit,icir: Receive and respond to u pdates
Review U nb an Renewal Plans-Foothills/m ay t El Lake G rove J u no- Moderate
Acitior:REitieiw and makEi recicimmer daticir to CC Deuemter
Ranks Master Plan Spning Modenate
Action: Rev iew and make necommenc ation l o CCI
•
Planning Commission Goals 2(]I2 December 20]1]1
Page 11
Rotenllial applications. Plan Arrierndments/zone changesII
Action:Horr€be i id€n/Turc€Id„ Vv. Lake C rot€ bperrisiiari, A.
Ave. Acrrik, CarALcrri on Armclrit off BR-po!sibl€ Ongoing High
r€cion rr€ndcrtion<.
Potential PC E oII<-s
Home Occupation Discussion* Rat ru ary- F igh
Action:R€torr,mend potential coder arr eridrr a ritsi April
Zoning of they Uake and/or Lake Access* Flat ru ary- F igh
Action: Roteniial recommendation fon ame amen:c.ments April
Alcce<-isory SIM cili res and SDUs* February- F igh
Action: Rotaril ial recommendation fora coce amerric ments April
Hou sing Options- Concept of 'cottage hot zing"* Rat ruary- F igh
ction: Rcrl aril ial recommendation fon Code amaric merits A iril
2012 Alnnt al Almenc[rents to the CDC TBA High
Adiari: Rec crmmenc A menc merits to CC
E reen et ilding Tech nigt esi/Slolan, eta.* TBA High
Action: Discuss and recommend potential amendments
Telecommunications Racilihies TBA High
Action: Discuss anc reccrmmenc potential amendmerils
Communications t
PC mem b er reporting from sub-corrimiitllees on boanc si Ongoin€I Hi€l-
ctior.: Ensuring timely (month ly) reports from Commissioners
"These goails carni t erccrme part of Comp Mari c ism ssions in Work Plan
•
Alan ning Commission Goals 20]12 December 20]1]1
Rage 2