Agenda Packet - 2011-10-24 AGENDA CITY' CF LAKE CSWEGC
LAKE CISWEGCI
Uentennfal 1970-1(10 PIJANNING C C MM]S S]ON MEETING 318(1 AAVenue
HO Bax
Mlc nday, Octc Iben 24, 2C11 Lakes Ch lw ega,,CIR910'_I4
6:30 p.m.
5(13-63151-025101
City Hall - Ccuncil Chamber www.ci.osme lo.cuLusplan
Contact: Iris MciCaleb Alda au blishec on the irternet at:
9mail: imuccalet @ci.oswego.or.us www.cii.oswego.oi.L s/plan/plarining_aommissian
F hone: 9C13-(197-65911
111-El meeting location is ziacessit le to persons with disabilities. lb request accommodations, please aontac1
Iris M ciCaleb at 503-697-6591,, 48 hou rs t Ohre t1-El meeting.
11. CALL TCI ORDBR
2. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZEN CCIMMBNT-Regarding Issues Not Clri the Agenda (3 minute limit rier indivic ua1J
This is an oppertunity to raise issues regarding Planning or Citizen Involvement.
4. CCIU NC I PDA11E
9. NINLITE!
•
August 8, 201111
.3 August 22, 20111
9.3 Slepterrit er 113, 2011
6. WORK 518951IONS
6.11 PP 09-0019-Lake Gum El\.illage Centen (LGVC) Rimming S1lnategv
Update and discussion. Materials will be providec at th e meeting. Staff cciord,inator is
•
Clernisi Egnerl As!htont Alarming Director.
6.3 RP 1111-0003- Hoot!"ills Update
Review and disau sision of c raft Rramework Ulan. Staff coordinator Ls Brant Williamsi, Director of
Eaoncur is and Capital Det e1loFlment
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1.1 Clydinanae 2526, LU 08-0(154-Comm riity Develapment Code- F aliav Related Hau sekeeping
Amenc merits. A menc rnents IlChapter 50: fbr tEl El punFiose 01 alarifyin8 and updating variaus aoc e
Firovisions. 111-ese provisions have been is entified as having pcilicy implications. This hearing is
continues ilroml September 26, 20111. The Commission will begin w ith pages(18-90 which aover
Article 50.13 Inc us1 rial Zones, Article 90.114 A acesscry and Temporary Uses, Article 90.119 Greenway
Management Overlay District,, Article 50.17 Flanned Development Overlay, Article 50.20 Rlag Lots. 111
time IrlermitI thely will continue with panes 98-156 which begins)with Article 5(1.30 5IFlecial
, en
FOR MOIRE rd�,c�►a ' ._ SeniorPllcn _ _._: -, _—
Requirement r Type o Raci it y. tacoordinator ria inator £le ra Ana eus, 1
,a r'errAlI ,/)www.cLDS reamcars4'Jcrr
.z /casefi fSelectLti 08-0054j
(Con tinue t on Otis er Side)
Jon Glustaison,Chair r Pdja Bhutani,Vice Chair
Bi]:I Gaar • Julia Glisson ■ Jim JohnAon r Mussel]Jonas • 'Ibdd Prager • Jeff Gudman,Council Liaison
Page
8. OTHER BUSINESS—PLA NNINE COMMISSICIN
8.1 Findings, Concdu<.iions anc Orc er
LU 11-0028—Almendro emtsi to Lake Oswego CbmmunityI Develoriment Code IICUC)110 bring tH e City
into compliance wilt Title 4 of Matra!! L rban Grown Management Functional Plan.
S. OTHER BUSINESS—CCIMMISSION RCIR CIIIIZEN INVOLVEMENT
110. SC H EOULE REV IEW
1I1. ADJOURNMEN1I
S
S
Sin, Sidaro
From: Sin, Sidaro
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 5:35 PM
To: Olson, Mary
Cc: Council Distribution; Frisbee, Denise; Egner, Dennis
Subject: RE: Comp Plan schedule
Councilor Olson,you are correct in your assessment of the updated draft schedule.
The impetus for the change has been the consistent feedback from the Technical Advisory Committee, Citizen Advisory
Committee, Planning Commission, and City Council to look for efficiencies and to shorten the overall process whenever
possible. In addition,there has been a lot of concern raised from the public as well boards and commissions about the
number of large public meetings. The draft process represents a best case scenario of what is anticipated to occur
between now and December 2012 and keeps the City on track to meet the spring 2013 Comprehensive Plan update
deadline. The overall benefits of the shortened schedule include:
• Cost and time savings by reducing the number of summits from seven to four,
• Avoiding community meeting burnout,
• Completing all of the community summits by May, rather than October keeps the community interested and
engaged over a shorter period, and
• Providing the opportunity to raise concerns early on in the process provides more time to address those
concerns.
The CAC had a discussion about revising the schedule at their September meeting. They are scheduled to review the
draft at their October 26 meeting. The Planning Commission has been asked to provide feedback through their CAC
liaisons (Jim Johnson and Bill Gaar) at the CAC meeting.
The next Comprehensive Plan quarterly update before the City Council is scheduled for December 13. However, I'm sure
the CAC would welcome feedback at anytime from the Council. I will work with Council Moncrieff, the City Council
liaison to the CAC, to schedule a meeting prior to the December meeting if that is the direction of the City Council.
Sid
From: Olson, Mary
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 12:02 PM
To: Sin, Sidaro
Cc: Council Distribution
Subject: Comp Plan schedule
Hi Sid,
I was reviewing the agenda on the website for this week's comp plan CAC meeting and noticed that the timeline and
schedule has changed from the one we saw when you last updated council a month ago.
It looks like future summits have been doubled up with two topics on one night, and Planning Commission and council
study sessions and public hearings are compressed. In some cases a study session on one topic is the same date as a
public hearing on another.
Am I reading the timeline correctly? My concerns are the full plates for both Planning Commission and City Council
and the ability of both bodies(and the citizens!) to accommodate this compressed schedule.
What is the impetus for this change? Has the CAC approved this schedule? When will council have an opportunity to
weigh in?
Thanks,
1