Agenda Packet - 2011-10-10 AGENDA CITY!011 LAKE OSWEGO
HAKE CIS WEGC
de ntennir I 1910-2110 pIJANNING COMMISSION MEETING 380A Avenue
Monday, Octcibeil i 0 2011 AO RSI 339
� Lakei C►:Iweiga,CIR SI1034
6:30 p.m.
`013.63 5141290
City Hall - Council C ham bet www.ci.osw cigci.cr.us/plan
Coritacit: Iris M cCalet Also put lished on the internet at:
Err ail: imeaaleb@ai.oswego.or.t.s www.ci.oswego.or.uss/plari/planning_commission
Phone: 503-697-6591
The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities. To request acaommoc ations please contact
Iris McCaleb at 503-E197-6591 48 hot. rs before the meeting.
1. CALL TCI ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZHN C CIMMONT—Regarding Iss t.es Not On the Agenc i (3 m inute limit per individual)
This is an opportunity 110 r is El iSSlt.es regarc ing Planning or Citizen Involvement.
4. COUNCIL UPDATE
5. MINUTES
5.31 July 11, 203131
6. PUBLIC H EAIRINCI
6.1 LU 3.3.-0018—A menc rr ents to Lake Cswego Community Develaprr ent Code (CDC)to t ring th El City
into compliance with Title 4 of Metro's Urban C row Management Hunctional Plan.
A regt.est from th El City of Lake Clsw ego for am enc mentsi to IF e CCC to limit 1F e sit EIS of specifiec
retail t.sesi in the Mired Commerce INC) and Indtstrial Hank ilI(0) zones. Sibffcoordinator hiAnd)
Gut iiia,Assiacslatle FVanner.
..r
Foq mop,EINFoRMATIOM I i fT=fit"; ,fiat .& s u0_0r.us clam aSef him Sele LU 11-65928)
7. WORK SESSIONS
i.11 RP 1131-00311—Harking Stu dv/Strata
H eview arid c isaussion of th El 20310 Downtown Harking Strategy)aorr rr issioned by the Lake Oswego
H edev elopmierit Agency (LC RA] as part of the 2011(1 Eaonomiia C Eiv elopmient Strategy). Staff
coordiincitoiii are Jane Bliacks tone„ Econom;a C1eveiloF went Manager arid Debra I naiades,Senior
Pilannien.
7.2 HP 09-01016—Hot.sing Stnategiesi
Recap anc discussion of Planning Corr mission h ousting tour on Jt.ne 14, 2011. Staff coandi'natar s
Debra Anoreadet.s, SElnior FVanner.
•
(Coinlinlued on Cthe, Side)
Jcin C Iustafson,Chair • Pu ja Bhutani,4 ice Chair
Bi 1:1 Caar ■ Julia C lisson • Jim Johnson • Bussell jams • Todd Pragea i • Jeff C ludman,Council Liaisc n
Page 2
8. O1IHERBURN ESS—PLAN NEN C CCIMNISSION •
9. O1IH EIR BUSINESS—CON MISI_'IICIN FOR CIl1IZEN INVOLVEMEN11 •
10. SCHHOU LE REVIR&
ill. ADJOU RN MEN11
•
411
®
STAFF RERORTI
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEIPARTMENT
PRALICANT RILE NO.
City of Lake Clswego LU 11-0028
11CICIATICIN STA RF
MC anc IA aarieis Anc y Eluliaia
DATE OR F 9RCIRT PLANNING CCIM MISSION HBA RING DATE!
September 30, 2011 October ]a, 2011
Ir � G +� i ( [7777,0' r + x�, '77:4,,;;,'"774
r F
N: �APRLIIC �NT S R13C�UEST � ,
.�_.�a���,�, .. s,�..Jk.......,..,..,...a»d�._...-,...,..,e.w� ., „��.l:.aid) IW .
® TF El City of Lake Clswego is proposing a legislative Community Development Code QCIDC]
Mot amendment limiting tF El sizes of sgeiciiiici retail a ses in tF El MC aric IR aortas to 2O1aaa
sat ane ieet in orc er to comply with Title 4 of Metro's Untari C rowth Management
Rt.notional Alan QED F ibit A-11).
r ..„iRPLIC: p 4 7r*
CII: AABLE7REGULAT1ONS, ws .. ..:
A. City of Lake Oswaga Comprehensive Rlan
Goal 2: Baric Use Rlannir€l
9ecition 1 Land Use Flalicies and RaHL lations, Roliay 23
Goal 9: Eaanomici DEl elopment
Policies]Cl and a]
9. Mal na Urban Glnowth Mar agement FL notional Filar
Tit le 4: Industrial arid CItF an Err ployrr eint Areas, Metro Cac El Sections 3.07.410-
. 3.07:494
1110
Planning Clammissioni Hutl lic Hearing 1 LU 11-01038
(Molder 10,2011
C. City of Lake Oswegc Community Deveic pmEirit Cc c El
LCIC 90.75.005 Legislative Decisions Defined
LOC 90.75.015 Requires Notice is DUCID
LOC 901.75.020 Planning Commissic ri Recommendation Requ inec
,LOC 9C1.75.025 City Council Review and Decision
gly INTROD.0CTI ON/BACKG-R(LUND INRCIRNIATICIN
Metro has asked 11.El City of Lake Clsw ego to su brniit a reporl c etailing th El CEIC's
compliance with Til le 4 lindu strial and CIi h Eir employ merit A neas; of Metna's Urban
G npwth M aragement He riational Plan Ilexhit it R-11). The purpose of Title 4 is to:
1Pirovic El and tlrotecli a su pply of sites fon employment t limiting th El types anc
scale of rlon=iris ustnial uses in Regionally Significant Inc u strial Areas IIR91A 51,
Inc u strial and Err ployment Areas. ...Title 4 fu rther seeks to ...encourage the
location of of h Eir types of employ merit in Centers, employ meal A was, Corric ors,
Main Si roots anc Station Communis ies." ...[Title 4, Metro Code 3.07.41110, B)h ibit R-
1]
The Title 4 map for Lake Oswego (E>h iibii E-11 designates a portion of westenri Lake
Oswego as emFlloymerit Lam. In one Eir to promote regionally significant obi-mint-rations all
err ploy ment,Title 4 rEuluines that employment Lam le aeries to limn retail uses NA ich
are less employee-intensive 1 h an other cicirr m enaial uses] to EICI,000 squane feet in area
and "those appncipriate in iv pe and size to serve the nEioC s cif businesses, employees and
residents of the Employment Areas" ]Title 4, Metno Code 3.0a.4.40(A) aric (B), E>habit R-]1].
The employment Laric area includes poral ions of se%enal City zoning districits, arraril which
the HC, CCI, CR&D, MC,, and IP zones permit retail use.
The HC and CC acmes ane EDerr ptec from the err Flloyment Laric iirr itations of Tii le 4
p1 rsuant to Til le 4, Metric Coc e (MC) 3.07.441011C] and Title 4,TaElEi 3.07-4 (Di h ibit R-111.
The CR&D Zone was the su t jest of a previous CDC text amens meal in 2009 KU 09-0034)
which addec a 20,000 square-foot SIZEI limitation on specified retail uses wh ich wEWE! not
limitec in size rpm iously. This amendment t rought the CR&D zone into compliance with
Title 4. Therefore,the subjects of the cu rrent text amendment proposal ane the MC and
IP zones. The neaent IP Cl‘,enlay am enc merit inch c ed nal ail limitations that were
cionsisi erit with Title 4. The IP Overlay only applied to the IR zones properties nonth of
Willow [lane. 1h El current cihangles oddness th El entire IA zone.
Retail.stores in the MC zone are alneady limitec to EICI,000 square feet in size ILCIC
50.1111.010(31], in compliance with Title 4. Howe%er, celicatesseris, sflegiaiizec food stores,
bakeries, restau rants, and bars are also listed as perm itted uses in 1 h El MC zone [ICICI
50.]I]1.0110Q2)(c1), 2(d), 211E11, 4Ia), arid 41c1] but with no limitations on size. Since these uses
Hlanninfi Clommission Flu t lie HEiarin0 ;1 LL ]l1-0028
Octot er 10,;IC1311 •
are aonsiderec retail uses uric Eir Title 4,a size limitation on these a ses in the MCI Sone is
req(ired 10 corm ply with th a Employment Lanc riequ iremeents cif Titley 4.
The IP zone pEermits '"inaic ental retail uses" ouiright 1LCICI50.113.0301 10)1 anc lists "'retail
es1 at lishnl ants which c ireai ly and prim arily provide goac s anc services to employees and
t u sinesses in the inc ustrial park" and "retail sales of lines, batteriiEis anc motor vehicle
accessories" as condil ioriial uses DUCICI 50.113.025121 and QZ)]. Since lb El CDC c OEIS not
currently limit the SiZEIS 01 th ese relail uses in th El IR zone, a new size lirr ital ion is reiquinec
to comply wii h the 9mploymenl Ilanc requirements of Title 4.
The Fjroposeic CDC tEpt americ meal to limit 1F.El speaifiErc retail uses in the MC anc IR
acines 1ci 20,000 squ are feet wou Id bring th El CDC into compliance with the 9mployment
Land riElqu irements of Title 4, as 1 h El 20,CIC10 squaw-foot limit is less th an the E10,000
squ are-foot ma)int u m allowed t y MC 3.07.4401E J anc is intended 10 smelt.El needs of
tusiniesses, employees, anc residents of the 9mploymenl Anea, as rEiquinErc by MCI
3.07.44C111A1. The prciposec 20,0(1(1 squariEl-foot limit is alsa acinsistEint with retail size
limitations alreiacy ins places in the CIF&D zone llwhieh is adjacent to th El MC zone) anc in
the IR Clverlay Clistrici whish was riecently adoptEic by the City Clciu nciil IILU 110-0042).
Staff notes there we citrrElntly na restaurants, tars, specialized lodc Mores, bakeries, ar.
delicalessens in the MCI zcirie which approach 20,CIC10 squ are feet in size. Hors reference,
® Plying 9lephants Deli at 5885 MEiac ows Road accu pies approximately 3,000 square feet.
Starbucks at 9EICICI Meadows Raac occiupies appro)imately 1,575 square feel. Olive
Garden F Erstaurant al 6355 Meadaws Road oaau pies approximately 9,100 squ are feet.
(Each of these businesses is local ec with in 1h El MC zone.)
Staff alsa notes that there are currently rio retail estaLlish mems in the IP zone which
exceed X10,000 square feel in size. or neferencEl, th El Les Sat.wab Tire Calton at 171711
Eaones Neriiiy F oad Qin the IP zone) has approximately 117,000 squ are feet all Erricdosed
spaae in thnee buildings. As mentiariEic above,the City Council recently adoplec an IP
Overlay Diss ricl in a poin ion cif the IP zone wh icrh permits more retail use than is permitted
elsewhere in the IR zone IIJU ]I0-0C143J. The IR Overlay District inaludes size limitatians
which cam ply with Til le 4.
f iV• _,. _gNOTICE CIH APRLICAT.ICIN `„
A. Newspaper Notice
On September 391, 3(1111, nu blic notice of the proposeic CDC tet amenc mEln1 arid
Planning Cam mission pu t Iia hearing was published in the flake OsiwEigci Review.
S
Manning CarrirriissianPublicEeianini 3 LL 111-0a2E1
Octaban 11CI,201111
B. N easune 96 Notice410
Slime the proposec text amendment woulc affect permitted i ses of pnoperty,
notice cif the Fpioposal was sent to all awners of property in the MC and IA zones„
as nequ inec by ORS 331.186 IM easure 9E).
C. DLCD Notice
Pursi ant to UCIC 50.15.015, staff has pnon is ec nial icIEI of th El proposed CDCI text
arr enc rr ent to the Cinegon Department of Land Conservation anc DEN eIlopment
IIDLCD
V ,CDMRLIAIi'CE.;WITFi;A►PPPICI A1;:
Goal 9: Economia Develc orient
(Compliance with Lake C swego Comprehensive Plan, Goal 9 Economia Development,
Holiay 20.
Rcdicv 20:
Allow commenciial and nElsidEiril ial uses within th El CentenFlcrinte anc Kruse Way
9u sinElsisl District at c ensitiEls wH ich su ppont mass tnansit aric which take advantage
of th El regional transportation system. These aciti‘ities may include:
a. Employee-inlerisive t u sinElssesl such as majon regional office uorr Flle)iEls,
high density housing, and associated services and retail commercial
uses;, and,,
t. Commercial activities which meet the needs of the tra\Elling publics anc
othEln highway oriented retail uses which require access to a large
markEll area.
411 Rirlcines: Th El MC zone is locatElc within the Can;Elrpoiril a and k ru sie Way Busiinesls
District designatElc in E oal 9 iIHigu re 7, page 9-3). The EINisting provisions of the MC
zone allow far high-density aorr mElrciial and resit Elntial use QLOC 9CI.titi.C1910;, anc
most of tF El area h as t EIEIri develoFlElc with high•cElrlsil y commercial uses, incilu c ing
nal ail. The proposelc tel arElrlc merit wou Id restrict the sizes of inc ividual
nestau rants, bars,.siFlElcualizec food stores, takeries, arid delicalEissens to]CI,000
square feet in oridEul to torr ply with M Eltro's Title 4 ru less for Employ went Land.
TEE!intent of the Title 4 rule is to pnioritize employee-intensli%a commercial
cevelclFlmer11 over lange-format retail uses, which are less employ ee-intensi%e.
This amendment would be consistent with both 1 h El Title 4 ru le anc with this
policy. TH is proposal is also aonsistenl will- the 30,000 square-foot limitations on
natail uses in the CR&D carie, which is ad jacieril to the MC zone aric is also located
within the ClerltElrFlointe arid k nu sie Way Business District.
Carscslu siorr:Th El proposal is cionsisl ent with this policy.
410
Plannin€I Clammission Put lic Hearing 5 LL 11-00211
0ctot er 110,;10111
•
Gaal 9: 9cionorn lc Der eilonmier t
Compliance with 'lake Clswego Carrprell Emsii%e Plan, Goal 9 economic DlevElloFlmienl,
Policy 211.
Policy 291:
Dci not allciw negiorial2 cir langen shopping aentens' within tF El Centeii ointe arid
Kruse Way E u skims District.
Findings: As rioted at me,the MC zone is locatec within the Centerpointe and
Kru sEl Way Hu sinElssi District. In c iscouraging large-scale IlEli ail u se,this policy is
consistent with tF El Title 4 rEl@Mations fon Employment Land. Staff finc sI tF El
proposed tEe4t amenc orient limits i F El sizes of netail t i siirlessies wt.I(i often local El
in siF apping aentens, aric thenefonEl camplies with tatF Til le 4 and with 11-is policy.
Conch siic'n:TF a pnaFlosial is consistent with tF is policy.
E. Metnci Urban Gnawth Management Flu national elan
The proposed 20,000 squire-foot limitation on the specified retail USE'S in the MC
anc IA zones is intended to comply with 1 F e Title 4 reduinemer'1 that nal ail a saes in
employ rrnen1 Uanc districts t El limited to 60,000 square feet or"tF ose appropriate
in type aric size la seiiVe 11-El needs of t L sinElsses, employees]aric Iles ideal s oil tF e
employ mien' P Haas" (Title 4: MC 3.07.44CIR, exhit it A-11.
Conclusion: The proposal is consistent wi F Title 4 cif the Lint an Growtl
M anaeement Au rictional Alan.
"Fegional Draw Bus messes"ane c efiriec it 1 he Clomrinehers ivEI Rlan as fallaws:`These are buy iressEis which
d raw cusl ame ns frcim viol only th El Lake Oswe€Ia manket anEia,b UI also llnorn th rciu ghou 1 th El Ron land
M Eitrapolitan Area. Far riumesas cif the CamprehensiyEl Iiari a negioral c Haut business shall to any sinole
1eriani cammencial est at lishment with a floor area of€'neaten than 35,0C10 sat,ane fed.
3 "Slhapp incl Carriers"are dalined in the Camp rail ensiv El Rlan as fcdlaws:"Fan th e p urp osEis of 1 he
CIamc nehersilo El Ilan,Slhc'ppirg Carriers are a onoup oil commercial establishrnenl5.,Fliar inec,constructec,anc
mana€1ec as a tatal er 1ity,vt ilh cuslame n planking p novided on-site,pirovision ilor goads c ahem sepanatec from
cu si omen access,aEn 1 hetic cansic erations arid prateai ion ilrom 1 he elements,arid landscaping ar d si€'nage in
accarc ance witf an ar p noved plan." 1111
Rla.nnini@1 Clommissior Rut lic Hearing El LL 11-0028
Octal er 10,2CI:1
•
U.J 0011 crosi0N [R9C C"N M g7NDIATioN
Based on the information pnesEirtE d irl this nEIFlort, staff recommends that tF El Commission
support the proposes CDC 1 ext amendment to limit tF E sizes of the specified 0E11ail L ses in
the MC and IP zones to 20,000 sou are feet.
HXHIBIT9
A. Daaft C rc inances
A-1 Ordinance 251151
B. INci au rrent exhit its; neservec for F Elaring use]
C. INci au rrent exhit its; neservEic for F easing u se]
D. INci cw rrent exhit its; neservE c for F caring u se]
E. Clraphias/glans
E-] Lake Oswego Title 4 Areas Map
F. Whitten IVatenials
® F-] Urban Glnowth Management fluriatiarial Alan,Title 4
G. Letters
None
•
411
Filar irinFIClomriission Rut lic HEiaring a LU 11-CI(Iaf1
Octot er 10,2CI11
DRAHT 9,29,201 1
URAIF11
ORDINANCE NO. 2575
AIN ORDINANCE CR THE LAKE CISME C1 CITY COUNCIL AIM ENDING ICC CHAIPTER 50
IICOMMUNITY DEVEILOPMEN11 CODE],AR111CLE 50.7171110 UMI11THE SQUARE ROCIIIAE E OF
RETAIL USES IN TIF 9 MINED COMMERCE (MC)ZONE,AIRTICLE 50.13110 LIMIllTHE SQUAIR9
RCICITAIGE OR RETAIIL USES IN TIH E INDUSIIRIAIL IaARK(IP] ZCINH,AND ADCIPIIING AIN DINE 51(IIU
11-0028].
Whereas, th El City cif Lake Oswego is neat fired by Metro Coc e to c err ansitnate aomplianae with
Metro Title 4 illndi strial and CO.er 9mplay ment Areas) cif til el.. rban Growth Management
1k national Rlan; and .
Whereas, N etro Title 4 (Metro Coc a 3.07.4714 .450) requires the Cityi ci impose lira its on the
squane footage of retail CSEisi in cesignated areas; aric
Whereas, the Corr rr L pity De%elopment Coc a does not aurnently limit the square footage of
cierlairl retail users in areas regilated ky N etro Title 4;
The City of Lake C swego circ ains as 1lollows:
Section 1. 9eatian 50.7171.010 of th Ei Lillie Oswego Code is henety arr enc ec by adding th El text
shown in bold. uric Eirlined tvDe, as follows:
2. Retail Sales- Rood:
C. Delicatessen, no table service.
Uses: R Speaial District Lirnitaltioris for Rermitteid Use
NC, CIC, HC, OC, EC,C R&D anu QNcil to eyceec 210,0Ca sc.ft.flaos alae a in CR&D aric MC aonefi'
MC
D. Specialized lloac stores.
•
Special Distric t_L imitations for Permitted.
Uses: P Use
NC,GC, HC, DCI, MCI CC, CR&D (Not tci Eixceec 2a.a0CI sa..ftl flabn area in
MC zonal
® EXH IBIT A-1
Ordinanue�No.:157f.1 EXH
11-CK128
Page ll of 4
DRAFT SI/2151/2(11:
E. Bakery-where baked foods manufactured elsewhere ane solc on the premises.
Uses: P I Sriecial Distuiot Limitations fan Permitllec Use
NC,CIC, F C, C C, EC,C R&D arid QNat lo eneec 110,CIOCI sq.ft.flocin area in CR&D arc MC zones:
MC
4. Retail SIalas--Restaurants, Drirkirg Places:
A. Restaurants,with or without associated IciL nge.
Uses: I P I Special Disllr at Limitations fcin Permitleic Use
NC, GIC,I-C, C C, EC,C R&D and JINo1 tci eixaeee 20,000 sq.ft. floor anea iri CR&ID and MC
MC zones)
C. Bar or cocktail lounge not associated with restaurant; use wish retail mall beverage license.
Uses: I P I �l Special District Limitations for Permitted Use410
IGC, HC, EC, MC INC,OC anc C R&D ((Not to exceed 20.000 sa.ft.floor area in.MC zone),
Sectior 2. Section 90.113.020 of 1 h El Laker Clswego Code is heady arr chided by adc ing the tent
sh own in bolt, underlined tvoe, as follows:
]ICI. Incideril al netail L SEM. not to deed 20.0CICI slaw are feed.
Sectic n 3. Seutior 50.13.039 of the flake Clsw ego Code is h eireby amended ty ac dirig the te)t
show r ir bold. uric erlined tvoe as 1lollows:
Ord inancie No.2157-`I
Pagc 2 of 4
EIRAB11 cI/2c1/I2(11:
® 2. Retail establishment!which dinecitly anc primarily..provic a goods.i and services to
elm ploy EIGS and bus.iinesses in the inc L stria) park.nail to exaeac 20.000 siauare feel
a. Retail sales of tires, batteries and mcitcir vehicle acuiessonies..nat_1doceeda0.000.
sauare feat.
Section 4.The City Cau nciil h eireby adopts the Rinc inigs and Clcinalu signs IILU-9191-CICI2f1-
attacih ec as EI h ibit 1.
9nacted at tit e meeting of the Lake Oswefa City Council of the City of Lail El Oswego heic on 1h e
c ay of , 209111.
AYE:
411 N0195:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
9�CU59D:
JacN D. Hoffman, Mayon
Dated:
Orc inanc a No.257!
Pagel 1 of 14
DRAFT 9)129)12011
ATT99T:
Robyn CIi ristie, City Recorder
APPHCIVEE PS TCI FICIRM:
David E. Rowell
City Attorney
Ordinance Na. 2fI1I3 411
Page 4 cif
i
\>>, -214- �` C,fCi Ofthirird
PNS �f aea, . ,t R,.3
`' aT 'w0y d R-10
–ler—Fir SI 0)1 � > m C R•r10 JYcol‘ Y
t7r b °Sy.
' , %
.../ .1111 &I R-5 Ln v Glelciel Orcharc C r
' ci ileCt rr
[Irll $ Dr OPfEcNfee Ct a
sI N, 4,4 C:,/ a III 9 �R-5 I N
ti ‘„ I Gre Parkview 3� R.7.5 ,
/ ' Charles e
6'-,', R-31 CICJR4PHA
Is
,141re X41 I R-:
j /�/// {1t. _ RNAI OC
i - CICdr I RNA
Gellewood y
a } A un
19onita Rc S�
,..,
.,,t
CiCh
, . ,
,1 • d Ln C -t8Q ,� n Harvw y Way
Cr ,� 1�°
R-7.5 a Ccta-2
t ,. "' 74•6 Q' m Collin s Waj1
* io Ct s R-71.51 '*Ohl St�1 mDou9las way, GC lied Cedar Way
Burmand ‘a" R-!I R-10
_Ur 1 Shake speElre R-15 Beasts" I ewood a SI
;9 __BatainEr St RNA C ��Y cil
d' en R-7.5 E�� R4 R- NCIR-O R-0
<�GI 1 7.5 : ='� s1 Rd R-0 lk R-Oel Gruen Awe
} > .fir ye od/ R-7.5Rd
Kable to r , m
"
v C
01
.e 1 01/,,
v co n __
HawigNadrtina 11 �r` *11 - ..4 'i rir. YenRUR*
. . a e I r
°P/R4.5 R RNA
k
Seville ° ve ` a R-2.5
� //" > Qa 5-2 SI ` a West summit),alr
I -_3 & Wa Ci 15 a N C 1 R-7.5 4.4
k
\ �,, m unm l?1 i1 "D gt. R,2-6
R-2.5 R-0 (ei e C
5~ a' a, if
PRA '� ��
L mit RNA .'"e9 4
��" •` RNA 3 •� �C:I erit
4p 1AEI5tlesway
} f/ �a i Chapman Wall Q
' f/,r," >i �' pOH R 5Si� .N4 Cobb Way alp EEmE Rc �
Q „' R-7.5 it C.
Q, Wddwood fit Haven 861 a
-7;
ik
` f, g R4 o n 3 `t n Llc rds :i; Du
t .4 &lb,.
`�' =a `SQAI 2;
�/ L. I �I Jewel1.7. je:n l Lln -1 _ 1 a ai 1
'7.51e[ .51 14/ t� 1j a
' �� c `
t
~_ c 1 nee St _ �` �g I a' t" Tuala� C a Bx �T ��°,r PF
�" . .a I Ken 'm RdT• wI a
/ I I,4
•
j
1 a Fef bn, rualata C, e' 1 Lake Oswego 7�or�in g
o ' o CtlaWaRwirlg Slt N
al a aind Vile 4Areasi
I • ✓ R-71.5 J R-7.9 wan Rd R-7• ,2 ! _ 4 Title 4 Employment
r% /
/ la 1. Lanc
°f Leaf St y St m
-1 $ lrt 1 a 900 '1,1100 '1,500 ;1,000
Q'ii, 4-'1C/
- Kr E' 1�1� \y _ ' a — — 4 Reel
• •
TITLE 41; INDUSTRIAL AND OTHER EMPLOYMENT AREAS
3.01.410 Purpose and Intent
The Regional Framework Plan sails for a . strong regional economy.
To improve the economy, Titles 9 seeks to prclvide and protect a
Suprl oil sited floe employment by limiting the typels and scale
ofl non-industrial uses in Rlegionally Significant Industrial
Areas IRS]As] , Industrial anc. Employment Areas. Title 9 also
seeks to Fxoiide the benefits ofl "clustering" to those
industries that operate more productively and eflfii giant ly in
px omiin i til to cine arother than in dispersed locations. Title 4
further seeks tel paotect the clapalcii til and effli ci ency of the
regian' s transportation' system flor the movement ofl goods and
seriices and to encourage the location of other types af
emplayment ir. Centers,, Corridors, Main Streets 'and :Itatian
Cammunities. The Metro Council will evaluate the eflfeativenes,I
of Title 4 in achieving these purposes as part oil its periadic
analysis of the capacity of the urban growth boundary,
(ClxdinEr.cie No. 97-1]I93, Slec. 1. Mended by OnicliinanciEI 02I-96gB, Sacs, 3;
Onidinarae No. CI4-1CI40B, Sea. 2; Oxdilnance No. 1CI=1“413, Seci. 3; .
3J17 .42a Protection_ of Regionally Signiflicant Industriial Areas
M. Regionally Significant .Industrial Aieas QRISIAs] are those
areas near the region's most signiflicant transportatian
facilities for the movement ofl freight and atHer areas most
suitable far movement and storage of goods. Each city and
county] with land use planning authority omer RSIAs shown on
the Employment and ]ndust rial Areas Map shall derimel
specific plan designatian and zoning district boundaries of
RSIAs within its jurisdiction from tide Map, taNil.nc into
account the location of existing uses that would not
conform, to the limitations on non-industrial uses in this
section and the need to achievle a mix af employment uses .
B. Cities and counties shall review their land use regulations
and remise them,, ifs necessary, to include measures to limit
the size and location af new buildings for retail
commercial uses - such as stores ar.d restaurants - and
retail and profes:ianal serviaes that cater to daily
customers - such as financial, insurance, real estate ,
]legal, medical and dental offices - to ensure that the
servle primarily the needs of workers in the area. CInEI such
measure shall be that new buildings for stores, branahes,
agIenaies or otliElr outlets for these retail uses arid
services shall not occupy more than 2 , 000 squares feet af
11 -BffEici�ilve 71x/16/10 6d CI]1 3/11 :1.CI7elCl af 71:1
PAGE 1 EXHIBIT F-1
LU 11 -0028
sales or sierwi_ce area in a single outlet, , or multiple
outlets that occupy more than 20, OOCI square fleet of .sale s
or serviae area in a single building or in multiple
buildings that are part of the same development project,
with the (loll owir.g exceptions :
] , Within the boundaries of a puUlia use airport subject
to a facilities niter plan, austomary airport uses ,
uses that are acaessoryl to the travel—related and
freight movement aativiities of airports, Hospitality
uses, and retail uses appropriate to serve the needs
of the trameling public; and
sl . Training facilities whose primary purpose is to
promtde training to meet industrial needs.
C. Cities and. counties shall reviiiew their land use regulations
and revise them, ifl neaes; ax y, to include measures to limit.
the siting and location of new buildings for the uses
described in subsection B and for non-industrial uses that.
do not cater to daily customers—stch as banks or insurance
processing aenters—to ensure that such uses do not reduce
off-peak perfarmance on Main roadway, Routes and RoadwaM
Connectors siIokri on the Regional Freight Network Map in
the Regional Transportation Plan or require added road411
capacity to prevent falling below the Standards.
P. Cities and counties shall remiew their land use regulations
and revise them, if necessary, to prohibit the siting of
schools, places of assembly larger than X10, OaC square feet
or parks intended to servie people other than those working
or residing in the MIA.
E. No aity or aounty shall amend its land use regulations that
apply to lands shown as RSIi1 on the EmploymEnt and
Industrial Areas Nap to authoriae uses described i n
subsection B that were not authorized prior to July ] ,
2004 .
F Cities and counties may allow di viiisi on of lots ox parcels
into smaller lots cir parcels as flollows
1. Lots or parcels smaller than 50 acres may be disided
into any number of smaller lots or parcels.
• 2, Lots or paraels • 5CI acres or larger may he divided into
smaller lots and parcels pursuant to a master plan
411
Effleatiive 1./16/10 & O1/113/11 3.01 - ell of 131
PAGE 2 EXHIBIT F-1
LU 11-0028
•
411
approved by the city or ccur.ty so long as the
resulting division yields at least ore lot or parcel
ofl at least s(I acres in size.
, 3. Lots or parcels 50 acres or larger, including diose .
created pursuant ta paragraph 2 of this subsection,
may be divided into any number of smaller lets or
parcels pursuant to a master plan approved by the aity
or county so long as at ]least 410 percent of the area
ofl the lot or parcel has been developed with
industrial uses ar uses accessory tci industrial
and no portian has been developed, on is proposed ta
be develcped, with uses described , in subsection B ofl
this section.
4 . Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3 cif this subsecition,,
any lat or parcel may be divided into smaller lots ox
parcels or made subject to rights-ofl-way flox the
following) purposes :
a. To provide public facilities and services;
b. To separate a portion of a lot or parcel in order
to protect a natural resourcie, to pravide a
public amenity, on to implement a remediation
plan far a site identified by the Oregon
Department cif Environmental Quality pursuant tc
OES 469.2251
C. To separate a portian ofl a lot or parae]I
containing a nonaor.forsing use from the remainder
of the lot cir parcel in order to render the
remaindex mare practical for a, permitted use; ox
d. To a3llciw the creation of a lot sclely Dor
financing purposes when the created lot is part
of a master planned development.
O. Notwithstanding suteection B of this section, a city or
aounty mey allow the lawful use of any building, struature
or land at the time of enactment cif an ordinance adopted
pursuant to this section to continue and to empar.d to add
up to 20 percent more float area and 1CI peiraent more land
area. Nc tw ithstanding subsection E of this section„ a city
ar county mays allow division of lots or parcels pursuant to
a master plan approved by the city or caur.tyl prior to
July ]I, 20041 .
® Effective 12/16/10 & 01/13/12 :1.07 - as cf 1311
.FAG E 3 EXHI BIT F-1
LU 11-0028
(Ordinance No. 97-7395, Sec. 11. Amended bS1 Ordfr.iainae No. Cl2-9169H Sec. 5; •
Ordinance No. C14-10433, Sec. 2; Oncliinance No. 1CI-1244B, Sea. 3)
3. 07 .430 Pxoteation of Industrial Areas
A. Cities and counties shall review their land use regul]laticins
and remise them„ if necessary, to include measures to limit
new buildings for retail commercial uses—such as :tosses and
restaurants—and retail and profeissional serviaes that cater
to daily customers—such as finanaial, insurance, real
• estate„ legal, medical and dental offices-in order to
ensure that they sexme primarily the needs of workers in
the area. One such measure shall be that r.ew buildings for
stores„ branches, agencies or other outlets for these
retail uses and sermices shall not occupy more than 9, CIOCI
square feet of sale: or serviice area in a single outlet„ ox
multiple outlets that occupy more than 20, 000 square feet
of sales or service area in a single building ar in
multiple buildings that are part of the same development
project, with the following exceptions:
1. Within the boundaries of a public use airport subject
tci a facilities master plan, customary airport uses,
uses that are accessory to the travel-related and
freight movement activities of airports, hospitality
•
uses, and retail uses appropriate to sexvie the needs
of the traveling public; and
2. Training facilities whose primary purpose is to
provide training to meet industrial needs.
B. Cities and counties shall review their land use regtlations
and remise them, if necessary, ta inalude measures ta limit
new buildings fcir the uses descaiibec in subsection A to
ensure that, they do not interfere with the efficient
movement of freight along Main Roadway Routes and Roadway
Conneatcirs shown on the Regional Freight NetNAork Map in the
Regional Transportation elan. Such measures may include,
but are not limited to, restrictions on access to freight
routes and connectors, siting limitations and traffic
thresholds . This subseictian does nat require cities and
counties to include such measures to limit new other
buildings or uses.
C. No city or county shall amend its land use regulations that
apply to lands shown as Industrial Alrea on the Employment
and Industrial Areas Map to authariae uses described in
Fffectilwe 12/716/101 & 01/13/11 3.(17 - 23 cif 131
PAGE EXHIBIT F=1
LU 11.00218
. • I
subsection AI of this section that Here not authoxized plriar
to July 1, 2(Ig4 .
D. Cities and aounties may allow division of lots ox parcels
into .smalleri lots ox parcels as follows:
1. Lots or parcels smaller than 50 acxes may be divided .
into any number of smaller lots on parcels.
2. Lots - or parcels 50 acres cir larger irayl be divided
into smaller lots and parcels puxstant to a master
plan approved by the city ar county so lang as the
resulting division yields at least one lat or parcel
cif at least 5(1 acres in size.
•
3. Lots or parcels 50 acres on larger„ including those
created pux sivant to paragraph (2) of this subsection,
may be divided into any number of smallex lots or
parcels pursuant to a master plan approved by the city .
or county to Icing as at ]least 40 percent of the area
of the lot or parcel has been developed with
industrial uses or uses accessory to industrial use,
and no portion has been developed, ar is pioposed to
be devieIloXed with uses described in subsection A of
411 this section.
4 . Notwithstanding paragraphs a and 1 of this subsection,
any lot ar parcel may be divided into smaller lots or
parcels or made subject to tights-of-way for the
following purposes : •
a. To provide public facilities and serviioes; •
•
U. To separate a portion of a lot ox parcel in order
to protect a natural rescurce. to provide a
public amenity. or to implement a remediation
plan fon a site identified by the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to
ORS 465.225;
•
c. • Tci separate a Fartion of a lot or parcel
containing a nonconio.iming use from the remainder
of the lot or parcel in order to rendez - the
remainder moxe practical for a permitted use,; ar
411
Effeatilve 12/16) 1C & 01/13/11 J.C171 - 214 of 131
PAGE 5 EXHIBIT F-1
LIU 11-0025
•
d . To allow the creatior of a lot solely for 41)
financing purpases when the created )cit is part
of a master planned development.
E . Notwithstanding subsectior. E of this suction, a city or
county may allow the lawful use of any building, structure
or land at the time of enactment of an ordinance adopted
pursuant to this section to continue and to expand to add
Up to 20 per cent more floorspace and 710 percent more lend
area.
(OrdUnanae No. 97-115IB, Sea. 1. Amender ardflnancea No. 02-969EI,, sleic. I;
ardinanae No. C14-1040B, Sled. :I; Clxdinmae No. ]ICI-11244EI, Sec. 1) .
;I.CI7 .4 40 Protection of Employment Areas •
A. Except as provided in subsections C, !] and E, in Employment
Plreas mapped pursuant to Metro Code section 3. 07 . 130,
cities and counties shall limit new and exapanded commercial
retail uses to those appropriate in type and s.iae to serve
the needs of businesses, emplayees and residents of the
Employment Areas.
•
B. Eiicept as provided an subsections C, D and E, a city or
county) shall not approve a coitercial retail use an an
Employment Plvea with more than mon square feet of gross
leasable area in a single building, or commercial retai]
uses with a total of mare than 60,000 square feet of retail
sales area on a single .lot or parcel , or on aontigjL ous lots
or parcels,, including those separated only ry
transportation right-of-way.
C. AI city' ar county' whose 2onin9l ordinance applies tc an
Employment Area and is ]listed on Table 3. 07-4 may continue
tc authc rime comirercia]I retail uses with more than E(I, CIOCI
Square fleet of gross leasable area ir that aone if the
ordinance authorized those uses on JainuarM 1„ 2003.
D. P.I city or county' whose aoning ordinance applies to an
Employment Area and is nat listed on Table 3. 07-4 may
continue to authori2e commercial retail usEs with more than
ECI, CIOO square feet of gross leasable area in that zone if:
1.• She ordinance authorised those uses on January 1.,,
30C 1I;,
•
Effleiative 12I/16/10 & 01/13/11 1.07 219 of 1.11
PACE 6 EXHIBIT F-I
LIU 11 -0028
2 . Transportation facilities adequlate to serve the
•
commercial retail uses will be in place at the time
the uses begin operation; and
3. • The comprehensise plan provides floc transportation
faaililtiels adequate to serve other uses planned for
the Employment Area oxer the planning period.
E. A city or county i[Ic y authorize new commercial retail uses
with more than 604000 equate fleet of gross lelasab]le area in
Employment Areas if the uses:
71. Generate no more than a 25 percent increase in site-
generated siehicle ti ips above permitted non-industrial
uses; and
2. Meet the Maximum Permitted Parking - Zane A
• requirements set forth in Table 3. 08-3 cif Title 4 cif
the Regional Transportation Functional Elan.
(Oxdinancei No. 97-719Bm Sec. 1. Ameinded b}I Ordinance Na. O2-9(19H, Sea. 5;
0"rdtnance bo. (14-1(140Bm Sec. 21 Ondiinancei bo. ]1(I-11244E1„ Sec. 3) .
3.01.950 Employment and )Industrial Plreas Map
® A. The .Employment and Industrial Areas Map is the oflfiaial
depiction of the ioundar ies of Rlegionally 9ignifliaant
Industrial Areas,, Industrial Areas and Employment Areas).
B. If the Metro Council adds territory to the UGB and
designates, all on part of the ter ritarm Plegic nally
Significant Industrial Area, ]ndustrial Aniea or Emplayment
Area, after completion of Title 7]I planning b1 the
responeiille city or aountyA the Chief Clperating Of ficeni
(COO) shall issue an cider to conform the map to the
b oundaaiies established by the responsible city or county.
The order shall alacl make neaessazy amendments to the
Habitat Consersation Areas Map, described in section
3.01.132C off Title 1: of this chapteni, to ensure
implementation Col Title 73.
C. A aity ar county may amend its comprehensive plan or zoning
regulations to change its designation of land on the
Employment and Industrial Areas Map in order to allow uses
nclt allowed by this title upon a demonstration that:
® Effectli`e 12/1G10 €J 03/33/11 3.01 - 2(1 aft 1:13
PAGE 7 EXHIBIT F4-1
1IU 11-00218
•
]I. 'Ilhe property is not surrounded by land designated on 41)
the map as Industrial Area, Regionally Significant
Industrial Area on a combination of the tuts;
2 . The amendment will not reduce the employment capacity
of the city or county;
if the map designates the property as Regionallm
Signifliaant Industrial Area, the subject property does
not have access to specialised services, such as
redundant electrical power ar industrial gases, and is
rot proximate to freight loading and unloading
facilities, such as trans-shipment facilities;
QI. The amendment would not ally ow uses that would reduce
aff-peak performance on Main Roadway Routes ' and
Roadway Connectors shown on the Regional Freight
Network Map in the- Regional Transportation Plan below
volume-to-capacity standards in the plan, unless
mitigating action is taken that will restore
perforn ante to PTP standards within two years after
approval of uses;
; . The amendment would not diminish the intended function
of the Central City or Regional or Tabor. Centers as the
principal locations of retail, cultural and civic
serviices in theins market areas; and
6. If the map designates the property as Regionally
Significant industrial Alxea,, the property sut_ect to
the amendment is ten acres or less; if designated
Industrial Area, the property slur:ect .t o the amendment
is 20 acres or less; if designates Employment Area,
the property subject to the amendment is 4(1 acres or
less.
D. PI city or ccluntyll may also amend its comprehensive plan or
zoning regulations to change its designation af land on the
Employment and Industrial P.reas Map in order to allow uses
not allowed by this title upon a demonstration that:
11. The entire property is not buildable due tcl
environmental constraints; sir
Flflflec tilve 18/1fl/1C & (111/713/11 a.01 - .I] afl ]191 411/
PIAG B 8 EXHIBIT FI-1
LU 11 -0028
Ill •
2. The property borders land that is not designated on
the map as Industrial Area or Regionally Significant
Industrial Area; and
3. The assessed value of a building or buildings on the
property, built prions to March 9, 2004, and
historically occupied by uses not allowed by this
title„ exceeds the assessed value of the land by a
• ratio of 1. 5 tci 1.
E. The COC shall remise the Employment and Industrial Areas
Map by order to conform to an amendment made by a city or
county pursuant to subsection C or D of this section within
3C days after notificat icin by the ciity or aounty that no
appeal of the amendment was Ailed pursuant to ORIS 997. 935
ox, if an appeal was filed, that the amendment was upheld
in the final appeal process..
F. Plftef consultation with MPAC, the Ccuncil may issue an .
order suspending operation of subsection C it any calendar
year in whish the cumulative amount of land for which the
Employment and Industrial Areas Map is ahangled during that
® year from Regionally Significant Industrial Area cr
Industrial Area to Employment Axlea or other 204(1 Growth
Concept design type designation exceed., the industrial land
surplus. The industrial land surplus is the amount by
. which the current supply of vacant land designated
•
Regionally Significant. Industrial_ Area and Industrial Area
exceeds the 30rfear need for industrial land, as determined
by the most recent "Urban Glrowth Report: An Employment Rand
Need Analysis", reduced by an equal annual increment for
the number of years since the report.
G. The Metro Council may amend the Employment and Industrial
Areas Map by ordinancle at any time to make corrections in
order to Uettex achieme the policies of the Regional
Fraxrework Plan.
H Upon request from a city or a county, the Metro Council may •
amend the Erniployxrent and I ndusttial Areas Map by ordinance
to consider proposed amendments that exceed the size
standards of paaagrapH EI of subsection C of the section. To
approve an amendment, the Council must conclude that the
amendment:
1. . Would not reduce the employment aeparity of the city
or county;
Effective 12/16/1(1 a 01/19/11 3.(17 — 28 cif 1:11
RAGE 9 EXHI BIT F•1
LIU 11.00 218
2 . Would not allaw uses that would reduce off-peak 410
performance on Main Roadway Routes and Roadway
Connectors shown or ,the Regional Freight Aetwork Nap
in the Regional Transportation Plan below volume-to-
' capacity standards in the plan„ unlless mitigating
action is taken that will restore performance to PTP
standards within two years after appraMal of uses;
3. Would not diminish the intended function oil the
Central City or Regional ox Town Centers as the
princiipal locations ..ofl retail„ cultural and civiic
sex vices in their market areas;
9 . Would not reduce the integrity or viability of a
traded sectar cluster oil industries;
% . Would not create or worsen a significant imkalance
between jobs ar.d Housing in a regional market area;
and
C. If the subject property is designated Re9li or ally
Significant Industrial Axea, would not remove from
• that designation land that is especially suitable floc
industrial use due to the availability of aplecia_liaed
services, suah as redundant electrical power or
industrial 9lases, or due to proAimity to freight
transpert faailities, such as trans=shipment
facilities. •
1. Amendments to the Employment and Industrial Areas Map made
in aompliarce with the process and criteria in this section
,hall He deemed to comply with the Regional Framework_ Plan.
JI. THE Council may establish conditionls upon approval oil an
amendment to the Employment and Industrial Areas Nap under
subsection F to endure that the amendment complies with the
Regional Framework Plan and state lane use planning laws .
N By Jlaruary 311 of eacH year, the COO ICCIO) shall submit a
written report to the Council and MPP.IC on the aumulative
effects on employment land in the region of the amendments
to the Emplayment and , Industrial Areas Map made pursuant to
this section during the preceding year. She report shall
includes any reccmlmeindations the COO deems appropriate on
measures the Counail might takes to address the effects .
(anidlir iriae'No. 0`]-1131A, Sec. 21. Mended b.y Ordinance rci. DD-1244B, Sea. 3) .
•
Effleiative 12/10110 8 01)13/1: :1.01 - 09 of 131 •
'PURGE 10 EXHIBIT F-1
LU 11-0028
Table 3.07-4
Clackamas County unincorporated
Commercial d
Commercial Industrial
Lake Oswego
Genemial Cammercial
Highway Commercial
I routdaie
Genesal Commercial
Hillsboro
General Commercial
Sherwood
Genetal Commercial
Tigard
General Commelrclial
Commercial Proflessiana]
Tualatin
Commercial General
Wil onvrille
Planned Development Commercial
(Ordinance t a. 9;1-113B, Sac'. 1. Amendeic by Onc inanca t c. (ISI-9I€9B, Sea. S.
Amendec by Ordinar.cie No. 10-12443, Sec. .1) .
TMTJE 5: NEIGHHCR CI'IIIES
f
Title 5 vs repealed.
(Oxdiinancei No. SI' -71;13, Sec. 1. Rapea]leicl Ord. 10-1a38A, Sea. 4.)
MILE 6: CENTERS,, CORRIIEIORIS, STATION CCMMANITIES AND MAIN STREEITS
3. 0_, . E]10 Purpose
The Regional Framework Plan (RFP) identifiers Centers, Corridors,
Nein Streetfl and Station Communities thnioughclut the region and
1111
0 & (I 13.07. - all
Flflflectivei 1.'I/16/1 1/1311 1 30 131
PAGE 11 EXHIBIT F-1
LU 11-0028
CITY CF LAKE O SWBGO
380 A Avenue
)1r, AO E 3(91
Lak e Clswega,011 910134
_ •
�z
MEMORANDUM NDU�►l�/�,� 523-(35-03101
j[1",l� wwv�.ci.oswieigaarxs
TO: Alarming Commission
FROM: Andy C ulizia,Assciaiate Plannan
SUBJECT: Rnoposed Retail Size limitations in Mired Commerce anc Inc ustnial Rank Zones (HU 9191-CICI2d;
DATE: October 3, 2C111]I
As c atailed in II*a Saptamd ar 30, 201111, staff nepcint,Title 4 of Mei re's Unt an C rowth Management
Runational Alan requires the City 1a limit th a sizes cif retail uses in anaas designated by Title 4 as
"Ulm ployrriant Lanc." Draft!Ordinance 2191191 proposes sEI enal Commu nity Development Code QCDIC)text
amendments to comply with Title 4. Afllen the staff nepcirt was sent to Planning Commissioners, it came to
el
staff's attention that one of the proposes text amemdn ents in th El c rafll ordirianae is a nnecEissary for Title 4
Gorrpliariae. Draft Ordiriaricie 21979 oni€inally proposes a 20,000 square-iloai limitation circ "inaidariial retail
uses° ir the IP zar e, which ane perm itted in LOC 50.13.02011110). In facet,the CLIC alneady lima its the siaes of
"iriaic ental natail uses" in the IP zare ir LCIC 50.113.04015):
''llriaideinl al retaii usiel!i in tile IP<iiteis shad not exceed a tot al of 3,,000 sicluare feet fear an!IL ah uses on
site. in addil iciri incidental retail usiesi are carisudered part of the mart fciaturing busiirieissi arid are not
caloweid additiorial siigrici51ei.'"
This existing Limitation alneady compliers with Title 4. Pt the °dad Eir 110, 201111, public hearing, staff nequ gists
that th El Planning Clommission nevieiw the net,ised Drafll Ordirarae 2975 attaches to 1 h is me morarc u m as
Exhit it A.11.1. The only change is to eliminate the roc a ndant limitation on "incidental retail uses."
EXHIBITS
A-11.1 Draft!Ordinarce 2515, dated 110/01111
DRAT T :I 0A/2011] •
410 DRAFT
CIRDINANCE NO. 2575
AIN ORDINAIN CB OFI THE LAKE 09WEE 0 CITYICCIUNCIIL AMENDING LOC CHAPTER 90
•
IICOMMUNITY 0 EVELORM ENT CODE), ARTICLE 50.11110 LIMIT THE SQUAIRE FCICITIAIGE CIA
REMAIL USES IN THE MIMED CICIMMERCE(MC)ZONE,, ARTICLE 90.13 TCI.LIMIT THE SQUARE
FCIOIIAIGE CIA RETAIL USES IN 11H E INDUSTRIAL FIAIRK(IP)ZONE„ AIN D AIDOP11ING BINDINGS ILU
11-0028).
W h eneas,1I-e City of Lake Clswego is reiquinec by Metno Code to demonsl rale compliance w ith
Metro Title 4 (Inc u stnial anc Other Employment A fleas; of the Wit ari E rowth M ana€lenient
Ru ncil ional Plain; anc
WF areas, Metflo Til le 41 1Metiia Cloc a 3.07.410- .4I5 01 negc,fres the CO y to impose limits an 1 h El
sqL are footage of retail a ses in c esignatec areas and
W h areas, tit El Community Development Code c OEIS riot cis rrenitly limit tF e squane footage of
certain relail u ses in areas regulatec by Metna Title 4;
The City of LEINEl Osti eau ordains as follows:
Section is Section 50:311.0110 of the Uake Clswego Code is hereby amendec Fy ac ding the tel
sh own in L old. u nderlinlec type, as follows:
2. Retail Sales Raoc :
Cl. Delicatessen, no table service.
Uses: P Specie!District Limitaliaris for Permitilec Use
NCI,GCI, HCI, CIC, EC,CIR&D ar d i1Noi to exceed 2CI,CI0(I sq.ft.flown area in CIR&D arid MCI zanEis)
N CI
_ D. Specialized food stores.
Special Dietrich Limitations for Permitiled
Uses: P X
Dal
NCI,CICI, HCI, EC, MC OCI, CIR&D (Not to exceed 20.000 sa.ft.floor area In
MCI zariei)
EXHIBIT A-1.1
®
CIrdinianat Na.2`.115 LU 11 (l(1.28
Hager 1 afI?I
DRAT I 10/21/12011 •
E. Bakery-where fi akec iboc s manufactured elsewhere are sold on the premises.
Uses: I P Special Distriat Limillations fan Peuimittlec Use
NC,CC, HC, OCI, ECI,CR&D and QNcr to eNceec aO,O(la sq.ft.floor area in C R&D anc MC sones;
MC
41. Retail Sales- Resstaurant%%, Drir kir c Places:
A. Restaurants,with orwilhcu,t assoeialled lounge.
Uses: I P Special District Limitations tlor Remitted Use
•
NC,CC, F 0, OC, EC,CR&D anc 11Not'ae)Gee d.ICI,CIO(I sq.f1.flooi area in CR&D and MC
MC aortas;
C. Bat at cocktail_loun9e nctl_aasociiateid_wiith restaurant; uses with retail malt beverage license.
Users: I • P X Special District Limitations for Permitted Use •
IGC, HO, EC, MC INC, 00 anc CR&D I(Not to exceed 20.000 sa.ft.floor area in MC zones!
Section 2. Section 90.113.025 of the Lake Oswe®o CocEl is hereby art ereEIC ty adding 11 El lent
!It own in bold. underlined tvae, as follows:
a. Retail establish merits wh rah dineeitly anc prier anily rincm is e gooc si arc sieNicies to
employees arc businesises in 11"El inc i strial park, no11 to exceed.2C1.000 sou are feet.
]. Retail sales oil tires, t atteriesi arc rr otor‘Aehiele aaaessories. not to exceed 3(1.000
square feet.
Cl dinancre No.2l57!
Pep 2 of1:1
DRAHTI l 03/20l1
® Sleclion S.The.City Cm mail h ereby ac opts the F inc ings and Conclusions U-11-0028-
at1 ached as DE ibis 1.
graded al the meeting of the Lala Oswego City Council of the City all Lake Oswego helc on the
day of 2011.
AYE'_I:
NCIES:
ABSENT:
A BSTIA I N:
EXCUSED:
Jacek D. Hoffrrari, Mayon
4110
Dated:
ATTE'_I11:
Rot y n Chnistie, City Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Da N id D. Powell
City A ttarrieiy
® Otic inane No.21575
Pagci 21 ofI
BAKE O SWBGO REDEVELOPMENT AC ENCYI
LAKE o'.IwHGO
• Centennia11914•]010
3f1a1AAvemiei
I nn
PC I Hax 3691
Bakes Clsweigci,ORI 9110134
•
REUBVEJO PMBNT '�c1.1-6;151-_191fs4
www.ci.oswego.orxis
AGBNCYI REPORfII
710: Rlanning Commission
HROM: Jane Blackstone, Economic Development Manager
Debra Alridreadeis,, AICP, Seniors Planner
• SI BJECT: Downtown Reding SltL dy f RR 1]I-00112]
OATS: Octot err 3, 20111
•
ACTION •
Review tF ea Dow ntow ni Rank ing Stuc y and Recommenc aatioris.
® INTRODUCTION/BAICKE ROU NO
Early in ;1009;, the Lake Clswegca C F amber of Commerce initiated th e Strategic Business Alliance, a group of
c'om'mit,nity stakeholders representing tF e City, School District, business owners,, and developers.It e
Alliance condi cted a roundtable disci,ssiion to El)plona economic develcaprrient needs and aspirations for
• Lake Clswego. Among the issues identified di,ring this disciusision, and later in development of th e April
20110 Economic Development Strategy,, were downtown parking est,pply wind parking regi irements fon new
development. Developers had cited City parking regi,irements as an impac invent to redevelopment in tF e
downtown', parties,larly for redevelopment of smaller parcels, where they believe ilFe on-site parking
reqs,iremeMls can k El a c eterrent to developrrient of high-quality projects. Downtown retail and nestaurant
owners raisac concerns at out tF e availability of pall ing for custorriesrsi.
Tb respond to ilF ese concerns, tF e Lake Oswego Redevelopment Agency QLORA] contracted with Rick
• Williams Consulting QRW C] to conduct a downtown' park ing study.At the March 20111 LORA Board meeting,,
Mr. Williams presentee the sti dy findings, including analysis of puking supply, demaind,, and usage, along
. with recommendations for panking management arc potential policY'and code ciF angel. At the direction of
tF e Board, staff prepanec a Downtown Parking Study Implementation Rlan which was presentee to the
Board.on September 26. At tF e same meeting,, the Board directed staff to begin the implementation
process by presenting the Slti dy to the Planning Commission for disci;sssiors and feedback.
DISCUSSION
SDowntowns Ranking Sticv Fine ines
The downtown parking study condi cied by RW C analyzed tF e actual downtown parking supply and
Page 2
demanc di ring peak h our use. It nevealed several key fincings:
• Cln-street parking favors long-term parking, with E14%of the s1 pply allowing four hours cir more.
• Cln-street peak hoi r occupancy is 49.3%, lea%ing 394 stalls empty.
• Cuff-street parking is largely in private control, with peak occii pancy of 61.6%, leaving 832 stallsi
empty.
• Th e average parking stay in one-hour spaces is one hour and 19 minutes,, making one-h oun spaces
sielf-c efeating.
• evaluating parking demand downtown on a mixed-use basis, peak parking demanc is about 1.E17
stallsi per 1,000 siquare feet of building space.
• The code req,lues minimi ms of uFI.to 9.518 stalls per 11,000 square feet,with 114 different standards'.
Based on th esie finc inns, RWC recommends sih ort and lori8eir-term strategies that will support a vit rant
downtown. Ti ey include:
• Pblic y recommendations; e.g., adoption of criteria'for decision-making re@lane ing parking;
• establishment of parking management zones;; and nossiibly limiting fi ture surface parking
development in downtown tci achieve a balance t eitween parking availability and parking ti moven;
• Simplification of deveiloprr era t code requirEirr er tsl;e.g. consider downtown as a '"rriixEid isle district"
to reduce ni rrber of categories for parking requirements lEisultinl in a nossit le reduction of the
minimum parking ratios,; and, 4111
• Mlanagerr ent recommendatior si,; e.g., establish rrent and staffing of a parking management
program,; re-format of the on-street parking supply to favor ai stomer demand and manage Icing-
term employee or park-and-ride parking; stronger parking enforcement; EDI nloration of shared-use
agreements fore access to surplus parking in private off-street lots; and oth Eir t est practices'for
parking rrianagemert. .
The Downtown Parking Study findings and recommendations are summari2ed on the slide sih ow inciludec
asi Attachment 1, and described in more detail in the full report inch ded asi Attachment 2.
•
lb address'these recommendations, the proposec Downtown Harking Slti dy Implementation Plan
IIAttachment 3) incluc es three phases of work. Ti e first phase focuses on policy recommendation's' and th e
second anc third phases address parking management necommerdaticinsi. Hor each ph ase;, the
Implementation Plan incluc es a pi blici process for incorporating input frcirri adjacent neigh bor h clod
associations; downtown property owners', businesses anc residents;c owMow developers and tither
stakeholders.
Title El (Metro) Compliance
ny amenc ment to thEl code with regard to parking reduirerrentsl must be in compliance with Metro's Title
6 which requires city code to encoi rage mired-i se, pedestrian friendly and transiit-si pportive
development. One way to dci th i5i isi to neck ae regulatory t arriers to miffed use, pedestrian-friendly and
transit sit pportive development 13.07.62011Q]. The potential code amendments recommEindec in the
Pager 3
Parking SItL dy aria rn eant 1 o support a si cicessful doH ntow ri Ix;siness distniai that is pedestrian fniendly.
SItaff will return to th e Commission al a later c ate fon discussion regarding specific amendments.
Staff requests inpL t from the Commission on the details of th El Flanking Stuc y,, pnoposeic F1arN ing
m anagem ant measures, and fL ture implementation steps.
AMC H MENUS
1. Lake Oswego Downtown Parking Study Hindirigs & Flamm miendations I slide preseiritatiorn
2. City of Lake Clswe®ci 20110 Parking REl oL rcie Assessment, Downtown Parking Sit dy Zonae 5i rr rr ary
REI port
3. Downtown Harking Hrojeci Proposec Irr plemeritai iori Plan
111)
S
LEIJAND CON SULTING G ROUP
S
_ •
. - Ill
LAKE OSW BGC DCWNTCWN RARING EMU DY
PIN DINGEI & RECOMMENDATIONS
F iek 111 IIIIams Cann king)
1( Octa bE II 2011
I
RROBLEIM STA11HriEN11
1. llhe ionmiat 01 parking dom ntlown dcies not meet existing
Matron needs or best k enefit t usirless acilh itly
21. llhere is riot c1 plan car strategic programa in place thall
resrionds on adapts tcl changes in derrlanc or land use
3. Curnent narking management is noil grounded in
irid u si ry besil practices
4. Current policy and coc a may be causing unintended
barriers that:
Make c evelopmenll mane difilici It arid costly
Bnlcourag es Iciw de risity denrelilaipmerll cove rltaiwrl
11 Octlbd 2711 - --__ -
LOSWEGO DOWMFON1I PARKIN( g1d11 canwumy 2
LW
ATTAC HMENT 1
■
PR 11 -0012
LRed Hstarle StrnIteglists • wrvw.lelandcoonsuilting.com 1
LBLAND CONSULTING GROUP
S
E11L DY APPROACH
Data
• Objective assessmant of au rrent use
•
dynamics
— -
• Use c ata 10 adc iiess penceirec arid
aril iCi patec problems it current parking - -1
1 manElgemeril and parking po iay
IV anagaimaint
• Derelori immediate, near,mic and long-
lerm sl rElegies fan test uses management - _
cifparHngsippI .
ail! - - WM)
Policy 8 Coca re. •
▪ Reacummenc changes to paha)!arid aoc e
1hal bailer aamcilemerit anea r ision
Octbed 21111
RIP MIMIC ConsullUma
tP4 IOSWEGO DOWNTOWN PARKING FIJOY
PARIIINC STUDY AREA
• IN 733 On-s1 neat spaces
- ,•• a
14• A
ra
2. 2,169 Off-street spaces
-15-t dOft-r,
ci
vfl„ 0513‘‘
"
kait;;;04 3. 93 cuff-street parking
•-
sites
'r z
-ft-INZA;f
Jit roo
L44"9 c115.
tr
4 -I A
October 2011
Rid WHIlined Conrail nil 4
LP&OSWEGO CONN OWII iM11 ING INDY
U . - —
Im Real Estahl 6.1trattigistd • www.lekaidconsultinbcom 2
LELAND CONSULITING GROUP
•
KEY PARKING ANALYSIS FINDINGS
3 On-stneei planking favors lang-term planking (€1491 of su pplly 4 hat.rsl ai moue)
3 On-stneel PIE ak haul'accupancy=49,3%(leaving 394 stalls err plty)
3 Off-stueet peak accupancy=€111.6% (leaving 832 stalls empty)
3 11-Hour stalls cue self defeating(menage time stay 1 hiy ifl minutes)
Mrljcrrity (80+98)of aff-stlleel suPFlly(av ailabilit)I)is in pnivzit e cclntrcil
`Cc Ire Zane"on-street is 85% accuFliec,bit mostly with errIpllayeeIs planking all day
3 Acltual peak pinking dElmand is about 11.871 stalls ren 11,0001 SR-ccic a requires
moliEi as a minimum
3 "Atundani"parkirlg exists,just need beton format and managerrlelnt
3 PeEld bath rinaguarn anc ecice basec strategies
11 Oclobd 2111
W2OSWEGO WNNTOMl PAWNS ODI AN k Winsome Cannel n41 5
111
PARKING FORNAT
Downtown Lake Oswego Pad Ing Stall Breakout
On-S1ree1111taisby Type ' Nunlbeso Stalls %c ITotaISlat 1
19 mit utee 3 <3%
1 F ow 121 19.794
1 2 hour 151 1.9.9%
4 hours 74 9.591
6 hour 6 <1%
No l im l 411 53.49E
Elec ric Vehk:M a Only 2 <1%
C h-Itreet Pdrkkl g Silalls 777 100%
Pub Id Of-Steal St Ile(1 at el) 93] 2dI.19E
F rivate Oftdlreel 91 alk 037 site e) 1,637 79.59E
Ta tad 0)1-ideal Narking Stalls 2,16!1 100%
Tot 19upply Surveyed 3,946 413,019
415 spaces(on 53%)a ne No Limit stalls.
Very t Igh penia n to ge 01 the on-street syst em del icaled 10 long-lerm use In a grow ing net it cone
• CInly 217 stalls(35.6%)provided a s tl a dItionah shorn ste Is(1 812 HR).
• A sign'fiica nt n tin be r al oft-street'facilities(92 sites)in a El t lock a nea.
III October1111 -.--__
LONE a MECO DOWNTOWN Pei PM sruli 1 Niel WAIS mi Conaunini 6
41
Real lista ti 5trategj,lis• wurw.lelandcorau ting.com 21
LELAND CONSULTING GROUP .
ill
PARKING USE: ON-S11REE11
00wn89wn Late. .. 1 ea-0n w«t Slab Only
Peak Vehicles Stags AVans
Type of Stan sof SePea Hour
Occupancy Parked
A1aYble lerlplh of
le mohr) Star
MI Stalls 777 2'��'eh 49.3% 383 394 2hr/22 min
Uwe by Uneasy
15 minutaa 1 Noon-1 SM 100% 0 0 N/A
Vein. 12 Noon-1 PM 44.3% 54 68 1 M/19 min
2 hours 1'11 11 PM-11001 51.6% 80 75 .1 NI 11 mir
4 hour 74 3PN-3 PIN 58.19 41 31 1 h,fall min
6 hour I 10 AM-3 PM 100% 6 II 3 h,141 min
Na Uml 41 1 PN-1 PN 52.0% 216 199 3 hr/91 min
Vid: 2 NM I 091 0 1 NIIA
olVel id:
Pdal hour occupelnc) of 49.21%(betweein 2:00613:00 Ph)-3514 empty stalls
ANelIage stay dcwnlown is 2 hat rs/2:I minutes(includes longterm par!ers in
avellage)
Alveir ge 1 itr a sta in"visa oil ste IIs"is less I han 9( minutes
• 1 HFI stalls aIle nal applIciIpnialelto need(1 hacn/191 minutE avena@e stay)
14%-22%nal a of vialae ficin al signed ste Its
Ll
L�AS OSWEGOOD0WN1ow8 IAaSNGSIWWY Rick Williams c:.omuMng 7
S
PARKING USE: ON-STREET
Lake Oswego Hourly Parking l/t Ilization
an-Seleet Oecupenc es(777 su Iia)
10% -
90% -
49.2% 48.5% 48.5% 48.6% 49.3%
SO% 01.6% 43.8%
40.7%
40%
iiiiiillii 32.9% 32.9%
0%
9 am. loam. 11w. 11pmm fpm- 3 pmi 3p ma 4pm- Spml %Am-
11 am Harr. 1:I pm fpm Spm Spm 4pm Ppm 6pm fpm
l 1,4E13 total vehicles pankeid betweein 9 AM and 71PM (Iciw nurnt:ElfIl
4 Average 4.2 limns per stall per cEiy
10 October 1011 -
LAOOSWEOIIOaWNO5N8AMIHOSTUDY
Rick Williams I 8
10
Real Estate Strategists • www.lelandconsulting.com 4
LELAND CONSUL TING GROUP
•
PARKINC USE: C N-STREET
� _
n
' irl-
Panty ing available on
" most k locks.
, Jilt
,, _,
N Corlcentnation of
. II
,� activity in SE corner of
I- _ town.
1111111:7
Most of
Je ~ --_ activity is at "No Limit
stalls (likely Eimplclyees
e1 a,.ebbwwrnw Oma*
Blair Mies Consultni .4 oa
rt rmMs
-
. , ,.a,l w. .1 I eo..a
RM..TYR7ed-rvbn 'T` 0 4.0
Neal COw 7Nie
1100o1er2111 111 N WBBIItae Con ratting 9
1.*OSYII000OYMONNPAPoONG MAY
0
PARKING USE: ON-STREU11TURNOVER
City Number at On-Street 5 to IN F it.of lurnovir
Beaverton,0 R 940 4 70
Bend,Ofl I 120 I 7.80
n I Ewen,Vl I 9.17
MINN raL 01 S 5< I 4 9(
Hood N Her,01 I 8.00
KI$dand,VIA 359: 8.60
Lae Oswegol C R 777 -_. 4.21
Milwaua ie,OR ...,_.. I
6
.0(
Om,on Qty,ON 3'.I7 I 470
Radnlcad.WA 7 1 I 3.73
Salem,01 :,711C I _ _ 3.97--_
SO am,WIA 1,915 I 630
9p,ngl end,ON 641 I 7.871
Vance over,VIA 051 icon) I 9.E8
/Baseline stand vic is 5.0ii tci support activey vitE I stud level atllracl ivanass
11 Oclobd 2111 ••
LAKE 4SY0000o5W11090 PAM HNC 51001 pet Mimi Ce Haul Ins 10
LReal L sitate 51trategisits • u7wwlelulndcor sulting.com El
LELAND CON SULI I1NG GRID UP
PARKING USE: OFF 11REE11
accluparicy,
Typed Stoll it allot II dire Pni MaiMoor CampingCamping I Peds Ong I
IMI I I 1141-24°01 I 'IL" I ea I E'S�lecially FlrivatEl,
ala kills I lals
Idyl hints I FL I 1637 I 1 -Sal pm I 07.6% I 6811 I
rp00tich e 930 I iA0-i:d,m 141% I 131 I Masi parking is
acciessony/
Lake Mew Hourly Padang Udiisatioa nestricltec
Off-Wed OccupencyCompariscr
■P.�..ere ■Dublin
&11 ga Oppcirti nity to
lo% I E 111111
m A $m E e n
. A . 4 f 'shale ofil-stneei
6011
r" Flanking to 1lreEl a Fi
an-si neeit fon visitors
3011 i
3011 N
1011 I e 83';I 9tall.l Elalrity irl
0%2 peal+ h ou r
Semi 10w-
11.n 13pnl1 Ipn. 2pm• 3pn11 aprn Svc I pm•
• loon 11011 13prn fpm 2., Spm Ipm 5e, it pm 7pw.,
11 Ottobd 2011
Loa 0000wkraxNPAlene'SNbI WORwlRlell�Col .s':r 11
PARKING USE: ACI1UAL DEMAND
I i I i I I I it I I I
Site a Gross a boss Tota Total Actual R arking
in Square Estimated Square 9talb Bullt Ratio SUIh Rath of .Demand'
9tudll Footage Vacancy Footsie in of Pdrk/ng Parket Pank ng w/]S%
Zone (Bulb) Rate ( yPiec) Study (GSR) in Peal Demandil 1 offer
Zdne Houn 1,000 SII
1,138 Am 1,011,521 2.65,11,000 1.63,11,000 1.81/1,000
106 9F 5% 9F 3,019 9F 1'T64 9F SF
' 1.1 million SH of built cammElnc ial laric use
• Flnoviding parking at 2.EI9 stalls pan 11,000 SF
Actual demaric for parking is 1.63 stalls pen 1,000 SIR
• Fou most part,City1 uequ ires a minimum of L87 stalls
•
per 1,000E Fl fciii neer dEvelopmeni,moue than ad u al
• peaM demanc
Ottober2011
tg166%EG41301WRIMIIMOW Sr110Y•
I�alllitBerrCawlninR 12
—
110
L■I
Real Eiiatel. trailegiiis• rouraa.ilelandconsultinll.com
LELAND CONSULTING GROUP
•
PARKING USE: ACTUAL DEMAND
Gap between parking
Actual dualActual oa,uad/ required and actual 5F 1.000 SI parking demand
(for every 1.000 gsf)
saion,o5 415 L16 u
SCR L 77-11 LII-Ll
Ca.Sk Ct 2.5 Ll0 03e i
Fwlsga L Lai Li i
Hood■ar,41 1.55 Lfl OJL
4r1W1,55R as LSO 0.52
Lake Oswego 2.65 1.63-1.87 0.78-1.02
dTIP1C1211 1m Li s7
Bildrnand,1111 no01.10 Wit 2H. 0.!-Ln
loam CI 2.5 LSO 1A
Won= 111 1n L11
1m/514 L5Y 175 675
3110011114111 Lr 1.11-135 Om-177 I
Yao25/ L10 LI
• Ckeobuild is common to cities yin high aonaeniraiion of
sunilace parking.
• "Right sizing" becomes an issue(L lit an Ilona'and cost)as
flutune parkin€ need tonsil ions to structured llacililies.
Iv'7 ctoLer:`U I I
Lehr S"IL.. 0 iANIIWN MHRF N�..iilll• VIl5b11O Cons, 13
•
CHALLENGES IN EXISTING PARKING ENVIRONMENT
• Panking is rlol "formatted" appropriately 1cin a dowrltchn n sl riving Ian
retail vittiarlcl}.
• Rate cid 1L raver art-stneet is 4.;4, Elf"Guild ba at least 5.0+
minirnu m.
• Lals cif available stalls, but most parking is fluivate/acice_=rsory (rlaac
"sfi ar€ic Lses")
• Naac a plan to trlarlsitiorl amplayees ofil-stneet OVEIII time and Park 8
Ric Euls cit 1 of dowrltciyn rl.
• Parking stark arc s are complex, need la be sirnplifiec. Cunrent
minim m reciu inemarlls EixnEIEic acts al cemonslnated c emarlc.
• NEIV\ sL rianEi Icits SI oulc be IimitEic or prior it itEic in tl"El futl ra
• 8 cialicy uaclommerlcatiarls arc ;5 management uaaommerlcaticirls
fcill fL1 L Ila Council clar1sic Elllatiarl.
L70moonr'G`i Rick Williams 14
-HE air, C".rr:�Ircar•i,,,r:G'
•
Real Estate Strategists • www.lelandconsulting.com 7
LELAND CONSULTING GROUP
8EY STRATEGY RECOMMENDAIIIONS - POLICY LEVEL
■ 9slablisr 3 parking mana€emenil '. ..
acmes to bettleii olden palrkirig by -
c emanc E nc Flu rpcise.
• Adopt the 85°i°Rule as a formal � .
otic foul eva lu ation cif,arid deciisioni - •
ma king far,the parkin€ supply.
• Designate a Downtown Parking
Cdorc iriataii and Parking Committee
to mania€a anc ciommu nica to pu k lia
Park irig assets. � 0000.. mrmrr°m
.00..10 maw=w= I
■ Simplify key c ev elopmenl r ` .100M
raga iiiementS tci create a more MO0 ,,;�,�
dev elopmerit friendly clot El. �.:�,m °--n000 - `5555""
• Limit ft 1 u re EIL rfaca park iri€ .='A"I `SO L55M1 =FM-. 50.35.411-11.11
dev elopmerit in dow ritcrw n -- - -r - �
_.:�.�.'m.,.,d��..,�.,.•,-0000-:.....�.»._
_...-0000.-..�....�_._..•�...
10°clotr 2011
UN MEG DOY9411:1141 HARMS STUDY Melt WIIIh.ri l Cos uRlnp 1 5
I
KEY E111RA11EGY RECOMMENDATIONS - MAMAGEMEM11
• Re-orc er th a an-stneeit su ri ly to
simplify unc erstaric ing,€i%1 El .d i ii1 ors CITY 011 SPRINGIIELD DRAFT SIGN PACKAGI
priority and manage employees anc MARCH Xtil
pa rk&riders gone Ala rid Zone B, ON SIR■E SIGNAGE
tom A
• Develop an on-street employee)
permil Kpio€ram(Zane B)to ciond rol
long-term use of an-street supply anc
disaau ria€e"Klark& ride poactl in€" 2 k CIUll 3 NdUR
!M lme m"■ 8m- Fr
• Strenglheri parking enfarciement as `�► `�►
E rinropiiiate
001 Sing SIGMAS!
■ Explore sfi a nec use agreeiment~I for
cm mew PARK
acicess in ril ivate iota
■ Eliminate aculessory designations foil '°Ica r FREE
privatd parking
rip
I;i room mx■mok..SM11ND eat,°II
to OclDbmr Zlit
MIS Wffilisins Consulting 16
LAE SWEGO Df WON WNW:TIDY
S
•■
Real E;late Sltrategii is r www.lelandconsudtinl€.wm
LELAND CONSULITING GROUP
I aY STRATEGY RBCC M M ENDJAIIIC N S - MANAGEMENT
❑ Davelap a Resic ante!'Ranking Hermit 3one(RPRZ)
program fcin adcipl ion by the City Cau ncil Ian ful ure
implementation in nesicential areas afilc(cled by -
spillover finalacimmeroial park ing gi.e.,'Jane C. e-P
❑ DENelciq anc install a signagEl pad age'all unifanm
c esi€n,logo and dolor at plutl lia anc pinivatel(sharac
use)afflslneel panty ink facilities.
a Dewlap a)le)aammencec package of inclaniives far ""°e,
1hel private c avedaplment cd plutlicly availahlel planking. 48t Ypa448 ma— .,
• Floor Are'Ratio(NAR)ton uses
• Height ton uses
• Pim rt tee wail ierr i jT 'a
• Irepaci Ilea weWars
• SUP PlYiIrevenueage(menu '41f�
-
• Uease/acqu'NEI sl ratelgically lacateld lane parcel s)foll
usei as ful ure plutl lic aFilstrelelt parking in ihela
c owntawn.
• Build new structure( supply
11 canter l 11
uu¢osvaloDOWNTOWN rnnwNSSTAY RIW WWeem ContWtInll
S
NBXTSTEPS
1. Public outreach
2. Finalize data finc iris
3. Refine smote gies and re commenlc atiorls
4. Compile final re porl c raftl
5. Acceptance yr applioval ty Planning +
Commission anc City Cou roil
6. Plan impllementatiorl
III October 2111
uvaoswe0000ue OM ruaaeislum• Riot Wil tens Coneunlee 18
1.
Real Eatdtel,Strailegi:Its a wevru.lelanaconsulfngl.com SI
LELAND CONSULTING GROUP
S
Bi ilding�.Integrity.
RICK WILLIAMS CONSULTING
6'0 SW Alder Steel Suite 122
Furl a r d Oregon
91205
p 503.236.6441
Rick.williams@ bpmde i.con
•
•
•
S
■
Real Estate Strategists • urww.lelandconsulting.com 10
CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
OREGON
2010 Parking Resource Assessment
Downtown Harking Study Zone
SUMMARY REPORT
Plreipauec liar:
City of LakE Oswego CR
380 p Them E
Post Clfficie Box _1E19
LE kE Oswego, OR 97(1.14
Brant Williams
Llirectorl of&orlorn is 81 Capital 11Er\eloprr ant
Nuepaneic Ey:
Rick Williams
6]ICI SW p Iden 51treet, Suil El 113311
Flcrrtlarld, Oregon 973(19
Rick Williams, Principal
Owen Rorlcihelli, Project Manager
LAKE OSWEGO
Centennial 1910-2010
irv-
MARCH 2011
ATTACHMENT 2
PP 11 -0012
Tadle of Conllelntsl
•
Section I: Background 1
Sector II: Replan! Ronme1 1
Section III: Flu lipase oftHEl Parking Ini%entorylArialysis 3
Section IV: Stuc y Area 3
Section V: Methodology 4I
Section VI: key Data Findings 9
Section VII: Format of the Barking Su Fnnlly 9
Section VIII: Characteristics cif tH El Barking Supply—Clombined Study Area fl
Section IX: Characteristics ail III a Banking Si.pply—I-igh Ocicuparicyl Ncic El 119
Section): Rarking Demarc Analysis 311
_'lection XI: Conclusions-Data Analysis 341 Ili
_'lection XII: A FIFlnoad- to Parking Management ala
'lection XIII: Problem Eli atement as
.lection XIV: Strategy Recommendations ala
Election XV: Conch skirl—Parkin®Mana€lemer 1 4141
Elect ion XVI: Checklist- Implemerd ation Elchec ale 419
Election XVII: Parking Management Plan—Operating Principles 9CI
Election XVIII: Su mmaryl 91
0
4110 2010 Ranking Resource Assessment
Downtown Parking' Study Zon e
I. BACKGROUND
In every'cavi rilciv,in parking is a .) — .
central issue to the Clity� and its '� "' ''�
--
staid eholc ens as they plan fcir, and • 4. ' ',-- `` ,�
anticipate,11-El c owntciwri's circ- i � ; Y '� ` r 1
€lairi€I economics Si aCEIS5. TH El nElEIC -e f • - r `-`
to understaric both the perception .., _ ,,'!R, .rte,,
ar d reality of parking is essential if a f `r �� �y �"
ciomprE H ensivEI,effects%El and +Ito 411,silt
successful flanking management . ' •.`• 'A. ,
®� ''
r- ,. 1 / gam,_.
strai egy is to be developec aric - > ' . '- s 1
implemented. r.. -�` *` '
TH is Reiplcirl presser's the findings �, i ,4 \ -
anc recommendations cif 1F e 2C11I0 • - 1
Lc wr 1 own Lake G<iwego Parking - ' f 4,r• V `1
_'tsdy. TH El City erisagec tH El study
with 1F El fli[Time of establisF iris an F F( o Courtesy of Leland Consulung Geo,p-20]0
II objeciliva uncenslandirigcif the
cu.nnenit c ynamicis cif flanking in 1F El c owntown and adjacent c EVE lopment aneas. TH Eire was also intErieisl
in u sing that understanc ins to rev iEiw, nefinie and neccimmenc potential rev isiciris tci both parkin€I pcilicy
anc the de%elcipment cm El. Finally, new parkin€I straieigies aric mana€Iemeri planning are desined to
assu ne that the existing parkiri€I sy stem is cocirc inai EIC a sing best piaci ices 1F at lead to€Ineater efiliciiency
of the parkins supply and anticipate)accommodate new growth in it e c al/trial/tin.
This replcirl fcicw ses cin Eisi al lishmeni of a clean inc enstanding of the neality of cu rre nt planking dynamics
in c owntown Lake Clswe€Ici. The data findings, recommendations and sl rategies au tlinec in i H is report
are irtended to t e u SEIC 'ICI maximize the parkins supply and stnatesicially plan fan 1F El luta ne.
R. REPCIR11 BC RM PIT
Major fine iriss aric reciommendai ions from the study anc ar aly xis ane presented herein. Sections al itis
report summary primary'wank tasks assciaiatec with i F e aplpinovec scciple cif work 'cin 1F e stu dy.TH Else
include:
Data c ohleci,icir i(Sections h I-XI)
• Compnehensive Inventoy cif tH El Parking Supply
• Detailed su mmay of parkin€I u tilizai ion Con and off-street)
• Analysis cif actu al park it€1 c E mar c
I
1 cikei Osw eicic —2(110 Pcarkir gl Reisc urce Asieissmen l
Parking Management(Sections'XIII—XVII)
•Holicy and coc El analysis—with reciammeir c atiar s
11 De%elapmer t of stnategy neciammeir c atiaris
Implleimeritatior cih ad list
Implemental for Framework—C gaol ing Plninaip leis(Section XVill)
11 Deiv eloplmer t of operal ing princiiples 10€lL ide ar c frame stnategyi impleimenta1 ion
A sL mmary of the major findir gs/reiciommendal ions with in eacif work 1 ask is pnavided t clow.
•
•
•
Rick Williams :'onsultinq Pcigei�I
Pc rkir g& Tnc r spurt atiar Demar c Mc r ac emer t
Lakle Oswe gc —2010 PcirMirg REisau raei Asse.fl fi me nt
• DATA COLLECTION
III. PURPOSE!OF 11H 9 PARKING INV 9N TOIivI AN A 1.11915
To di rive objective inform atior I and a ata necessary to a eve clop and im p le im ent a comprehensive,
efjective ana workable parking managers int plan for Downtown Llake Oswego. The packing
management plan will maximize the parking supply ana strategically siupplort the deivelopmenit of a
vibrant,growing and attractive aestirlation for shopping, working, living,remotion ana
einiertair Irn ent.
Th a pi lipase of a park iris u tilizatian study is la c wive a clomFlreh ensiv a and c etaileld u nc e11191 andins cd
ad i al use c ynamicis and access characteristics assaaiatec with Flanking in 1F El c awrii awri. Impart ant
elements of th is sed ion include:
Ill) DElvelaFlmerIt of a dal a l emplate for all panking in tH El study area,c ending all parkins stalls, ty
time stay type,for both on and off-street facilil lEis.
13) A ciamplete su rviey cif or arc off-s1 neet parkins a se on a typical day.
I3) Analysis cif Flanking utilization and to nnover dial inch.c ec:
a. Qu antificiation of the entine sl u c y anea parking in%entory.
t. Hourly aaciu pantry cou ri1 s(9:00 AN —7:a0 AN)for on and aff-streel inventory.
IIc. Pankingtunnoveranalysis Ion-street).
c. Parking du nation cd stay analysis Marl-stneet).
a. Derivation oft a ilt parking supply to total IL ilt squ are footage Qi.e.,1 ru a pankirg demarc
ratio).
I4) Identification cif surpluses arc cionstnaints within 1F e Flanking supply
In sH ort,1 h e Flu imams of th a parking u tilizatiarl stuc y was to produce a succinct analysis of exist ing
parking cymimics in Dawrilciwn Lake Cswega 1h at car be employed over time to support and infcmm
decision-making redaleic 1a C EIV elaFlmerIt arc parking.
IV. Sill CIY AREA
Th a paging irlvertory study area was c eterminec in 1F a initial project scoping process and in
aoondinatiarl with the(lily cif Lake Oswego and the consultant team. THEl study area cerllEMI on the
commercial heart of tH El downtown. TH El area's outlying boundaries exterlc to 6'h Streel ciri the west,
State S1 reet ar 1F El east, Lake Bay on the south and or tH a rlortd C Street I etween list arc 5th and D
5ltreet between 111 arc State. An additional portion all the stu c y ]orle exterlc s south along State 511'met
to Oswegcl Village)MI opping center ircorpora1 ing tH El business EIS that frcirli along tH a cornic cm.
IF El study zone is ready w F Idly contained in the city's I rbarl Rerlewal A nea and is reflective of the City's
uric erstarc ins cif current parking activity arc laric use c ensil ies in tH is area. Qu antifyirlg parking acii iv ity
within 1h is Jane pravic es a cicimpreH ersivel look al parking patterns,l rents arc surplusage eficits within
. c awnitawn area. Aigure A, I slow, pnavic es a€lnaphic representation of tH a study ansa.
Rick Williams Maga 3
Flarkincl& llranspartailicin Demard Mar agerner,I
Lame uswe!go-20]CIRariding Resource Ass essment .
Figure A ill
Downtown Parking Study Arca
S li ; . \I
&,...4,11,._
�u Via fir•L. +*hal:1:4,-* gift riik,4r/ /,�
"..74, . .„... ___ ______?
......,:im 4„.,_ .... _tailli Eliyar; gall r
Lira i�t0.I rix,�g CI `--_-� pr i i,
i eil I
41-0 pi
ogler it14: - 1 4 - 1
O
1' MI so •s• ----hi iv sat II
0 ,4 a FT Al
iii!
1/ '
- irk
lv - aii fiI; 17 Q - c[ �
a , irit4-8. ail it...-ii. i 0 . , ,
,-,___41 1 i /art ,..... mi 1 i taw i i'"wf ca , '10 C )
CI
,4"-t-::„„:--1 RET i 0 o
ill
C3 a
, .., ..,, ,„__.,,
il,
,____,.
:• Vj I iff '
''2 23 / o�� �
0 J 71� .aim Lilikt* t MOS r---RGR ..`�• l T Q� .44,, - FOOT I
1 'I I raiv m flia..� f ii' f - 1, , 'D NII
/ ���:t�
1�'}] *Nri�� Pre„e ►Q p i RC1 -TA
T.r iy`1+,��Y f,7 t CI .. 4...-le:11ZZItr:i 0:31=1 •"
70
illaithiltitil' ,.. pia
ill o\ ciz5 Q 4
„Alf.***
- le►-aE oL�n c��,
4.
„,.. :.. "4 ORS i;Wei\ C3..1,i) D1
F
Richt Williams Consulting ---'-- Legend
Parking&Tran short fon Demand Management w `nom-
610 SWAdem,Suite '2121 ` �- E sbdt
un3s i plar4_aperi_space
Pdrtland,OR 972[5 — - �i pq ls
8 I 1'
V. METHODOLOGY
The consultant team was able to irlientory all ctrl arlc off-street parking in th El study zone. In tatal,.there
are 3,01ISI stalls within l h el stt Ch area. Our approach for each tyipe cif supply Mori or off-streeli] is I
c esclrit ed t eliciw. oill
Richt Williams CorIsu Ring Rage 4
Rorldingl& Tlrc!nspartcd an Demand Management
Lake Osweigci—2010 Pnakir g Re curcei Assessme r t
• G n-Street Suc ply
Vs project team's mEltF ac alogicial aFIFliiciacF to gal F ening Flarking utilization/capacity/11 nriciver dal a
t agars wil F a pH y sicial ciomFlilation cif all put lice cirrsl neet parking assets wil F in the study arEla. This
assElssmerli was care i ctElc in advance of the survey c ay.All on-street stalls were idEirll ified by ty Fla ai
stall (i.e.,time or use nestnicticiri), block nu mber enc block lace. TF is irillonmal ion was LSEIC I(neatEl a
c ata template necessary to care i et the caFla(lityi 11 ilizaticirl assessmElril. In total 117 on-street parking
stalls aiiEi located wil F iri tH El 2011(1 study zone.
TF El surveys irly eked F CIL my (IOU rits of each cicicii nice on-street Flanking stall in 1 h e stu c y anew, nElaclrc ing
1F El first four c i€Iil s of the party ed vehicle's license plate. 9u r ley ems collected license plate c ata al each
on.street Flanking stall located in the study area slam Elvery H ou r OVEN a 1Eirrhoun panicle 119:00 A M —1:00
HN;. All 111 an-ll rElet slalls wane su rvIey EIC, representing a 100%samFllEl sizEl fcir tF El ori-street
invElrilcmr I.
TF El capacity/utilization i u rviey fcir the on-street supply took place cin WEIC nese ay,Ji re 8, 2010.The
survey Cay was selectee in cionsu ll aticir with the City cif Lake Oswego arid was neflecil iv a cif 1 F e it iitial
sccmFlin€1 process. Clverall,tF El survey day was mostly sunny aric warm Ili FIFIEIn 1 ci mic 7(1 de€piees) wil F
mac enatEl parking activity evident in all sectors cis 1 F El c ciwrll ciwrl. No major everts were scIF EIC I IEIC fcir
tH El downtown and put lice school was still in selsi ion.
Off-sitre€il 5 upp ly
As with the ctrl-stneet system, each off-strElEll fa(lilily was idElrll ifiEic enc cicii rlted in acv ance ai 1 F El Ju re
8,2a110 su rviey day.TH a invEirilciry of off-street stalls, both publics and Fpiiv ate,was tate€Icniizec by block
numt Em aric identifiec by tenant)ciFlEuiator. A 1a1 al of 1,242 off-stneet stalls were docu mented in 91
facilities. Within this 1cidal 11,514 stalls were IcicialEid cin 89 surface Icili aric 7;I8stalls were locate( in 8
ganagEis.
On the June 8, 2C1110 ii rviey day, 2,1169 of the 2,342 stalls in the off-il rEiet su FIFIIy were pH y siaally
surveyed in 92 facilities(6 garages and 86 lots'. 11F is nepresents a ian ple size of 97°i°. Similar to the=-
street study,eac F lot was 11 rvieyEic fcir oacu rpm cine tH El hour, Elver h clu r between 9:00 AM—1:00 AM.
In E II, a total of 2,946 of 3,019 Flanking Malls wane surveyed it the dowrtawir, a ciomt inec onl/tiff-street
samFllEl size) of appro>timalElly 98%, whicF FlrcivicEli a slatiilically si€Iriilicant sample for mEiasirin€I 1Fe
opEiralion, performance arc activity aisoaiated with parking in downtown Lake Clswego.
VI. KEY MITA HINDINC S
KEI Eric in€Is of the data collection effort anc analysis ane presented here. ComFlnehensive
docu mElrltaticlrl arc c ala vol-iclh i u pports these fire irl€Is are fciu nc in Sections VII &VIII t elciw
1 Stalls that wenn lc cat ed in a ingle laaility/site with aormbined surface and 5.ti uci ui ed pa i king were cc nsider ed tc be"in
garages."
Rick Williams Pagel 3
Flairkinc & Arcirspcuitnilion DEimond Mar aSElnnent
d c kei Osrn ago—2(10 Pc rFl it g Reuciurcei Asseissmeni
C n-Stneet Pankiing
✓ TI1 El format of on-street parking I enc s to fa on long-term parking. This may not t El 111 El ideal format
in tF a lutune as Elfilorts tcl€plow/Err pant grounic level netail/restau pant actio ity are puns'.ec.
✓ T-El pElak h ou n is t Eltween 2:00—3:00 FIM when 49.3%al all stalls are occupied. A s su c-, 383 an-
street stalls are occu pied leaving 3514 empty stalls availat le wil F in the downtown.
✓ Til El average time slay for all on-streEll park ers is 2 F cru rs and 22 minutes.
✓ Til El average c u nation of stay t y u ser in stalls c Elsignated 1I-hou n Q1I F n/1I9 minutes; El)Icoeds 1 F El
posted limit. til is suggests that 1I-hour sl alls may ricll bEl El lElrclpriatEl for on-streEll parking
downtown.
✓ C n-sl neat to nnover 141.21 falls t Ellow the t end-mark start arc 119.0; fon a parking sy si Elm designed tcl
support high actio 8nou nc leo el land uses.
✓ Puking is reac ily available on-street th not.,ghout 1 F El day, with SOME) pockets of -i€I- occupancy on
specific block faces fit-cru 8h those block faces are generally acjacent tcl t locks with a ailat le
parking'.
Cff-StnErert Aclrlkiing
✓ til a clv erall acct.€fancy cif 1 F El crfil-street system within 1F El c clwntclwn study area is Ela%al t-e peak
-crurof1:00-2:00 PM.
✓ TF a comt inErc off-street system is unc Eiru tilizErc, F aving an abu nc ante of a ailable parking,totaling
832 stalls c u ring the peak F au n.
✓ IF a majority of available su pply is in private ownership,which may involve coni%ersaticinis and
partnerships will- private clwlnens to manage underutilizec parking into a system of more efficient
use �Er.g.,sharErc use agreements .
VII. FOF MAT OF THE PAIRKING SIU PPLY
A total of 3,019 parking stalls were docu mentec wil F in the stu cy area t our caries. This inclu c EIS 777 or-
street parking stalls and 2,242 off-street stalls. Of is 1 cll al, 2,514E1 stalls were surveyed, ID d r-street
stalls and 2,169 stalls in 92 lois arc garages? Parkir€ it dowrtowr is almost u r ivEuisally free Hank irg
whether at a public clr-sheet sl all or in off-street facilities.
Table] prErsErnls a breakout cd all parking surveyed in t-El 20110 Downtown 51tucy Zone.
' hal purposes all 1 his study handiaa p/disabled and 'coding zone s1 a IIs w elle iiemoved fiiam the study results, based on 1 he
assumption that such stalls aiie nat readily available to general parking demand. The prajec1 learn believes that if 1 hese stalls1111
were included the study iiesults would artificially overstate suiiplus supply.
Rick Williams - Page 6
Pc liking&I Trar sF cur c tion Derr anc Pllar agerr er I
LCIk1el Oswe qci—2(10 PcirMir g Reisau roe Ass i rrie nt
• A. Clr-strElElt Dark ine time stay form at
As the table inc icates,tH El 0111-.11-met su Flply all Flanking ir 11-El c owritowni has a wic e-nanElinEl mi) till
parking time stay apt ions. Key elements of the an street I ime stay format are:
a A majority of stalls do rich F ave a designatec time stay, refenned to F Ellie as Na Limit. Of the total 771
stalls,4115 spaces Ior 53%1 are Na Limit stalls.TH is is a vera F iEIF percentage of the an-stneet system
c EIC ivated to lora€i-term use, Flarticu larly when (a; contrastec to cclmparat le cit les wit F gplawiro retail
cones arc IIL) in a downtown wit H a si®ni1liciaril riumL en tail cifi-street facilities I9]sites).
•
Stalls more gElrElnally associated wit F isitor reeds()1I and 2-hours) make up 3.9.E1% of tH e on-street
supply,, with 1122 11-hour stalls(19.7%) and 1159 2-H ciu r stalls I11SL91%;.
a TE El rEimairc er all til a cir-stneet su Fiply is aompnisec of 4-F au r stalls 1I141 stalls cir SI.5%) and 115-
mirlutEi, 6-hour and elecitnic vehicle stalls Ia combined total 111191 ails on 11.9%;
With severe diffEirert stall c esigraticlrs,the relatively small su pply of ori-street parking ir 11-El c ciwri ciwri
coulc be pElrcieivElc as ccirillusiri€I 10 first time visit ars to the cclwrtawr arc seems 1a be formattElc to
flavor larg-team ()possibly employee] parl(irg.
B. Off-street Dairkine format
A total cif 3,1E 9 off-sitneeIt stalls WE1IIE1 suruiElyec ir 93 facilities.
• Witt-ir this supply, I F El City controls 933 stalls c istnit t.tad across 5 sites.3 TF is nepnesents
appro)imately 24.5%of the aff-street supply.
•� The remairiri€i 1,631 stalls are dispensed IF 1101 ghout the downtown in 87 stilt.c1 t.res arc/or Si dace
lots dal anEl pri%ately ownec. TH is Flu 1 s about 79.5%clf tiff-street su pply in pili%ate cclrtnclI,wF icih is
not L.rt.su al, t t.t means stnatEl@lici a f fare L ri11Eis for sh arec use agreements and managing eN isting
s1 FlFlly 1 F haw oh cart nalized and cionsolic ated pnogramming becomes more ciomple).
Table 11
Harking Inventory —Downtown Study Zone
Downtown Lake Oswego Parking Stall Breakout
On-Street Stalls by Type Number of Stalls %of Total Stalls
115 mirutEls 3 <lcA
11 hour 122 19.1%
2 hours 15! 19.51%
41h ours 741 9.5%
EI hours E <1%
No Limit 4119 5Rz1%
9lectrk Vehk les CInly 2 <1%
3 Coe Id indicate mull iple"stall designations"loi a par iaular user type within a single surlaae lot;does not ielieat the ailual
number of individual public lat9.
Rick Williams FlogE a
Flairkincl& 71rcinsi cuitcil ear De alord Mair°Glenner.I
LaiAle Ont e51o'—2(11 C1 Flarklin g ReIsoIu rce AssessmE r I
C n-Stre e t AarMin g Stalls 7717 1100%
Public Off-Street Stalls 19 sites) 932 24.5% S
Private Off-Sineel Stalls 017 sites) 1,E137 79.9%
Total Oft-Stree i AarMin g Stalls 2,31E94 100%
Totall Su plplly!Iu rveyeid a,94E1 of 3,0119
VIII. C HARACTBRIS11ICS OH 11HE AAIRKING SUPPLY—COMBINED SITU DY AREAI
A. Peal Hou n a ric C crewel Oacu Derides
Peak h au r ocicu parity! is 1 h e Period dining th e L u siness c ay Men tF El c owntown epi pleniEircles the h if h est
utilization cls Flanking stalls. TN is analysis attempts 1 ci c Eli ermine that ploirl in th e c ay at which the
greatest nu mbers cif vehicles are parkEic in the cciwrlciwr.5
C lr-Aneet ParA inlg Summary—Cc mbined Study mesa
Du fling tF El survey c ay,th e h if h est peak F au n fon ti a on-street in%entory in tH a downtown was bei ween)
2:00 and 3:00 PM (i.e. all stalls, all use types'. P t 1 h is Fol..n, nearly half I4 9.3%I of the su rvley ec stalls in
the study area were ocicu fiec. IF is left!a luta'of 394 stalls empty and a%ailat le for use.
Tait le 2,, below su mmanizes acct.planclies Ly type of stall, peak hot.r by stall type and average length of
stay. Figure C'Nov is e9 an illustration cd ctrl-s1 neet occupancies for each hat.n of tH El ten!-h cu r survey c ay.
Flncim Table 2 arc tH El assoclial ec Figlu ne,the follciwinlg clonclusicirls can t a c eniv ed:
41 Du ring the 2:C10—3:00 PM peak hour, 383 ori-street stalls ane cicciu pliec leaving 394 empt' stalls
a%ailat le within the downtown.
• The average 1 ime stay fon all on-street parkens is 2 H ou rs and 22 minutes.
• TH El highest level cd u se IIfcm a meaningful nu mber of stalls] was wil h in stalls designated as 4-h ou ns,
which achieve peak h ou r occupancy of 58.1%t etween 2:0(1 arc 3:00 HM arc ar average lime stay
of 2 houns arc 33 mini tEis.
a Average length of slay Ly users in 9lalls cosi€!rated 1l-hour 11 h ni 119 minutes) exceeds the fclstec
•
limit.
al Parking is neadiiy available or-stneet throughout the day,will- some pockets of high ciciau piancy an
specific t lock facies QthougH those t lock facies are generally ac jacient to t locks u,itH av ailat lEi
park snug).
°A 1 ala I cif 2,242 aff-stneel stalls w ere inventanied w ithin 1 he study area;2,169 oil the 10 al wene sur ieyed hciuriy along with 1 he
an-s1 need supply,11 is represents a 96.7%sampling all the aff-stueed system.
5 Peaks may var11 between the an and aff-street pans ing systems and per ks mi y vary!between tiff-s1 reed kiss. As slaleid,this
a nalysis cap!ureas 1 he highest peaham kin the downtown,when use al the an and tiff-s1 nee! system,ccirribined,is at its higheisl
Plaint.
Rick Williams Flacle 8
Flarldincl& 7Iransr entcilicr Dernic nd Mar cigernien l
' Lcikei Oswega—2(110 Parking Resource Ass ssn elnt
Table 2
leOn-Street Parking Summary by Time Stay
Dowri own Lake Oswego Parking Study A Inea—Or-Sl nest Stalls Only
Heck ueHicles
Sltalls AVerags
Type of Stall #of Sltalls Peak Hot n Clcat party! HarNec Maga le Lang hof
(empty) Stay
Ail Malls 7717 2:00 L0C 45L319A 3.13 394 2 IV 22 min
Usage h y Time 5Itay
1I9 mir ties 3 Nocln—1 FIM 1100911 CI 0 N/A
11 hot.r 1132 Noor —3 AM 44.1% 54 EIS 11 h nl 7151 mir
2 hot ns 1195 1171 AM.,N cion 511.E1% 90 15 11 h IV 26 mir
4 hot ns 74 a HM —a HNI 58.11% 43 111 a i.n/ 32 mir
61 hot ns EI 110 AM—3 PM 110051 EI 0 1 i.nl 41 mir
N ci Limit 4115 11 Al —2 HIV 52.094 2116 11951 a i.rl 511 mir
Electric 2 N/A CI% CI 2 N/A
VeH idle
Figure C
Hourly Clrl-strEiet Clcc upanc iesl
Lake Oswego Hourly Parking Utiliaatiorl
0 Cn1-Stneel Ocicwpanlaies1777 sizIIs)
70% -
60% -
49.2% 4.8.5% 48.5% 48.6% 49.3%
5(3% 43.8%
41.6% 40.751
410% - 32.9% 32.9%
3a% -
]a% -
]0% -
0%
9am-i 10anm- Ilam. 12pm 1F m- 2pm- 3pm- 4F mi 5pm•i 61pm-
10anm ]lam 12pm 1F 2pmi 3pm 41pm 5pm 6pm 7pm
2. Occupancy By Block Fcic6 i—Or-street
The central study area is ccimprisec of apprci>timai ely 11E1 city blacks. Within th at area tH ere ane 811
individual I Iciclk faces. llicL re 0 pros is as a visual su mmar i of h ow ctrl-si met parkins ia disltrit i ted
i h reit shout the downtown in the peak Eau r. Block faces parkec at a rate of grail er i h an 89%tutu partly
Qred)woulc be aonsidElrec "cans1 rairlac."C=pandas bEItw lanl 19%-841% ilorange] would t a
moderai ely constrained and occupancy levels t elciw that Ilyellciw arlc green)woulc presarli tH emslelves
as prosis ins easy and cons eniant awes!'to availat le stall.%
Rick Williams Consulling Pa5Ie 9
Parkir B1& Transportation Den and Mar agelmenli
Lasle Csiwwigo—;ICI]CI Rar* ng Resource Assiessmeint
Figure D
II
Or-Street Feak Hour Ocicupeneies(2:00- 311:0{0 PM)
--_&_11,r---5_/ tegh.--i*vs tc) •tiji - ----./4.7 --------2 .____J ��
ir-2-7 ,---zth7e -7----/d1
-. ++', �S + iifl "IP1p 1.-)irn éL7; t_,_.�'+�,r it
+ _ �b + _ , I ,r...-.„,! ,. .A...., I ,�,
PA
`'�/ '�� irt,t '.,... 11 Milari ,t laza i 1,,/ l" 't
114, .1*--i pl:i ,1 ,,,_,,..._._ , , i- .......a. Art
ImAi:kg; t Mi .1 � L i,/,'
tea/ , 1
I (--1, ,
. ....-4)
/ "dh '' ri ' .--------- -""--------- Wits_r......•-1=+---41 ,' tillif, H -
_� �r �u
] �!' �l !7 SII
'j ++ _ 111 set . J '/ 1 ti I
11 f? ` AI S7REETr ;hw
� + ? f
—______ , / i 1 .
#' �,i
11//
� ~1 � .' � ;—�_
11
L
at - „�• � ., S,il �..
' [I I x r ,'_ 'REF Ci
C " ii 's. d
all
-si5
I 1
is �� �� ���. � 1 �1, .r 0EILJ6
r� , i
�� ,, / c---\ t�
, - titts*.____,
- Lir ,I
1
, i-c--;2 1,- , _____—:•
, i ." _ , .
N I C n-Street Peal Haur CWaupannies
Ria Wlliams Ccnsullingl -- rr— ]00%-e1%
Pirkirg&TrarsFartationDlmandManagemen H �.E ' &491-15%
610 SWAth r,Suiti 1221 \ . 1491-6591
Pdnia n(I,aR 97205 .=-r —11MII <6491
S ® Na pari incl
As Hi13l.re D illu strates,on-street park in@I is fainly at a ndant during th ei peak hour. In total, lid cif fill block
faces are parked in el of 85%labout 112%). ConveIrsEily,46 of 8111 lock faces 157%) are leis than 64%
oacu pied at the peak h au r. In all,th e cera-street su pply pros ides reasonable oppori unities for ac ces5l 1 cl
u sersi cif th ei c ciwritciwri. Any perceive( parking aon<itnaint ciari likely le found in the area of Blacks 22, 23
arc 24 on the Figure DI graph is Ism 5lecl ion VII t Eilow;
S
Rick Williams Clonsultir g Page.]CI
Pars'ng& Trans pori atic in Damara Management t
• IAA e OswEigo—;ICI1CI Flarkir 61 Resc zrcE <99essmE r
• 3. Cn-S lreeet: Usage Characteristics(Cluration cf Stay,, Vok MEI, Turnover and Excleeecit g Time Stay!)
TH EUIEl ane a number of way 9 to evalu ate th a efficiency of the on-street system. TEible 3 Klnciv is es a
summary)of se%anal measures.
a. Duration of Stay
Most notably our data concludes:
ii The av Eiiiage stay in downtown ion all on-street parkin@ sl alls is 2 F au us arc ;12 minu 1 Els.
ii The No Limit stalls,with an memo 1 ime slay of 3 h au us anic 511 minu tEls,clearly bring up the overall
avEulage.
I' In1EI11a91iriflly rice other stall type category),other than1Noun, e)CElElcstHair time stay cElsignaticlns
QdiscussEIc t EIIOW].
b. Volu rTIEI
TH El Survey c ata irc lutes thal 1,483 a niqu El license plate num):ens were rElcordec pulling in the on-
street system t Eltween the h au ns of 9:CO AM zinc 7:C 0 AM.' Ov en 1 h El course of an av Eulage day;this
woulc 1 rani la1 El"ICI aFlFlnclximai Ely 11418 vehicles arriving each h
Tait Ie 3
Clr-Street Parking: Summary of Use Characteristic s
Conrlletc Study Alma(777 stalls],
USE CHARACTERISTIC June 2010
AvEuia@Ie lEingth cif stay per vehicle Fleur occurliEid Stall 2 hrs/212 minutes
Ad I.,al nu niter cit uriiqu e v ell ides 1,418:1
Ad a al nu mt er cit vehicle hot,us puked 21,419E1
Actual ti nnovEui nal a(rL mt er rill cars tau se a single 412
cicct,piec stall river a 10 hour placid
Y of u niquE vE hic les viola)ing the pwl ec 1 km 91 ay 121.9%
%of 1 cital vEiF idEl hciurs sF lEint in v ialaticin of pa9tec lE.E%
time stay
e. llu nnclver: 9fficuElricv of the Park ire 9vstem
In moss cities,the nllimaryl 1 ime limit will allow for calcu laticlri of an inter deed turnover rote. For e)ample,
if the in erc ed us El fclr a stall is twcl H ou rs which is a v Elryl"nEltail fnienc ly" rate of turnov en),1 h en 11-El
stall should t El Elxpeetec to to nn 9.0 times over a teri-h au n pElrioc. As such, if turnovElil were
'1"1.nique license p tale ni mbens"nepresen l the lcii al number of oars parking wil hin the an-sl peel system. Si r ieycns neccnded
individual plate numbens(first fciur digits)whict allows us to delermin a individual sans and,thereby,quantif\1 the lcilal number
cif cars to use the an-91 neet sysl em an a given day. It is inipantant 1a nal e 1 hat It is dries nul nep resent all vehicles in 1 he
dciwntawn,a9 license plate n umbers were no1 neconded in off-sl nee) facilities. the i nique vehicle 1ola1 is only nepnesenlative all
1 t e an-stneet 9y91em.
Rick Williams Pci91E 11
Flarkincl& 7lrcinspcutmlion Demcird Management
Lak el Os w ecici—2C 10 Park it g Reisau rce Assessor e it i
c elmonstratelc to be at a rate)of less tM ar 9.0,tll El system wcu Id t e c eiemeic ineffiaielr 1. A rates in eixaess
cif 9.00 woulc indicate a system that is operating efficiently.
In Lake Oswego,th e c cwrii awri on-streeli park it 8 system has an average turnover rat el of 4.24 to nns par
Vali over a 10 hour femiac. TF is is clalculatec by dividing 1F e average time slay(2.36 F at.ns; c oris EIC foam
tF a stu c y into a ten hour a fanatirig day. As are can sere, a rat el cif less 1F an 9.00 inc'clateis that the Lake
Osweigo system is operating)sluggishly and is rat 1t.nrlinlgl ov en in a marine n t F at wau Id t e aonsic erred
su nnci t iv El cif v ital street les el activity. n is is veryi much due to th a fact 1F at aver half th a su pply is
c ediclatec to time stay allowances 111 at ane more cant a cove to commuter/em flay ee trips. Flar instance,
if only turnov an is calclu lated ar average c u natiarl of stay in 11 and 2-hou n stalls,the nate is 7.24 Qmu ch
more cicirlc I.alvei to su flflari ingf arc attracting gnat.nc les ell retail I.sell;.
Table 4 pros is els a clamparisarl with cit en‘A em ' esi Coast cities 1F at Rick Williams Cansulting has civ alu atec.
Table 4
On-sltreet Turnover—Clomiparison to CItli er Cities
City Number of On-Street Rate of Turnover
Stalls
Seas eirtan,OR 5.190 4.20
9erid,OR 120 7.6(1
Beret,A A 1,995 5.12
F illsbano,OR 5.I24 4.5.ICI
F aoc Riser,OR 982 6.0E S
Kirklanc,AAI 2129 8.6(1
Lake Oswego, OR 777 4.24
N ilwaukie,OR 2Ia0 6.0(1
Megan City,OR 1S12 4.10
Reic ranc,WA 1311 1:13
Salem,OR 1,2E10 7.512
Spokane,VSA 1,965 6.216
Spninigfielc,OR 647 1111 i
Vanccwver,WA 694(cores) 5.68
As the downtown Economy telgins to develci i arlc diversify)with small business(e.g., retail,office,
seraiaeis: it will bei im fartant 1a initiate measures that su flflari H igh er to rrlov en rates 1a acicammoc ale
the growing c emarlc fcir parking. Currently,all day parkers and a 11 eavyl mix of No Limit st alls F ave a
dramatic)affect on Lake Oswego's c owntown turnover rat El. It will L El imglari ant to gpiadually neck CEI the
number of these stalls, most particularly in the cele teal retail cane.
S
Rick Williams Consulti Pagel 12
Flarklir g& 11ran4 cirtciliar Derr and Man acerr end
1 ci el a w ego—;Cl/CI Flarkincl Flesciu rtes 1 ssessmer t
d. exceeding time stays—At L se of stalls
Exceeding a p'CIStElc time stay is considered a "v ialal ion." High rates cif v icilal ion are consic ElrElc an
indication that on-streEll stalls ane Ila) improperly formattec; Qt) a sans are cif 1 h El belief that ElriibncElment
is not aggressive and/on lc: management is not aggressive enough to encci rage use cif tiff-street
supplies for IciriBer term stay c emaric. Because Lake Oswegcl has a high rL mber of No Limit on-si rest
stalls that allow p'ElcipllEl to park all day without penalty, aL n analysis omittElc th is s1 all type frcim th
analysis cif at use. In other words, all "violations"trackElc were only in l h OSEI stalls that ane lime slay
designatElc
Clv er til irtEler FlElnceril 11113.9%; of unique veil iclEls period in downtown's on-street stalls exceed the
posted tin El stay. By complarisClrl, inc L stryl L Els1 practices woulc strive far a v'dation rate SomElvlt ane
between 9%and 9%cif total I rlicIL El v eh ides. Being within 1 h is range would t e consic ened a very'
efilicient 5y 51 Elm. Lake Oswego's higher rate of v iolation contributes to a less efficient sy 51 Elm. Clrle
partici.Iain fi€lL IIEI 1 h at 51 CICIC out was the! h i€lh percentage of violatiClrls at 1 hour stalls. Clrle in five v eh ides
I2€l.3%I are Elx cElEldirl€I 1 h e FlCI51 EIC time stay and nearly one-quart en 124.4%) cif all v EIh icle h CIL rs park ed at
1 h011 stalls ane spent in violation cif til El timEl stay. This says til El 1 h al r stall may rcil bEl ideally
calibral EIC I CI ac EICIL ately serve downtown patron's nIEIElC 5,wh eneas a 90 minute on a-hour Flcisl EIC lime
stay may reduce the high ciccL Hence of v iolations at 1 h esEI stalls.
P rlcith er 51 atistic 1F at can be helpful is the percentage oft Elhiclle hours!pent iri iclkltior l;1 h is compares
the total veli iclEls hours pankElc with l h El nu mt er of h ciu ns parked while in v icdal iorl. In Lake Oswego's
cease 111% liar 1 out of ev ElryI 6 h aL ns parked) are spent in v iolation. As a rule of thumb,the great Ell!1 h El
dispanity� L Eltween this numt em and FlErlcElnll age of u nigi EI vehicle in v icdal ion inc ical Els that users cif the
downtown ane neat simply mistakenly overstaying thein lime, but mcnlEl likely, cclnlscliai sly ignoring the
posted time slay,confider ll th ere will be no ac verse ccinsegL ElrlcEls.
While peak h aL n parking occupancies are low, it is still necommElrlc EIC 11°at Lake Oswego t egin to t otter
manage its parking su ppplly. Givers that significant stalls are available in Na Limit aneas dwhiah are on-
s1 neet];1 ime slay stalls sh oulc bEl mare aggressively managec tci assure aacElss to t u sinesses, partici.lanly
with iri areas designatElc 11 arc/ar 2 I-ou rs.
4. Off-5,1ieetParMiriS SrJrrnmary
While the on-street syslElm operates at approximately 50%peak ciaclupancly, it is impartart la evaluate
how til el cifil-strElEll sy sl Elm operates in relal ion.11F is is partici.lady important to u rderstand, as potElr l ial
futi re access ccirsl nairts within the on-street sy stem will neat la be directed int cI ofil-stneet lcieal ions.
A Iso, if decisions are mac El to refcirmat the on-street supply to more visitan conducive time slay
designations Qe.B., increase 2-Hou n planking],there neec s to t a a high sense of carilic arae that ofil-stneet
park iru€I is available for those 1 h at might be c isplacled from the ori-streel sy slam. To this arc,
understanding av ailat IEI capacity for absorpticir cif ori-street c(marc €Trawl h will be important.
Table 9 pray is es a summary'cif ofil-street usage far th El study c ay VJune 8, 30110). Riglu re 8 balciw
illustnatEls occupancies fan Elach hour of the len-hour si rvey c ay and ccirsl rasts publicly
owned/ccinll nailed si goy with the pnivatEl supply.
S
Rick Williams Plage 131
Pcirkirg& Tncirspc riaticr L1emarr AAclraclemert
LaMe C:wei9Io—;101 CI w04, essr7er.
A total of 2,,1169 cif 2,2412 toi al off-street parking stalls were survey ed h at rly within tH el study area. The
highest peak occupancy acihievec during the su rviey day aaclu rrad between 11:00—2:0C1 HM. At this timer,
the off-street supply reaches E 11.6%occupancy, leaving 832 stalls err pltyl and available for se.'
Table 9
CIff-9tneet nadir g Summery'
Types of Sian #of hots #of Stalls Pea II Hou a Peak Occu plancy Spalls Available
Ilempty)
AIIStains 92 2,]69 1:00—;LOCI pm 6i.6% 832
Usage y Type
Prival a Lots E.......... ..
h
ElI3 ( 11:00-3:00pm 51.f19f 615141
Flu Elio Lots 5 5132 11:00—IOC pm 7,11.11% 11:18
Clelspite the system showing abundant off-s1 rest capacity, ii is im pari ant to dote who controls)manages
the rr ajority of the e isting capacity'. As der arid for parking continues to grow, an on-going cN allenge
for the City is the number of'available" stalls in private ciclritrol. Curreritly,the vast rr ajority of the 832
err pity peak hour stalls are on plriv ate lots)zinc '°'restrictec" as accessory'parking(with signage limiting
use to specifics parkers;. As!IL ah„tN a challenge may require conversations and partnerships witt private
owners of su pply to make more of their su pply av ailatr le to gar'oral public users,particu laxly err ploy eels
using the ari-street syssterr for work/cclmrr cling purposes. A longer-ierm,yet more costly alternative
woulc be fcir the City to is entifyI parcels of land c clwrii ciwn that clow lc be proca rec fcir off-street a sells
neec ing long-term parking aric begin rr imaging the on-street system to direct these types of users into a
'"plc blit'"lot as a means la increase acicess fon v'sitors/customers and turnover in the ori-street supply.
Figure E
Off-Street Oc c iu par cY1 by Hou r of Clay
Lake C swego Hourly)Parking Utiliaailion
C ffl Street 0 cciupancyl Comparison
■Privale ■Public
80% o n
uo
70% ?� 3� a to .01,
t
r: __ r-
� in ` r
all , �, re;
'
6a% " ,4., i U, a
% T
5a% .71
"'
w
a% 1
3a%
2a%
10%
0%
9am- 1CIam- 11 am 12pm- 1pm 2prri- :pm- 41FImi 5pm- 61p1m-
l0am ]lam 12pm 1prn :prn 3pm 41prn 5pm 6pm 7prn
' When camtline d with the un-sl nee' stem,approximate h 1,25(1 total stalls are a rnpti an( av aila t k al 1H e peak hau us in111
dove ni ow n L kei Osw ego.
Rick Williams Clonsultir g Pagel 4
Parsing 8 Trar s pori aticin Delmar ie Mciniageime it t
• Lake Oswego—201 CI Ac rldir bI Ae source AsseissmElr t
As Table 9 aric Figu re EI demclrlsl nate,significant stall availability exists in the tiff-street su pply. 111.e
at u rc antis cif availability c u ring de peak F ciu r preserii s ar opportunity larlc a challenge] tci be in
cionversal ions with private FInciFlerty owners 1 ci pater l ially set up sH aned I 5E1 a€neements tF at wciu lc
benefit all parties inv oily ed QemFlloy aes,ciu stcimers and t u sinesses].
Fncim data derivec ilcnl 1 F EI cifil-street system,the fallclwirifi conclusions can t e c enived:
• Tile ovEulall ociciuparlcr of tH El off-stneet system within 11-El c awritawnl study area is 62%at the peak
hour cif 11:00—2:CO HM.
• Tile combined off-street sy51Elm is underutilized,h aving ar abu r anCIEI of a%ailatlEl parking,tcltalinfl
83:1 stalls during the Fleali H our.
• T11 majority cif available supply is in Ovate ownership, which may involve conversations and
partnIElrsH ips with pniv ate owners to mar a@le L rc erutilized parkinfl into a system cif more EifficiiElnl
use Ile.@l.,sF aned use agreements).
IX. CH AIRACTERISTIICS OF 1HE SIU PPLY —HIE H OCCIJ PANC\1 NODE
In many instances lookinfl a1 tF El peak 1.01,II oculi flancy nate for ar entire stucy area c CIEIS not adequ Melly
portray scime of the car strairits or 11-e Flanking system in specific areas cif tF El c clwrltclwrl. Cu rrer i ly, low
aacu flan cies ori-stneet along the periph ery of the study area 1 enc 9 to bring down tF a ov erall Teak
aacu Nancy rate. ThEirEdcule, it is important tci icentifyj ar c evalu ate the"anea of highest occiupari(Ne
tH rclu€lh a ricic al ar aly sis. A r ac al analysis prcly is es informaticlr on tH at sElcItiorl Ilsu t-area] ci11 F e stu c y
zone that consistently demonsl rates tF El H igF est peak h ciciciu pancy mitt-in the larger study area.
RWC sartec 1E e c ata to is an anea that displayed consistent flattElrris of use that markedly differElc
from th a larger c owntown ori-s1 IlElet ciciau Fancy av maga. WE ile smaller 1h an a i naditional node 103041
stalls],this area c emaristrates tH El 11 igH est level of parkirifi activity in the c owntown c I rind tit El system-
wice peak hour. Fon pu rpcl5El5 of this analyuis,tH El Lake ClswEl@lo's F igH Ocuiu darcy Node is that sub-area
that is cieritElrElc in the sou th east corner of the downtown and t au ric ed t y A 111 Feet or 1h e ricin h, 3rd
111 rElat an i h a west, evEllldneerl on the sou tF arc !Hate StrElet on tH El ea91; also inclu C EIC was the north
sic El oil A Street t Eltween State and First 511 neets.
Figu re E below illustrates the t ou rc arias fcrl tF is nolo EI Ilk ElntifiElc by 11.e t lack bour c ary line] arc peak
occu parities t y t IcicN faces.
S
Rick Williams Flcge 15
Flarkir SI& 71rcv sq c ritcI for Demand Mar clgenler II
Lake Oswego—2C10 ParGlin g Ras ou rce Assessmein t
Figure G
High Occupancy Node-Bo'.ndalriesial
-------f izift L ,I I i I i L:74,-.7-qi--p
/ ," 1,/,-,15---1 i I if \ i/
„ ,
II, r _ � I f -4, ? ii
+ IIJ , , , ,
, , , ,LI iY e.. i, _ ASr tLi''t4,____it„ ,,,,,
iiii'fit+ -�. r '�{ :
MO
/,_
r i a : 1i
�1 • /,S fi w r , 4--___ •
�f' - f t - I
23
+� V ,-ll,.r I I
Q
Ki tri Wer ' +: --- C ,�� 8
,.it: it .--- ---:!P/- - " Q F-0
-� . ,
c„ „, ri
tz,:,-- 1 . gip". ..„..„. i__;
�- ri4 LI
_ �oc3 -,_, "pill ,_ - ,.. . ,...--,\, \S„,___,—_____ - r---1 it il A L7a
_--„,----\,
Li seri
10
411.
r I1.�1�-'jam'' r---} J +r- -
N On-Sltreel peak Hour Occupancies
Rick Williams' Consulting ,;� IMM■ ]00%- 85%
Parking<ansportatian Demand IVanag emein1 w1 o E % 1 84%-75% 1
Ella SWAicer,6uite12:'I \ ‘? % i N%-65% l
Pdrlland,OR 97209 --r, 1==i <64% ,
9 ® No pad ing 1
A. Tirr El$11aiv llormail -Hid Om Darcy Node
Table 6 Flrovic es a breakout of ori-sitneet parking in the High Occupancy Node. AS 1h El tat:le indicates,
the sub-area is very sni all(92 stalls total)and like th a larger c awnl owr1 favors No Limit Harking stalls
iIwhich comprise 63%of all an-street parking in 11-is node). One-h at.r stalls make up 29.3%of the
remaining on-street supply(27 stalls: arc th ere ale twci, 2-hour Si allsi The high rt mber of No-Limit
stalls is unusual in an area til at appears tci strive for high retail activity anc active street fronts ge for ,
business.
Table El
Parking Irr enlloryl—High Occt palmy Ncrc El 1
Dclwntcmim Lake Oswego Parking Stall Breakout—High CIccupang!Noce
an-Street Stcdils by Type Numbeu of Stalls %01 Total Spalls
1 hou ii 'e� i 29.394
2 hauls 2 1E1%
Na Limit MI 613.094
C n-Stre e t narking Stalls 5121 100%
11111
Rick William sa Clonsulling Raga 16
Pcirkin g& Trot asportation Demand Man ageimen 1
Lake Csweiga.- 2010 Parking Reisciurce Assessment
B. On-street Utilbaticlri-Hid Claw Dana,Noc El
Table 7 provides a breakout cif panking use ty aggregate arc by stall type for the Higl- Clam.Flancy Node.
AigIu nel H pncivides a€piaphic summary of oacuparIcy by Hou r of day.
As Tat le 2 inc iaates, the 2010 peak F cru r is t etween 112:001 cr 1:0C PM fon the circ-stneet sy stem in th is
FICIC El. At tH is hour, 84.8% of the 92 parking stalls are occupied. Ben tH ou 8h this is a very!small roc El,
1F is is a significant inanease in peak occu party whorl ccirltrasted 1a tH El larger study area,, whish tops out
at 49.3%. Similarly, this ncicEl experiences an '1 ptiak" of use in the Elrenirg hours teginnirg at EI:00
p.m.,wH icl was not evident for the larger downtown area ilsee IligurEl H).
TF e overall riot El maintains an average IEIrigi h cif stay of 2 F cu rs aric 17 minutes,which is a little less
11-an 1 F El Cl%erall c owntowr ar erage of 2 hours and 22 minutes. As will. tH El larger stu c y zarlEl,the
Clr erall c u ration of stay average is iriflu Elrcec by tH El nu nit er cif No-(limit stalls,whic1 ad ually have a
mud- longer ar erage tH an th El rest of the downtown 14 hot,ns anc 113 miniu 1 es r ersi.s 3 hours and 91
minutes).a This may not be compatible with the type of downtown retail/rElslaurarit uses th at
characterize th is sect cir of tH El c owntown. It sH ould also be notec,th at desFii1 El tF El small numt er cif
stalls ori-street tli is roc El contains l wcr off 1 F EI largest cifil-street facilities wil F it i the study zone,,
comprising a aomt itiElc 492 stalls. TF e ability to capture more of tH is supply for longer term stays wciu Id
likely facilitate to mover rates that are more su marl it e cif retail.
TablEl 7
High Clcciupancy Noc El—Ori-Street Parking Sum m ary by Time Stay
Downtown Lake)Oswego Clad inlg Study Area F•jgh Dim oaricv Node
Peak Stalls Available Average LEInlgth
Type of Shall *1 of.'halls Peak F cru n C11acu pan Nof Shaly
(empty]
All Malls 92 12:00—1:00 PM 84.8% .1 41 2 hi(/17 min
Usagci tyTime Shay
112:00-11:CI0 PM
11 hour 27 2:00-3:0(1 FIM FIE1.91% 3 11 hr/119 min
4:00—5:0(1 FIM
3:0(1-4:0(1 FIM
2 hoc.ns a a9.2% 9 11 hr/ 23 mire
6:OC1-7:0(1HM
h Cl Limit 9E1 112:00—11:00 PM 84.9% 9 4 110 12 mini
E
Inc ti stry Iandarwaulc su ggc St ac rage cu-streel time stay fardciwntciwn in ranEle frani 1 haul anc 20 minul e to 1 hour
a nc 5CI minutes 1 o asst,re tt,rnove r and canoe r lent aaae to!treeit le vel bu ineiss.
Riak Williams Consuliling Page 17
Parkinig& Transiglartationi Demand Management
Lcikei asweigci—2010 Pcirkiriigl Resaurcei Assaumenf
Figure H
High Occupancy Node—Cin-Streelt Parking Occu parlciesi(by Hou r of Dal)
Lake Oswe Rio Home Iv Planking UV izatii cin
On-Street Clclaupanclies- High ClcicuparlcyNoce (92 stalls;
9099 84.8%
70.3% 79-396 77.2% 77.2%
8091 - 70,7%
70% - 63.0% 52.0%
58.7%
130% - 54.3%
mar 5(1% -
a.
§ 4(1% -
O
o 30% -
2(1% -
10% -
CI%
9am- 10am- 11i m- 12nm- 1pm- 2plmi 3pm- 4plm- 9plm- Elpm-
loam Ilam 1ZrIm rpm trim 3ppm 4plm 9 plm Elpm 7pm
Tables 8 summarizes use ch a racteiristics for the High Oact parity Ncic e1 arc pros ides a comparisiclrl to the
ID
la rger sty dy area.
As provided iri Table 8,tH era is a slight c Emma.se in average time stay, with stays about 5 minutest less in
the Node as aontrastelc to the entine sty c y area. Th isi h as a pos!itirle corollary affect on the turnover rater,
wh iclh improves'Ey 3.9%, from 4.24 to 41.39, I it is still below the minimum desired staric a rc of 5.0.
The"short-ierm"stalls in the rick e lIwh iclh are primarily]I-hour Malls) pElniElriae very h igh r iolation
nates1122.5%) that alscl cieled 1h eI already high 113.9192 rate at artifice for the larger study zone(see
Table 3]. As there are high concientra 1 ions of restaurants with in the node,, a one hour time stay does riot
appear ac elgi ate to accommodate the demand fon a slightly lore en-term stay. Ninety-minute or]-hot,n
parking rr igh t be mares a ppropria to to 111 isi area.
Finally,,this small zone attracts]EI9 a roque velli ides per day which is a bar t 119%of the downtown an.
street total. The 92 stall Si pally al clri-street parking in th eI not e reprelser is ]Ii%of the total supply. It isi
clea r tha 1 this is an area that 'people wa nt 1 cI be."
is I
Mall Williams Consulling Flagei 18
Pcirkirig & Transpartaitiori Demand Mlarialgement
` Lake Osw E go—.OICI Pcirkir gi Resource Assessme rit
Tables fl
1111/ Cin-Street Perking: 5 L mimaryl cif Use Characters:it ic:i
High Occupancy Node(92 stalls)
USE CHARACTERISTIC Entire Study Area High Occupancy Node
(777 stalls) (92 stalls)
Averaple Iengttl cis stay pen vehicle pen
accu p iEid stall 2 hrs/21El minutes 2 Find 117 minutes
Actual number'of u nigluEI vEih icle9 1,18;1 389
Actual number'of veh icle h ciurs piarkec 21,1 918 E1491
Actual turncn er rate(nu mben of cans to u 5E1 4.21 4.:191
a single ciccu p sed stall avEm a 1(I F aur pierioc
%cd u niciu a eh icles ialating the p osted a
1;1.9/ 219%
time slay
%cd total vehicle hou ns spent in violas ian of a
pa9tec Iirne stay a1.El/ 271.7%
Finc ings from th El on-street analysis in 11-El High Clccuparicy Noc El include:
•• On-street stalls in this node are fcirmattec to favor Icing-term poking(which tent s to t El u SEIC by
employ ees).
• The highest nate of occupancy occurs tetweeri the hours al niacin arc 1:00 AM, reach ing 84.8%.
41/ •� Occu pancies peak at the lunch hour,which is likely a resu It of the sumar-live 9u rrau nc ins lanc uses
(i.e., high concent nation of Elating es1ablishments;.
•� Aside from a c ip in afilernoon accu pancies, Marking activity remains fairly brisk through ail th El
su rviey c ay and t egins i a move upward at 6:C10 p.m.
•� Block faces that a>dElEic 89% in the peak hour are generally adjacent 1a,on within reasonable walking
cistance,cif ticick faces with availatlei planking(see Figure C, above).
C. Node cif HieF eu i1 Clec Iu Darcy—Off-s1 neet system
9imilar to the on-street system, it is also important 1 cr Err amine 1 F e ofil-street supply in a HigF Clcct.panay
Ncic El analysis,thereby rec u ting the platential influence of 9plansedy accu pliec surface lots on the
periphery'ctll l h e stu c y anea. Using the same bou nc allies of the on-street High Clccu pancy Node,l h El oft
street syst Elm was 'trimmed'to sh aw only off-stneet occupancies that Hall wholly with in the ricic e's
bort Eirs.
Th El Nac a contains 554 of the total 3,1E19(AI-street parking stalls in the larger study area, approximately
2E1%of the total off-street su plply. A total of 355 publicly owned afil-street stalls,captained in a single
parking sin.ctu re,fall within th El Node's boundaries. Prival Edy awnec afil-street stalls represent 3E1% of
that supply liar 1991 of 5511 total stalls].The combined p1u t lic/priv ate off-street peak hour occupancy in
11.1 El Nac a cit Highest Occupancy is E19.5%, a fau II percent age point increase when contrail EIC I ci th El cril ire
study area (61.6%). As with the on street sy slam, u se/occu panty moves u pwarc in the evening,
beginning at E1:00 p.m.
S
Rick Williams Page 19
Harking& Transf c ritaticn Demand Mar agerrienil
Lcikei Oswegci—2010 Parking Resource!Asseiu menti
Tak le 9 quantifies ofil-street occupancy characteristics of the High Occupancy Node and cemonstrates
that a significant amount of parking is available in this Noc e as the peak hoc r,with 191 empty si alls
•
spreac relatively evenly between both publics 11112 stalls available] arc privai EI II 9 stalls)owner=-h ip.
Tak le 9
High Om par cy Node-Off-Street Parking Sun'm ary
llyple of Stall #cif Lots #oil Stalls FIeak F aur Fleck Oaciupa ricy Stalls A valla h le
(empty]
MISItllls 6 554 1:001-2:00 PM E5.5% 151]
Usa se by Type
Private Lois 9 1195 9:00-110:0(1 AM E13.8% 72
FIubIicLoi s 11 359 11:0C1-2:0(IRN E18.5% 11112
F iglu re I sh ows the comparative occupancies by h aL r in aff-street facilii ies with in the High Occupancy
Noc e versus th El larger stuc y area. As th EI fig(re demons1 rates,, lot acuiupanaies in th El node are
generally high er than the area av erage, but still well below the 85%stanic and th at way.Id signal a
constnairlt ar lack of av ailak ility.
Figure I
High Occupancy N ode—Corr Farah el CIff-SltrElet Occupancies'
Lake Oslwlegc Hou riv Par ng U�iliaailialn
Off-1 trEiet Occw palncy Comparison-'.Itudy Aiwa(2,1165 stalls]w.H.O. Node 11554 si alls]
•
■Stuc y Area ■I Higlh Occupancy NcidEI
71(1% En ,� ° '
q *y tic w oa Ma
61(1%
14 ry - - u", sa
ati
4(199
3(1% I
a(1%
1(1% "r
(1%
gam'. 1 Clam- 11am- 112pm- 1 F1mi- 2pm- ?Ipm- 4 rim- 5ppm- Elpm-
l0am 11am l2Plm 11pm .Ipm 3F1m 4pm 9pm 6ppm 7111rr
From data c eriv ed fon th a clfi-street system in this Noc EI,the following conch sionsl can'be mace:
• Th a peak houn clam r9 between 11:00—0:00 PM when occupancies reach(15.9%. At this time,there
are 15111 empty stalls in th EI clfil-street supply.
1111
Rick Williams Cor siRing Peigei110
narking!& 'Arc ns pcirtcil ion Demand M ancigemeint
• Lake Oswego—2010 Pci,i 1r g RE source AssE ssrriEint
• Clne-quarter of all afil-streEli parking is Icic'atEic within i F El t Cu.nc anies of tH El High Clcu'u p'ant'y Node,
41111 present ing an opportu riity to move employees ciu nnently park irig an•si rest in tH a Ncic El to
conveniently located and pnaximate afil-streei options.
• Th au gh cic'c'u p'ant'ies are somewh at H igh Ell!within 1 F is riot e,tH Eire is an at u rdant amau rt cd Flanking
av ailat le c u ring the peak h au n in off-street lots,th au gh much of that su pply las with 1 h e'anger
study area) is in private ownersh ip/contnol.
X. RAIRKING DIEM AN CI ANAL\ISIS
Ranking ratios express th a ad u al numt en ail Flanking spaces available I ci sere c ern arc fan toric uses Ili.e.,
cifIce, retail, resic ential arc/or muted-use c evelopment). Th El riu mter cif 51 ails repnesented by a parking
ratio may e)ceEic actual demand for planking or fall short of that demand. Demaric ratios,an the oth er
H arc, are generally expressed in tH El cIontol of I H El pElak hour use cif a specific'built supply of parking. In
at h Eir words,c Eimand ratios reppiesent an est imate of the actual number of stalls occupied at the peak
F au r relative to oc'au pied land u SEIS. E filecitiv ely managing the relationship bei ween laric uses arc t u ilt
arc oc'cu pliec parking su pply is a fu nc amerital challenge of parkiripl management.
Unc erstandirg the c ifilerer'c'e t etween the ratios ail t u ilt su poly arc ti El ratio of actual c emanc is an
impart ant element for parking management. Harking rii ios t ased on actual demand allciw cities the
atility to plan fan panking at a rate ccinsistent with actual use,thwet y reducing overall parking
c evelopmeri costs oven time. A r' u ric erstanc ing of actual demand also allciws a c'ityl to est imate the
impact of new development on an EixistirIg supply of parking.
S Th a Eiherc'isEi represented in this section is an atlempi to develcipl a better u rc Eirisiandirg cif parking
supply and demanc ilon c ciwr'l awn IlakEl Clswegci.To that end,the consultant team c erived two"rat ios"
frcim the c ata analysis.
• The actual kilt Rai fa of available planking stalls, in' relation to total built laic uses in the Dciwri civ,in
Lake Oswegci study zone.
• The actual current Elea arid Ratio for par-Niro stalls par total built laic use t ased on act u al usage
data frcim the "tylpiaal day"su rviey.
PI. Methodology
TF El consultant team c EIV eloped a comp neh ensiv a list cif all land uses within'tb El c owr'tciwr'study area.
This c ata set was compiled from tH El masa au nnent laic a 5E1 dal a ilile for the downtown pnavided ty the
City' of Lake Clswego. A II inc ividual taxi lots vviitb in the si u c area were manually verified through
Clackamas Cciu rty assessor c ala arc Flcirl lanc Maps. VI.H Eine squ ane ilcicitage information was riot
available,the site was Eivaluatec using Google Barth arc indivicual site visits by survElyons. Squares
fcicil ages were derivec farccimmencial, rot ail and insi itu tional ppiciplerlies cinly. Residential ppiciperties
were riot c'alcu IatEic, t ut to assu re an acucu nate derivat ion of ccimmEuiciaij retail/instituticinal parking
c Eimand,wF EMS iiesider'1 ial properties wEiiie ider'1 ified,so too was 1 F air park irig. In oth Eir words, paging
in resic Eiril ial facilities was riot include( in 1 h e assessment cif 1 H e overall panking su pply. A s such, lanc
use and park irig ciccu p'ant'y ru mbers are only asscicuatEic with commercial, retail arid instituticinal
t u ildings arc planking asscic'iatec with 1 F ci5Ei uses. To the degree 1 F at a single sciu ncEi land use c ataba9Ei
is ncil available forth e c ciwntcivvir study area,th El dal a sEli c'reatEic by 1 F e consultants is,we believe, an
accurate arc ccinservai iv a est imate of lard u se square focii ages it tH El c owntown study zcine.
Rick Williams • Pagel 1
Flerking& 7ransF crtalian Derr and Mc r agerr er A
Lall a Os we ago—;0.1(1 nark in51 Flom.rc a Ass issmeint
The resultant bxillt ratio cif Flanking to lanc use then is reflective of the total availability of poking serving
a mixeic-uses erlvinormert in tF es c owntown. In short,, tH E1 built ratio el presides a relationssF ip of all stalls
that e1 ist in tEl El study zone and the total squ all footage of all commercial/office, retail and institutional
buildings!in tH El study zone.
The demana r aticl reflects the Fµ,t lice demand for Barking stalls associated with that lard use using actual
peak CICIc1U nancy data from tH E1 2011CI park irg su rviey. TF e c emand ratio a SEIS a reasonable estimate of
occupied builc irg area as opposed to total bu ilc iri8 area.
Using these two measures,tH e clorsu Itarii team was then at le to o pnesis actual parking ratios per 11,000
square feel of mired-use development for Lake Oswego's Downtown for both the t u alt environment arc
as an expression cif"actual c emand.'ii9
B. extrapolated Beak Hour Occupancy
Data from tEl el survey samples was extrapolated to the total supply of parking to derive a basis for
measiu nirltl park irg demarc. The consultant team sampled ]10(1%of tH El on-street parking su pply in tF e
downtown and 97%cif t H e entire off-stneet SIL FlFlly• This level of sampling Flrcivic es a statistics Ily
significant representation of park iris activity in all stalls.
Table 110 sL mmarizes the methodology'a sed to determine tH e numt en of Y ehiclless puking in all stalls in
tH El downtown sL t zone at its peak hour cif ma.Flancy.
Table 10
Beak Occupancy- All Stalls
Supply #of Stalls Peal Oc c u panty 5It ills Oct upset Sltail'empty)61Ei
Or-Si reeit SL pply
D n-street su pply 7177 45.3% 3E13 3941
1100%sample]
Off-S,It.eeit Su plplly
Ofi-street supply 21,116SI E111.6% 11„317 832
( 161.7%wimple]
Extrapolatec to all
off-street stalls 21,342 E 11.6% 1,3E111 8E3
(1100%]
Combined Or a nc Off-Street Supply
Extrsapollated tas I 8,,6115 518.4% 1,764 ],235
Total Sluglply
9 This analysis quantified the relationship between land uses, parkinEl occupanq ant huih parkinEl supply. 11heugh net a
definitive measure cif demand by specific land use type,this exercise was useful in derivingeslimateis 1k s avenall demand in1111
Lake Oswego based cm actual palrking activity in the dawntc wn.
Rick Williams C omit Itind Pci91e 22
AarsNVing& Trc nspc rtaticin tlemarid Mana5lemennt
Lake Oswego—2C1(1 Fork in51 Flesc w rc e'Assessmer t
C
Bindings-Clemaric
0
Calc.lai ion for party it iia c eimanc ratios reveal two c ifilerent, t u t Eiqu ally .sefu I aonnelatians IIseel Tat lel
1121:
• Bull Ratio of Parking. 111•is nepresents 1 h el tatal n.mber of existing parking stalls correlate( to
total e>I isting land a 5E1 squares fcicli age llociau pliec or vacant] within the stu cy area. Aacorc ing to
c ata c E1111%ed from City land a 5E1 c ata,,th ere is approximately 1,,113$,448 squ ane feet of built
mi>Ied users in th el a awniawri subzorie Kok mn 0]. A H plarkin€l stalls in the su bzone total 3,0119
stalls IICcllumn 91.
Prom th is c ata, we can calculate a built panlllinig natio of apprci)imatelly 21.65 park ir€ stalls pen 11,000
square feet of built lanc use within the si u c y area iIColumri H).1°
• Gley and Ratio. Th is relFlnelselnts peak hour parking occupancy within i h el entire stu dy anela.Ase
siuch, ad a al narked vehicles iIColumri E1 wane correlatelc with ad a al CICICIL DiEIC buildirif area
IIColumri D).11
Prom th is plensplective, au rrent Freak hour demarc stark s at a rat io of appro>I imatelly 11.63 parking stalls
per 11,00CI square)feet of occupied lanc use(Coli mn h
lable 111
Study Area Clerr arc — ed La rc Use to Bu ilt Supply
Total Total Actu all
Site's Gross! G Kass Parking
Estimated SNalls Buill Ratio Stalls Ratio of
in Se a axle Square) "Clem and'
Vacainici ins cif Planking Barked Harking
Study RootageRate' Rcane Study (GM) in Pe'a'k Demand) yr/15%
Zone IlBuilt] (Occiupiecbufiler
Zone Howl ]I,OCICI 9R
10EI 11,138,448 99111,081,527 -,0151 2.09)11,0001 1,7164 11.6311,000 11.87/11,000
511 SF SH SF 511
As Table 1111c emonstretees,the actual dem and for Harking is 11.63 stalls per 1,,000 9l1 when'ocicupied stalls
Qat the peald Mout)are acumellated to CIcuw grist built in®area. If iri th e futt re poking were only ppiovided
at the nate of actual demaric at sorption (1.63),c'verall peak hour occiupariaieis would rear 1100%. Th is is
due to i h e ilaci i h at the act al rai io of demand covers total demand and c aes riot assume a tush ian or
"bu filer"" of stalls i a ac c miss une)pelctec pinawth or spikes it i parkin€ acts%ityl.. As such,Table JIM also
presents"park ir k c mare with a 1199 la filer,"which incre'ase's the actual natio cif parking demand from
LEE to 1.87 stalls per 1100C1 SF(Column l].13
11
The lanmula would be 3,01E 1o1a1 stalls/(1,13E,44E gloss equane leer/10CC)
13
The lcinmula would be 1,7641olaI parked vehicles/(1,C 81,527 equane feet oacupiieed t uiidin€l area/100C).
u Vac n'cy rales were derivec thnciuElh discussion will 1 he City oil l ake Osw eega,neiseia nctl cm natal office supply data bases
(Clushnian Wakefield,BOMA,etc.)and an Clcicite n 20C El dcewntcewn retail assessment t Mall elek.
13 The 1591 buffo'is calculatec ty multiAplyinEg total stalls pia nkat in 1 hee peak hciun(Ckilumn El)t y 1.15,which would
hypicil hal ica IIy allow far a cushicen cif 265 additional"empty"sea Its at 1 he peak hau n. This number!-2,02E stalls-is then c ivided
t y occupied squa ne iluotage tci get a plaid ing demand numbs r 1 hat would allcew iron a 15%cushion oil stalls in 1 he peak haul.
Rick Williams C onsultlnig Flag e 2?
Parkir g& Trar!portatic'r Delmar a Man a5 ement
Lakes Csweigci-2W 0 Parking Aesoa tit e A0;0k0.a,i,kdrt
To dates, parking Has been built at ars c,a L.,61:, rate of 1E19 stalls per 1,000 sat ane feet of developm ert
withirs di El downtown(whicH includes l F El or Hstreet sysi eml.This rat.,.C„r,f,L,C,:,,;ci have teen effective,
thougF significarii stall availability EDI s with in the party irig system. In actL ality, larc L ses ir Dclwrii ciwri
!lake Clswegci ane generating parkrng demur d ral ios cif 11.6.1 stalls per 1„000 SFI of
ciommercial/retail/institutional de%eloFiment in tH El study zone.14
As tills study transiiicir s to the parking s1rategy phase!,programs and strategies wild need to be examined
that assure parking its 'moulded al a rates appropriate)to growth and m aiketcibiility as minas in a format
that is off cier t, cast effective and siui, of thea dciwntciwrs vision of higher density'and mote
compact urban aevelopmelni.
Ran poses of comparisor, Table 113, Ielciw, provides a summary cif t u alt su pply to ad L al demand for
off er cities that the ciorisu(tart team has worked witF.
Table Ila
•
Other Cities-SL nimarli of Built Supply)tcl Actual Demand
Gap IetWe€ars pad ing
(ity Actual Built Actual Demand) mot ired aril actual
51upply/1000 SF 1,000 SF parking demand
ijilor everyl1,000 gsf)
BeavE rtani,C R 41.115 1.E 9 2.3
Bend,CR 3.0 _ 1.71-L9 111-11.21
Corvallis,
CR 2.0 11.50 as CI
F illsbono,,CR I -- 2I.0 11.64 11.3€1
F clot Riser,C R 11.54 [ 1I.23 I 0.111
Kirklaric,V1A I ;1.9 I 1L98 (1.93
Lake Oswego 2.415 3.63-1.871 (L78-i
.021
Oregon Cityl,,C R 3.00 11.413 .97
•
Rec manc,WA I 9.5 max/4.110 built ;1.911 I (1.519-11.119
Sacmamentci C:AI �l.(I 11.60 0.4
Salem,OR 11.115 11.041 11.1111
Seiai tie,W A 1511111 3.9+ 11.39 0.35
Sfningfield,C R 11.88 11.1111-11.38 0.6(1-0.77
Ventura,CAI 3.99 11.90 11.09
XI. C ON C LU SION 5I-OAIIA ANALYSIS
The data ar!aly sis cif the Lae Oswego Harking inventory indicates tH at tF a system is operating at a
moderate ley el of capacity. Tu rnov er falls below tF El stark and generally established for an area
Inc ul try palnkin8 stanc ands v, lc necammeind maintaining this ty pea of planking cushion,particularly in ne tail envinanmeints,to
creates a sansei or pelnee,ptior of parkins "availability"ty the custcimein to the downtown.
14 It is impelrtant to motes that some inc iv'dual users will generate c emarid that exceeds 11.71. F ciwiever,wF en
viewec as a land use anc access system,overall parkina demand wou Id to near i h is number.
Rick Williams Consuilling Page 24
Parlor iq& Transportat'or Dein land Mar agement
• lake Oswego—;ICI1C1 Flarkinc Flescw rce L ssessmer
aggressively su flooding gnciu nc lev el re 1 ail. P Iso,c ata su gg€sts that there is ar at u nc ant sup poly cif
av ailat le parking c istributed through out the downtown. Pt l h El plE ak hour there are aplplrarimal sly
11,350 emphy flails in the combined on/ofil-stneet supply.
Peak F 0111 ocuiu plarcies hover near 50%for the on s1 raet su poly anc E19% ofil-stneet. TF EIIIEI ane a few
"c eficits"of parking in the downtown at loaalizec block facies,though th El pro>imity of available supply is
cIansistently with in a shorl walking c istariae at all points th noughout the downtown. In sh ort,the
av ailat ility of"su rplus" parking is%mall IciciatElc to the demand for parking th rough aunt-e c CM ru avnri
study area.The facet that a significaril portion cif available parking ofil-street is in pniv ate aantnol prElsElni
both al allenElEs anc opportu nities. The all allenge lies in initiating disaussions,lanming partnElrsh ips anc
managing mimic inal ion of diverse properties. The opportunity lies in 1 F El fact i F at sH aned panking
arrangements clan qu icikly leac to better management of a demansi rated su npllu s of parking anc is a
natu ral first step towanc acIaammac atin8 c ernanc anc controlling long-team parking c Eivelapment awls.
A. Or street
The format of ani-stneet parking INA with a high nu mber of"No Limit"an-stneet stalls] anc th El cialau latEic
rate of turnov en ane rat conducive to an ansa sl niv in@I 1 ci attnact austome n 1 raffic anc [-Mail growth.
C ivE1n th El lengi Fy cu nation at stay nates inI the No-Limit stalls,employees may be inaentec to park an-
stneet rates Eir th an ofil-stneet. TF is lowers turnover anc c ernes cu stomers prime parking space at l F e
au rt. k E y finc in@ls far tit El on-streel system inch,c a:
✓ The format at an-fl rest planking tends to lavar long-1E111171 parking. This may not to tF a is sal format
in the future as efforts to grow/e>pand ground level retail/restaunant activity are pursued.
✓ The peak H our is between 3:00—3:0(1 PM. At this time, 383 on-streel stalls area oat pliEic leav in8 3SI4
empty' stalls available with in the cawniClwrl.
✓ 11Fa average timEl stay fon all ori-stneet park EMI is 3 hours and 32 minutes.
✓ 11F a average duration of slay by user in stalls designal ac 91-h ou n 111 F n/1ISI mina les) excieec s the
pastec limit. This suggests th al 9l-F au n stalls may not be appropriate fan on-street planking
c awritawri.
✓ Cri-stneet turnov en 14.3] lalls below the beriahmank standarc 19.0] far a parking system designec to
support high activity)grounc level lanc uses.
✓ Flanking is readily av ailat le an-s1 neat th rou€IF au t the c ay, with some pockets of F iplb occupancy on
speaific t locik faces Qthough lb ase t locik faces ane generally ac jacient 1 ci t lociks with a ailat le
planking].
E. Ofil-street
There is an at u nc ancie cif ofil-street parking within th e c clwrll awn at 1F is time. !nib e peak hour, E133
stalls are empty and av ailat IEi in lots th noughout the study arEla. AA id in the F igb Oacu parlay Node,th ere
are 1991 empty aric availatIEi stalls during the peak hour. As Lake Oswego grows, ma>imizing use ail
these stalls will t El intEi@pial 1a la) improving/prionil izing the availat ilily cif the an-stneet su pply ion
au Si cimers and visitors, Qt] p namotirg an attractive [-Mail environment and lc] cost effectively managing
how, arc by F aw mu ah,1 F El fu 1 u Ile su pply of parking shows. key findings fon 1 F e di-street sy steam
IIIP include:
Rick Williams gage 23
Parikirg& Trcirspciricrticn Demcir c Maraciemert
d cika Osw age—2(10 Parkir g Reisourcei A99eissmer
✓ The overcall occupancy of the off-5l neat system with in the downtown Stu c y anea is 62%at the peal
hour cif 11:0(1—2:00 HM.
✓ The combined off-street system is underutilized, Having an abundance cif available Harking,lcllalin€I
83:1 stalls during the Fieal H our.
✓ TH El majority ail available supply is in F iii%ate ownership,wh ioh may in cil%ei cionve nsations and
partnerc9H ips with private owners to mar loge uric anutilizad Flanking into a sy stem cif more efficient
use 1e.g.,shared use agreements).
(I. Demand
Harking is aunnently pnovided at 2.€19 stalls pan 11,000 SF of built lark area. Actual use!of the parking
9u pply in the Fleak hour occurs at a rate cif 11.711 stalls per 11,(100 SIF.A itH ari addec factor for a narking
tuffer,future pad iri€i c emand calculations woulc be mclst efficient in the rare€ie!of 1.88 stalls pier 11,0(1(1
SF. 11h is wou lc pros ide for ac adu ate Flanking, a cushion to accommodal El c eimand and seasonal
flu ctu ationis and be most cost efficiienl for pu rpose of night sizing Flanking to row c elonmerIt. Again,
thecemanc numtenmay flucituatelby indivic u al user, ii is a "tar€let" riumtenton monilcrciri€itHEl
overall su pply rielelc for a mired uses c owritown.
S
0
Rick Williams Page 26
FlcirMing& Trcirsparlatian rlemarc Mciragement
• LciMei Oswego—2(110 PcuiMlirg Resource Assessment
PARKING MANAGEMENT
XII. APPROACH TO PAIRNING MAINAIGBMEN11
As a nesu It of the recently completed downtown Lake Clswego Parliiri€I c ala collection effort, specific
panking mariagement stnatecies ha%e t earn is erilifiec arc are reciommendec for cansic eraliciri.
Recommendations for ch aniges ins au orient policy/otic El arc se%anal rear-term sl natecies(Phase 1; will
optimize the efficiency cif the existing Flanking inventory)in Downtown Lake Clswecci. Additional mic-
aric longen-term strategies(Rhases a 8131 are also necicimmericed lion cionsicenation. The strategies
raiciommenc EIC in this report area designec to assist the City to more effectively mariace its downtown
flanking su nnly
XIII. PROBIIRM S1IA11EMBNT
The City' till Lake Clsv%ergo engaged a parking study to address nencaii%aid and aniticipatec problems
associated will- Cunnent parkins manafleiment anc parkiri8 policy it the downtown. Thai parkiri8 sluts is
inteiric EIC tci prov ide the City with a mear s to u nc auisl and cu rrent park it g c ynamics, initiate more
effective management of ea isting su no arc strategically propane fon new cnciwth and c aimaric for
access into the dowrtowni. Strategy aric management recommendations ane ani aeric ed tci ac c iiass the
following plot laims:
II The format of parking in the c ciwr I ciwr is r ot ac eiqu ate to meal air isi in patncin nieiaic s.
41 There is r ot a plan on strategics procram in place that responds or ac ants la cihanfleis in c aimaric
on lanc use.
II
CII lucent parking manafleimerit is not grciu nc EIC in inc a stryl"park ire t aisl practices."
CIL orient parking policy anc code may t a causing unintended t arriers t h at Qa] makes dei%elanmenit
more difficu It aric cosi ly ar d perpetual es low c air sits C eivelopmeir 1.
)alu. S1IRATEGY RECOMMENDATICINS
Sltrategy recicimmaincations ane arganizaic as follows:
411 Floliciy Level A cations
Recammainc ed Flanking Management Sltratecies: Rh ases 1—3
s c rr mar},of ail/mann.ended A ctions and Strata igiie s is attciche id as an!miller?'enl anion Sell adu le at l he
end oj this Section.
A. POEICY LEVUIl ACIIIONSI
The following policy)elements h ave beer included to ensu ne 1 h e coals cif l h El panking management plar
can be acihievec by incicuipcuiatirg parkins system mariacemairit into the City's c ei%elcipmerii policy.
S
Rick Williams Flagei 27
Pc liking& Tnani orlation Clemarc Mciraclemenl
Lakk l Oswego—;101 LI Aaridiri 51 f lesc iu rce AsseisA men t
1. Adopt policies art rulers to guic ei parking management •
a. establish ti ref!'Harking Management lanes" basic on usa®e and desineic economic
development.
It is recammericec 1F at Lake Clswego establish th nee distinct planking mariagement zones, each
h aving specifics operas iorial prianil ies. Figure J t elciw provides a neciammeric EIC breakout of
1F CISEI zones.
Flanking data fcir downtown Lake Oswego inc icates that the sew th east sectcm of th El downtown
Qaone A] maintains h igh or occu panties IF an th El rest of downtown and serves a c eraser retail
orientec land use.This anea shot.Id le mar aged to ericourage ars-stneet tunniover arc presence
curb spaces for visitors and cit.stomens. The anea immec iately adjacerit tri Zcirie A nepinesents arc
emerging area alit e c ciwritciwri Pare BJ,with parking c snare s that are si@niflciaritly less th an
carie A at the au nnerit 1 ime. Zone B sh ou Id pelvic e for flan 1 emm stay opportunities for cit.stcimers
as well as an interim sat.role of parking II elecl 5E1 of low ocicia parries)for employees of the
e owritowri (possibly th rough a permit proppiam]. The area outsicEl carie E is almost a>clusively
residential in nature Ione C J and should I a manacled river time to mitigate parkirig spillove n
helm downtown commercial uses.
Ac opt the"C perating Principles" art implementation framework that c efir les the priority
purpose/use fou parking in each parking management zone)as provic ed in th is plan.
Operating principles are establishec to cascribe the pinimaryl purposes fon planking with in each 111
planking management zcir1E1. TF El recommender Parking M anagement Zones sh at.lc t e
esi at lished with dinectiori that th El Operating Hrinciples c eve lopec wit F this plan will serve to
@luic El th El EIV aluation arc mana@lemerii of day-to-c ay cynamicis all planking activity). Draft
Clpenating Principles are inch c EIC in th is neport as Section XV II.
ci. Ale opt the 85%Ru le to facilitate/direct parking management stnategiea.
The 89%Flu le is a mast.re cif planking utilization that acts as a t enchmank aplairist which parking
management c ecisions are based. Wil h in the parking industry, it is assn mec that when an
inventory of parking ercieeds 89% occupancy!in 1F e peak hour,the supply t ecomes constrained
and may riot pros ide full arc convenient acceiss to its iris enc ed user. Once a su pplly ed planking
rat.1 iriedy Elk creeds fl9% acct.parley in th e peak hour,th El 89% Rule wou Id nequ ire 1 F at planking
mana@lemer I strategies be civ alu atec and/or implementec to t nin@I peak hour mummies to a
level below 85%to assure intended users are conveniently acciammoc sled.
S
Rick Williams Consulting Rcicie 2E
Parklirg& lrkir,spc rtatinr, Demarc Mciracgemert
' Lake Oswego–2CI1CInarking!FlesourceiRSSt iiter t
Figure J
Recommended Periling Management zones
� � 1 one- ~ es;c ' i
1 it
l"----
7 iiiiii.i .41 :-/L: . *is ,
i.
ILO �1t - /4 11 40
L
� •��• � 8'SIT1�eE7 ,
tAir fir— 17 .
2bne B �I tl
2111 .11 (-----"H.
,', 7 A � 2Crre
Miii .
' 214 23 .1:r 71�
EveRd
sr-
sr,ow Sit 0* -= - - -- , , r \ . 1
----,..._0
wisat *--i* , 0 I ,. -
legim. ' AIL ,
11_14:071 rral.. 0.,. 11' ;NA'
11111 _ ,- . ,...._...,- r '
}Q
. .
iilliirlt( 'e PI
'1
4T
?\..t. Illft
.V/S) ze(-'5,:i
--,4(\"/ ‘ ii,_ .
N Legend
Rick wlliarr a Clonsulting vii ) Zone Al
PArling9logic nation Duman( Ivanagemen1 w 10- --,Ae E
610 SWA der.Suite 1221 -' )?' r----1Zane6
Pdrtle net,OR 5 205
9 Zone CI
The parking invelritory for Lake Oswego re%ealed that enisting peak F at.r occupancies with in
Zone P has'"plock etsl of activity where parking exceeds 85%it i the peak F cm!!lar-<tneet].This
wou lc slug€IEI.e11 moving forwarc with strategies idEiril ifiec in 1 F is report iri Zarie A iri a timely way
(see„ Rh ase]I stral egies, below). The 203ICI study also nevealec that aneas adjacerit tci Zara A
generally operate at occluparIckes of less th an 89 pacerit-atth is lime. Having the 85% Ru IEI
formalized in polis'will assure that a process for evaluatirg and nes iciric infl to futu re packing
ad iv ity in th i:,.y:: I.e.,is in place.
I
Ricik Williams Conn Icing Pagel 219
Florklincl& llirans partal for Ole imand'vim age later 1
Lake Oswego—;1611C1 Harking Fleisou rice Asseusmein t
2. Aslsigri a part-time position far Parking Coordinator to monitor and address changing Harling
celmand in downtown lake Clsweglcl. 1111
11F a complexity of parking asst access will incnease as tF a City arc tF El c owntown grows 1 F not.glh
reit evelopment asst increased c eirnarc far aacielss. A single person should t tEl assigner to oversees
asst manage all aspects of the program assaaiatec with Flanking in til El downtown parking
management zones. This person will also be nesparsible for tnansii ioning stnateglies devellopec as a
part cd i F el 2(1110 si u c y ion c awni ciwn as demarc fan panic ing increases river time.
Ideally,this person Riau Id staff a representative siakeF alder group(see 3 telow: to routinely neview
overall Flanking activity in tF El downtown as well as by zone. Information developed 1h Rau oh
panicle is t.pc ate al tF el Flanking inventory'I i.e.E19%Rule)wen..lc be used to EN alu ate "act ion triggers"
and implement appropriate ac opteic strat eglies as necessay. The Padding Coorc inator woulc also
t e charged with refining and sF EIDF eroding t F El policy recommendat ions aontainec kith is c aaumert
thnough the appropriate City Dnoaesses and implementation of necammenc EIC banking man'agemen't
Si nategies.
This posit ion woulc ideally occur as a refinement/refanmatting of an existing posit ion. At t F El
outwit,the work outliner within t F is plan coulc consume as much as 0.25 to 0.50 FTO,growing over
time to 11.CI FllE as mone c awntawri c EN elclpment odours and action thresholc s that are a part of this
plan ane exaeedec.
The City "pnaaess"far apprav ing 11-is type of serviciel adc ition sF au Id be completed immediately to
faailitat El riean-term rests cturing of an existing position.
1. Es'tablis'h a Harking Advisory'Com m Mee consisting of downtowri sltakeF older)to assist in[larking
program implementation and review.
The City sF at,lc develop a process through which a
representative cross-secit ion of downtown interests
routinely assist the Pari tri@I C cicirc inai ar in i F a review avid \ � / r
on-going implementation of th a Flanking Managemerii Plan.
Or
A FlankingAcvi9ay Committee will: la) assist the Parking) s.
Coordinator iri the implementation of tF El parking t
management plan; (b] revielw parking issues river time; are
Icf ciao Id advise City Clau rail on stnategYi implementation Ai 1
basec on the Guic ing u se dynamics is eirtifiec for specific
parking aneas. 1
41. Clevelclp'''exception" criteria fclr adoptions by City Cou riciil that infclrm s decision making fon
es'tablishme'nt of loan ing zones alnd 15,?ICI, 60-minute 4-HR, EI-HR and No-Limit stalls with in del
downtown on-street;ll pply.
It is necammenc EIC tF at, OVEIII time, all on-streetl parking in the Dawnt awn be designated as 2-HR
park ing as a base stanidarc. hiF is is predicated an study findings that iris icate the majority of
"cu stomens" iri til el downtown stay between 1.5 and 2-Hou rs. A s such,time c esignat ions cd less
11111
Rick Williams PagE11.ICI
Flarkinci& 7lrcansgertniian Demand Management
• d akei Osw ecici—;ICl/LI Flarklincl Flesciu ree <sseissmer
1F an 3-hours c anot allaw ac equate time)for a cu s1 amer trip'. Similarly,time stays in excess of 3-
h cu n9 are masa likely being used t y employees.
Given this, all oth Enr ty pies all on-street Flanking that differ frcim the 3-hour t ase si andard (e.g.,
loac ing zones, 119,30,6(1,4-HA, all day, etc.: wou Id t e consic ered "elxcepticlns" and wou lc h aye to
t El renqu ested t y an affewtelc business or ppnaplerty owner.
It is recommended that the Coondinaton and F arking Pdviscnryl Committee Qa] staric andizel 2-HR
Flanking in Gariel A immEnc lately and QbI establish cnite nia fan elxcepticlns as well as a prouelss for
requesting exceptians. It is alsa recommendec that once specific cmiieulia ane establishelc that t11 El
City Managelr woulc t EI Empowered with ac ministrati%a authority to apprcn‘e/c eny requ Ensts t ased
an input from the Parking Ccncnrc incicnr aric Parking Ac isoryl Cclmmittelel.
Criteria and prouelss si'CIL lc consider the fallclw
a. Handicappelc/disabled access
t. P ll time stay designations that vary!fnom the base 2-HR staric and
1. Speciiilici criteria for appro‘al ilia., ty specific t u siness 1y per.
2. Specific!motions Qi.e.,end oft IcaaN ensu s mid-t lack].
3. Numt ern par plenagraph is area Qi.e.,sharenc by users in a pail icular area:.
a. Lcladin@I zoriens
11. Maximum nu mbar peer block ilacelQs).
2. Limitation on number per geephnaphic area IIa.B., rice mane th an cine fon every 11.nee
continuous t lock faces).
3. Bvalual ion of opportunities far sharec laading and cu stamer plarking.15
9. Simplify'parking si and ards for new commer(sal ain't residential devedopmerll in the'c owntowr.
a. Comm enciai Pan.ing Star dards
Many cities liken Laker Clswenkio maintain minimum parking start ards kin spencifia land u se9,wt icih load
to parking codes that are cu mbersomEl aric cou nterprodu citive. Flan instance,tEl El City of Milwiaukie,
Clrogoni had 951 selpIanatEl parking minimums fon uSEIS rare@lira@!'nom small retail, tarber shag,
restau rant, clinic, penscinal service, etc. Within 1 h is system, parking minimu ms ranged from zero to
19 stall9 per 1,000 sq1.ane feel. In 3008, MilwauNie ciallaplsec its c awntawn parking node to fives use
typies: resit Enrilial (ownership!), relsidential Qnental), commercial/retail, instituticnrial arid ilneestanc ing
iIsingle use).16
Th E1 City'of Lae Clswenkio's cat E1 also has nu merous standards fon planking in 1 h e1 c awn.'awn. Aon
commercial land u seas there are 9141 diffe neat s1 arc ards, aric an o‘,eulay that anon is for a redu citiclri i c1
Enoch of these standarc s in th E1 downtown area.
"Clambinatian Loading Zanes" have been used in olher jiinisdiclions allawing loading duiing specific peniods oil the dad (e.g.,
ap6:30 a.m.- ]0:00 a.m.),then convert la shart-lenm parking duiing all athen time periads. Silo acmes, ill siiccessilully mana®ed,
can in lease ovenaII short-term supply.
'a LV ilwaukie,Onegan,2(108 inaneportal ian System RIan((Ihapten 12,Pa nL ing)
Rick Williams nage 31
Harkin 61& 71ransp artation Demotic Man agemen 1
LaAli l C sweigo— '101C1 Parkin5!Fleisou rc a Assee ismeint
The flaw in this approach is that the code bleats east use separat ely as opposed to recognising the
mixec use nature of a downtown c evelopmenl area. As the 2010 study demonstrated,the actual
"mixed user peak c emanc for parking in downtown take Clswego is approximately II.E E stalls per
11,000 square feet of commercial land u SEI. Most of the minimum nequirementl in the Lake Oswego
Clcic El exceed this actual c emanc numt en, ev en with the"rue u ction" allowed fon t t El c owntown.
Clver time,this tylple oil puking regulation leads to overt u ilding of parking, low non-auto mode splits
and low density.
It is recommended that[lake Oswego simplify'its park c evelopment standarc s for commercial
parking in del c owntown into tvV o categories:" Com mercial Mb EIC UsEl arc Com mereial liree
Stanc ing. New Requirements wciu lc standardize minimums at ILC stall peen 1,000 SR. A summary of
necomm one ations is presentee in Table 13.
Table 13
Recommended Com merchil Parking Developmelrit Standards-Downtown
Current minim m RECIOMMENDED
MCC MNIENDHD u rider LC CIA rlidEr
RECOMMENDED RE(IOMMENCIBD Maximum in
Arid Use Category 5(1.99 modification structu,ed Doak ig
plpenidix 941.95-A fan downtawn(01.15
Minim m Maximi.m allowed
in A Redu ireimer t an!snick e lot (than meets LOCI
(11)—04] cif cu area minimumdesign and traffic
regluinemenl) stanc ardsl
Na Limit
Ranges from(1.19 to 11.90 stalls/11,000 SF All parking over
Commercial 1.90)2,000 SF shall
9.9E st alts Pier 11,004 1.0 sl alts/11,00C19F or 21C1,00(19F cif1111
Mixec Use 51F surface anea. to dEisiglnatec non-
icaessary general
put lice puking
Ranges frcirn CI.15 tci Cu nraiFlPlendix Current appendix Current appendixCammereial 5(1 5(1.99-A:
9.5IEl sta Ils pun 11,000 Commercial
A:Commercial 90.95 A:Clcimrnercial
FneEi Stanc trig SF sl and arc sl and arc
sl anis arc
- Creates twci categories wit h in 90.99-A tci replace E.Commercial:
11. Commercial-N ixec UsEI
21. Commercial-Fneestand ing
- Assu mes ai mixec use site"blend s parking demand ail levels cociumenlec iri 2ICI110I parking oat pancyi
and dEirnam study (Ei.g1.,commercial oven retail,resicential/ccirnmercial over Elnourid level active use].
- Sl nivEis to limit impact cif sun acre parking area on c cwnl awn a rt an form.
b. Downtown Resiaential Forking Standard
Asl with commercial puking standards,, minimum panking requinement.S that are inordinately h igI
clan ad as a deterrent to residential t u ilding activity' c asked for the downtown, partici.larly m u Iti-
family developments. A recent import conducted ty the Rorlland Bureau. of Rlanning noted that the
average nu tuber of stalls built per unit of central city residential develotrlment(bety,1een 11996 and
"Sleet Lakes Oswegci Cloc El,,Append ix 9C1.55-A,Miniirnu mu OflI-street Aarkingl Bectu inements,(E; Commercial.
Rlcik Williams Consulting Pagel 32
Parkir 51& Trenspgrtat dont Demand MlonergE iment
• Lcikei Osw ecic—2C 10 PcirH in g Resource Asseswrier i
3C 08)was 1I.0 5I stalls par residential u r it.TF is average e>cludec su t sic ized F au sing built c u rir 11 th El
same perioc.18
Lake Clswego's cu linen cevelopmElrt node for mu Iti-family resic Finial park ir @1 in the downtown
regi, m iriivn urr per unit star c ands that ane at a level that e>mac s the urbar resic ential actu als
rellerenced ir the Portland stu cy. Tarble 114 F navides a su mmaryl a1 existing nequ inemer 1s ar c
relciommendec standanc s for cicrr sideral for by the Lake Clswefla City' Cou niciil. Lowerir g the minimum
rEulu irements wau Id create a morel c Elv elapimer 1 frier c ly stark arc fern mu Il i-llamily resic ential
projects in the c awritown. New sl andards wau lc alscl t EI mone su ffarl iv a and comFllEimer taryl of
fu 1 u re streetcan c elvelopmenl arc elfiorts 1a Eir courage a F iflb an mix or alternativ El mode use in the
dowr towr over ti MEI.
A s with the commercial star c arcs being recommended,th use changes would t e coupled with cac el
char€leis recommended ir items 1E1] arc 13) telaw.
Tart le 14
Recomrt.(int cc Resic ential Pauikirig Clevelopmerit Start acids-Dow ntown
Land Use Category Current minimum under LOC Recommended Minimum
Article 50.55 Requirement
Residential Multi-Family
11 uc io Efficiency 1 Stall Pen L nit 0.5(15talli Heir Unit
1 Redreicm 1.25 51 ails Plein l nil .15 51 ails Hen Unit
an Mone BEIc nocirs 1.90 Stalls plEun Inil .15.51 alls Henn Unit
It is importar l to reiterate i F at i F ese rercommer dal for s are being mac a tcl m mem u rr park irie
rem irements. A s such,these are not limitai ions or 1 F el amou nt of parking that cou Id t e provided in
a del,elapmerit, nather a moue IIIErx it le,attractive arc Doter tially cost effective star c arc tH at
oromates and Eir cou rages celvEllopmElnt in the dowr towr.
El. 9v alt ate arid c Elv elop restrictions on non surface parking lot devalopnr art within Zones A&El.
TF El lark use visiciri fcir downtown forecasts a c Err ser mane compact u rt ar Ilanm for Lake OsweElci.
Ta support the tYpe cif"lot coverage"ernvisiciriElc in the plan,the City will reed to move towarc
rev riaticrn9, if rot prohit it ions, on the dev elci iment of su rlace parking. Table 13 recommends a
rElsl rictiar cif 30,000!IF forth e r EMI Commercial: Mixec Use recommended ir 9tnatef ti 9 at ova,
requiring all Flanking that woulc exceed this restriction to tel Fllacec ir a stru cture. TN El
rercommer c aticin does not yet ac c ress fnee standing lard u SEIS (Commerciial: Free 5Itandingl but
wau Id su ggErst mare c Eli ailEic et,alu atiar and c iscu ssian cif 1 N EI impact of surface lots or the
c ElvelopmElr t v ision with downtown sl akeF alders and decisiar-makers.
It is recommended that the City evalu ate:
a. Uimitir 81 h el lot caverage area of fu tu rEl surface park ir g lots ir tF El c owntown 'see Table II).
t. Rrob ibiting new surface lots in new c evelopmElnt.
�I 1! Sea City of Hartland,Cleintral(lily:039 Hlan.
Rick Williams - Page ISI
Pcirkirg& Transpc rtatic n Demur c Mantic ement
Lade Omega—;IC110 Parking Reisouraa Assessmeinit
c. Connelatirig su 11 acres lot nestrictions tci a fele-iri-liew option ion c evelopers as supported in
Strategy 4 (below).
d. Flreparai iori of a policy/program reacimmeinc ation fcir stakehoic Em anc Cityl Council neview and
adoption.
3. 9v alL site and develop a fee-in-lieL option for new park iri8 dev elopmieinit in tH El downtown.
A key challenge for Lake Oswego will t a tF a at ility to(a; attnacit row de%eloplment to 1 F El
c owritowri, Qt) maintain and encicw rage an a nt an form fear new development 1 F at is consist art with
tF El downtown vision arid (c) cart airs costs associateic with row parking c evelopmenl
Clflering developers the opticin to pay a fee-in-lieu against tF a minima m Flanking requinemeni may
be an ati racl ix a anc workable plrci@lnam fear pro%iding struts a rEIC park ing ir the futu re. A fee-in-lieu
rat El WCIU Id t e sell at a le%el below wF at it woulc cost a c eveloger to Flrci%ic El th El parking tF emselves
anc flrant tF em ars "access aril itlement" into a pit,t lice parking facility. TF is%nem Id save on
c EN%eloplment casts and pnovide a guaranteed entitlement to parking for the new c evelopmenl
Flees-in-lieu cou Ic be implement ed as an option or as a requinemenl
Necessarily,a fee-in-lieu option core nuts the Cityl tci playing a key rale in developing and
managing parking in the future. As such„ additional discussion and reviews is rieiceisslary and
recommended.
It is necicimmenc ed 1F at 1F a Ranking Manager/Coondiriaton arc 11-El Ranking Ac%isoryl Committee
EI%alu ate:
a. Design of a fee-in-lieu policy for cicirisideral ion by the City Clou nail.
b. Pros anic cions cd ant ional versus manic atoryl fee-in-lieu pincigrams.
ci. Rates
c. TH e option to pay fees-in-lieu on a parking minima m as well as tF El option to "buy mare,"
up to a lee-in-lieu mar imu m.
El. Preparaticin of a policy/program reccimmencation fan City' Council review and adoption.
8. 9stablish a Downtown Parking and Transport ation Fund as a mechanism to direcii funds c erivec
from parking into a dec Masted fund.
As 11-El supply of parking becomes ccinsi rainec oxen 1 ime, it will be important tci dinect fu nc s into a
specific account intended to support on-going transportation anic aCicEiss in di El downtown. TH is clan
be done with exist iriEl aric/csr futu re park ir g-relateic rei%enue e.g.,Qenforcement,fees for parking),or
with reit new revenues generated as a result of impllementatior of this plan Qe.g.,feels-in-lieu). TH e
Downtown Rank irg Fund shciu Ic be dedicated 10 Imncii in ppsiority order at tH is time):
a. Det t service
b. Parkoperations(or.street/oft-street/erifcuwement)
ci. Lai/garage maintenance
c. Mark etirg and communications
El. Trarisportal ion Damanic Management plrci@lnams
f. New su pIFIl1
•
Rick Williams Paylei�I4
Aarklincl& 11rc nsF nrtaticin DEirnic nd NIanciSIeni ent
I aAle Om ego—.ICIICI Flarklinq Flesc urce <ssessment
It is reaommendec that such a fu rlc be establish ec as soon as felasit lel to ensure that net new
nevem els are aaptu nee within 1 h el fu nc.
B. PARKING MAINAGEM BHT STRMTBC IES
PHASE.i —NEI R TERM IMPLMENTI T10A1
Th El fallclwirI l stralelgies ane nelcammerlc EIC far near-term implemental ions.
1. Appoirll a Downtown Ranking(loorc inator.
Upon approval of a budget arid service package t y the Cil y Clau nail,the City sh au lc move forwarc
with the assignrnelnl clf a c awntown parking coordinator cm relsi n,cturing ani e)isting City position. In
the early going,the position could likely be parr-time Cth elrellone, relstru cturing of an e>isting FTHJ.
Al tH El outset, it is relcommendec that the City dedicate ai Ileast 0. 15 F119 to a positiani of parking
clan inatar.
This posil iani woulc be ch argue with the implementation of tH El Clv mall parking management plan,
monitoring clf Flanking in maniagemelril zones elver time, neview and assistance to new c elvelopmelnt
and wank with tH El Parking Acv isoryl Committee to faailital El c elaisiclni-mak ini€I baselc on the 89%Ru ler
for cawrllemirl parking.
2. Initiale Park in1 Advisor' Committee pploaess.
Creel lhel Parking Coondinator is appointed and establishelc,the Fplcleelss clf neview, evaluation and
c ecisiarrmaking with relprelselrii ative stakelh arc en input for narking managelmelnii in c awrIl own
slim Id to initiatelc. A consistent and routine schedule ell meetings sh au Ic be establish EIC as well as
u see of th is plan as a template for c iglu ssion clf flanking management anlc stnategy implemenl atiorl
with the Parking Ac isor1l Committee. In the early going,11-El committee ciao Ic meet qu arterly. As
c elvelopmelnt in downtown increases, meetings and c elibelraticlns may requine a monthly scih EIC u lel.
It is relcommendec that tH El City Council formally appoint members to the Harking Advisclr I
Clammiti ea as 21 means to Ilanmalize th air role ire assisting the City in 1 h El efficierii aeric timely
management of the cawnsawn parking su FlFlly
3. Develop and su Writ service package 1lon new rigF t of way signage per on-stneet charges in 13.4, 5
& 110 below.
Fight-of-way inionmatiarlal signage will need tot e c elvelopec to pnovide replaciemenl signage as
per aH wiles relaclmmenic EIC H erre. A servliciel package will neec tot e c eve lopec anic presentee to
(lily managers and/or City' Cclu niciil for approv al.
4. Rec a ae and)cm eliminate all 115 mini 1 el, 11-HR,4-HR, (IHR arc No-limit planking stalls in come A and
convene all stalls to 2-hour plark inlg. F elqu elsts for any other type of stalls in 1 F El fu 1 L re woulc be
coordinated through and exception process asl descrlibed in Policy Level Ad ion A.4,above.
S
Rick Williams Pcig .=15
Flarklinci& 7ranspcurtatlian Demard Nlancic,Iernien1
LAE'Osweigci—201C1 AarMir cl Flesource Asseissrneint
The 20110 ParNinE 51tu cy demorlstrall Etc 1 h at th a CITY OI 9IRINGFlIELO DRAFT 9IGN PACK/IGE
N
c clwrll awn au nnently maintains a number of ON STREETREST SIGNAGE
c ifilerent stalls types. Th El v ariety of stalls types has
ZONE A
laic to(a; clonfu sion an the part of the park irlE
customer,(b) high rates of violatiar arlc qal low
rates ail 1 u rrlaver. In particular, eel isting 1-HR stalls 2 HOUR
maintained an ay Einagei cu S1 amer du nation tail stay of 3 HOUR
8AM•5PM ZONES 8un•5ati1
11 t.ou r/119 minutes, clearly indicating that such
stalls ane nat ag gnoF niate to c awritown Lake
ClSwagO. OFF STREET SIGNAGE
ON STREET 'ARK
It is recommended all ZaneA Malls t e clonvelrl ed to
DIRECTIONAL
SIGN TO
2-hoursiEroc stalls tocineateaparNiriE zone that is FF STREET LOT :REE
30x36
u nifarm,simple to u nc enstand and assn refs visitor
access and 1i rnaver that is supportive of active `A
ground level retail business. A
Efla mple Zone A 81 B 9igr a®e pael age—Sp ningfield,arelon
5. Reec u ce and/or elim it iai1 EI sill 115 m inute, 1-11 our, EI-
HR and No-limit perking stalls in Zone B chic convert all s1 ails to eith en]-HR arc "'4-HR ar by
permit." Requests for any other type of stalls in I h is Bore woulc be coordinated*laugh aerl
exception process as c esciribec in Policy Level Ad ion A.4.,aebc ve.
On-street parkiriE in Zone B is cu rrerllly a varied mix of parkiriE stall types. Zone B is also an area
that is siEnliilicantly underutilizec at this time,wish peak hotn cicl(IL Flanclies of 90%ar less. In an
effclrl to la) simplify massaging lion customers inc (b) allow clontrolleec levels of employee parkirlE
on-street in coria)9, it is recommendec that all panking to cesiE dated 2-HR or"4-HR or by permit."
In the Icing-term,tt.EI E tial far Zane B wou lc be to convert as much on-street park iriE as possible to 2-
I-R. Th is 1 ralnsition wou Id be marlagec through the Park iriE Coorc inator/Park iriE Advisor'
Commits Ela with stnateE icl impileimental ion of the 85% Ru le.
6. Stripe all an-street parking in Barrels AI&B l o better is entifyl park in€1 ay ailability and location.
Striping is effective becau se ii assists the cu si amer in identifying a park iniE stall,thereby creating a
sense)of orc or zinc convenience. Efilecltiv a striping also rec L cies inclic ants of damage)to vet icIIEI5 ar d
faailitatEls clamplianleel.
To this end, it is reclommended that the Clity stripe all on-strElE11 stalls in Zone A& B land in the arca
adjacent 1c1 Roosman Hark) as soar as it is fir ancially feasible 1c1 do so.
7. Develop an or•stuElet emplceyee narking permit program li.e., paid permitsl) that woulc allow
limited L se of 4-HR stalls for art-street all c ay Flank ire in'one B.
permits wou Id be issued to any empilci ee with a downtown t u siness ac c news, allowing them to park
at a 4-HR stall in this zone. This will free u p a siE nificiant number of on-street stalls for
cu stomend visitor use as well as improv iriE an-street 1t.'mover. PE1rmi1 s will also ensure that Park &
Ric El commuters ane ria) a sing downtown streElls to warehouse vet.ides for employ Etas th al work in
areas outsic El tt.El dowr town (e.g., downtown Rail laic).
40
Rick Williams Rage 36
Pclrkirg& Triarspc rloticn Llemanc Mcirwc rrert
• LciMe Oswegc —2(110 Pat—Ming Resau nne Assessment
By pro%ic ing a limited ru mbElr of on-street mcirth ly Parking permil s,1 F a Ciq will Ila) gain card ncil of
411, How the on-street systEsm in Zones B is utilized, IIt) t El in a position to asst.11E11 F El 89% occ'nano)
stark anc is met,19 zinc (c) in tH El long term, derives a sources of revenue to su FlFlari ars-going narking
prog hams and strategy implemental ior. Comparable North mist cities cH ange maritH ly esmplclyee ori-
streal pEsrmil rates 1F at nangEl betweer I CI IlMilwau Nies, ORI, $45 (Kirkland, WAI arc $69
IVaritouvEits,WA).
Perc ing resources,the City tau Id initiates the program as a freEl permil IiEl.g., issu ad qu art erly to
reglisterec Esmplciyeesl to trarsiticir Esmplciyees irks a "system"that directs use of the parking
supply. Similarly, a permit program ion I SE'of emplcl ee parking in the Clity s off-street system cioulc
also t El integpsatec into IF is strategy.
Based on fisc irigls from 1F a narking study, a 11E19 HI t.fillirgl cif a arc 4-HR s1 ails with ir Zor1EI B may t El
apprcipriate, based on the type and mi>{ of street Ie%Eli bu sinessa9 zinc ocicu parties. C ata c is sugglessl
that cl`d and 41h Streais betwElar A and Bverglneen and 5th and 41' Streets tetwear B and A may be
suitable fan pEmmit parking.
TH El City will need to evalual a IF El costs associiated with estat lisp irg ar ac ministrative function far
dislnibuting passes and collecting re%enue asscitiatec with the passes.
I. Initiate an clri-s1 relelt Elmplciyee p'a'rking pewit program (i.e., paid pElrmits] alllclwing lirr ited me of
4-HR hour!talks fcul on-sltreElt all day pulling)ins aclr e1 B.
TH is strategy'implements IF a prciglram c EN elcipad in B. 6, above.
I. StrElrlglhen irElrlilculcemelnt czlctivities ir Zor AI ta aSI5Iume existing time zclr es'ire honored
and system utilization)ti rrlcl%er is operating)ilsI intElrc etc.
Based on tF El nesse Its of the turnover arialy sis, it is appanesrt IF at abuse cif existing timed Malls is
occurring. TF is nisi Its in very irafficier 1 to rrici%er,whiciF is ricsl conducii%El 1cs a succassfu I sl reset level
busiria9s environment. Similarly,IF El c ata su 8gasts a siglrificant numt Ells of amplayeas using 1F El circ-
street system fan flanking. Adequate Marc aturcant] parking is(a; available tiff-streal arc lit) iri
Zara B. Ta this arc,greater efforts at enfortemert in Zor1E1 A are warraritec. 9rhanciirigI panking
enforcement will 'Ill) ircreas8 ovanall system efficiency zinc ala) sufficiently provide for cost reciovelr .
It is 118ciclmmarc EIC '1H at IF a Flanking Coordinator monk wil F tH El Park irg Acv isory ClcimmittEEl ta
e%aluate the cclst arc formatting of a parking'esrillcustament officer for the cciwrtowr. This position
cut.lc be(a) contractec with IF a pri%ate sector anc It; Flrcl%ic ad in a part-1 ime, "nandom"format
tH a1 controls toss but assures compliance.
It is further recommended that evalu aticiri/toss irigI cif r amt erifcllicEsment to completed witt in 18
marl hs. 111.is wou lc rept.ire cicimplaticir of tH El Esvaluation,de%elcipmEsrit of a jot c ascripticir ar RFFI
arc service p'ackag'es fon pre9Esriaticir ta City Council.
1
9110 This end 1he City can cantnol 1he number cif man1F ly permits issued,thereby alluring a specific Supply of ] houn parking
ton cuitomen visitar use. /l9 the 85%occupancy standard is met,l he number at permits available l o0 9a le can be reduced an the
nate far manthhi panking can be increased 10(a)induce parking in aff-street lat9 a ndilou(b)enaaunage use at a I1 ennal ive madei.
Rick Williams Rage 37
Flarfir SI& Ncvisr artatior Demcinc Mar c gemer
Lafile Cswego—:£110farklingRes ocrceAssessment
110. Revisit the use agreem erit for public parking at the Lake View Village G amage to more Wed ively
manage parking for customers and employ eesi.
Data from 11.e 2CI110 Flanking study 51 ggests that employees should t ee assigned stalls on 1 h el lower
ler'el aric on the lop floor of the garage,th ereby reserving stalls on ground and second level for
ceustomers only.
PHASE;I—MD TERM IMPLEMENTATION
The follcewing strategies are recommended for mic-term implerr'ev►tailicun.
11. Re-evaluate and reformat stalls'in tF el 932 stalls of put licly ow red off-street supply lo balm(El
employ ee use and ssF ort-tenor ac cesisi. elplore err plloyEee park ing perm it pric'iri81 based on 89%
star dud.
Greater er'foncEement of ore-stneet parking in Zone A aric allowing longer term parking in 2 one B
(with permits,will likel' create a transition'of move em ployEeese into off-street lots aric frEeeir'@l u p
visitor parking in Zone A on-street spaces. This will create a "re-'stir'irig"of parking through ou t tH Ee
c owntciwn. Tci assure that off-street parking is baler iced to t crtt Eemplcuyee and visit or neEec,the
Harking Coordinator and Harking A dvisory Committee should explore c esu flr'atir'8 a h igh Eli mix of
stalls in off-street lots to employee stalls. This can be aaceomplis1 ec through lot signage and/cm
permits. Similarly,,on employee lots that are elceecir'fl th El 89%oceaupar'cy siandarc,the City
sh ou Id implEemert mor'1 t ly priceir'8 Ilir'acimbir'atior with on'-stneet permits ir Zor'El BJ to(a; create
choice within 1 h El system, int] complement tnansii, bike/walk and nic ad are efforts and lc; estat list a
future reverw e stream.
12. Negotiate siF aped use and/or lease agreem wits with owr'aeis of strategic ally placed existing private
surface lots ir 3cu es A&B to provide ilor an'interim supply oil park ing where needed. Begin focus
s
or sites identified ir'the 2010 Parking Study with SU rrllusi availability.
The 20110 Parking 5111udy sampled a s'igreificeant porticen of existing privately cewnlEec off-street parking
lots Icecal ed th rceughout the study zone. TF El general firec ire was that most are s'igniflceantly
c r'derutiliaed,,er en c u ring peak times Ile.,, less than 69%percent occupied]. These lois comprise
approximately 1,E137 stalls arid ane generally with aut signage cur have signage that is inconsistent and
confu sing to cu stomens arc v isitors.The ability of th El City to"aaptu roe"as many Flriv ately owned
si ails as'ane available for more alive management will pros ida relatively low cost near to mid-
term strategy for mitigating existing and future access ceor'straints durir'8 gElak park iris c em and
perioc s. TII e study sam pie estimatEec tH at or er 800 off-streEut stalls are empty iIpu t lici aric private]
at the peak Hou r.
SharEec use agree'merits ir ot1 our coil ies are wic e and varied. In some eases Ile.@I.E reuses am,, Oragorn)
the owr'en of i h El property "clonal es"siu rFllus si ails to 1 h El City on a month to m onth basis in rete rn
for as'sistanc'e with signage arc lands'c'ape/mainter'ar'ee crests. Ott Euu cities(e.g.,, Kirkland,,WA)
program funds within'their parking budgets to lease Si rglu s stalls from the private secion. These
stalls are then sigr'Eec arc/or metered and operatec tH rough 01 El City's or mall park ire prce®nam
(including markeitir'g and cam municatiorIs].
S
Rick Williams Consulting Page•
3Fl
Perking& Tram_pan atior Deman c Maregemenie
• t able O!we go— ala Aar/dr ca Aesc rce< essmer
It is reiciommendec that tH El City,1 h nau gh the HarkinEi Coordinator arc ParNiri@I Adv isoryl Committees:
a. Initiate an effori to work with owners of private lots 1a mien irito shares use agreements to
allow u nc a nutilized narking tot e mac El available 1a customer/v isitor on employee a ses Qas
aaFIFInaFlniate).
t. Elxplone the c evelopment oil incentives to warn rage act ineemer 1 s signage, lark soaping,
lighting,sidewalk improvements, leasing,etc'.].
13. expainc outreach to call businesses within the stL c y zone to communicate the parirr eaters of the
new Pad ing Merlaaglement Plans.
Changed in thE' pank ing system rest ltirlg from implerrentation of new HolicyActicmd alnd
strategies rec carr rr ended through the Harking Study will need 10 t El communicates tci the
public, businesses anc employees. It is ne(orr mended that 1F e Fla rNing Coorc irlator aind tF e
Harty ing Advisory Corr m ittee initiate disc i ssiorls with key affected stakeholders to edu cote
tF err on th El reasons foil the parking c F anges and on rr Eians to access the sys1 Eirr in tF e
fu ture.
14. Develop a Residential Palling Perrr it Zone(RRFIZ)policy and plrogl"arro for adoption by the City
(log rieil for future implementation in residential areas affectec by spillover from commercial
parking(i.e.,Zone C).
Clh angel toFlarking management in 1 h a commercial zones ail i h e
cawirtawrl cot lc cause issue's nelated to spillover of emFlloyEleas
.2111-ral 111
and park& ric ens seeking Flanking in residential areas. To tH is ,y0KING
end, it is necammenced 11.at the RarkinEi Coordinator anc Padding ;ve
FERMI
Ac v isoryl Committee initiate c evE'IopmE'rlt oil a RE'siderltial
Harking PEarmi1 aerie(RAAZ; policy anc pragnam for fu 1 u re
aonsic oration and adoption t y the Clity Clou nail. 9u ch a policy 4 _
Riau lc outline 11-El criteria necessary)i a estat lisp an HHHa Owhich 30
MINUTES
wan lc prionii ize on-street parking in resic entially zonec areas fan =-►�
nesic anc FlrovisE'a methanis miloniriitiatiorlofan HHHaat
the nequest of an affeatec neigh boril oac associai iori.
15. Develop and install a signage package of uniilonm design, logo
and colon at publico and private IIsharec use)off-street parking
facilities.
CneatinEl a uniform signage package tH al inccln lcu'ates a u rig'El logo zinc calor scH E'me for publicly
av ailat le parking facilities will establisH a sense cd neeogni1 ion, iderll ity anc customer oriental ion for
users ail 1 H E'c owritowri parkirlEl system.
It is recommEarlc EIC I H at 11-El City:
a. DEN elan a signage flack aEle 111 at inconponates a u niionm design, logo, and colon scheme into all
irlianmalional signage relates to parking.
b. Elvalu ate lanc a se and coat El implications of the signage package program partici')only size, design
and placement issues, anc initiate dangles as aripnap'iate.
Rick Williams Pc ge.39
Aarkincl& Aransr cu tet ion Demand Mar ogler-lient
Lcikei Osweigci—2010 Parking Resat,rtes<sseissrrieinn
c. "Bnand"each ofl-stneet publics facility, apeiri to publics access,with 1b ei eistat lish ed "logo"
package. 411
The Rad ing Advisory Commill ee can serve as a fort'm son c eiveloFlmeirli of such a package. Cost,
t u dgets and an implementation strateegYl will need to be c El%ela feed as well fan rev ieiw by l h ei City'
Manag'e'r and the Clity Cou niciil.
16. Strategically place nieiw and coordin'a'ted way finding signage in I h El right-of-way,all local ions
chosen carefully to c irect visitors to off-street locations.
The City Sh at.Id develop dinactional Signage on 1I-a
illi
noadway S that gt.ides cu stomens to specific facilil leis.
a � o n t This will t e of glreatasi importance at primary' pcirl als
OPEN SPACES int a th El downtown, at major 1 raffici intersection's and
�
Rk at pnimaryI points cd ingress at specifics facilil ies. It is
neciammeir'c EIC 1 hat:
a. Tb a signage packages should t e consister'1 with, ar'c camplemeini any of,l h El signage package
c eiv eloped for the off-stress' facilil ies Isee 15, at aye].
t. libel acidness of th e neared' %isitor facility shot,lc be incorporal EIC into the noadway signage to
assist arc c irect cu stomeml to the nearest padding location.
1I1 Hartner with th ei bu siineiss oom munity 1 o develop/mane a m auk eting and commie Mention system
for access in Willa C swego.Th ei marketing/con'm unication system could inch c ei On t not la a
limited to]: branding; maps and Transp'orta'tion Dem and M anagen.art IITIMI alternatives. 110
A successful parking system will nequine cin-going marketing and communication.The fou ncation fan
a marketing and cammu nicatian program it the signage zinc way uric ing package necommeric ec in
this report ilsee strategies 15 and 161. 51u ppari cif this Sy steam car t El facilil ated th no1 gh
ir'lonmai Tonal maps ain't broch t'refs abau 1 Lakes C swega arc its Flanking system distnibuteic by th El City
and through Business Associations,Visitor Serv'ic'es, Retail and Lodging networks.
11 is reicommendec that the City:
a. Flail r'er with th e business cammu nityl to dev slop a manketing ant' cammu r'iciatian sy stem fon
access in Lake Oswego.Th a Ranking A c visay Committee can serve as the t u Siness lam.m for this
c ism.ssion.
Thea marketing/communication'system would inch,cEl IItut nal be limilac 1a]:
1. Maps. Develop maps that visually nelFpiesent Flanking zones'leg.,aan'eis A, B&CI] and identify
the local ion'of visitcm%ensu s employee facilities.
;I. Validatior program. Evalu ate 1 h e feasibility of retail%alit atiar'systems if, arc wh sir', paic
cus1amen parking moves ciffl-streeel.
.:1. TCM akeirnatives. Incorporate alte nnativei mcic ei dpi ions i.e.,Qshuttles,transit, ar'c bicy del
into Flanking cammu r'icatians materials.
110
Rick Williams Plage'40
Policing 3 Trar JFon oiticir Llemar c Managemen9
LciMe Osu eicici- 2C1.I0 FlarMing Resource Asseissrr er 1
118. Cleavelopl al recomnr sire ed Flaickaige cif inc Eartiv els fear the private developn Elrt of public ly alv alilaible
pawl kill.
Developers generally plrcayic El airlc mann€lel parking to serve exclusive accessory uses to 1 F Elill
parr icular site. As su ah,sites ane cifllen c elvEllopEac without t enefit of a pinocEIss or policy that woulc
allow Ion c iscussions id mamimize both the)accessory arc publics Si plplly of pankirg in a€liven ppaivate
project cm tci encourage employees to u SEI alternative trarlsportal ion mcic EIS.
C Ken the cost of parkin€1 c EN elcaplmerlt it will be import art and u sellu I far tF El City to encau nage)tF El
c EN eloplmerlt of publicly availat le parking in future private c ElvelopmElnt ppacajElcts.TF El opponi a rity✓l
to irlcElri Elith er mClIlEl MEIN it1E1 manaplemEln1 of private su plpllies QaIIclwin€l€IElrenal plu t Iia access; car
ac c itional SupIFlly far public use with in a ppaiv ate project should t El EDI ploned as we'll as TDM systems
th at coulc rEIC u ce overall devEllciplment casts.
Basec on the overall pinicarity1) of customer/palrcar parking tri City owned/cicarltraollec facilities,01E1 CityI
shoulc also empllore incElrii iv es 1F at enicou rage and su marl c Elvelopmerit all residential parking in
private)cafl-street locators to ensure that cIcarilicts t etween future resicential parking cemarlc arc
custcamer/visiton c mart are minimized.
TF El first step to creat irl€I a "toolt ox" cif irlcentivEls (such as llloor P nea Ratio and F eight t cine sEIs1
requ ires c evEllopmenit cif a fonmal policy that would allow the City to ciffler insert i%es if specific
public park ir€I arc trarlsplcarl aticarl €kaals were melt tri the ccarltext of a prival El C CM ril Clm r1
C Elvelclplmerit. It is recommElrced that the Barkin€1 Coordinator, Harking Advisory Commillee and
key development stakEiF clic ers em amine a sElt cal incentives that cot.Ic be ac optElc by 1F El City✓) as a
• means id indent future parkin€I c Elveloplmerii.
ErampllEls of devel aplment irceritivEls cu nnently availat lEI in cath en jurist ictions inclu c El It u 1 are rlcll
limited to):
•I Floon ArEla Raticl MAR; t circ SETS
41 FEIigF1 borluses
41 Hermit fEIEI waiv ers
41 Impact lee waivers
Su pply/revenue a€lreaemElriis'°
11 Property lax abatements
119. IV orlitor c owntowni pankirg utiliaatiar continuously aunt periodicially. Conduct paid ire
inventory airiaily ses.
11F relcElrily complletElc analysis of Lake Oswego's pankirg inventory pro,ices e>cellerlt irformaticar
can park in8 to nnovElr, Cu nation cal stay, pElak hour capacity arc c Elmaric.The reed for this
c ata is venii important as a foundation piece for determirlirl€I actions id maN imizEl park Ir®su pply.
Heinioc is monilcuairl€I of pankirg act iv Hy will allow Lake Oswego to Qa) bell ten coorc inatEl erifcuaaElment,
Qt) assn re)mall imu m utilization t asEld or interldEic uses ard Qc; pro,is El solic EN Ic anal fon tF El rIEIEId
la move to higher and/on more ag€llessivEl levels of parking marlaglemElrt.
IP20 Revenue agreements ane lease agneernents wi ereby the airy agrees 10 a guava nieed lease far publicly ava ilable spaces at a
negotiated nal e pen s1 a II. In many aases,IF e(lily lease is engaged to assure can1inued custamen/visilon access.
Rick Williams Flatlet 41
Poi king& Ti anir on atic r Demotic Manaclameni
1 ake Oswego—2(110 Parking Resource Asseissrmir
It is re comment EIC th al a parking inv enitory analy 9is t e conducted at lea91 ev aryl two years.
Irfonma tion from tF e9 El upc al EIS would t El farwianded to 1h El Ranking Claanc inatar arc tH El Parking
P c visaryl Clammitte El fcir rev ieiw, ev alu atiari arc strategy)implemeri atiar.
PI-11A SE 3--LONG 11ERM IMPLMENTA 1IICIN
llh a ilollowinig st rategiies are neciammerc EIC Ilan hong-teuvri,'mpilemeintation
21C1. !lease/aaquine strategical!) located land parcEll Is) for use as future piu t lic off-street parking in the
downtown.
Ill El City sh ou lc move to acquire strategically lociatec c evelaplment parcels that cioulc be used
as "cionsolidatec" parking)aneas lion visitors and employees of the downtown. It is important to
glair'aartnol of such sites to assune that parking)can to useic as an iraentivEl 10 new development
111F rough lee-in-lieu options' anc is pro)imate to c esire c c evelaplment opporl unities.
It is necommenc EIC tH at 1F El Flanking Coondinaton and Ranking p c v isoryl Committee ev alt.ate
opportunities relaiElc to parking)site aaquisitiar arc farwanc recommendations an specific sites to
til El Cily(lau nail.
2111. Sponsor employ er-based initiatives to encourage employee uses of alternate travel modes.
As 1 h El c owntown ev clv es,greaten constraints 1 a parking acciess will occur given 1a) the sciaruity{ all
lanc for su riacie parking dev elopment and lb)the dost of future parking supply that is transitioned
into parking struc to nes. la 1 h is end, mcire facu sed programs arc incentives will nem to be p navic e d
lo comma to ns to increase use of transit, bike,Hialk and ric eshare options.
l!F a Ranking P c vi9oryl Committee shoulc devote time and c isaussion to estat lish iri8 commute
trip reduction programs within the c awnl awn. llh a RAC can servie as a fciru m to bring TriMet,
t u sinless associai ions and the Clityr i aglether to c isau ss anc create new incentives and c irectiors for
1 ranspari atiar c e mand management.
22. Bstat lisF c am muter rr ode split targets fon em ploy ee acciess in di El downtown.
Flanking development negulatiars arc requ iremerts nem to be su priori ed t y a sy si em of access t h at
acciou nts fan all forms of capacity Qi.e., auto,i ransit, t ike,walk anc ric ash are). M eii ra regional
gu is alines fon puking management call lion a gneater percentage of c owntown employ vies la move
into alternativ El modes of transport atiar. Quantifying for!lake Oswego the desired transit ion of
commuters fnom an establi9 H etc status quo t aseline to a c esirec target will Ila)give policy!support to
regional trip reduction goals; 1b) inform arc facilitate parking strategies arc (ci) pnovide a siaridard
of measurement 1F at can be ev ala ated in the fu to re.
It is recammerc ed that the Clity all Lake Clsweglo,through c isau ssions and review with tH El Parking
Adv isory Committee,fcuimally incorporate mcic e splits targets ion all modes Qi.e.,5ICV,transit, bike,
walk arc rideshare; into its parking managiemeri policy. The pi lipase of this strategy woulc be to
clearly establisH a logical lir k t etween mode split targets anc actual parking minimu m9 ar c
ma)imums in City policy. Clver time, !lake Cl9weglo may want to explore implementing maximum
411P
pankirig natios that ane logiiaally aorrelatec to the moc El split targets estat lish ed for the c awritawri.
Rick Williams nage 42
Acirkir & lrar sp artc tior Demand Manic gierr era
Lal4Ie C swe igo—20]CI Parking Resc a rce Assessme crit
2?. Evaluates the impact of ream am rr id-term strategies based or an updatec utilization and damaric
SdIU d y. If and w F en warrar tad,develop!a pricing policy!tnategy aric implement paid on street
parking it do%rtown'districts'based circ the 85%Iii le.
The Phase 1 and 2 strategies cittlinec above will create changes in access cynamias cciwrilciwr.
Similarly,!h El eventual impact of a raw strelEdcian lire to Lake Oswego may to nealizec, wh iah will
alsci create rw arses and ch alleriges fair park ire management. As sucih, ii after nearly th res years of
growth, planking ociaupariaies in c ciwritowr rot tinely excised 89%in the peak h of r; movEI to meter
the impacted zcire(se). If metering is pursuec, it is reaommendec that on-street play stations be
considered rath er than single h ead metal's.
Options can range frcim pniaing parking in specific areas IIe.B.,tiff-street only) lei priairifl specific usans
(e.g.,employees)to a commit'ensus a system of pricing th al would include metering on-arc off-
stneet.
The Harkin€!Coordinator arc the Parking Adv isoryl Committee shoulc c Eivelof a coordinate( strategy)
for h ciw parking pniaing will I El implemented as the demarc fan pauiking and new parking supply
evolve in the mid-to long-term. Clnice c es elcipeld,,the parking policing strategy sh ou Id t e ppiesented
to l h e City Cou r kill for review arc approval.
The outline of strategy issuEls presentee below is iriterded to inform the City,the Parking
Coordinator and th a Harking A dvisciryl Clcimmittee an majcm c Eaisiori and management guidelines
sh ciu Ic pricing become necessary as a means to maximize and facilitate access capacity. Based on
the firdiri8s of the 2011CI park ing stt c y, th Eire is rci recommer idatior i to move to pricing at l F is time.
a. IV iter on-street park iris to increase efficiency aric capacity.
As th a 89%Rule triggers ac c itioral and more agenessiv a management of th a supply, Lake
Clswego may at some future point aonsic sr pricing pinking in areas th at are cu month free.At
th at plaint pricing would t Ei intent ec to(a) facilitate mare Elfficiiert turnover,, III) ercou rage use
of specific facilities in specifics patting acmes Ili.e.,shciri-term ss.employee parking), (a)
Eiricourage u se of alternative moc es, and(d)provide a furic ing sou rce fair irr pros err ants to
existing supplies,development of raw supply arc alternative mode options.
In the context of pricing, Lake Oswego sF at Ic consider new tech nolci@lies as ailat la aric in place
in other ciities that allow for flex ibilily in the rr aragemerit of pad in@I pricing and contribute and
complement Lake Oswego's existing and c asirec urban form. "IV ulti-space metering" and"pay-
and-display'''systems are an example cd l h ase types cif tech nalogy, which allow a City to cut arge
for parking with cult"cluttering' the pedestrian way with inc iv is u al metals.
b. CIF arse for parking in publicly owned ofli-street facilities.
The City sh au Id establish a policy for pricing short-term parking it p!t t!icily ownec or ccirrl rolled
tiff-street facilities. Th El Ilnamewcirk cif st ah a policy is providec below:
1. 'SE ort-term rat El' is equal to hou my fee cit angec at on-street sy stem
2. 9vening rates establish ec to attract/serve appropriate uses
3. Long.term,c ally/monthly nates t alancied t y Ht le of 89%
Fl id Williams Clor su!ting Pagel 4 3
Flarklin5i& Wainspc rtcition Deimc n d A ancigc rneint
LaMc i Cswega—20]0 Pcirkir ci Rescw rc e i Asses:smenit
4. Rate manipu lad ion triggerec by Rule of 85%
9. Rate manipu lation generally al th El long-term end to faciilitate transition of long-term
parkers to appropriate parking locations within th El c owntown.
Reiv enue acdled ion in ofil-street facilities can vary greatly t y type of facility,design and mix of
ses(Le.,, short-term,, long-term, monthly).
24. Recorr mend tci the City Clot ricil the corr muter modest split targets developed in 22 above, for
adoption as a policy element of the Lake Clswego parking cot El.
It is recommended that the City formally ac apt commuter mode split goals as a key policy element
of the City s transportation and parking management plan. This woulc assure that all parking
standards,,strategies arc programs are logically correlates to the City's broac er goals for access.
25. Complete c evelopment and open new publics supply in the
downtown. 4 1
Clompletiari of site is entification,, planning,outreach arc fu nc ing 1
efforts describes woulc bei finali;iec aric tH El projed corn pieta aric 1 +.
opened to th el pu blic. a1
XV. CONCLUSION—PARKING MAINAIGBMENT .11
It El park ing manageme nt strategies'recom mended here is intended to "a ,.
provide a template for ad ion that would leac to a more efficient and - -;
organizes padding sy stem for the Downtown Lake Oswego. The
strategies would t El led by a Parkin€l Coordinator with informed insight ---
arc direction from a rE presentative Park irikl Adv isory Commits ee.
It is necommenc etc tH at th El strategies envisioned here be imple mentec oven a rr inimu m of 30 months,
trig le red t y the 85%Rule and docu rr entec park ing c err and. Ov erall, the strategies are c esiiklned to get
the'right Flanker to the right parking spot' in a manner that supports th el strategic visicm for growth as
establis h ad I) th a City.
Rick Williams Consulting Page 44
Parking 8 Transport aticini Delmar c Mcin agement
Lcikei Cswelgcl—2010 Parking Resource Ass Issmelnt
XVI. C H EIC KLIS1I- IMPLEME NTIAITION SCHEDULE
Strategy Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Comment
POI ICY PIC1IIC NS
A.1(a)—(c) Aids in guiding future
Aldopt policies and nules deaisian making and
(M an a(erne nt Zone' stnal egy implement ation.
(penal ing Principles a nd
85%Rule).
AI.2 110 provide rout in n oversight
Assign Parking and continued input in the
Coordinal on Posit ion to pnoce'
oversight of Barking ✓
management and plan
dawntawn.
AI.3 To provide noutine oversight
Establisl a Ranking and continued input it the
Advisory!Cclmmittee pnocess.
consisting of downtown
stakehcdderi to a!silt in ✓
planking pnogram
implementation and
review.
Al.a In 1 he future,on-s1 reel
Develop"'except ion"' pa eking in zones will ba
111, cnil eria for adapt icor by format ed using a ba<e
City'C ciuncil that sta ndand(e.g.,2 hours).
inllonms decision ma king R»ceptions to i F e base
lior est(blisl mens of s1 a n dad should be granted
loading zones and 15, ' only fan businesses that
30,60-minute 4-F R,6a <lemionslnal e a legitimate
F R a nd N oiLimii s1 alls need.
within the downtown
an-steeet supply
ALS Bet en conrelal a required
Simplify parking parking 10 actua I demand.
standard Is fon new ✓
develapmenl in the
downtown.
P1.6 Balance land use density
Eva Itiate and da velcip vision la exist ing parking
nestrictians an new a[Iowan cies ikon la nd area
surf ace par)ing Ice ✓ cciverafie"in surfa ae
development wit hin pa eking.
Zones A&B.
41.7 Enaauragespnivatd sedan
Rvaluate and develop a investment in parking that
feeiin-lieu opt ion far can mutually benefit a
new pari ing ,/ pnojeci and the downtown
development in 1 he
downtown.
Rliok Williams Consull ing Page 45
Parking& Trans ortafiorl Demand Mar agelmerli
Lake Os%ego—2L 10 Parking Reisource Assessment
Strategy j Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Cc mm en1
•
A.8 ; Ensures pankingkinds are
Establish a Downtown i "harbored"in a ma nner that
Parking and supports an on-going
Tnanspc,rtalion fund as parking management and
a mechanism 10 direct facility system.
funds derived from '� !
panking into a dedicated
fund.
NEAR TERN IN PU M ENTAITICIN
B.1 ' Initiates aen1 r lizal ion all
Appoint Pank°ng parking program.
Coardinalcmr ✓ ✓ I ✓
•
B.2 Pravides oversight and
In Wale Parking Aldvisaiy i monil oring committee for
Committee process Parking aoclydinalon and
assunes guidance oil plan
1 ✓ ✓ and inform at ion feedback
1brClity(bunch!.
B.3 Nenessaryl l o support new
Develop anc submit lime stt y formal cin-street.
service package for new
right of way signage per ✓
or-street changes in B.
Al,5 8110 below.
� l
B.4 I Clontrols employee use of
Reduce and/an on stneel system in
eliminate all 15 minute, • constnained part ing zones.
1-1i F1,41-R,6I-A and '�
Increases supply al parking
Noslimit pans ing stalls in lair visit ors in aiiea cif highest
Zone A and convert all
demand kir a aces.
Malls tai 2-hour parking.
B.9 Maximizes s urrent y
Poedwa and,on undc rutilized parking
eliminate all 15 minute, supply.Balances emipicryec
•
1-how, Po and N of f and visitor need. Uses 85%
limit parking stalls in Rule to miainLl in
Zane A a n d convert a II apprapniate balance.
stalls to eil hen 2 11 Fl and Event ua I tra nsil icm al ti is
"4-HA air by permit."" aone 10 mole customers
I I i pant ing cin•sl neet.
B.6 I-pgnades existing panking
51 ripe all an-street supply to pnavide clean and
parking in Zones AI&B aonvenienl identification of
10 better identify ✓ on-sI neer parking.
parking av<ulability and
laical icin
Rick Williams Clonsulting Page 4E
Parking 8 Trar pori ation Delmar c Man agelmer it
Lac Csweigc —2010 Pcirkirg ourceiA!sessment
S1 rat egy Iremiec late Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Commas
8.7&8 Moves longen term parkers
Develop and initiates an into unc enutilized parking
on-street employee wl ile opening up s1 ails in
parking permit pnogram the cone fon prionihI visitor
(i.e.,paic permits)ti al parking.
would allow limilecl use ,/ ./ ✓
oil 4HRsiall'fan on-
Coni rola pa nk&nide abuse.
Zones B.
B.9 Reduces abuse oflime'
Strengthen parking zones and increases
enlloree mens activities turn oven.
in Zone Al to assure
eo isting time zones a ne ✓ ✓ ✓
honored and system
u1 iiiza tion/tt nncver is
opelating as intended.
B.10 Bet e n utilizes 1 his part ing
Revisit the use asses 10 bala nce employee
agneemeni ilor public and visitor need and
parking al the U ke View conven fence.
Village Garage 1 o more
eflecl ively man a le
parking Son customers
and emipicryees.
MIO-TIRM IMPIEMENT1AI1ION
B.11 Assures panking is managed
Re-evaluate and to(a)pniaritbe austomer
refonmat stalls in access(b)aomplemeni TDM
publicly owned off- a efforts and(c)event ua ll l
street lots io balance pnicing parking to"'market
empk yet i use and demand."
ill or-1 erm acnes s. ✓
Explore'e implcryee
pail ing penmil pnicing
based on 85%s1 anc ard.
B.12 Redirect undeiuililiaecl
N egotial a shared c se pnival a parking supply ecu
and/or lease moue gen anal public use.
agneemen is with
owneus al stnal egicall11
piaeecl eo isling pnivale
surface lois in Zones Al&
B i o pnevid a 1bn an ✓ ✓
in 1 Brim supply oil
parking where needec
Begin locus on sites
iclenlified in 1he 2010
Panking Si udil with
surpluu availabilitil.
Hak Williams Consulting Paige147
Parkir gi& Transs lortation Demand M an age amen 1
Lclkei Cswegcl-2010 Parking ReiselurceiAssessmen'
Strategy Immediate Phase 1 Phase2 I Phase 3 I Comment
B.13 Implemental ion ala new
Expand outreach 10 a II i pa liking plan will create
businesses within the changes'hal neer to be
effectively cammunicaled to
study/one Io
eommun icate the .i ✓ businesses and err ployees.
parameters cif the new
Part ing Management
Plan. •
B.141 Anovides criteria and process
Devek iiaResidertsal allowingneightlanc�scid
Panting Permit Zone associations la request
(RPPZ)policy and RPPZ's a s a nespcinseita
program skin adciptian by parking spillover issue s
the Cit) Cauncil kir t
fut une implementation
in residential area s
affect ed by spillover
from commercial
pa nking(i.e.,Zc ire C). I
B.15 I Improves customer
Ddvelcsp and install a I awareness of supply optic ins
signlage package a
un ifarm design,logo
and colon al public a nd 'P
privy t e(shared use)off-
streel parking facilities.
B.16 Impncves nifstomfer
St nal egically place new awauen ess cnl supply
and aoondinated way options.
finding sign'ge it the
rig't-of-way at ✓ I
laraiicins chosen
carefully to direct
viiitcus to aft-street
local ions.
B.17 Provides a coordinated
Partner with tie system of communicat ion
business community tcs . br II those who want 10
develcip/refine a access downtown U ke
market ing and f ,/ Oswlegci.
communication system
akin access in U I e
Oswego. •
B.18 Prc vides incentives that
Deuek ip a would encourage use all
recommended packs ge private supply to men t
col incentives for the multiple dawntawn part in g
private develciAlrrfenl of demands rmi t her than Ju
publicly ava lir ble i site based demand.
parking.
Rick Williams Clonsultirlg Payee 4E
Parking& Trot pori aticini Demaruc Mclmagieme m t
Lakle()sweigcl—201C Pcu king Flescurce Assessment
411 Strategy Immediate Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Comment
B.19 Update 2010 Barking Study
Monitor downtown to provide intlonmation for
paining utiliaalion informed decision making
aonl inuouily and and 1 o m easune impact of
peniadiaally. Conduct pa nking ma n age menl plan.
panning inventory ° 9upporis 85%Rule
analyses.
LANG-1lERM IMPLEMBN11A11IOI
B.20 Provides Ion consolidaled
Corn plel e develop mens !apply a rid avoids continued
and open new public !Lir-lace lot dome la pment in
supply inlhe downtown.
downtown. Could t a by City ou part of
public,pnivale partnhnsl.ip.
S
•
1111
Rick Williams - - Page 49
Flarklinc & 71rclrspciricllicn Demcird Mclnci ennen,l
LaAle Osvve SIo—;ICI/CI Flarkling Re sou lice Assessmeirt
IMPLEMENTATION ARAMEWORK S
XU II. PAFIKINE MAIN AGHMENT PLAIN — OPERAIIING PRINCIPLES
This section of tit El report presents a prapasec park in@I managemeinl plan for dawritcwin flake Clswega.
The proposed plan strives to give direction to ilutu ne c ecisiari-mall in@I Ion 1F El implementation cd Flanking
management 51 nategies ins specific aineas al l h e c awril awri.llh ese strategies ane c esignec to assume
pricmity acciess is maintained in each parking management zarie. Ovemall,1 h El plan is intended to pravic e
a fle>ible system of parking managemenil that is triggered ty demanc aric implemented with in the
ciaril ext of ucansensus goals arid v ision Ion 1h e c awritawni.
The purpose cif the Flanking management plan is 1 ci:
11 Cleanly c efine 1 h e interic ec use and purpose cif th e parking sy slam,
Manage 1 h El supply and enfarcie the parking policiies aric regu latians,
Mondor use and resparic 1a changes in c emand, aric
Maintain 1F El interic ec fu riction ail 1 h El overall system.
A. Parking Mariaeement Zones
Difilerent segments of tit e c owntown have c iffenent economics users aric represent different points cif
aaaess into 1F El c cawnitcawr'.Ibis parking plan endeav ons 10 emphasize that the heart or cern nal core cif
downtown represents the area in which the highest density{ cd economic aril iv ity and acciess is intender
to occur.llh eine are also distinct areas of the downtown with c ifilering levels/tyrpes cif c mired eaariamici
activity. The desined uses in a pari iciular area of downtown sh ou Id c Ike the c ecisioni making forth e
ty pie cit Flanking required. Parking,then, becomes a management tool that supports specific euanamic
uses. Implemeril atican of parking management strategies in pi licdy aontrollec park irig supply is
supportive of the economic de%elapment plan Ilan 1 h El CityI of Lake Oswego aric its c owntown.
Higi rel K,next page,sh camas three recommended parking manage merit sones for downtawn Lake
Cls wegca.
dories A and 9 ware primarily derivec from 1F e c ata c ensued from the 2011(1 downtown parking inventory'
aric c ala collection piiocess and infanmed through work arid analysis real ec 1a actual parking dynamics
c emonstnatec by the data. Gane C represents a "Kleniph oral zone" comprised primarily cif residential
uses,which new s scime management to assu re that spillov em impacts from acmes A and El are mitigated
ar minimized. Zone boundaries Iniene est al lished Lased or 1F El edit ing ecionomici aric transportation
characteristics,, as well as desirec uses ion 1 h el anea, as identified t y the(litin previous planning effarl s.
ElaciF zone is su mmanizec aric its primary'purpose aric priority stated in 1F is section t Blow.
In sh ori,these th nee zanies represent "eccariamic aativ ity zaries" in the downtown 11-at ane Lath
reflective of eNis1 ing land uses in addil ions to areas where future growth of specifics ecionomici
c evelopmeril is anticipated and desirec. Hnam an access perspective,each zone will need to be
managed in a manrien 1 h at su pparts pricuaiteconomic uses and usens identified for i h at zarie.
I
Rick Williams Pcige ICI
larkincl& 71<rc rspc rite clic n Demcino Mcnciclemeint
1
Lake C swe go—210]CI Parking)Resciurai Assessme rpt
Figure K
Reaammer ded Ir itial Parking Managemer t Zones
t—1 LIIIR. _ --:-. ..-: Jowl
OW
Zone
IT !fiti -t_ a L___ it. . ,, ac.,.... ,,---- c-.---_i — - -- -- ,, ii.„fra 4,1!:,
*Ireft" 4,,, .„, xk
1Mk 9
i 1
kAlialital s sr 8
� �; Er
WOW 17 �c ._,
Zone g 1�' 18
91 -
A STREET
LII ,
i ,ar
A. .
'�c ]I + .„, . 1.
it •• ' 23f co, Za
Ili.111* Aji-aft.! : --:-EY.h7,1i9Reim:_; ' '
ial Mt ONI a ---1- - - . -' 1
„....<4,
ill . , mor .., _,
itmegiV NOr• c�"� r
imigv4aft 4..* .ili-toUp. ,
ONO - rill ,._../.-
1 I U --
Pit
JY\'\✓ ,<i r r"'"----.--._ - `�1
n tJegend
Rick WIIlilams Consulting. --L. al 2'.c neA
wFankingRTianspcctatienDemandManagement '(• '+' .-E
6'0 SW Alden,Suite'221 2 one 9
Hartland,ORI 97205 fir°
9 _ 12oneC
•
B. Clperatirg Princiipiesiv
Clpemating priricifles define the purpose and priority'fail parking in each of the Parking)Management
0 Zciries. Operating)Principles)complement and reinforce the inteinc ed priority'eistat fished for the
c owntown. Within th El context cif it El apelratirg nriricurltEas for each zone is a specific'implementation
m
Rich Williams C or su sting Pcige 32
Parking& 1Ircinspcirt!ation Demcirid Nlancigemeint
La Ala 09w egad—;C iC flarkling REiscu rcei AssessmEir 1
framElwcrlk th nough which decision making for that zone can ocicu r. TF a implementation framework
pnavic as an on-going foundation ion stralagic decision making gnaw nc ed in the operating prionil ies
established for the zone and llcrl 1 H EI c owntown as a Htt tide.
WitH ac opt ion of a parking management plan 1H a City commits to implement parking mana€lament
strategies in pubilicily owned or coir trolled park frig areas to assure the purpose and priority for park inig
established in iF El Clpanating PoinciplEl9 arEl consistently attainElc.
Operming principles aric an implementation framewcrlk have bEIEIr c eveloped Ilan EIacH parl•in€I
management zonEl. It is important to recognize tH e operas in€l principles anic 1H El implementation
framework for each zona arEl intenc ec to serve as neutral neferencie points from whicH c iscussiors of
parking c eciision making and strategy implementation are Lased aver time. As 89 percent occupancy
triggers are acitival EIC,these FplincuplEls and framewonk gu idelinEls will F elp fu l u ne c Elcision-makans
through stnategy cevEllopmant. Strategies will tH Eli be implemented id ac c IIElss specifics c Elmand and
capacity issues in a manner appropriat EI 10 that partiau tan point in time. In this manner,the parking
management plan remains fluid and adaptat le to cH angling conc iticlns as the c clwritclwri dENelclps arc
grows.
ZONE!Al-Clara scar a
ThEI ucrIEl zone of downtown inch c es tH El highest density cd c evelopmElr1 aric is intenc ec to su priori a
high concientrat ion of employment, rat ail, rElst au rant, aric crit art ainment opportunities.
].
Operating Principles les(2onie A)
•
Tile prim city purpose of parking,iri Zone A i< to serve austorrer and other short-Um vis itor needs and
support desired economic users tri the zones.
• The pt.-pose of,and priority'far, put tic parking in Zone A is to support zinc enhance the vitality,
oll 111 EI rEli ail ciclra.
• Parking for short-term users is the priority fclr on-street areal off-street spaces in none A.
• 9mplciyeEls shclulc be discsoura€lac loam parking in 2lone A, particularly on-stneet.
• Ranking will to pros ic EIC acs ensure cam enient,Economical,and user-friendly access lkrl
customers,clients, and visit ors to c civil-limn at all Eau rs of the operating day lIi.e., weekc ays,
evenings and‘nieekenc sJ.
• All on-strElet flanking in ZornEl A will I El regi la1 ed Qi.e.,time stay arc Elnlbncec
2. Implementations Framework(12bne A)
A. P II clr-s1 neet parking will to 2 Eau r parking t asEIC on the principle 1H at:
11. TN El 2 hour time slay allows ac EICIL ate customer,visitor arc client aacElss to 1 H a
retail corEl; and
2. Uniform 1 ime sl ays foster a flanking environment 1H at is easy for the customs'',
visiton aric client tcl understanc.
3. Any variation to the Z F au n start enc will be evalu ated 1 F nclu gih and excsepticlrs
process i]seEl El, t elclw:.
•
Rick Williams Pci51e
/larking& 1lrcirspc nla tic n Demcir c Maragemer
• LaiAle Ost cgio—;ICIICI Aarkincl flesc urce I ssessmcr l
8. The lore-term ppiiority far on-street planking in aclrie A will t e 2 F ou r park ire. Ps
stnateplies will'iri this plan are implemented, arty arrstlleet spaces of longer dural iori will
to tnansil ionElc to off-91 neat locations within the core aric immediately ac jacent to it.
C. The pricniityl Ion cifil-street pank ire in Zone A will t El a comt ination of stays of parkin®Ion
downtown employees and visilcul parking that accommoc ates customers,visitors and
clients riEledirg IonplEul lEuim stay opportunities. ClvElr time,employee parkino in the core
is to t e c iscau nagec in City owniec facilities as visitor demand increases. Ps v isitor
c emaric increases 1F El mix of employ EIS Flanking in 2onie A shoulc favor v isitons with
more employees mov EIC tcI Zane B anc/or alternativ El modes.Pt no time should parking
in ZariEl Ate ppiciviced Ion u9E1 by nari-ccMinlawn basec users 1e.g., park aric ride] who
v ciu lc park cars all day in Zone A as a means to leave downtown for another
c estiraticin.
D. The City)will conduct reaular utilization arc capacity studies to ascertain the actual peak
F n iiilizaticin arc averafle 1u mover of plarkiripl rEisou rces iri the cane anea. If utilization
cif an arc off-street park ira iri Zone P exceeds 85 plencert fan sustained periocs of time
and to nnover meets c es irec rates,1F e City will ev alu ate aric implement are,or a
comt iraticir of,the following implementation steps"tni8gerec" t the 85 percent
th nest.tilt:
• Increase level arc/or dural ions of enforcement to assu re desined nate of turnov en
arc minimize/eliminate abuse(i.e.,exceeding time stay, nriov ire la evade;.
S . Rec u ce on-street time stays to increase 1 u mover(e.g., 2-F au rs to 90 minutes' as
apppicippiiate.
• Transition employ ee planking in Gone A into att.'en planking zone's' throuplF ati nil ion
arc/or elimination cd monthly permits issue( for lane-term parkinpl in 1F zone.
• AL rsue shares-use aeneemerts with pniv ate lots 1c1 prov iC El Ilan ac c itional sh art-term
pankinig in acme A.
• Flu rsu e implementation cd valet programs Ile.e., in pan rens Hp wil F mita nants)to
art ante custcimer/v isiton access by sh u ttling cans to areas with au ailat le capacity.
• Convert same siered 1 ime limits ta meterec time limits ta create 8neatElr efficiency
in actual rate cif to rover arc to create a potential nevEinu El source for new su pply.
• 8xparic th El boundaries cif the Cane manaeemEirl zone to iricreasEl th a rw miler cif or-
street v i9 itor spaces.
• Incnease ran-SC V use li.e., proplrams for sh u lties,tnansil, ric est.anirg,etc.)
• Create new pi t lic supply in acme A.
O. The City will est at lish policy guidelines for except ions to the sh art-term park ire
requinemElrls in Gore A.
11. Haric icapped/c isat lec access
2. 115 -_ICI minute zones
a. Specific crilenia ion appnoval (i.e., by specific business ty pe).
t
I. Specific locaticirs II LEI.,end cd t lock vEirsu s mid-block).
c. Number per geoppiaphis area I]i.e.,shared ty users in a partici Ian areal.
Rick Williams Pciyle r3
Parkins & 7rnrspcuiic iic n Dcmcira Management
l
lake Osw eicici—2C 10 PcirFling Reiiciurcei A99eissmen
3. Loac ing zones S
a. Maximo m nu mer per t lock facie's].
I. Limitation ciri numt Ell!plElll 8eograph i(1 area de.g., no more than twci llth Elver}I
th rElEI continu CIL 9 block laces].
C. 9v alu ationl oil ciFlFlclrl u rlities for sh aped loac inpl arc (kV timer plarking.zl
BONE B—Bmerging Core Zone
Gone 9,the lmElnf ing Clone Aare, includes a mix of development types, bu t at lower c ens ities 11-and in the
Clore and with a relatively h iplh Em proportion of service, nesic EIrl1 ial and professional services. l3)I planlsions
oil 11-El economic lark use all allacl Elllisti(Is of Zone A ane expected to man in the emEin irg Clore Aare.
.1. Operating Principles'(lone E)
The City's goad is to cor tinuEi to er courage)tfIEi mixed-we devellopment of this)sone, pclrticlu,lacly cm'it
supports the rEitclid core.Asl sluclh,, onslireet parking in Zone B is it tended to tcansitior oven time io serve
sfl ort-ienrr ocir lir a r Eledsl clr d tile desired Aand uses in this arm El. An the inteilim„ sU/IFIIiIu3i parking it thEl
zon EI clan be effEuctit ely utiliiled to meet UnmElt long-term demand.
✓ Most ricit all) on-street parNirl€I in this zclrle will be transitioned io serve short-1El11m,visitor
par-Nino. Off-stneet parking will continue to pnovide a mix of shclrl aric long-1E111m stay
opportunities.
✓ Uric Elru1ilizElc on-streEll parking in this zone will to made a%ailat le to employee parking. •
✓ Ov Ell!1 ime,on-streEll parking will reillElat a balanced mix of sh ctrl aric long-tEnlm si ay
opportunities. Long-t Elllm parking may ev anti.ally nEICIL ire transition into off-street supply.
✓
0.111-stneet parking in this zone is intElrlc EIC to provide convenient and cost-Elfle(Itive employee
par-Nino supply as a measure to pneserve higher access opporl a nit iEI5 for cu stome n aric nation
use in the core zone(Zone A).
✓ Parkin€I in this zone will be managec in a manner that minimizes and mitigates spilloven oil
ciclmmEulcial Flanking demand into nesic ElrItial areas immediately adjacent 10 tli a central t u siness
di91 riot.
2. Im plElmentation fllamewosk(Zone BI,
A. Th El majanity ail art-street parking will to 3 11 ou r parkirlo"on t y plenrnit,"with art
anrIrclplriatei mix of sh ctrl arc long-1Eu1m parking basec on capacity' considerations(i.e.,,
f19% Rule)." This is based on 11-el principle that:
]I. This mix cll planking i9 titbit u eivEI to both au stomEul9 arc employ ees and longEul term
visit clr parking lion 11-el c clwrlt clwrl;
Z1
"Clambinaticin Lcia ding Zones"have been used in athen junisdicl ions allow ing loading during specific peniads til the day(e.g.,
6:30 a.m.-10:C( a.m.),then convert 1 a short-tenrn panking duping a II athen time peniads. Such none!,if s ucces1 lully managed,
as n incneane civera II shcirt-tenrri!upply.
21 llhe Clity and PAC might cci iden st a rting w ith 3 hour!tall! 'or by penmil'in this zcine if i1 i! believed I hat I F e permit system
110
and enfancemenl can en!ure that emplayee1 ane not adversely affecting auslornen access in Zcine El.
Rick Williams Page 514
Rarldincl& 711ransr cirtcilicin Derrinno Mar cigemenI
• lake Osw et ci—2CC 0 Flarkling Resource Asseissmer
]. TF emel is adequate ori-street capacity in 1F a zones to meet t citF sH ort anc long-1 emm
parking camanc.
3. TF El cunrent economic uses in the zones c a not as yet rent.ire the ty Fla ail It.nnaver
ratios necessary'in Zona A.
41. Variation to 1F El 3 H our standarc can t a monitored and adjust EIC 1 F reit.gh occupancy
dala anc an excelptiars process lsee 9, telaw).
B. liF a long-term priority for on street Flanking in Gana 9 will be 2 F ciu n Flanking. As
stral egies witH in tF is plan ane implementec, Icing-term Flanking 11 ima stays anc plemmits)
will be transitioned 1a ofil-stneet local ioris wit F in the Emerging Core Zone arse
immediately ac jacent to it.
C. TF El priority for off-s1 reset parking in Gone 9 will be mix ed-use park ing to accammac ate
tF El ft.II ranges of users, including employ vies of tH El c owntown, customems,visit ars anc
clients. TF ellEl facilil leis are intendec to ppiavide for a range of time stay cipporlunities.
TF El intent of off-s1 wet parking in Gone 9 is to minimize anc/or prohit it laver times] tH El
use of city( awnec/controllec canes B park in€l ilcm plank anc ric et.SEIS. !nth a near term,
SOME!accommac atian coulc t El made for su cH uses Rased ciri acct.panties of lass than
89%;. lc Bally, any lank and nic el facilil iels woulc be proF ibited cm specifically limited to
assure that City park ing resou rces ane ag€piessi%ely managed to max imhiel access fcir
businesses anc patrons of the downtown.
D. TH El Cit))will cant u ct negular utilization and capacity stu c ies to ascent air tH El actual peak
• hour utilization and average turnovem of parking nesou reels in cone O. If utilizal ion of on
anc off-stneet park ing in the Emerging Clare zone axceec s 85 percent ion su stainec
periods ail 1 ime and 1t.nnaver meets c esired nates,(F e City will e‘alt.ate anc implement
one, cm a combination of,1H el fallowing implementation steps"triggerec" t y the 85
percent thresholc:
• Increase level and du nation cd enforcement to assune desirec rate cif to waver anc
minimize/eliminate at u set Ili.e., ex ceec ing time stay,moving to evac a).
• Increase mix cif short-term time stays l]or 3 Hour onlyj to increase tt.rrimer.
Flu nsue sH anec-use agreements witH private lots to ppiavide for additiaral parking in
Zone B cm ac jacent areas.
• Trarlsitiar or-street elmplayeei parking in Zane B into available aff-street locations
wit F in the park ing zone or"satellite locations."
▪ Attrition and/or eliminate uses of publicly owned/cartncllec parking supply by non-
downtown t.sers(e.g. plank anc ric el)
• Increase non-5ICIV use by emplcryees di.e., programs,lnansil, tike/walk, ridesharin€I)•
This would t a aaaomplisF Bic 1 F rau€lh rec u ction/elimiratian ar pricing of mirth ly
permits issued for parkin€1 in afil-strelell locatiars.
• Meter/charge fcir parking ton and/cm afil-street; 1a create€pieater efiliciency in actual
rate of turno%en arc 1a cneate a potent ial re%ant,e sciu nce for new su plplly.
• Cneate new mix ec-use put lic flanking su Hoy witH in cm acjacent to the zone.
B. TF El Cil)I will establisH policy gu is elines fan exceptions to the park ing requirements in the
• 9merging Core Zone.
Rick Williams Page 35
Rai—hula& 7lransp artat ion Demand Man agemein l
Lae Oswego—;ICI1(I Flarklinc Flesounce Asse ssrnent
JI. Haric icappeic/disat lest access
3. 15 -30 minute zanies •
a. Specific criteria for approval Ii.e., t y specific business type
b. Specific locations Ilf.e.,end oft locik vs. mic-t Icicik
a. Numbe n per plea€raphic area li.e.,shoulc be shared by usens in a particu lar area;
3. Loading Jones
a. Ma)imum number per block 11acells).
b. Limitation on number per geogpiaphia area iIeI.tl., no mares th an two for every
thnee canitinuous t locik facies'.
ci. Elvalu at ion of opportunities fcir sharec loading and customer parking.
ZONE C—Periplh anal Parking Zone
The Peripheral Area serves a h igih proportion cif Resit erit ial demaric with 9cime law-c eirlsityl corn me racial
uses. Iii spillov en effects lhiom the Cone and emerging Cares 3ariel9 'pones A 81 B; ane prat lematic, a
Resic eintial Parking aonie QRRZ] may be establish EIC to ensu ne that adequate parking is available for
demand 8enera1EIC from uses within th El Peripheral A nea. Inst iafly, planking in th El Peripheral Area is
intended to t e largely u rinegu latest.
. C;grating Piincipllks(Peripheral Parking ArEici)
Parking in the Peripheral Area is intelric eic to serves residential c eimarlc arid uses geirlenatinlg demaric i
from within the zciniei. It is intended that"spill over"from oth or parking zones with in the c c rut awn be
mitigated.
• Ranking in the Peripheral A nea is intended to meet demand general eic within tH is planking area.
• Ranking in this anea i9 unreal.laced.AQ such, Rio 1 ime stay nestnictionis area in effect. Rutu ne
management strat eigies assumeic fan 11-is area wou lc be contingent an th El parking ad ivity,
capacity,and utilization of all Oh an planking zones.
• If parking spillov en ilnom Zones A or B rest.Its in iniadequat El parking availability flan plrapeirl ies
within the Reniplhanal Area, REISidential/Area Renmit Zone pnograms may be desireic.
2. impiemieintatior Framework(Plei*helral Area)
A. Railing in this zone is u rinelgulatec. As such, no time slays are in efilect. Ruture
management Si nategies asst.med for this area will be writ ingeirlt on the parking activity,
capacity,arc utilization cd all other parking)zones.
B. Resic eirlt ial Permit Zciniel progpiams may t El implemented ii planking spillover from Ganes
A —El results in iniac equate park ina availat ility for properties within 1F El Relnipb elral A nea.
C. Cleric IL sion—Ooelratine Principles
Rarmatt ing decision-making within tH El context of u pique parking management zcirieii with specific
operating objectives and criteria ass'.nets tH at th El implementation clil strategies is tiec directly to c mired
•
Rick Williams Paige �6
Parking& Transpartalinn Demcirc Manciclemert
• LakEi Oswego—2I01GI Pcuikir g Resource Assessment
oLicomEis. This will facilitate what may at timEis seem to be difficu It or cortray ersial c Eici9ionis
incneased enforcement,displlacEiment cif employEie9 out ofvisilan supply, nates, etc.). Operating
FlriniaiFllEis arc establish ec 1a pros is El a rea9anaL IEi zinc strategic framework fcir discussiaris of parkiri8
mane I emEmt actions and thein aflfplclflria1Ei implementation.
XVIII. SUMMAIi1I
Lake Oswego F as c are ai gloat job in managing)its flanking assets 1 ci tH is plaint in time. LakEl Clsweglcl Has
also mace exaellEiril strides in engaging planning efforts that form tH El fclu nc atian ilon glaoc ilutu ne
c ElvelopmElrIl; devElopment that su marls a mcuie ciomplacil aric trans flare ation efficIiEirIi urban fcuim.
VV F at is Iackirigl is a clear,IIEIxiblEl arc consensus basElc blueprint ion u sing parking management to
su pport aric facilitate the loriglen-term strai egic s isiari. This plan pinavides that L IL epnirIl. It will serve as
a gu is El 1 a maximizing the Ci1y'9 er isting parking)rEI9CIL rces and as a means to assn Ile cost effElctivEl
solution's far access,wF id inch,c EIS improvemElrll9 to tick El anc policy, refcmmall irlgl anc simplifying)
access in the cawntown anc a ciommilment to parking)bast praaticEls.
This flanking managlemElril plan defines tH e imtElrIc ec use aric pi IIFIcISEl cif tH El parking system; manages
11.e supply aric enfarcies the parking policies; monitons 1F El use and responds 1a(tangos in c emanic; arid,
maintains 1F e intEiric EIC fu action cif tF El overall sy 51 Earn.
This plan F as Leen c ev elclpled to builc u flare piniriciple9 and opera)ingl 91 nategies tF at are L ased on tH El
fundamental values and objEicli\EIS fcir Downtown Lake Oswego. The parking management stnategliEi9
HwenEl identified to clfllimize the use of existing parking)in 11.El cowritciwri.)these strategies inch cEl policy,
zone specific and circ-going anea wide strategy recommendations. The suacEiss ail tH e plan is dependent
L fora its ac opt ion Ly Clity Council and ilcmmal im fllemental ion through a coorc inatec proiEiss. p c cipltiori
oil 1 F El plan by City! Council will L El Ei9sential to impllElmentai iori.
ft is apparent 1F at as Downtown Lake Clswe o Snows, sa too will cemanc Ilan parking. r ew
cevelopmEirit, a !taster paaEl of tnifl growth, losses of current parking supply an surface lots, parking) zinc
1 rans flan ation c Elmaric management pnograms, Si neetcar and/all otH Ell!EN ents can work to acmElleral El clr
moderal El 01E1 nem for new flanking Si flflly. 5Iimilarly, the City's c evelopment vision for 11.e anea targEil9
a muciF high Eir mac El split fon EimpIdl ees u sing altEirriativ a modEis, leac ingl to a situ atian wH ere tH El
ciurrerii parking) requinements may nEIEIC to be adjusted c ownwarc to a level mone commensurate wilF
c esirEic lei Els of EimplayeEI parking) demarc, aneating a riElElC ion a segaral El and cedicial EIC su FIFIIy cif
parking far s isiton u SEI.
In summary.the Dian c Elvelooed th nou gh this process recognizes tF a importance ail'milking and access
Ifl tH EI success al cciwr11ciwri's Elcorlomici ceveloDment lutune. TH e Dian and its associiaiad strategies
Dnovide a coria Eixt from Mich coordinated and stnategia banking managEiment can t agin.
s
Rick Williams gage 51
Pad irg& Trnnspcirlaticin Demarc Manaclemert
LAKE OSWEG CI RBDE J ELCIRM ENT A G EN CY
LAKE OSWEGO Downtown Rarlding Rroject ImplerriE ntation Rlar
Centennial 1910-2010
SE pi Ember 112, 201111
BACKG RCIU N
TF El Lake aim Elglo REIC EVE IopmE nt A€IE rlcy IILORAI recently completed the Downtown Pa rk irlgl Study
th a 1 analyzed c civ%rl1 ciwrl paging usage, su pply,and eoc El requ iremelnits in order to address concerns
atciu1 downtown parking)availability arlc develciFlment constraints. 111.€ Study rev ea led that ciunnelnit
parking nE qu irE merits may pose a balmier to redEly ellciFlment. It also detElnminled that an adElqu ate
supply of parking actually e)ists in downtown. Howe%E n, mu ch of the off-street Si. III is F iiiv ately
ccintnollElc aric is ofilElni rElsi'kited for pu t Iia u 5El. Thu s, c civ%rltclwrl paging ca n ilelel constrained; an
impression 1F alt is compounded t y the fact that ma riy an-stneet spa('Els h Eve timE limits th al c ci not
ccmnesFlcind i ci th El av eraglel c esirec stay by c owr'tciwr'shoppers and visitors.
PROJ ECT OB.I BC11IV ES
Objectives hon i h el Downtown narking Project inch c El:
• Ma)imize the use cii11 h El City's existing parking resources;
• • ImFIIicive and simplify Flanking c'cic El requ irements to Elrlcou rage quality neldevEllopment in
c ciwr'1 clwri;
• Support downtown' t u sinesses;
« Effectively mana€lel supply zinc enforce narkir'€I policies;
' Implement best Flnac'1 ices Ilan c ciwrli awns park in@; ar'c
• Further ensure a h igh au ality-of-life for downtown nelsic Eris zinc %isitcins.
I M RUM BNTA TION PROCBSIS
The Study makE s a nu mbE r of policy arlc managi€ment recommendations,some of which time ccist
implications. Ranking is e I ay issue for downtown t u sinesses and residents, FlnaFlerty owners,zinc
ac jaclenit neigh borh ooc s. Th a process for rev iEIH ingl, necicimm€lrlc ing arlc as aFltirlg changes la
Fla liking policies zinc operas ions sh au lc be ii elnativEl, ph ased and inclu s i%a ah 1F Elsa stakeholders.
PHASE CINE
Clver the ne>t hew months, stzifil will c relit rElcommE r'c EIC eh angels to the park ingl section o11 tF El code
consistent with the nec'Elntly comFIlEli EIC Downtown Flanking Sit.c y. S1 alff will wcirk wit h th El Plan'n'ing
Commission, RIa nnir'gl Dep rtment, arc th El at aye 51 akEIF tilt Elrs to c elvEllop the most efilElci iv El sEli of
releommElr'c aticir's and policies fcir Council consideration.Th El5El code c'h anges may ir'cdu c El:
•I Simplification of dEly ellopment c'cic El rElqu irElments, inclu c ing redu cticin of minim.m parking)
requinemelnts;
• Pc option of c'nilElnia Ilan making)ac ministrali%El c Elcisicir's about pzirkirigl mzineBemElnt alnd
operations;
AT71AC H MENT 31
Downtown PanAIingi S Ludy iImplerrentation Plan HR 11-00121
• Establish meant of parking management zones; and,
•l Limiting ft.ti re surface parllinpl development in c awntawn.
Th a FlnaFlaseic sah EIC u 1E1 fcir phase one wank is as follows: •
Code Review &Project Planning Sewtember-odobeer
✓ Review Sltudy recommendations against code provisions Seipierrdeir
✓ Onganize plu t lac involvement and outreach SEipierr tier
✓ Rnesent planking 51 L c y to Manning Commission Ocii ober
Initiate Code Rvalu ation &Draft Modifications Octc dear January
✓ Initiate t lic involvement process
• Targeilec Clpen Houses Cctcideir/Noveimber
✓ Iniil'ale Coc El re%iElw process with Alarming Department Gctcider-Eleicieimbeir
• 9valuate planking start arcs fan new commercial card
residential c evelopmenl c owntown
• 9valuate criteria fan new surface planking lot c eveloplment $1
consic Ear lot cco%enage limits
• 9r plane fee-in-lieu captions for meeting planking nemEacs fan
new de%elcipment
•
• ASSEISS aiacessanA Flanking sland ards anc potential fan sharec-
use ppiavisions in aac e
✓ Manning Commission Wank Session on potential code amendments Nciverr der
✓ Dr fit Coc el reieommendations December
✓ Rut lice Clplen HouSEI on draft!Ccic El recommendations W inter 2012
✓ Rlanning Commission Hearing& Findings Wir tear 2012
✓
Council Consic eraticin of Reaammendatians Spring 2012
Conct.rrent with the consideration cif flat ential code changes, Council sh ould consic en aidapltin®1 h
management pIoliaieis and rules outlined in the Downtown Parllire€1 Study to guic a flanking
management and continued pIno.ject implemenlatian.
✓ Council Hearing on reaammenced Cac El changes April/Mciy
✓
Council consic enation tail planking management rt.les and pioliaies April/Mcry
• Parking Management Zones;
• Operating Rninaiples;anc, •
• 85% Rule
Clowntown Flarking Stud) IrrpAEimet tcitior Plan �I
PHASE TWO
. RH arse 2 will depeiric or the approval of proposed parkin€1 policies ilnom Phase 1 and the av ailat ility of
ilu rdire lion most ail 1 h ei Rh ase 2 implementation i1 Elms. Ii will alsa ir c El 1 h El resolution ail parking
management issues arc significant pi r lic involvement arc input. Rase 2 could accun ire 20113-20114.
Pauling Coordinatiari, Management 81 Hu nc ing Mechanism
•I Corsic eir estate lish ire Downtown Ranking Coordinator
•� Establish Parking Ac isoryl Committee
Potent ial DOW ntown Parking Manaflement Strategies for Adoption anc Implemental ion
•l DEIV elan sigr package for zones A arc B, arc far Lake View Village
Convert aerie A parking stalls to 2-HR limit
a' Stripe or-street park ire ir Zor EIS F arc B
• Develapl admirisirative exception criteria for on-streei parking
• Increase parking eirfoncemerit activities in zone p as stalls are convert gid 1 a 2-I• R
• Develapl and implement husir eiss autneach communicatiar plan
• Develapl annual ciccu part monitanire plraenam
• Begin annual p naeness replan irie fan Council
PHASIB THREE
Additional Potent ial Dow ntawni Parking Management Strategies for Adoption arc Implemental ion
• • Evalu ate Lake View Village garage pc d lic-L se agreement
41 Clarsic er emplcl ee permit program for an-stneet parking ir Zor El B
• Clarvert ZarEl B parkin€l stalls 112-HR or 4-HR by pie omit)
• Assess ileasil ility of establish ing downtown parking ar c trarsportaticir fi ric
• Evalu ate format ail pli h licly ownec off-si met pulling
Clarsider neeatiatirq sH are-usel lease agreements wit h owners cif si rategically placec prival El
Si.dace lois
a' Evali ate reed for Residerii ial Harkin€l Permit tore policy for futi re implementation in 2cirEl
C Qnesic eirtial neigh borh oods)
llh a schedule for Abase 3 is dependent on nedev elopment in downtown and timing for Rhases II and
2,anc wou lc a gain nequ ire significarl pi Id tic involvement and input.
•
Dowr tciwri Pariliricl Slludy lmpiIerrentation Plan 3
110)]I1)20111
S
; , •,...,IA*Its' w
City of slake Oswego
Review of June 24, 2011 Housing Tour
Planning Comm isisior Work Session
RP 09-001E1
October 10, 2011
I
Hastings Green -
,_4 -W. - ,
.,., .
„ • ,,
,;,.-:•.. - .. -----,4000, ..: i . _
4, , . . iiNt, .
.,•. .. . _
. _,4. if' , _ -_- P' 1
11
1
-4'-
110/111/20111
S
Hastirgi5.1 Green- 5E Cllintcr bletweer 710th &I 7115'
Portlanc zoning: R-5 and R-2.5
Site: 30,592 sill Size of units:
Total units in 3 phases: 23 1,CICICI.1F500 sf(1-2 bedrooms)
Price range 2003: $]I90,CICICI•]41(1,000
0
Floc L51:
V .
Hosier community amorig __ .4...i
resic ents WI 16 TT -� ',,
''''. Jille. 14'‘
Higk cp.ality design hal
.
11ilia.
Common garden area
•
i t 1 ...-191111111141k . ....,
a , ' _ '
7---,-::::: C �# tet ;`
•
4 ► ' A s . -- -. o _ '1. f LIQ r .
te-
'. r ` _. -
Aese
;: _ rr " ,;
• T,
F. t s ; T
,r
friliti-cit,_ik,' .4: •ligillik
—
Is
2
SI
LI
,...
,--t
---,
Ilo
[ F.1 4 a
•
, t, .• _
r„.-• , .„: ...
&
" "L''
NI 111F :i. • ., „ik. 1/ ... . i'p,'" 0-A .. J -i,.
•.54file. '.., , .,
41% I• „
,oar
..„
c . „ , _.
0 • in. .-.' ---
I
Or
7.1 , 4- 14.:. ,
Id,
-• , li .0, *gip t
.
. ,
r !
17 4 ^ It I
r...
1 4 'ITIII 4 4 I 4
, V*
'1 I. '74' '
^ ,4 ,'" '
' ,• le. ir-
1i - 7r.'0 r
,—..
1,11111...
a Ammd.,
__
-
.01104k
. e
ININNINEff at
I . 1
TT
0 0
. .
V
II
-- 1 . A: ---4,I hiiippir. .
, }
45.
ter,. iv .. i, fa �'-
t s ♦ r !' 1. a" _
i.
3
fi
'1,
_ i - Mme' .`E _ -..
I 4 —
J I 7 _ ii. t' ter_ —
`i fff
1
•
1r-- e
.ii,. r p- rt . '# „,;-10 . -1
0
5 IIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIgrIMIIIIII ,1101111111=11
glw
It
tiellilliiii
•
0
TTOZ/TT/DI[
10111,02,4,A I
01 '1,02 1I
0
•r
ii
J
n -
-
r
t
a+r
0
' _
Separated Padang • 441
,
Atm-= s
0
9
1 -
10/11)2011
0 _
*OP :4111F
_ 't. I
_ r . _ _
' .- >
:Y r - .w ,, Arm • R ,
PPP r _ . - -• .
11110
Salish Plond
Fairview„ Oregon
I
Ori
ili . - .- --.eb- A .,
M ,. K
I
larli
f r4 ` s
y
,r rt M
.j , . ;
i
6
110/111)20111
i
Salish Poru: Rairview, C regori Zor ing: Ii-a.5
DeslignEc by Ross CE zipin Site: 34.11 aclle_'.l (3.]7 acres open space)
Ur its: 110
Reclaimed Gnavv/ it— Wetlanas Lcil size: 2,4199-3I,413 sf
Built 1999-2000 Ur it slizEI: 11,000-]1,]44 slf
Price range: $220,000-$250,(ICICI
u ality Design
Community Clubli cu.se
Waterl vont view
Separate garage parking - walk to units
•
r ry J Tract A
Open Spate
111114;
_ I- - +
. � .
r
I
Harking sl ructu res
+~. v tea''
i i' r ►
4 I
•
S
7
10/11)20]1
._ •
:11,;;;;;;;#04,00.0i iiii
....;fr'•..,:' .,r _ •__= _.__ .,,, .
f .
* ,,,,- .4, ...- .. .4 ., r
... ... .1%.
Vii, MI
truer'
4x
t
I
sr - Ai-----,.__---,-.":" 1.16- ,
'`
/ ., 4., ___ t-_ - — . —' J ..
I
ito
y 1
.
rd. 11 '1.._ ....: . -".. Sj . _ . ..;„....7.- _ .4 ,..... 14._.,_-_.... __
i
-L..- '`E •r_;il r�. ,,I ri.----,_14411.• — -_+bR _S,..
Ai -
I
10/111/20111
IS .
- ai
J ill
t ' - «
1
I
1
0
Com mor CIL d hou se
.001-
'r_ • _ " '
I
,a -
1
•
0
9
OT
S
, .. ..,
".f -. h� - K - i�1Ir° ��
N
01 .1 _ -A 'r ► ` A.
irvik
'_
IT
., i \' ' rid r :4
lic,itififile.4.-41 . ,..
141
•
4 i`-� .4 ate-
' i! !!p ! 14 V. tAL aOA t
I •s..4 T*
I
0
_
- _ ry
- �- .� _ w";�
+r
N33ia
` . _
M
T.
- -.
..4'10r.. I.' ' . '
- '•- . - - _ ,,- w .
e
1
a
- 1111111*- ..,. \,..
a
IITOZ/IIT(DI[
1C/11112011
0
-.... -I,1. I- loe -
-st
: , • ' ''. , • ,ir
-t Vore _Ale
..
• - . _ .:
• . ..-,--. ,f„ _ .-.••
_ ,..,t' ,
elt t.4 ir •
- - *Iljt' 4110'
ilcolvitio:
— -,
— i -
,----------
- .•!--,:- : - .., ;. -. .
.....„------ t •--It% .,-k:...,:. ,--t...
....„ir
, .. „,.,
e - w' 0%- A '
. _ , ..
..
14i ,
- 'Iv 0,16„, 4f
.:weivitOt ikpV
et: I7 .:17*: 4,301PC
.04.1e .4'. ' 'Ilitrir° 41
0
' - 9abir Gneen-Portland miring:R-5
A+
4 Units
. klIthiaction of two lots:
Lot 11 :renovated h CIL SEI
.-- ' ri"It7.11.11;
m. Ai- ..•11, - , I Lot 2: new tau SEI
Each lot has ar
- L Accelson Dwellir g U,nil.
r1 a _
4
4 •
1,7i illinlIV.
,.. •111111k, .
IT' ,-7M1POIMO.11.1 ,
111r-
:1' 110
irr 1
..111.1111,111T a 0
mIE_:API-
t/06LX
9t: * '
liV Al
4
111
,, • • • N
.._,
.,_,
O
N
1-1
v
I
•
cil ••-• 11)1:1
illi
_ II ° ,fir } ' r N y ti
- t�"'r-
404/
41 1,,!'I ,li41' 'if
�A. M1
4' -;
ci i d,m
, 6:n
.._ ,
..
, ... .11' '
•
•
col plc, r
V -+..r _ isholk, 1
V .r �, - .7 — • + it
lIl
Q 4 ., .FiT . +d a r' + .. - III
rA
,...- A _
p� r ..
4 r1j up
y- f
v 46, w _♦_ . �.. 11 f r; M r•-•.,4, I Jai
'. ) — . if tV,,, , ,,e, 0
' -, # ' rt�I 'K • +. . Vim( "114 ��
•
".,.O1 f sf�Y'' ," - ',0",.,tir b t .1',1III11� ,? At` Wy' h.+1 i
r.
ET
S--,_
wie,_
- --—
,tii1—
Ask. I 1,,
..
-. ' c,‘.0. •440(' 'P.' .
'1114, " "1 •: _ . .04 1' -.;a i..A. - ' - " •
1
....._
-.....,__
....4"--4• ' -:"
.- --- . -
....
. 1
.$,',:
-.-
ler . ,.„.t.,
T - ;00,. „„, • . 6,4 _ .."
•def.
4. _ _ - - _, . c__„...„..: ...• ,-_ . . .de'' .'''
4 `li . . ' . ,.... akIRIN—P,.. v- : , ,,•-.. _ •
• %It we ilk . ,
i• ,
k iint.t., ,"•'' _ . ._. -.,,,I.,'",.. -7.i.dli--
'
* ...., 1* .- .r• 4 1•0 i et- t' .,
- ---- . _ -
0
::.
-.. : . • if gli -
11041-- 4.0o111" .
- 411
. IS
•
.......1•...'-'
410.
- . .• 'Ck.-
.i.
— .• -
lir '
-A. •
t• A 7. :0- ' - --'?. 4
1
I
Li -
Er!
e:
f, dm il I 111 mp,-,T
milr: - , , , - ,7*-kiiii• i
.-ri dri
. -
, ,- - . AI
.___.
. ...
a4!1; NI. • • . ' •
,, .,—"...,A C ...,
II)ii)wl)le • ',40...:... ,r'05 .
aan41)ia4s - I& ffil 104 . 4 ... % iii 4.L: ..-.0-• -
I i 0 LAJ L.0 OD ' ',•-•?7?;'. 4,41: '14 . . 'PI., kilkile. -
S•
TIE Dz(tir(oir
1
• 0 !
NI.110
....... I
v
4
.'►� . , 1r o
s 7�A r
." 3 +r
IC Vj
p.' e ra s
`40 ',011111ri-,yr ,
+.
_ t°441:,"1 u o '' y 144 ,'
•
t- Al
r• _ ♦ {
d *t. w rria r, If rte. N ,
•-„ + -19,,,„ i
%� . g. 0, .
4111 ,
. .+ All . {Ii ,
.Ir
lir
_ . ., .
0 ,. . . .
F' Mfg:1„ +,rAr' i
Sf• 1" f1
1C/11111201111
I •
Lurch Break all the M issisa ippi Ave.
Food Ca Id Pod
-... lik - , .
1
r
iffe
. .* ,err - ;
Ja
\ "MM1 lir
f\\Iiii-iit _ ._
...01111111111111i11___._
1°......°116114644\ NI \ _ 4,r
LI4
1 '
&A ri se n1 CotItaig�es 1uoi,34' ioce
SW \ ilita; Rortland f trail
1,,2�3iiksf uY lis I ;
Hiuel oottz gels on a 9 Icts share 11,500 !, X01
Singles 8,500 sf lot 511 chi open spi ne I I— a 1 Loll 5
aonim R-7 I--_T,. Jr;
g le19.f Lot 4l Ilrif
Lots H .
-
}
P44,11 II
1 AFT — 0 sf l'rriits
1
Ir_
Al%erage List
i Ili ioa in 2009:
0. $319CI,000 '
40
15
•
. r I
r
I
AC P ......
AIM
_ • ' • II
WOE
F -
•.
6 J
lb
..A . . _ _
_ ......._
. 1,_._ ._. , ___ _ _
. ,
r.......-".*: _._
.. .______
0
•
'I . . x
. .
.ir,
0
116
•
LT
0
0
•--- -....OW Ito- - F -
' - L_
4 ,i iv r 111
f I 11 s
1/4 • 4f ‘140 .A' '- .3r f 'i
iy ...,„," . . .....
irir ,a -m, -. .
d• , - ' -
'ao, -2 -'1,..11k1L_—--;',..16 7, i
I ;4.L. ., 727'fir..' -— - NI'
All e -1
7.-
-,-- —
-,.
4t AO ...,
''," ..•
- I i -'
. a-
P I
..• -14 I
,_ '11" ..4-4. ''''' ,: '04•Pic' - , v.
, ..... . A
.'$ ' :.• ' "1/101111? .,, ; -4, ' 1
. ...
. .. A
.,. .......
-AIL411111
,30 41411 11114%,
.• 4)411 '"i'
ir
0
InTOZ(IVI/OT
. , •